saying

šŸ”„ | Latest

Being Alone, Arguing, and Bad: Alyssa Milano @Alyssa_Milano Follow Ns NEWS MARIJU 4:14 PM 18 Apr 2018 MAKEMAT 1,593 Retweets 4.735 Likes äø»äøŽēŽ‰äø°äø° -- libertarirynn: vaporwavevocap: cheshireinthemiddle: napoleonbonerfarte: cheshireinthemiddle: pseudopupil: cheshireinthemiddle: hardboiledoldman: cheshireinthemiddle: hardboiledoldman: cheshireinthemiddle: But you knowingly broke the law. You could sleep with a 17 year old and the age of consent of your state can lower the next year. You still broke the law. Youā€™re an unfathomably dumb cunt. At least I have a good argument. And since iā€™ve already gone into great detail proving my point, unless you have something constructive to add, move along. A sound argument is not a good argument, you dummy. Making a sound argument isnā€™t the same thing as making a good one, and youā€™ve made a bad argument cause youā€™re a dumb as fuck bootlicker. We all know breaking the law has consequences, doesnā€™t mean we have to think itā€™s morally good, you brain-worm-riddled moron. Something being normal and the accepted reality doesnā€™t make it reasonable or good. Youā€™re not smart and your rhetoric is garbage-tier. Eat shit. A sound argument is one that is well thought out and covers its bases. Which is what I gave. Your counterargument isā€¦insults. You personally not agreeing with a law doesnt mean that you can just break it. If youre an immigrant coming from a country with a liwer legal drinking age or age of consent, you can see breaking those laws in the US as harmless. You can think they are stupid laws. They might even change in the future. But if you break them in the US, you will be punished. ā€œI personally dont find an. Issue with this lawā€ is not a defense. If you want to do something illegal and think it is unfair, work to have the law changed. Advocate for its change. And abide by the new rules (in this case, get a license, sell only to specific people, and dont sell to children). And this isnt slavery. This isnt criminalized homosexuality. This isnt infringing on your right to live. You can wait to get high in this particular method or sell it to others after it has been legalized. It isnt that hard. You are such an idiot and coward.Ā ā€œBreaking the law is illegalā€ is the entirety of what youā€™re saying (congrats on your basic baby brain logic) but its still fucking pathetic youā€™re defending a heinous prison system simply because you are pussy who loves authority and pointless contrarianism. Like it IS a stupid law and the point of this comic is that no one should lose years (or any time!) of their life over it. Ā If the government made a law that jaywalking is a felony youā€™d defend people being locked away only because they ā€œbroke the lawā€. Thats stupid and says more about you than anything. Grow a spine you slug. Another person who just insults and doesnt read. The argument isnt ā€œbreaking the law is illegalā€, but that knowingly breaking the law comes with predictable punishments. If you dont agree with a law, you advocate for its change. You dont personally get to decide what is and isnt a stupid law. The age of consent in France is 15. And if you live in France, that could seem harmless. But if you immigrated to Japan or the US and started sleeping with 15 year olds, you can argue that it is harmless all you want, but it is still illegal. The government has made leaving your preteen or lower child home alone as a form child abuse. You can have your children taken away if you do it too much. I was left alone at 8 years old. All the time. I was fine. The other little kids left alone were fine. We could handle ourselves. We and Our parents saw it as ā€œharmlessā€. That doesnt mean the parents cant be pubished for it. ā€œI will break this law because i personally dont like it/think itā€™s harmlessā€ is acceptable to you until it is used on a law that you actually support. ā€œmaybe if those jews didnā€™t want to get sent to concentration camps they shouldnā€™t have been jewish in poland.ā€ thatā€™s exactly what you sound like lmao. Iā€™m really not sure what argument youā€™re trying to go for right now? Oh, iā€™m sorry, I guess you getting high is comparable to persecution now. Your argument can be used to justify breaking literally any law. There is a HUGE difference between laws that violate your right to live and laws that you just dont feel like following. If you cant see the difference then i feel very sorry for you. It is persecution, if there is no victim there is no crime, therefore treating people like criminals without a crime is persecution. What she said ^ Also forcing people into legal slavery by arresting and imprisoning them for victimless crimes sure as shit sounds like persecution to me.
