🔥 | Latest

Alive, Anaconda, and Apparently: Barber: "what you want?" Him: "give me the most dystopian shit possible" Barber: "got ya fam" LifeNews com LifeNews.com @LifeNewsHQ Follow British Govt Encouraging Women to Give Birth to Disabled Babies to Harvest Thei Organs buff.ly/2Fuaepo <p><a href="http://krungle.tumblr.com/post/171933983002/libertarirynn-matt-ruins-your-shit" class="tumblr_blog">krungle</a>:</p><blockquote> <p><a href="https://libertarirynn.tumblr.com/post/171933218134/matt-ruins-your-shit-kajiosblog-this" class="tumblr_blog">libertarirynn</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="http://matt-ruins-your-shit.tumblr.com/post/171925993106/kajiosblog-this-articles-title-is-rather" class="tumblr_blog">matt-ruins-your-shit</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="http://kajiosblog.tumblr.com/post/171917720473/this-articles-title-is-rather-misleading-they" class="tumblr_blog">kajiosblog</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>This article’s title is rather misleading.  They aren’t encouraging women to somehow disable their fetuses in order to use them for organs or something like that.  They aren’t encouraging anything.</p> <p>The truth of the matter is that expecting mothers who find out that their baby will be born with fatal defects will be given the option to carry out the birth, rather than terminate early, in order to allow for organ donation.  Note this this is simply an option, and there is no incentive or penalty for either choice.</p> <p>Source: <a href="https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/health/650467/NHS-to-harvest-babies-fatal-defect-foetus-donate-organs-mothers-option-terminate-birth">https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/health/650467/NHS-to-harvest-babies-fatal-defect-foetus-donate-organs-mothers-option-terminate-birth</a></p> </blockquote> <figure class="tmblr-full" data-orig-height="200" data-orig-width="370" data-orig-src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/e52518448e2c705676d57e41594cdcb7/tumblr_inline_p5oc0lNajE1si8t7m_540.gif"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/e52518448e2c705676d57e41594cdcb7/tumblr_inline_p5p3fvAsQ11rw09tq_540.gif" data-orig-height="200" data-orig-width="370" data-orig-src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/e52518448e2c705676d57e41594cdcb7/tumblr_inline_p5oc0lNajE1si8t7m_540.gif"/></figure><p>I don’t think a single other person read that headline and thought they were “encouraging women to somehow disable their fetuses in order to use them for organs.” That’s not why people find it incredibly disturbing and I’m astounded those were the conclusions you drew and thought it needed to be corrected. No seriously where did you get the idea that it was being claimed that mothers were being told to disable unborn children so they could be harvested? That makes no sense, that’s like the logic of Ricky from Trailer Park Boys who thinks that as long as you drag stolen goods down to the curb it becomes garbage and it’s not illegal to steal garbage. The very idea of a baby needing to be disabled in order to justify harvesting it’s organs should be offensive, it implies disabled people have less right to be alive and have their organs inside their own fucking bodies. The article title wasn’t misleading your terribly needless strawman explanation of the title was misleading. This is the exact reason I hate “fact checkers” you need fact checkers for the fact checkers they can be so bogged down in spin and semantics and dumb bullshit like this. The problem is with the harvesting of organs from disabled babies full stop. I didn’t think this needed to be explained but here goes.</p> <p>First of all it turns human life into a commodity, and not just a commodity but a commodity that would be controlled by the medical system of an increasingly fascist socialist government. What could go wrong?</p> <p>Like for example it hasn’t even happened yet and already there seems to be confusion about what exactly constitutes fatal defects. A system that always is going to want more organs is going to determine for themselves what is disabled enough? And what level of disabled is enough that you should be determined as scrap parts instead of a person? How do you know the baby will die? Doctors tell people their kids will be born dead or will die soon all the time that live full lives. One of my best friends parents were told he wouldn’t make it past a few weeks and he’s in his late twenties now. Really glad this wasn’t the policy back then.</p> <p>“will be given the option to carry out the birth, rather than terminate early” No, carrying out the pregnancy has always been an option it’s the harvesting of organs that would be the new factor here. If it’s as you said that they are being given the option to carry out the pregnancy does that mean that right now women are being forced to have abortions? No giving birth is and always has been the default option. I find it gross that you think the only thing people do when they find out a baby will have serious defects is just abort it. These fatal defects represent a percentage chance of survival not a guarantee, so while yes a lot of people just say fuck it and abort at any sign of a problem there are also lots of people that take the risk give birth because worst case scenario the baby dies naturally best case scenario it survives. Medium case scenario it survives but raising it is costly and they have a lower quality of life…but it’s still a life and it should be up to a person to decide if their quality of life is low enough that they would rather not have it at all. <br/></p> <p>The horrifying part is they are not talking about stillborns, they’re not talking about babies that died in the womb. They’re talking about babies they believe will die eventually after being born. Who makes that determination? You trust the NHS… a system so shitty they amputate the wrong limbs on people to decide what babies are basically done for before they’re even born. Especially when they will benefit from every single baby a parent decides to allow be harvested. If there is room for corruption there will be corruption.</p> <p> So what happens once those babies are born and they’re alive? Do they start up a daycare center thats whole purpose is to wait for babies to die so they can be harvested? I’m sure the care there would be super humane and hospitable. What do they do with the ones that survive? By that point they would have become property of the NHS because they’re not babies they’re just living organ donations that haven’t had the courtesy to die naturally yet. Do they call up the mother and say hey so remember when you told us we could harvest your dead baby…well can you come by and pick up your two year old… that fucker is being really stubborn about not dying like we promised. Or much more likely they’ll just kill the babies immediately to avoid that burden and complication and not give them the chance to survive. I’ve already heard the term post birth abortion or as someone with a soul left would call it baby murder. </p> <p>They try to get around this by claiming the harvesting wont be an option until they are told the mother wants to have an abortion. What a great failsafe right? Well except that they can tell the mother whatever they want to get her to say she wants an abortion. They can tell her that her baby will definitely die when it might have a good chance of living. Which happens already without the added incentive of wanting to harvest the organs.</p> <p>Where would the oversight be. The NHS is already overwhelmed you think there’s going to be someone checking to make sure nobody is telling mothers their babies have fetal defects when they don’t? You think the system is going to check every single case, especially when every single case is going to benefit them? What fairy tale world do you live in. It’s the setup for a system where you give a doctor the power to say to himself this baby has a 10-60% chance of survival this mother is being a real bitch…and we’re in need of organs right now…maybe I tell her the lowest number in that estimate. Which is all it will be…fucking estimates. I have a member of my family that was pronounced dead four times and lived another twenty years. These people can’t even figure out when a person is dead and you want to give them 100% authority to determine who will die. Fuck that, fuck this. If they do this there will be horror stories rolling out within the week.</p> </blockquote> <p>Imagine fucking reading this and being like “no guys you don’t understand nobody’s asking the mother’s to disable the babies, just to give birth to disabled babies instead of murdering them in the womb so we can chop them up for parts! Because that’s so much better!”</p> </blockquote> <p style=""> “ babies diagnosed with fatal illnesses “</p> <p>That is a pretty high bar if you ask me. The kid will die anyway, sometimes destroying the organs in the process and often involving massive pain while being kept alive for enormous sums of money on machines. At least in this way the poor kid doesn’t have to suffer and some other kid gets a chance to end their suffering, as well, when they receive their transplants.</p> <p>The entire conversation on this started with fetuses that developed with no brain.</p> <p>You all that say this is wrong because of ‘compassion’ are showing no compassion for either the pain and suffering of the baby or the pain and suffering of the kids who will be able to live a much more normal and longer life once they get transplants. It isn’t ‘compassion’ you are showing but a strict adherence to a moral code and be damned how much pain and suffering it causes others.</p> <p>You people would show more compassion for your dog than you would for another human being.<br/></p> </blockquote> <p>“No YOU guys are actually the cruel ones for not wanting to murder sick babies to harvest them for parts!“</p><p>Are you fucking serious? First of all apparently it’s no longer possible to harvest organs after natural death despite the fact that it’s done all the time? “They’re going to die eventually anyway“ I’ve got a newsflash for you pal, so are you. I like how you think this is completely justified based on your assumption that all babies born with fatal illnesses are in constant pain and should therefore be exterminated for their own sake. This is post is a hot mess in every way.</p>
