馃敟 | Latest

Fucking, Radio, and Tumblr: piperpancakes: petimetrek: This is my new project, mixing the radio adaptation with the tv show. IM FUCKING CACKLING WHY AM I LAUGHING THIS HARD
Fucking, Radio, and Tumblr: piperpancakes:

petimetrek:

This is my new project, mixing the radio adaptation with the tv show.

IM FUCKING CACKLING WHY AM I LAUGHING THIS HARD

piperpancakes: petimetrek: This is my new project, mixing the radio adaptation with the tv show. IM FUCKING CACKLING WHY AM I LAUGHING TH...

Being Alone, America, and Click: Jason Fuller, Contributor Working to bring about the best in America, both on-line and off. Impeachment Is No Longer Enough; Donald Trump Must Face Justice Impeachment and removal from office are only the first steps; for treason and-if convicted in a court of law-executed. 06/11/2017 10:39 pm ET for America to be redeemed, Donald Trump must be prosecuted Donald Trump has been President of the United States for just shy of six months now. I think that most of us among the electorate knew that his presidency would be a relative disaster, but I am not sure how many among us expected the catastrophe our nation now faces. friendly-neighborhood-patriarch: hominishostilis: abstractandedgyname: siryouarebeingmocked: mississpithy: bogleech: notyourmoderate: angrybell: thinksquad: http://archive.is/5VvI5 Huffpo, everybody. Can someone tell me what high crime or misdemeanor Trump has committed that merits this? Or is the HuffPo just publishing outright fantasies? God dammit, I鈥檓 now in the position of defending Huffington. I didn鈥檛 want to be here. Okay, @angrybell 鈥 actually, @ literally everyone who reblogged this uncritically as a tacit endorsement and agreement. Such as @the-critical-feminist that I reblog this from.My first question has to be: are you serious? Don鈥檛 read that with a tone, don鈥檛 read that as an attack. That鈥檚 my first question: Are you asking a serious question about what high crimes or misdemeanors Trump has perpetrated? Are you asking a sincere question or is this the sort of rhetoric that doesn鈥檛 translate well into text? And, if you are actually asking this question, are ou going to hear the answer or are you going to immediately start concocting your counter-argument because you just know in your heart that anyone who disagrees with you must be wrong, so you start formulating a plan to prove them wrong before you actually hear what they have to say?Next: did you read the article that was posted in the link you responded to? Because the author of that article does a reasonable job of explaining their thought process behind the headline. Or did you lash out before you read the article? Okay, presuming that you did read the article in good faith, evaluate its points, perform the follow-up research to understand context, and still disagree with the central tenets and simply believe that the author鈥檚 reasoning does not hold up for whatever reasons you have chosen not to state, and you believe their source information is falsified for whatever reason you have chosen not to state, I will move on. After I have given you and yours every conceivable benefit of the doubt and every charitable assumption. Because if the article itself doesn鈥檛 convince you, there鈥檚 the fact that Donald Trump has broken literally every federal law against corruption and conflict of interest. Not one or two, not most, not all but a few. Literally every single law we have against corruption, from the Constitution to the informal guidelines circulated as a memo from the White House ethics scholars. He鈥檚 broken literally every one of those rules. He鈥檚 openly traded favors for money and favors for months now. Hell, that Chinese influence-peddler that paid him off for sixteen million dollars should have been enough to get him convicted of treason. Sharing code-word level classified information with a government on the opposite side of an ongoing military conflict isn鈥檛 *necessarily* treason, unless the information was part of a share program with an allied nation and wasn鈥檛 his to distribute. That鈥檚 aiding a foreign aggressor at the expense of a military ally, and that鈥檚 treason. Giving aid and comfort to enemies of the nation. Obstruction of justice is pretty clear-cut, that鈥檚 an impeachment, except that the justice in question is also a matter of national security, so that鈥檚 treason. Again. Defaming the former president? Misdemeanor, impeachable. The way he drags his heels nominating posts in Justice and State could be prosecuted as dereliction of duty. If he has tapes of Comey, he鈥檚 on the hook for contempt, if he doesn鈥檛 then he鈥檚 on the hook for witness tampering. Hell, deleting the covfefe tweet is destroying federal records, which is a misdemeanor, and impeachable. The man doesn鈥檛 go a week without bringing on an impeachable offense. Strictly speaking, every time he goes to Mar-A-Lago he鈥檚 committing grand larceny by fraud, because he鈥檚 taking millions of dollars of American funds for his own benefit, after promising not to do that. There are dozens, hundreds maybe, of impeachable offenses already in this 140 days, 鈥渉igh crimes and misdemeanors鈥. Actual counts of treason, punishable by death by hanging, is probably only five or six counts. Only five or six counts of high treason by our sitting president. His job does not put him above reproach. His job is to *be* above reproach. And he鈥檚 failing that job. Trump鈥檚 supporters probably believe he鈥檚 done nothing impeachable or treasonous because they spent eight years claiming on no grounds whatsoever that Obama was impeachable and treasonous, just because they didn鈥檛 like him. They now probably convince themselves that these facts about Trump are as fake as their Obama theories and they鈥檝e ruined the gravity of these terms for themselves. 