Being Alone, Arguing, and Bad: Alyssa Milano @Alyssa_Milano Follow Ns NEWS MARIJU 4:14 PM 18 Apr 2018 MAKEMAT 1,593 Retweets 4.735 Likes äø»äøŽēŽ‰äø°äø° -- libertarirynn: vaporwavevocap: cheshireinthemiddle: napoleonbonerfarte: cheshireinthemiddle: pseudopupil: cheshireinthemiddle: hardboiledoldman: cheshireinthemiddle: hardboiledoldman: cheshireinthemiddle: But you knowingly broke the law. You could sleep with a 17 year old and the age of consent of your state can lower the next year. You still broke the law. Youā€™re an unfathomably dumb cunt. At least I have a good argument. And since iā€™ve already gone into great detail proving my point, unless you have something constructive to add, move along. A sound argument is not a good argument, you dummy. Making a sound argument isnā€™t the same thing as making a good one, and youā€™ve made a bad argument cause youā€™re a dumb as fuck bootlicker. We all know breaking the law has consequences, doesnā€™t mean we have to think itā€™s morally good, you brain-worm-riddled moron. Something being normal and the accepted reality doesnā€™t make it reasonable or good. Youā€™re not smart and your rhetoric is garbage-tier. Eat shit. A sound argument is one that is well thought out and covers its bases. Which is what I gave. Your counterargument isā€¦insults. You personally not agreeing with a law doesnt mean that you can just break it. If youre an immigrant coming from a country with a liwer legal drinking age or age of consent, you can see breaking those laws in the US as harmless. You can think they are stupid laws. They might even change in the future. But if you break them in the US, you will be punished. ā€œI personally dont find an. Issue with this lawā€ is not a defense. If you want to do something illegal and think it is unfair, work to have the law changed. Advocate for its change. And abide by the new rules (in this case, get a license, sell only to specific people, and dont sell to children). And this isnt slavery. This isnt criminalized homosexuality. This isnt infringing on your right to live. You can wait to get high in this particular method or sell it to others after it has been legalized. It isnt that hard. You are such an idiot and coward.Ā ā€œBreaking the law is illegalā€ is the entirety of what youā€™re saying (congrats on your basic baby brain logic) but its still fucking pathetic youā€™re defending a heinous prison system simply because you are pussy who loves authority and pointless contrarianism. Like it IS a stupid law and the point of this comic is that no one should lose years (or any time!) of their life over it. Ā If the government made a law that jaywalking is a felony youā€™d defend people being locked away only because they ā€œbroke the lawā€. Thats stupid and says more about you than anything. Grow a spine you slug. Another person who just insults and doesnt read. The argument isnt ā€œbreaking the law is illegalā€, but that knowingly breaking the law comes with predictable punishments. If you dont agree with a law, you advocate for its change. You dont personally get to decide what is and isnt a stupid law. The age of consent in France is 15. And if you live in France, that could seem harmless. But if you immigrated to Japan or the US and started sleeping with 15 year olds, you can argue that it is harmless all you want, but it is still illegal. The government has made leaving your preteen or lower child home alone as a form child abuse. You can have your children taken away if you do it too much. I was left alone at 8 years old. All the time. I was fine. The other little kids left alone were fine. We could handle ourselves. We and Our parents saw it as ā€œharmlessā€. That doesnt mean the parents cant be pubished for it. ā€œI will break this law because i personally dont like it/think itā€™s harmlessā€ is acceptable to you until it is used on a law that you actually support. ā€œmaybe if those jews didnā€™t want to get sent to concentration camps they shouldnā€™t have been jewish in poland.ā€ thatā€™s exactly what you sound like lmao. Iā€™m really not sure what argument youā€™re trying to go for right now? Oh, iā€™m sorry, I guess you getting high is comparable to persecution now. Your argument can be used to justify breaking literally any law. There is a HUGE difference between laws that violate your right to live and laws that you just dont feel like following. If you cant see the difference then i feel very sorry for you. It is persecution, if there is no victim there is no crime, therefore treating people like criminals without a crime is persecution. What she said ^ Also forcing people into legal slavery by arresting and imprisoning them for victimless crimes sure as shit sounds like persecution to me.

libertarirynn: vaporwavevocap: cheshireinthemiddle: napoleonbonerfarte: cheshireinthemiddle: pseudopupil: cheshireinthemiddle: hardb...