Alive, Anaconda, and Apparently: Barber: "what you want?"
 Him: "give me the most
 dystopian shit possible"
 Barber: "got ya fam"
 LifeNews
 com
 LifeNews.com
 @LifeNewsHQ
 Follow
 British Govt Encouraging Women to Give
 Birth to Disabled Babies to Harvest Thei
 Organs buff.ly/2Fuaepo
<p><a href="http://krungle.tumblr.com/post/171933983002/libertarirynn-matt-ruins-your-shit" class="tumblr_blog">krungle</a>:</p><blockquote>
<p><a href="https://libertarirynn.tumblr.com/post/171933218134/matt-ruins-your-shit-kajiosblog-this" class="tumblr_blog">libertarirynn</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://matt-ruins-your-shit.tumblr.com/post/171925993106/kajiosblog-this-articles-title-is-rather" class="tumblr_blog">matt-ruins-your-shit</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://kajiosblog.tumblr.com/post/171917720473/this-articles-title-is-rather-misleading-they" class="tumblr_blog">kajiosblog</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>This article’s title is rather misleading.  They aren’t encouraging women to somehow disable their fetuses in order to use them for organs or something like that.  They aren’t encouraging anything.</p>
<p>The truth of the matter is that expecting mothers who find out that their baby will be born with fatal defects will be given the option to carry out the birth, rather than terminate early, in order to allow for organ donation.  Note this this is simply an option, and there is no incentive or penalty for either choice.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/health/650467/NHS-to-harvest-babies-fatal-defect-foetus-donate-organs-mothers-option-terminate-birth">https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/health/650467/NHS-to-harvest-babies-fatal-defect-foetus-donate-organs-mothers-option-terminate-birth</a></p>
</blockquote>
<figure class="tmblr-full" data-orig-height="200" data-orig-width="370" data-orig-src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/e52518448e2c705676d57e41594cdcb7/tumblr_inline_p5oc0lNajE1si8t7m_540.gif"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/e52518448e2c705676d57e41594cdcb7/tumblr_inline_p5p3fvAsQ11rw09tq_540.gif" data-orig-height="200" data-orig-width="370" data-orig-src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/e52518448e2c705676d57e41594cdcb7/tumblr_inline_p5oc0lNajE1si8t7m_540.gif"/></figure><p>I don’t think a single other person read that headline and thought they were “encouraging women to somehow disable their fetuses in order to use them for organs.” That’s not why people find it incredibly disturbing and I’m astounded those were the conclusions you drew and thought it needed to be corrected. No seriously where did you get the idea that it was being claimed that mothers were being told to disable unborn children so they could be harvested? That makes no sense, that’s like the logic of Ricky from Trailer Park Boys who thinks that as long as you drag stolen goods down to the curb it becomes garbage and it’s not illegal to steal garbage. The very idea of a baby needing to be disabled in order to justify harvesting it’s organs should be offensive, it implies disabled people have less right to be alive and have their organs inside their own fucking bodies. The article title wasn’t misleading your terribly needless strawman explanation of the title was misleading. This is the exact reason I hate “fact checkers” you need fact checkers for the fact checkers they can be so bogged down in spin and semantics and dumb bullshit like this. The problem is with the harvesting of organs from disabled babies full stop. I didn’t think this needed to be explained but here goes.</p>
<p>First of all it turns human life into a commodity, and not just a commodity but a commodity that would be controlled by the medical system of an increasingly fascist socialist government. What could go wrong?</p>
<p>Like for example it hasn’t even happened yet and already there seems to be confusion about what exactly constitutes fatal defects. A system that always is going to want more organs is going to determine for themselves what is disabled enough? And what level of disabled is enough that you should be determined as scrap parts instead of a person? How do you know the baby will die? Doctors tell people their kids will be born dead or will die soon all the time that live full lives. One of my best friends parents were told he wouldn’t make it past a few weeks and he’s in his late twenties now. Really glad this wasn’t the policy back then.</p>
<p>“will be given the option to carry out the birth, rather than terminate early” No, carrying out the pregnancy has always been an option it’s the harvesting of organs that would be the new factor here. If it’s as you said that they are being given the option to carry out the pregnancy does that mean that right now women are being forced to have abortions? No giving birth is and always has been the default option. I find it gross that you think the only thing people do when they find out a baby will have serious defects is just abort it. These fatal defects represent a percentage chance of survival not a guarantee, so while yes a lot of people just say fuck it and abort at any sign of a problem there are also lots of people that take the risk give birth because worst case scenario the baby dies naturally best case scenario it survives. Medium case scenario it survives but raising it is costly and they have a lower quality of life…but it’s still a life and it should be up to a person to decide if their quality of life is low enough that they would rather not have it at all. <br/></p>
<p>The horrifying part is they are not talking about stillborns, they’re not talking about babies that died in the womb. They’re talking about babies they believe will die eventually after being born. Who makes that determination? You trust the NHS… a system so shitty they amputate the wrong limbs on people to decide what babies are basically done for before they’re even born. Especially when they will benefit from every single baby a parent decides to allow be harvested. If there is room for corruption there will be corruption.</p>
<p> So what happens once those babies are born and they’re alive? Do they start up a daycare center thats whole purpose is to wait for babies to die so they can be harvested? I’m sure the care there would be super humane and hospitable. What do they do with the ones that survive? By that point they would have become property of the NHS because they’re not babies they’re just living organ donations that haven’t had the courtesy to die naturally yet. Do they call up the mother and say hey so remember when you told us we could harvest your dead baby…well can you come by and pick up your two year old… that fucker is being really stubborn about not dying like we promised. Or much more likely they’ll just kill the babies immediately to avoid that burden and complication and not give them the chance to survive. I’ve already heard the term post birth abortion or as someone with a soul left would call it baby murder. </p>
<p>They try to get around this by claiming the harvesting wont be an option until they are told the mother wants to have an abortion. What a great failsafe right? Well except that they can tell the mother whatever they want to get her to say she wants an abortion. They can tell her that her baby will definitely die when it might have a good chance of living. Which happens already without the added incentive of wanting to harvest the organs.</p>
<p>Where would the oversight be. The NHS is already overwhelmed you think there’s going to be someone checking to make sure nobody is telling mothers their babies have fetal defects when they don’t? You think the system is going to check every single case, especially when every single case is going to benefit them? What fairy tale world do you live in. It’s the setup for a system where you give a doctor the power to say to himself this baby has a 10-60% chance of survival this mother is being a real bitch…and we’re in need of organs right now…maybe I tell her the lowest number in that estimate. Which is all it will be…fucking estimates. I have a member of my family that was pronounced dead four times and lived another twenty years. These people can’t even figure out when a person is dead and you want to give them 100% authority to determine who will die. Fuck that, fuck this. If they do this there will be horror stories rolling out within the week.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Imagine fucking reading this and being like “no guys you don’t understand nobody’s asking the mother’s to disable the babies, just to give birth to disabled babies instead of murdering them in the womb so we can chop them up for parts! Because that’s so much better!”</p>
</blockquote>
<p style="">
 “ babies diagnosed with fatal illnesses