鈥 His job does not put him above reproach. His job is to *be* above reproach. And he鈥檚 failing that job. 鈥 I like how Bogleech doesn鈥檛 know many Trump supporters are former Obama supporters. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/04/us/obama-trump-swing-voters.html https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/10/16/17980820/trump-obama-2016-race-racism-class-economy-2018-midterm https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obama-Trump_voters It鈥檚 not even a secret. But why am I not surprised bogleech - that intellectual titan - failed to do basic research? And last time I checked, no nation required their politicans to be perfect. Which is what NYM is asking for with that quote; perfection. That鈥檚 what 鈥榓bove reproach鈥 means. An impossible standard, considering people 鈥渞eproach鈥 Trump for feeding fish wrong, for his skin color, for any and every little thing, even if they have to twist reality into a pretzel to do it. In fact, I鈥檝e seen people take pictures of kids in cages from 2014, and blame Trump for it. So this: Are you asking a serious question about what high crimes or misdemeanors Trump has perpetrated? Is a question of this: Can someone tell me what high crime or misdemeanor Trump has committed that merits this? Seems you missed the part that says聽鈥渕erits this鈥. Next: did you read the article that was posted in the link you responded to? Because the author of that article does a reasonable job of explaining their thought process behind the headline. Or did you lash out before you read the article? (The underlined is in the subtitle, not the headline.) Okay, presuming that you did read the article in good faith, evaluate its points, perform the follow-up research to understand context, and still disagree with the central tenets鈥 Context? Central tenets? Do you not know how highlighting works? You don鈥檛 need to know the context, or any other point, when you鈥檙e indicating a specific, explicit, and isolated quality. The subtitle called for Trump鈥檚 execution, we鈥檙e 5 paragraphs in and you haven鈥檛 even acknowledged that part yet. Or at all, I鈥檓 guessing, because I鈥檓 not reading further. You keep talking around it. You accuse others, preemptively, of not hearing the answer and pre-鈥漜oncocting鈥 a response, and yet you鈥檙e waffling on about shit around the one, sole, isolated thing that was indicated in the first place. This isn鈥檛 about ignoring context, this is about criticising one thing. Which is a thing people are allowed to do, by the way, just because people criticise one thing, doesn鈥檛 mean they鈥檙e criticising everything about the everyone involved, and everything said before, adjacent to, and after that one thing, and therefore are required to include all of those things in their consideration and assessment of this one thing. The specific criticism of the indicated quality is the advocation of Trump鈥檚 execution. That鈥檚 it. No context is needed to understand that this is what was said, especially since that which was said, which is being criticised, is explicit. No amount of,聽鈥淪o, click-bait subtitle that you don鈥檛 see until you鈥檝e already clicked on the article link out of the way, here鈥檚 what I actually meant when I said I wanted this person tried and executed,鈥 could excuse the use of that language, let alone actually believing in it. It鈥檚 like鈥 it鈥檚 like if someone makes a typo, someone else is like,聽鈥淥h, seems you made a typo,鈥 you鈥檇 jump in like,聽鈥淏ut what about they鈥檙e perfectly reasonable spelling everywhere else? Hm? Forced to ignore contextual perfect spelling I see. They鈥檙e lack of typos everywhere else explains this typo, and vindicates it鈥. You and what鈥檚 his face, James, fuckin ReasonAndEmpathy or whatever now, y鈥檃ll keep saying聽鈥渂ut what of the context?鈥 when the criterion of criticism is isolated, atomic, specific, and/or explicit. No amount of context invalidates the very specific, singular words explicitly spoken.聽鈥淪ure he called for Trump to be executed, but he explains himself.鈥 Fucking and? When did the death sentence become ok? When did that happen? Moderates are ok with the death sentence now? Aight, weird. Man this fucking post aged like fine wine, take a SIP Delicious This was quite a ride
Being Alone, America, and Click: Jason Fuller, Contributor
 Working to bring about the best in America, both on-line and off.
 Impeachment Is No Longer Enough;
 Donald Trump Must Face Justice
 Impeachment and removal from office are only the first steps;
 for treason and-if convicted in a court of law-executed.
 06/11/2017 10:39 pm ET
 for America to be redeemed, Donald Trump must be prosecuted
 Donald Trump has been President of the United States for just shy of six months now. I
 think that most of us among the electorate knew that his presidency would be a relative
 disaster, but I am not sure how many among us expected the catastrophe our nation now
 faces.
friendly-neighborhood-patriarch:

hominishostilis:

abstractandedgyname:
siryouarebeingmocked:

mississpithy:

bogleech:

notyourmoderate:

angrybell:

thinksquad:


http://archive.is/5VvI5


Huffpo, everybody. 




Can someone tell me what high crime or misdemeanor Trump has committed that merits this? Or is the HuffPo just publishing outright fantasies?

God dammit, I鈥檓 now in the position of defending Huffington. I didn鈥檛 want to be here. Okay, @angrybell 鈥 actually, @ literally everyone who reblogged this uncritically as a tacit endorsement and agreement. Such as @the-critical-feminist that I reblog this from.My first question has to be: are you serious? Don鈥檛 read that with a tone, don鈥檛 read that as an attack. That鈥檚 my first question: Are you asking a serious question about what high crimes or misdemeanors Trump has perpetrated? Are you asking a sincere question or is this the sort of rhetoric that doesn鈥檛 translate well into text? And, if you are actually asking this question, are ou going to hear the answer or are you going to immediately start concocting your counter-argument because you just know in your heart that anyone who disagrees with you must be wrong, so you start formulating a plan to prove them wrong before you actually hear what they have to say?Next: did you read the article that was posted in the link you responded to? Because the author of that article does a reasonable job of explaining their thought process behind the headline. Or did you lash out before you read the article? Okay, presuming that you did read the article in good faith, evaluate its points, perform the follow-up research to understand context, and still disagree with the central tenets and simply believe that the author鈥檚 reasoning does not hold up for whatever reasons you have chosen not to state, and you believe their source information is falsified for whatever reason you have chosen not to state, I will move on. After I have given you and yours every conceivable benefit of the doubt and every charitable assumption. Because if the article itself doesn鈥檛 convince you, there鈥檚 the fact that Donald Trump has broken literally every federal law against corruption and conflict of interest. Not one or two, not most, not all but a few. Literally every single law we have against corruption, from the Constitution to the informal guidelines circulated as a memo from the White House ethics scholars. He鈥檚 broken literally every one of those rules. He鈥檚 openly traded favors for money and favors for months now. Hell, that Chinese influence-peddler that paid him off for sixteen million dollars should have been enough to get him convicted of treason. Sharing code-word level classified information with a government on the opposite side of an ongoing military conflict isn鈥檛 *necessarily* treason, unless the information was part of a share program with an allied nation and wasn鈥檛 his to distribute. That鈥檚 aiding a foreign aggressor at the expense of a military ally, and that鈥檚 treason. Giving aid and comfort to enemies of the nation. Obstruction of justice is pretty clear-cut, that鈥檚 an impeachment, except that the justice in question is also a matter of national security, so that鈥檚 treason. Again. Defaming the former president? Misdemeanor, impeachable. The way he drags his heels nominating posts in Justice and State could be prosecuted as dereliction of duty. If he has tapes of Comey, he鈥檚 on the hook for contempt, if he doesn鈥檛 then he鈥檚 on the hook for witness tampering. Hell, deleting the covfefe tweet is destroying federal records, which is a misdemeanor, and impeachable. The man doesn鈥檛 go a week without bringing on an impeachable offense. Strictly speaking, every time he goes to Mar-A-Lago he鈥檚 committing grand larceny by fraud, because he鈥檚 taking millions of dollars of American funds for his own benefit, after promising not to do that. There are dozens, hundreds maybe, of impeachable offenses already in this 140 days, 鈥渉igh crimes and misdemeanors鈥. Actual counts of treason, punishable by death by hanging, is probably only five or six counts. Only five or six counts of high treason by our sitting president. His job does not put him above reproach. His job is to *be* above reproach. And he鈥檚 failing that job. 