Being Alone, Arguing, and Bad: Alyssa Milano @Alyssa_Milano Follow Ns NEWS MARIJU 4:14 PM 18 Apr 2018 MAKEMAT 1,593 Retweets 4.735 Likes äø»äøŽēŽ‰äø°äø° -- vaporwavevocap: cheshireinthemiddle: napoleonbonerfarte: cheshireinthemiddle: pseudopupil: cheshireinthemiddle: hardboiledoldman: cheshireinthemiddle: hardboiledoldman: cheshireinthemiddle: But you knowingly broke the law. You could sleep with a 17 year old and the age of consent of your state can lower the next year. You still broke the law. Youā€™re an unfathomably dumb cunt. At least I have a good argument. And since iā€™ve already gone into great detail proving my point, unless you have something constructive to add, move along. A sound argument is not a good argument, you dummy. Making a sound argument isnā€™t the same thing as making a good one, and youā€™ve made a bad argument cause youā€™re a dumb as fuck bootlicker. We all know breaking the law has consequences, doesnā€™t mean we have to think itā€™s morally good, you brain-worm-riddled moron. Something being normal and the accepted reality doesnā€™t make it reasonable or good. Youā€™re not smart and your rhetoric is garbage-tier. Eat shit. A sound argument is one that is well thought out and covers its bases. Which is what I gave. Your counterargument isā€¦insults. You personally not agreeing with a law doesnt mean that you can just break it. If youre an immigrant coming from a country with a liwer legal drinking age or age of consent, you can see breaking those laws in the US as harmless. You can think they are stupid laws. They might even change in the future. But if you break them in the US, you will be punished. ā€œI personally dont find an. Issue with this lawā€ is not a defense. If you want to do something illegal and think it is unfair, work to have the law changed. Advocate for its change. And abide by the new rules (in this case, get a license, sell only to specific people, and dont sell to children). And this isnt slavery. This isnt criminalized homosexuality. This isnt infringing on your right to live. You can wait to get high in this particular method or sell it to others after it has been legalized. It isnt that hard. You are such an idiot and coward.Ā ā€œBreaking the law is illegalā€ is the entirety of what youā€™re saying (congrats on your basic baby brain logic) but its still fucking pathetic youā€™re defending a heinous prison system simply because you are pussy who loves authority and pointless contrarianism. Like it IS a stupid law and the point of this comic is that no one should lose years (or any time!) of their life over it. Ā If the government made a law that jaywalking is a felony youā€™d defend people being locked away only because they ā€œbroke the lawā€. Thats stupid and says more about you than anything. Grow a spine you slug. Another person who just insults and doesnt read. The argument isnt ā€œbreaking the law is illegalā€, but that knowingly breaking the law comes with predictable punishments. If you dont agree with a law, you advocate for its change. You dont personally get to decide what is and isnt a stupid law. The age of consent in France is 15. And if you live in France, that could seem harmless. But if you immigrated to Japan or the US and started sleeping with 15 year olds, you can argue that it is harmless all you want, but it is still illegal. The government has made leaving your preteen or lower child home alone as a form child abuse. You can have your children taken away if you do it too much. I was left alone at 8 years old. All the time. I was fine. The other little kids left alone were fine. We could handle ourselves. We and Our parents saw it as ā€œharmlessā€. That doesnt mean the parents cant be pubished for it. ā€œI will break this law because i personally dont like it/think itā€™s harmlessā€ is acceptable to you until it is used on a law that you actually support. ā€œmaybe if those jews didnā€™t want to get sent to concentration camps they shouldnā€™t have been jewish in poland.ā€ thatā€™s exactly what you sound like lmao. Iā€™m really not sure what argument youā€™re trying to go for right now? Oh, iā€™m sorry, I guess you getting high is comparable to persecution now. Your argument can be used to justify breaking literally any law. There is a HUGE difference between laws that violate your right to live and laws that you just dont feel like following. If you cant see the difference then i feel very sorry for you. It is persecution, if there is no victim there is no crime, therefore treating people like criminals without a crime is persecution. What she said ^
Being Alone, Arguing, and Bad: Alyssa Milano @Alyssa_Milano Follow Ns NEWS MARIJU 4:14 PM 18 Apr 2018 MAKEMAT 1,593 Retweets 4.735 Likes äø»äøŽēŽ‰äø°äø° -- vaporwavevocap: cheshireinthemiddle: napoleonbonerfarte: cheshireinthemiddle: pseudopupil: cheshireinthemiddle: hardboiledoldman: cheshireinthemiddle: hardboiledoldman: cheshireinthemiddle: But you knowingly broke the law. You could sleep with a 17 year old and the age of consent of your state can lower the next year. You still broke the law. Youā€™re an unfathomably dumb cunt. At least I have a good argument. And since iā€™ve already gone into great detail proving my point, unless you have something constructive to add, move along. A sound argument is not a good argument, you dummy. Making a sound argument isnā€™t the same thing as making a good one, and youā€™ve made a bad argument cause youā€™re a dumb as fuck bootlicker. We all know breaking the law has consequences, doesnā€™t mean we have to think itā€™s morally good, you brain-worm-riddled moron. Something being normal and the accepted reality doesnā€™t make it reasonable or good. Youā€™re not smart and your rhetoric is garbage-tier. Eat shit. A sound argument is one that is well thought out and covers its bases. Which is what I gave. Your counterargument isā€¦insults. You personally not