“</p>
<p>That is a pretty high bar if you ask me. The kid will die anyway, sometimes destroying the organs in the process and often involving massive pain while being kept alive for enormous sums of money on machines. At least in this way the poor kid doesn’t have to suffer and some other kid gets a chance to end their suffering, as well, when they receive their transplants.</p>
<p>The entire conversation on this started with fetuses that developed with no brain.</p>
<p>You all that say this is wrong because of ‘compassion’ are showing no compassion for either the pain and suffering of the baby or the pain and suffering of the kids who will be able to live a much more normal and longer life once they get transplants. It isn’t ‘compassion’ you are showing but a strict adherence to a moral code and be damned how much pain and suffering it causes others.</p>
<p>You people would show more compassion for your dog than you would for another human being.<br/></p>
</blockquote>
<p>“No YOU guys are actually the cruel ones for not wanting to murder sick babies to harvest them for parts!“</p><p>Are you fucking serious? First of all apparently it’s no longer possible to harvest organs after natural death despite the fact that it’s done all the time? “They’re going to die eventually anyway“ I’ve got a newsflash for you pal, so are you. I like how you think this is completely justified based on your assumption that all babies born with fatal illnesses are in constant pain and should therefore be exterminated for their own sake. This is post is a hot mess in every way.</p>

krungle: libertarirynn: matt-ruins-your-shit: kajiosblog: This article’s title is rather misleading.  They aren’t encouraging women to so...