Trump鈥檚 supporters probably believe he鈥檚 done nothing impeachable or treasonous because they spent eight years claiming on no grounds whatsoever that Obama was impeachable and treasonous, just because they didn鈥檛 like him. They now probably convince themselves that these facts about Trump are as fake as their Obama theories and they鈥檝e ruined the gravity of these terms for themselves.





鈥

His job does not put him above reproach. His job is to *be* above reproach. And he鈥檚 failing that job.


鈥






I like how Bogleech doesn鈥檛 know many Trump supporters are former Obama supporters.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/04/us/obama-trump-swing-voters.html
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/10/16/17980820/trump-obama-2016-race-racism-class-economy-2018-midterm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obama-Trump_voters
It鈥檚 not even a secret. But why am I not surprised bogleech - that intellectual titan - failed to do basic research?
And last time I checked, no nation required their politicans to be perfect. Which is what NYM is asking for with that quote; perfection. That鈥檚 what 鈥榓bove reproach鈥 means. An impossible standard, considering people 鈥渞eproach鈥 Trump for feeding fish wrong, for his skin color, for any and every little thing, even if they have to twist reality into a pretzel to do it. In fact, I鈥檝e seen people take pictures of kids in cages from 2014, and blame Trump for it.

So this:


Are you asking a serious question about what high crimes or misdemeanors Trump has perpetrated?


Is a question of this:


Can someone tell me what high crime or misdemeanor Trump has committed that merits this?


Seems you missed the part that says聽鈥渕erits this鈥.


Next: did you read the article that was posted in the link you responded to? Because the author of that article does a reasonable job of explaining their thought process behind the headline. Or did you lash out before you read the article? 


(The underlined is in the subtitle, not the headline.)


Okay, presuming that you did read the article in good faith, evaluate its points, perform the follow-up research to understand context, and still disagree with the central tenets鈥
Context? Central tenets? Do you not know how highlighting works? You don鈥檛 need to know the context, or any other point, when you鈥檙e indicating a specific, explicit, and isolated quality.
The subtitle called for Trump鈥檚 execution, we鈥檙e 5 paragraphs in and you haven鈥檛 even acknowledged that part yet. Or at all, I鈥檓 guessing, because I鈥檓 not reading further. You keep talking around it. You accuse others, preemptively, of not hearing the answer and pre-鈥漜oncocting鈥 a response, and yet you鈥檙e waffling on about shit around the one, sole, isolated thing that was indicated in the first place.
This isn鈥檛 about ignoring context, this is about criticising one thing. Which is a thing people are allowed to do, by the way, just because people criticise one thing, doesn鈥檛 mean they鈥檙e criticising everything about the everyone involved, and everything said before, adjacent to, and after that one thing, and therefore are required to include all of those things in their consideration and assessment of this one thing.
The specific criticism of the indicated quality is the advocation of Trump鈥檚 execution. That鈥檚 it. No context is needed to understand that this is what was said, especially since that which was said, which is being criticised, is explicit. No amount of,聽鈥淪o, click-bait subtitle that you don鈥檛 see until you鈥檝e already clicked on the article link out of the way, here鈥檚 what I actually meant when I said I wanted this person tried and executed,鈥 could excuse the use of that language, let alone actually believing in it.
It鈥檚 like鈥 it鈥檚 like if someone makes a typo, someone else is like,聽鈥淥h, seems you made a typo,鈥 you鈥檇 jump in like,聽鈥淏ut what about they鈥檙e perfectly reasonable spelling everywhere else? Hm? Forced to ignore contextual perfect spelling I see. They鈥檙e lack of typos everywhere else explains this typo, and vindicates it鈥.
You and what鈥檚 his face, James, fuckin ReasonAndEmpathy or whatever now, y鈥檃ll keep saying聽鈥渂ut what of the context?鈥 when the criterion of criticism is isolated, atomic, specific, and/or explicit. No amount of context invalidates the very specific, singular words explicitly spoken.聽鈥淪ure he called for Trump to be executed, but he explains himself.鈥 Fucking and? When did the death sentence become ok? When did that happen? Moderates are ok with the death sentence now? Aight, weird.