Alive, Anaconda, and Bailey Jay: Barber: "what you want?" Him: "give me the most dystopian shit possible" Barber: "got ya fam" LifeNews com LifeNews.com @LifeNewsHQ Follow British Govt Encouraging Women to Give Birth to Disabled Babies to Harvest Thei Organs buff.ly/2Fuaepo <p><a href="http://matt-ruins-your-shit.tumblr.com/post/171925993106/kajiosblog-this-articles-title-is-rather" class="tumblr_blog">matt-ruins-your-shit</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="http://kajiosblog.tumblr.com/post/171917720473/this-articles-title-is-rather-misleading-they" class="tumblr_blog">kajiosblog</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>This article’s title is rather misleading.  They aren’t encouraging women to somehow disable their fetuses in order to use them for organs or something like that.  They aren’t encouraging anything.</p> <p>The truth of the matter is that expecting mothers who find out that their baby will be born with fatal defects will be given the option to carry out the birth, rather than terminate early, in order to allow for organ donation.  Note this this is simply an option, and there is no incentive or penalty for either choice.</p> <p>Source: <a href="https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/health/650467/NHS-to-harvest-babies-fatal-defect-foetus-donate-organs-mothers-option-terminate-birth">https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/health/650467/NHS-to-harvest-babies-fatal-defect-foetus-donate-organs-mothers-option-terminate-birth</a></p> </blockquote> <figure class="tmblr-full" data-orig-height="200" data-orig-width="370"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/e52518448e2c705676d57e41594cdcb7/tumblr_inline_p5oc0lNajE1si8t7m_540.gif" data-orig-height="200" data-orig-width="370"/></figure><p>I don’t think a single other person read that headline and thought they were “encouraging women to somehow disable their fetuses in order to use them for organs.” That’s not why people find it incredibly disturbing and I’m astounded those were the conclusions you drew and thought it needed to be corrected. No seriously where did you get the idea that it was being claimed that mothers were being told to disable unborn children so they could be harvested? That makes no sense, that’s like the logic of Ricky from Trailer Park Boys who thinks that as long as you drag stolen goods down to the curb it becomes garbage and it’s not illegal to steal garbage. The very idea of a baby needing to be disabled in order to justify harvesting it’s organs should be offensive, it implies disabled people have less right to be alive and have their organs inside their own fucking bodies. The article title wasn’t misleading your terribly needless strawman explanation of the title was misleading. This is the exact reason I hate “fact checkers” you need fact checkers for the fact checkers they can be so bogged down in spin and semantics and dumb bullshit like this. The problem is with the harvesting of organs from disabled babies full stop. I didn’t think this needed to be explained but here goes.</p> <p>First of all it turns human life into a commodity, and not just a commodity but a commodity that would be controlled by the medical system of an increasingly fascist socialist government. What could go wrong?</p> <p>Like for example it hasn’t even happened yet and already there seems to be confusion about what exactly constitutes fatal defects. A system that always is going to want more organs is going to determine for themselves what is disabled enough? And what level of disabled is enough that you should be determined as scrap parts instead of a person? How do you know the baby will die? Doctors tell people their kids will be born dead or will die soon all the time that live full lives. One of my best friends parents were told he wouldn’t make it past a few weeks and he’s in his late twenties now. Really glad this wasn’t the policy back then.</p> <p>“will be given the option to carry out the birth, rather than terminate early” No, carrying out the pregnancy has always been an option it’s the harvesting of organs that would be the new factor here. If it’s as you said that they are being given the option to carry out the pregnancy does that mean that right now women are being forced to have abortions? No giving birth is and always has been the default option. I find it gross that you think the only thing people do when they find out a baby will have serious defects is just abort it. These fatal defects represent a percentage chance of survival not a guarantee, so while yes a lot of people just say fuck it and abort at any sign of a problem there are also lots of people that take the risk give birth because worst case scenario the baby dies naturally best case scenario it survives. Medium case scenario it survives but raising it is costly and they have a lower quality of life…but it’s still a life and it should be up to a person to decide if their quality of life is low enough that they would rather not have it at all. <br/></p> <p>The horrifying part is they are not talking about stillborns, they’re not talking about babies that died in the womb. They’re talking about babies they believe will die eventually after being born. Who makes that determination? You trust the NHS… a system so shitty they amputate the wrong limbs on people to decide what babies are basically done for before they’re even born. Especially when they will benefit from every single baby a parent decides to allow be harvested. If there is room for corruption there will be corruption.</p> <p> So what happens once those babies are born and they’re alive? Do they start up a daycare center thats whole purpose is to wait for babies to die so they can be harvested? I’m sure the care there would be super humane and hospitable. What do they do with the ones that survive? By that point they would have become property of the NHS because they’re not babies they’re just living organ donations that haven’t had the courtesy to die naturally yet. Do they call up the mother and say hey so remember when you told us we could harvest your dead baby…well can you come by and pick up your two year old… that fucker is being really stubborn about not dying like we promised. Or much more likely they’ll just kill the babies immediately to avoid that burden and complication and not give them the chance to survive. I’ve already heard the term post birth abortion or as someone with a soul left would call it baby murder. </p> <p>They try to get around this by claiming the harvesting wont be an option until they are told the mother wants to have an abortion. What a great failsafe right? Well except that they can tell the mother whatever they want to get her to say she wants an abortion. They can tell her that her baby will definitely die when it might have a good chance of living. Which happens already without the added incentive of wanting to harvest the organs.</p> <p>Where would the oversight be. The NHS is already overwhelmed you think there’s going to be someone checking to make sure nobody is telling mothers their babies have fetal defects when they don’t? You think the system is going to check every single case, especially when every single case is going to benefit them? What fairy tale world do you live in. It’s the setup for a system where you give a doctor the power to say to himself this baby has a 10-60% chance of survival this mother is being a real bitch…and we’re in need of organs right now…maybe I tell her the lowest number in that estimate. Which is all it will be…fucking estimates. I have a member of my family that was pronounced dead four times and lived another twenty years. These people can’t even figure out when a person is dead and you want to give them 100% authority to determine who will die. Fuck that, fuck this. If they do this there will be horror stories rolling out within the week.</p> </blockquote> <p>Imagine fucking reading this and being like “no guys you don’t understand nobody’s asking the mother’s to disable the babies, just to give birth to disabled babies instead of murdering them in the womb so we can chop them up for parts! Because that’s so much better!”</p>
Alive, Anaconda, and Bailey Jay: Barber: "what you want?"
 Him: "give me the most
 dystopian shit possible"
 Barber: "got ya fam"
 LifeNews
 com
 LifeNews.com
 @LifeNewsHQ
 Follow
 British Govt Encouraging Women to Give
 Birth to Disabled Babies to Harvest Thei
 Organs buff.ly/2Fuaepo
<p><a href="http://matt-ruins-your-shit.tumblr.com/post/171925993106/kajiosblog-this-articles-title-is-rather" class="tumblr_blog">matt-ruins-your-shit</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://kajiosblog.tumblr.com/post/171917720473/this-articles-title-is-rather-misleading-they" class="tumblr_blog">kajiosblog</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>This article’s title is rather misleading.  They aren’t encouraging women to somehow disable their fetuses in order to use them for organs or something like that.  They aren’t encouraging anything.</p>
<p>The truth of the matter is that expecting mothers who find out that their baby will be born with fatal defects will be given the option to carry out the birth, rather than terminate early, in order to allow for organ donation.  Note this this is simply an option, and there is no incentive or penalty for either choice.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/health/650467/NHS-to-harvest-babies-fatal-defect-foetus-donate-organs-mothers-option-terminate-birth">https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/health/650467/NHS-to-harvest-babies-fatal-defect-foetus-donate-organs-mothers-option-terminate-birth</a></p>
</blockquote>
<figure class="tmblr-full" data-orig-height="200" data-orig-width="370"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/e52518448e2c705676d57e41594cdcb7/tumblr_inline_p5oc0lNajE1si8t7m_540.gif" data-orig-height="200" data-orig-width="370"/></figure><p>I don’t think a single other person read that headline and thought they were “encouraging women to somehow disable their fetuses in order to use them for organs.” That’s not why people find it incredibly disturbing and I’m astounded those were the conclusions you drew and thought it needed to be corrected. No seriously where did you get the idea that it was being claimed that mothers were being told to disable unborn children so they could be harvested? That makes no sense, that’s like the logic of Ricky from Trailer Park Boys who thinks that as long as you drag stolen goods down to the curb it becomes garbage and it’s not illegal to steal garbage. The very idea of a baby needing to be disabled in order to justify harvesting it’s organs should be offensive, it implies disabled people have less right to be alive and have their organs inside their own fucking bodies. The article title wasn’t misleading your terribly needless strawman explanation of the title was misleading. This is the exact reason I hate “fact checkers” you need fact checkers for the fact checkers they can be so bogged down in spin and semantics and dumb bullshit like this. The problem is with the harvesting of organs from disabled babies full stop. I didn’t think this needed to be explained but here goes.</p>
<p>First of all it turns human life into a commodity, and not just a commodity but a commodity that would be controlled by the medical system of an increasingly fascist socialist government. What could go wrong?</p>
<p>Like for example it hasn’t even happened yet and already there seems to be confusion about what exactly constitutes fatal defects. A system that always is going to want more organs is going to determine for themselves what is disabled enough? And what level of disabled is enough that you should be determined as scrap parts instead of a person? How do you know the baby will die? Doctors tell people their kids will be born dead or will die soon all the time that live full lives. One of my best friends parents were told he wouldn’t make it past a few weeks and he’s in his late twenties now. Really glad this wasn’t the policy back then.</p>
<p>“will be given the option to carry out the birth, rather than terminate early” No, carrying out the pregnancy has always been an option it’s the harvesting of organs that would be the new factor here. If it’s as you said that they are being given the option to carry out the pregnancy does that mean that right now women are being forced to have abortions? No giving birth is and always has been the default option. I find it gross that you think the only thing people do when they find out a baby will have serious defects is just abort it. These fatal defects represent a percentage chance of survival not a guarantee, so while yes a lot of people just say fuck it and abort at any sign of a problem there are also lots of people that take the risk give birth because worst case scenario the baby dies naturally best case scenario it survives. Medium case scenario it survives but raising it is costly and they have a lower quality of life…but it’s still a life and it should be up to a person to decide if their quality of life is low enough that they would rather not have it at all. <br/></p>
<p>The horrifying part is they are not talking about stillborns, they’re not talking about babies that died in the womb. They’re talking about babies they believe will die eventually after being born. Who makes that determination? You trust the NHS… a system so shitty they amputate the wrong limbs on people to decide what babies are basically done for before they’re even born. Especially when they will benefit from every single baby a parent decides to allow be harvested. If there is room for corruption there will be corruption.</p>
<p> So what happens once those babies are born and they’re alive? Do they start up a daycare center thats whole purpose is to wait for babies to die so they can be harvested? I’m sure the care there would be super humane and hospitable. What do they do with the ones that survive? By that point they would have become property of the NHS because they’re not babies they’re just living organ donations that haven’t had the courtesy to die naturally yet. Do they call up the mother and say hey so remember when you told us we could harvest your dead baby…well can you come by and pick up your two year old… that fucker is being really stubborn about not dying like we promised. Or much more likely they’ll just kill the babies immediately to avoid that burden and complication and not give them the chance to survive. I’ve already heard the term post birth abortion or as someone with a soul left would call it baby murder. </p>
<p>They try to get around this by claiming the harvesting wont be an option until they are told the mother wants to have an abortion. What a great failsafe right? Well except that they can tell the mother whatever they want to get her to say she wants an abortion. They can tell her that her baby will definitely die when it might have a good chance of living. Which happens already without the added incentive of wanting to harvest the organs.</p>
<p>Where would the oversight be. The NHS is already overwhelmed you think there’s going to be someone checking to make sure nobody is telling mothers their babies have fetal defects when they don’t? You think the system is going to check every single case, especially when every single case is going to benefit them? What fairy tale world do you live in. It’s the setup for a system where you give a doctor the power to say to himself this baby has a 10-60% chance of survival this mother is being a real bitch…and we’re in need of organs right now…maybe I tell her the lowest number in that estimate. Which is all it will be…fucking estimates. I have a member of my family that was pronounced dead four times and lived another twenty years. These people can’t even figure out when a person is dead and you want to give them 100% authority to determine who will die. Fuck that, fuck this. If they do this there will be horror stories rolling out within the week.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Imagine fucking reading this and being like “no guys you don’t understand nobody’s asking the mother’s to disable the babies, just to give birth to disabled babies instead of murdering them in the womb so we can chop them up for parts! Because that’s so much better!”</p>

matt-ruins-your-shit: kajiosblog: This article’s title is rather misleading.  They aren’t encouraging women to somehow disable their fetus...

Bad, Breaking Bad, and Children: What ta Watch start Are you watching with children? Do you have to watch it with No Yes No them? Are the kids YesFeeling frightened easily? Girls only? nostalgic?- No> Muppets or music? YesOld made new, or No No just old? The Secrot Garden Alice in Rango Old Yo Gabba Yo Gabba Gabbat Freaks and Geeks The Nightmare efore Christmas Sherlock (BBC) ParaNorman No Classic mystery or thriller cliffhanger? Coming of age60 story line? Do you want the most intense 30 or 60 minutes? Tv series or Crime drama? No made? 30 Focus on the good guys or bad guys? Escape with Yes No Yes some fantasy/-K No sci-17 Politics and fast talking? Breaking Bad Bad Head to outer space? Law & Orders Sons of Anarchy No Kevin, Verbal Kent, Spacey? Steeped in history? Star Trek: TNG Explore or War? Less science, more fiction? No No Battlestar Galacticaar The House of Cards The Tudors The WalkingY Dead The West Wing Do you like Twin PeaksYesthings to be a little strange? Lost Highschool of the Dead Yes Family Guy Mad Men No_- You want to see things in B&W? Gratuitous No No 〉4-- cleavage and up. skirt shots? Dick and fart The Twillight Zone jokes, with random musical interludes? Ye) Animated? No Dick and fart The Twillight Zone Nojokes, with Yes)+ ← Animated? random musical interludes? A little more childish or a little World-class social commentary? No YesThe X-Files Do you want to remember laughter? Do you ike the paranormal? Futurama South Park Do you want to watch the most pred up show on Netfix? Do you want to do as little thinking as possible? Ren & Stimpy Show Do you dig British humour? No Archer Skit show No Frasier Do you like things to get a littte odd, a littie quirky? Are you really Nointo weed and Do you reckon to be a bit of a sophisticate? Fawity Towers Chappelle's Show No No Do you want a show with astounding rewatchability? The Kids in the sh't hawks Are you realty into football? No circling in the sh't winds? Trailer Park Boys The League WorkaholicsNo Arrested Sunny in Philadelphia Satire or insanity? e Upon a Time in the West Louie Do you find awkward situations funny? Parks and Old Cheers No Columbomore You want to go oldschool or keep it fresh? Are you about the solution, or the process? The Rockford Files Mystery or Space? Are you extremely nostalgic? Star Trek Want your night True Grit No Yesto be action packed? Want your night True Grit Firefly Horses, boots Have you seen NoThe Terminator? Noand 10-gallion hats? Black Hawk Down (Yes Terminator 2: Judgment Day Do you want to keep it serious? Do you consider snowboard films documentaries? What about a No Set in the future or present day? Art of Flight Do you want to have your face melted off froem maximum rock? Top Gun Aeon Flux Yes)--Year of the Horse Take it to the Pain or Paint? streets? No murderers and madness? Do you want to Nojust how Gift Shop religion can be? Should there be Are you a Woody Allen fan? Or would you like to become one? chainsaw at An Woody Allen: A The Evil Dead Three parts classic horror one part something new? Cabin in the Grizzly Man Do subtities bother you Man on Wire the sense out ofNo Duck Soup Session 9 Ferris Buellers Day Off Are you in the mood to laugh? Do you find clever wordplayNo Do you mind it when people break out Do you want some drama with your laughter? No Are you adverse Happy Gilmore white? Do you want to Do you like your humor to be more or less Do you love Paul Newman? Do great, or you want to? Slap Shot Gritty or pretty? Clerks Slap Shot Grity or pretty? Clerks Slow-paced ManHattan Yesquirky romantic Trainspotting indie? Do you hunger for adventure? Lost in YesWere you a fan of Yes Big Fish Firefly? Super 8 Yes Star Trek : The Wrath of Khan Want some thrills Do you like main The Hunger Games with yourYesrollis to be played adventure? No by kids? Do you enjoy diatribes entirely unrelated to the plot? Are you upset by No〉←- seeing drug use? Care for some criminal intent? Hustle & Flow YesDo you love hip- YesReservoir Dogs Yes Mob story hop? No No Miller's CrossingYes Clay Pigeons Hypothetically The Girl who Played with Fire Have you seen the original Girl with the Dragon Tattoo? Nowould a long Ready for some romance? Yes No brutal rape scene ruin your night? Have you seen The Girl Who Played with Fire? Girl with the Dragon Tattoo Yes Pi Are subtitles going to be aNobe completelyXYes Do you want to Kicked the Yes problem? Keep it mellow?Yes No TomCruise or 4 (Yes Matt Damon Midnight Cowboy NoThe Machinist Good Will Hunting Vanilla Sky Matt more awesome pictures at THEMETAPICTURE.COM a-mouse-duh: Well there goes the rest of my life.
Bad, Breaking Bad, and Children: What ta Watch
 start
 Are you watching
 with children?
 Do you have to
 watch it with
 No
 Yes
 No
 them?
 Are the kids
 YesFeeling
 frightened
 easily?
 Girls only?
 nostalgic?- No>
 Muppets or
 music?
 YesOld made new, or
 No
 No
 just old?
 The Secrot
 Garden
 Alice in
 Rango
 Old
 Yo Gabba