Man this fucking post aged like fine wine, take a SIP 

Delicious

This was quite a ride

friendly-neighborhood-patriarch: hominishostilis: abstractandedgyname: siryouarebeingmocked: mississpithy: bogleech: notyourmoderate: ...

Apparently, Bitch, and Moms: ruby-white-rabbit There's a turtle in my yard laying eggs This bitch really gonna dump her kids on me and vamoose I'm not ready to be a single mom I know shit about reptiles I had to put a stick next to the nest because she decided the MIDDLE of our yard was the primo spot to give birth Mowing is gonna be interesting this summer Meet the mother leaving her wildlife progeny under my city girl care I'm googling turtles right now, I sent photos to my southern stepmom for help. Apparently she's a box turtle? 70 DAYS UNTIL THEY HATCH?? iplemons You a mom now Text from stepmom "watch out for foxes, cranes, raccoons, and snakes. They'll eat the eggs so chase them off ruby-white-rabbit mrswinterbarnes Name her Sharron, she sounds like she doesn't care about her kids @mrswinterbarnes you're not wrong. When I came back from closing the barn doors she was gone. Nowhere in sight. I thought turtles were supposed to be slow I was gone maybe ten minutes so first off, not even a goodbye?? I don't think Box turtles return to their nest either, so until they hatch and dig out YOU GONNA BE A MOMMA DAMN IT SHARRON First that bird makes its nursery in my bike basket on our porch and now this Why am I becoming a wildlife nanny?? UPDATE SHES BACK NEVERMIND ITS A DIFFERENT TURTLE That's two deadbeat turtle moms dropping their spawn on me ladystud Call this one Susan blad-the-inhaler You're like a really ticked-off nature witch who never signed up for this animal empath shit I'm trying to figure out when "oh, it's only midnight" to "omg it's already midnight" #lawnmowerpeople
Apparently, Bitch, and Moms: ruby-white-rabbit
 There's a turtle in my yard laying eggs
 This bitch really gonna dump her kids on me
 and vamoose
 I'm not ready to be a single mom
 I know shit about reptiles
 I had to put a stick next to the nest because
 she decided the MIDDLE of our yard was the
 primo spot to give birth
 Mowing is gonna be interesting this summer
 Meet the mother leaving her wildlife progeny
 under my city girl care
 I'm googling turtles right now, I sent photos
 to my southern stepmom for help. Apparently
 she's a box turtle?
 70 DAYS UNTIL THEY HATCH??
 iplemons
 You a mom now
 Text from stepmom "watch out for foxes,
 cranes, raccoons, and snakes. They'll eat the
 eggs so chase them off
 ruby-white-rabbit
 mrswinterbarnes
 Name her Sharron, she sounds like
 she doesn't care about her kids
 @mrswinterbarnes you're not wrong. When I
 came back from closing the barn doors she
 was gone. Nowhere in sight. I thought turtles
 were supposed to be slow
 I was gone maybe ten minutes so first off, not
 even a goodbye??
 I don't think Box turtles return to their nest
 either, so until they hatch and dig out
 YOU GONNA BE A MOMMA
 DAMN IT SHARRON
 First that bird makes its nursery in my bike
 basket on our porch and now this
 Why am I becoming a wildlife nanny??
 UPDATE
 SHES BACK
 NEVERMIND
 ITS A DIFFERENT TURTLE
 That's two deadbeat turtle moms dropping
 their spawn on me
 ladystud
 Call this one Susan
 blad-the-inhaler
 You're like a really ticked-off nature witch who
 never signed up for this animal empath shit
I'm trying to figure out when "oh, it's only midnight" to "omg it's already midnight" #lawnmowerpeople

I'm trying to figure out when "oh, it's only midnight" to "omg it's already midnight" #lawnmowerpeople