 Yo Gabba
 Gabbat
 Freaks and
 Geeks
 The Nightmare
 efore Christmas
 Sherlock (BBC)
 ParaNorman
 No
 Classic mystery
 or thriller
 cliffhanger?
 Coming of age60
 story line?
 Do you want the
 most intense
 30 or 60
 minutes?
 Tv series or
 Crime drama?
 No
 made?
 30
 Focus on the
 good guys or
 bad guys?
 Escape with
 Yes
 No
 Yes
 some fantasy/-K No
 sci-17
 Politics and fast
 talking?
 Breaking Bad
 Bad
 Head to outer
 space?
 Law & Orders
 Sons of Anarchy
 No
 Kevin, Verbal
 Kent, Spacey?
 Steeped in
 history?
 Star Trek: TNG
 Explore or War?
 Less science,
 more fiction?
 No
 No
 Battlestar
 Galacticaar
 The House of
 Cards
 The Tudors
 The WalkingY
 Dead
 The West Wing
 Do you like
 Twin PeaksYesthings to be a
 little strange?
 Lost
 Highschool of
 the Dead
 Yes
 Family Guy
 Mad Men No_-
 You want to see
 things in B&W?
 Gratuitous
 No
 No 〉4-- cleavage and up.
 skirt shots?
 Dick and fart
 The Twillight
 Zone
 jokes, with
 random musical
 interludes?
 Ye)
 Animated?
 No

 Dick and fart
 The Twillight
 Zone
 Nojokes, with
 Yes)+
 ←
 Animated?
 random musical
 interludes?
 A little more
 childish or a little
 World-class
 social
 commentary?
 No
 YesThe X-Files
 Do you want to
 remember
 laughter?
 Do you ike the
 paranormal?
 Futurama
 South Park
 Do you want to
 watch the most
 pred up show
 on Netfix?
 Do you want to
 do as little
 thinking as
 possible?
 Ren & Stimpy
 Show
 Do you dig
 British humour?
 No
 Archer
 Skit show
 No
 Frasier
 Do you like
 things to get a
 littte odd, a littie
 quirky?
 Are you really
 Nointo weed and
 Do you reckon to
 be a bit of a
 sophisticate?
 Fawity Towers
 Chappelle's
 Show
 No
 No
 Do you want a
 show with
 astounding
 rewatchability?
 The Kids in the
 sh't hawks
 Are you realty
 into football?
 No
 circling in the
 sh't winds?
 Trailer Park Boys
 The League
 WorkaholicsNo
 Arrested
 Sunny in
 Philadelphia
 Satire or
 insanity?
 e Upon a Time
 in the West
 Louie
 Do you find
 awkward
 situations funny?
 Parks and
 Old
 Cheers
 No
 Columbomore
 You want to go
 oldschool or
 keep it fresh?
 Are you about
 the solution, or
 the process?
 The Rockford
 Files
 Mystery or
 Space?
 Are you
 extremely
 nostalgic?
 Star Trek
 Want your night
 True Grit
 No
 Yesto be action
 packed?

 Want your night
 True Grit
 Firefly
 Horses, boots
 Have you seen
 NoThe Terminator?
 Noand 10-gallion
 hats?
 Black Hawk
 Down
 (Yes
 Terminator 2:
 Judgment Day
 Do you want to
 keep it serious?
 Do you consider
 snowboard films
 documentaries?
 What about a
 No
 Set in the future
 or present day?
 Art of Flight
 Do you want to
 have your face
 melted off froem
 maximum rock?
 Top Gun
 Aeon Flux
 Yes)--Year of the Horse
 Take it to the
 Pain or Paint?
 streets? No
 murderers and
 madness?
 Do you want to
 Nojust how
 Gift Shop
 religion can be?
 Should there be
 Are you a Woody
 Allen fan? Or
 would you like to
 become one?
 chainsaw at
 An
 Woody Allen: A
 The Evil Dead
 Three parts
 classic horror
 one part
 something new?
 Cabin in the
 Grizzly Man
 Do subtities
 bother you
 Man on Wire
 the sense out ofNo
 Duck Soup
 Session 9
 Ferris Buellers
 Day Off
 Are you in the
 mood to laugh?
 Do you find
 clever wordplayNo
 Do you mind it
 when people
 break out
 Do you want
 some drama with
 your laughter?
 No
 Are you adverse
 Happy Gilmore
 white?
 Do you want to
 Do you like your
 humor to be
 more or less
 Do you love Paul
 Newman? Do
 great, or
 you want to?
 Slap Shot
 Gritty or pretty?
 Clerks

 Slap Shot
 Grity or pretty?
 Clerks
 Slow-paced
 ManHattan
 Yesquirky romantic
 Trainspotting
 indie?
 Do you hunger
 for adventure?
 Lost in
 YesWere you a fan of
 Yes
 Big Fish
 Firefly?
 Super 8 Yes
 Star Trek : The
 Wrath of Khan
 Want some thrills
 Do you like main
 The Hunger
 Games
 with yourYesrollis to be played
 adventure?
 No
 by kids?
 Do you enjoy
 diatribes entirely
 unrelated to the
 plot?
 Are you upset by
 No〉←- seeing drug use?
 Care for some
 criminal intent?
 Hustle & Flow
 YesDo you love hip-
 YesReservoir Dogs
 Yes
 Mob story
 hop?
 No
 No
 Miller's CrossingYes
 Clay Pigeons
 Hypothetically
 The Girl who
 Played with Fire
 Have you seen
 the original Girl
 with the Dragon
 Tattoo?
 Nowould a long
 Ready for some
 romance?
 Yes
 No
 brutal rape scene
 ruin your night?
 Have you seen
 The Girl Who
 Played with Fire?
 Girl with the
 Dragon Tattoo
 Yes
 Pi
 Are subtitles
 going to be aNobe completelyXYes
 Do you want to
 Kicked the
 Yes
 problem?
 Keep it mellow?Yes
 No
 TomCruise or 4 (Yes
 Matt Damon
 Midnight Cowboy
 NoThe Machinist
 Good Will
 Hunting
 Vanilla Sky
 Matt
 more awesome pictures at THEMETAPICTURE.COM
a-mouse-duh:

Well there goes the rest of my life.

a-mouse-duh: Well there goes the rest of my life.

Bad, Breaking Bad, and Children: What ta Watch start Are you watching with children? Do you have to watch it with No Yes No them? Are the kids YesFeeling frightened easily? Girls only? nostalgic?- No> Muppets or music? YesOld made new, or No No just old? The Secrot Garden Alice in Rango Old Yo Gabba Yo Gabba Gabbat Freaks and Geeks The Nightmare efore Christmas Sherlock (BBC) ParaNorman No Classic mystery or thriller cliffhanger? Coming of age60 story line? Do you want the most intense 30 or 60 minutes? Tv series or Crime drama? No made? 30 Focus on the good guys or bad guys? Escape with Yes No Yes some fantasy/-K No sci-17 Politics and fast talking? Breaking Bad Bad Head to outer space? Law & Orders Sons of Anarchy No Kevin, Verbal Kent, Spacey? Steeped in history? Star Trek: TNG Explore or War? Less science, more fiction? No No Battlestar Galacticaar The House of Cards The Tudors The WalkingY Dead The West Wing Do you like Twin PeaksYesthings to be a little strange? Lost Highschool of the Dead Yes Family Guy Mad Men No_- You want to see things in B&W? Gratuitous No No 〉4-- cleavage and up. skirt shots? Dick and fart The Twillight Zone jokes, with random musical interludes? Ye) Animated? No Dick and fart The Twillight Zone Nojokes, with Yes)+ ← Animated? random musical interludes? A little more childish or a little World-class social commentary? No YesThe X-Files Do you want to remember laughter? Do you ike the paranormal? Futurama South Park Do you want to watch the most pred up show on Netfix? Do you want to do as little thinking as possible? Ren & Stimpy Show Do you dig British humour? No Archer Skit show No Frasier Do you like things to get a littte odd, a littie quirky? Are you really Nointo weed and Do you reckon to be a bit of a sophisticate? Fawity Towers Chappelle's Show No No Do you want a show with astounding rewatchability? The Kids in the sh't hawks Are you realty into football? No circling in the sh't winds? Trailer Park Boys The League WorkaholicsNo Arrested Sunny in Philadelphia Satire or insanity? e Upon a Time in the West Louie Do you find awkward situations funny? Parks and Old Cheers No Columbomore You want to go oldschool or keep it fresh? Are you about the solution, or the process? The Rockford Files Mystery or Space? Are you extremely nostalgic? Star Trek Want your night True Grit No Yesto be action packed? Want your night True Grit Firefly Horses, boots Have you seen NoThe Terminator? Noand 10-gallion hats? Black Hawk Down (Yes Terminator 2: Judgment Day Do you want to keep it serious? Do you consider snowboard films documentaries? What about a No Set in the future or present day? Art of Flight Do you want to have your face melted off froem maximum rock? Top Gun Aeon Flux Yes)--Year of the Horse Take it to the Pain or Paint? streets? No murderers and madness? Do you want to Nojust how Gift Shop religion can be? Should there be Are you a Woody Allen fan? Or would you like to become one? chainsaw at An Woody Allen: A The Evil Dead Three parts classic horror one part something new? Cabin in the Grizzly Man Do subtities bother you Man on Wire the sense out ofNo Duck Soup Session 9 Ferris Buellers Day Off Are you in the mood to laugh? Do you find clever wordplayNo Do you mind it when people break out Do you want some drama with your laughter? No Are you adverse Happy Gilmore white? Do you want to Do you like your humor to be more or less Do you love Paul Newman? Do great, or you want to? Slap Shot Gritty or pretty? Clerks Slap Shot Grity or pretty? Clerks Slow-paced ManHattan Yesquirky romantic Trainspotting indie? Do you hunger for adventure? Lost in YesWere you a fan of Yes Big Fish Firefly? Super 8 Yes Star Trek : The Wrath of Khan Want some thrills Do you like main The Hunger Games with yourYesrollis to be played adventure? No by kids? Do you enjoy diatribes entirely unrelated to the plot? Are you upset by No〉←- seeing drug use? Care for some criminal intent? Hustle & Flow YesDo you love hip- YesReservoir Dogs Yes Mob story hop? No No Miller's CrossingYes Clay Pigeons Hypothetically The Girl who Played with Fire Have you seen the original Girl with the Dragon Tattoo? Nowould a long Ready for some romance? Yes No brutal rape scene ruin your night? Have you seen The Girl Who Played with Fire? Girl with the Dragon Tattoo Yes Pi Are subtitles going to be aNobe completelyXYes Do you want to Kicked the Yes problem? Keep it mellow?Yes No TomCruise or 4 (Yes Matt Damon Midnight Cowboy NoThe Machinist Good Will Hunting Vanilla Sky Matt more awesome pictures at THEMETAPICTURE.COM a-mouse-duh: Well there goes the rest of my life.
Bad, Breaking Bad, and Children: What ta Watch
 start
 Are you watching
 with children?
 Do you have to
 watch it with
 No
 Yes
 No
 them?
 Are the kids
 YesFeeling
 frightened
 easily?
 Girls only?
 nostalgic?- No>
 Muppets or
 music?
 YesOld made new, or
 No
 No
 just old?
 The Secrot
 Garden
 Alice in
 Rango
 Old
 Yo Gabba

 Yo Gabba
 Gabbat
 Freaks and
 Geeks
 The Nightmare
 efore Christmas
 Sherlock (BBC)
 ParaNorman
 No
 Classic mystery
 or thriller
 cliffhanger?
 Coming of age60
 story line?
 Do you want the
 most intense
 30 or 60
 minutes?
 Tv series or
 Crime drama?
 No
 made?
 30
 Focus on the
 good guys or
 bad guys?
 Escape with
 Yes
 No
 Yes
 some fantasy/-K No
 sci-17
 Politics and fast
 talking?
 Breaking Bad
 Bad
 Head to outer
 space?
 Law & Orders
 Sons of Anarchy
 No
 Kevin, Verbal
 Kent, Spacey?
 Steeped in
 history?
 Star Trek: TNG
 Explore or War?
 Less science,
 more fiction?
 No
 No
 Battlestar
 Galacticaar
 The House of
 Cards
 The Tudors
 The WalkingY
 Dead
 The West Wing
 Do you like
 Twin PeaksYesthings to be a
 little strange?
 Lost
 Highschool of
 the Dead
 Yes
 Family Guy
 Mad Men No_-
 You want to see
 things in B&W?
 Gratuitous
 No
 No 〉4-- cleavage and up.
 skirt shots?
 Dick and fart
 The Twillight
 Zone
 jokes, with
 random musical
 interludes?
 Ye)
 Animated?
 No

 Dick and fart
 The Twillight
 Zone
 Nojokes, with
 Yes)+
 ←
 Animated?
 random musical
 interludes?
 A little more
 childish or a little
 World-class
 social
 commentary?
 No
 YesThe X-Files
 Do you want to
 remember
 laughter?
 Do you ike the
 paranormal?
 Futurama
 South Park
 Do you want to
 watch the most
 pred up show
 on Netfix?
 Do you want to
 do as little
 thinking as
 possible?
 Ren & Stimpy
 Show
 Do you dig
 British humour?
 No
 Archer
 Skit show
 No
 Frasier
 Do you like
 things to get a
 littte odd, a littie
 quirky?
 Are you really
 Nointo weed and
 Do you reckon to
 be a bit of a
 sophisticate?
 Fawity Towers
 Chappelle's
 Show
 No
 No
 Do you want a
 show with
 astounding
 rewatchability?
 The Kids in the
 sh't hawks
 Are you realty
 into football?
 No
 circling in the
 sh't winds?
 Trailer Park Boys
 The League
 WorkaholicsNo
 Arrested
 Sunny in
 Philadelphia
 Satire or
 insanity?
 e Upon a Time
 in the West
 Louie
 Do you find
 awkward
 situations funny?
 Parks and
 Old
 Cheers
 No
 Columbomore
 You want to go
 oldschool or
 keep it fresh?
 Are you about
 the solution, or
 the process?
 The Rockford
 Files
 Mystery or
 Space?
 Are you
 extremely
 nostalgic?
 Star Trek
 Want your night
 True Grit
 No
 Yesto be action
 packed?

 Want your night
 True Grit
 Firefly
 Horses, boots
 Have you seen
 NoThe Terminator?
 Noand 10-gallion
 hats?
 Black Hawk
 Down
 (Yes
 Terminator 2:
 Judgment Day
 Do you want to
 keep it serious?
 Do you consider
 snowboard films
 documentaries?
 What about a
 No
 Set in the future
 or present day?
 Art of Flight
 Do you want to
 have your face
 melted off froem
 maximum rock?
 Top Gun
 Aeon Flux
 Yes)--Year of the Horse
 Take it to the
 Pain or Paint?
 streets? No
 murderers and
 madness?
 Do you want to
 Nojust how
 Gift Shop
 religion can be?
 Should there be
 Are you a Woody
 Allen fan? Or
 would you like to
 become one?
 chainsaw at
 An
 Woody Allen: A
 The Evil Dead
 Three parts
 classic horror
 one part
 something new?
 Cabin in the
 Grizzly Man
 Do subtities
 bother you
 Man on Wire
 the sense out ofNo
 Duck Soup
 Session 9
 Ferris Buellers
 Day Off
 Are you in the
 mood to laugh?
 Do you find
 clever wordplayNo
 Do you mind it
 when people
 break out
 Do you want
 some drama with
 your laughter?
 No
 Are you adverse
 Happy Gilmore
 white?
 Do you want to
 Do you like your
 humor to be
 more or less
 Do you love Paul
 Newman? Do
 great, or
 you want to?
 Slap Shot
 Gritty or pretty?
 Clerks

 Slap Shot
 Grity or pretty?
 Clerks
 Slow-paced
 ManHattan
 Yesquirky romantic
 Trainspotting
 indie?
 Do you hunger
 for adventure?
 Lost in
 YesWere you a fan of
 Yes
 Big Fish
 Firefly?
 Super 8 Yes
 Star Trek : The
 Wrath of Khan
 Want some thrills
 Do you like main
 The Hunger
 Games
 with yourYesrollis to be played
 adventure?
 No
 by kids?
 Do you enjoy
 diatribes entirely
 unrelated to the
 plot?
 Are you upset by
 No〉←- seeing drug use?
 Care for some
 criminal intent?
 Hustle & Flow
 YesDo you love hip-
 YesReservoir Dogs
 Yes
 Mob story
 hop?
 No
 No
 Miller's CrossingYes
 Clay Pigeons
 Hypothetically
 The Girl who
 Played with Fire
 Have you seen
 the original Girl
 with the Dragon
 Tattoo?
 Nowould a long
 Ready for some
 romance?
 Yes
 No
 brutal rape scene
 ruin your night?
 Have you seen
 The Girl Who
 Played with Fire?
 Girl with the
 Dragon Tattoo
 Yes
 Pi
 Are subtitles
 going to be aNobe completelyXYes
 Do you want to
 Kicked the
 Yes
 problem?
 Keep it mellow?Yes
 No
 TomCruise or 4 (Yes
 Matt Damon
 Midnight Cowboy
 NoThe Machinist
 Good Will
 Hunting
 Vanilla Sky
 Matt
 more awesome pictures at THEMETAPICTURE.COM
a-mouse-duh:

Well there goes the rest of my life.

a-mouse-duh: Well there goes the rest of my life.