agreeing with a law doesnt mean that you can just break it. If youre an immigrant coming from a country with a liwer legal drinking age or age of consent, you can see breaking those laws in the US as harmless. You can think they are stupid laws. They might even change in the future. But if you break them in the US, you will be punished. ā€œI personally dont find an. Issue with this lawā€ is not a defense. If you want to do something illegal and think it is unfair, work to have the law changed. Advocate for its change. And abide by the new rules (in this case, get a license, sell only to specific people, and dont sell to children). And this isnt slavery. This isnt criminalized homosexuality. This isnt infringing on your right to live. You can wait to get high in this particular method or sell it to others after it has been legalized. It isnt that hard. You are such an idiot and coward.Ā ā€œBreaking the law is illegalā€ is the entirety of what youā€™re saying (congrats on your basic baby brain logic) but its still fucking pathetic youā€™re defending a heinous prison system simply because you are pussy who loves authority and pointless contrarianism. Like it IS a stupid law and the point of this comic is that no one should lose years (or any time!) of their life over it. Ā If the government made a law that jaywalking is a felony youā€™d defend people being locked away only because they ā€œbroke the lawā€. Thats stupid and says more about you than anything. Grow a spine you slug. Another person who just insults and doesnt read. The argument isnt ā€œbreaking the law is illegalā€, but that knowingly breaking the law comes with predictable punishments. If you dont agree with a law, you advocate for its change. You dont personally get to decide what is and isnt a stupid law. The age of consent in France is 15. And if you live in France, that could seem harmless. But if you immigrated to Japan or the US and started sleeping with 15 year olds, you can argue that it is harmless all you want, but it is still illegal. The government has made leaving your preteen or lower child home alone as a form child abuse. You can have your children taken away if you do it too much. I was left alone at 8 years old. All the time. I was fine. The other little kids left alone were fine. We could handle ourselves. We and Our parents saw it as ā€œharmlessā€. That doesnt mean the parents cant be pubished for it. ā€œI will break this law because i personally dont like it/think itā€™s harmlessā€ is acceptable to you until it is used on a law that you actually support. ā€œmaybe if those jews didnā€™t want to get sent to concentration camps they shouldnā€™t have been jewish in poland.ā€ thatā€™s exactly what you sound like lmao. Iā€™m really not sure what argument youā€™re trying to go for right now? Oh, iā€™m sorry, I guess you getting high is comparable to persecution now. Your argument can be used to justify breaking literally any law. There is a HUGE difference between laws that violate your right to live and laws that you just dont feel like following. If you cant see the difference then i feel very sorry for you. It is persecution, if there is no victim there is no crime, therefore treating people like criminals without a crime is persecution. What she said ^

vaporwavevocap: cheshireinthemiddle: napoleonbonerfarte: cheshireinthemiddle: pseudopupil: cheshireinthemiddle: hardboiledoldman: c...

God, Monster, and Movies: INTERNATIONAL INTERNATIONAL SAN DIEGO AN DIE ECON CONCON CON INTERNA INTER INTERNATIONAL 1N DIEG0 OIEGO SAN DIEGO CON OUG NO CON DIEGO CON INTERNATIONAL ONAL INTERNATIONAL IN E WATIONAL TERNATIONA SAN DIEGO CON SAN OIEG0 0 93 eONCON CO SAN OIEG N OIEG CO INTERNATIO COMICE CO OM feministscoundrel: This photo means a lot to me. And Iā€™ll tell you why.Ā  Natalie Portman, as we know, was shut out of Marvel. She chose not to sign any new contract not just because of the way her character was treated (though there is that) but because Thor: The Dark World was slated to be the first Marvel movie directed by a woman, her friend (and eventual Wonder Woman director) Patty Jenkins. Portman hadnā€™t planned on being in The Dark World, but lept at the chance to be a part of feminist history and to be directed in what would have beenJenkinā€™s first film since her 2003 Oscar-winningĀ Monster. Portman signed a new contract with Marvel. They fired Jenkins soon after. Portman was crushed because she essentially had been duped into a contract for a film that would keep her away from her young son and force her back into a one-dimensional role under yet another male director. And we all remember how awful that movie was.Ā  When it came time for the third Thor movie, they tried to get Portman under contract again. And she said no. Marvel decided to spin the story to make it seem like it was all their idea. At first, they went for the lame and nonsensical:Ā  When Marvel Studios President Kevin Feige was asked about why she wouldnā€™t be in the third film, and said there were ā€œmany reasons, many of which are in the film, so you will see thatā€ continuing with ā€œThere are only a couple of scenes on Earth in this movie. The majority, 95 percent of the movie, takes place in the cosmos.ā€ (x) Seeing as The Dark World also took place in space, this answer didnā€™t have a lot of credibility. When Portman said she was ā€œdoneā€ with the Marvel Universe, Feige got vicious in interviews, telling reporters that Valkyrie was in Ragnorak to be better than Jane Foster and a better match for Thor.Ā  ā€œWe wanted Thor to encounter somebody that was near his equal and that his relationship with Jane may have evolved in unexpected ways in between The Dark World and Ragnarok, and we wanted to pit him against a character who was much more his equal and in many ways his superior.ā€ (x) Feige implies that A) Valkyrie was in Ragnorak to be a romantic interest for Thor, B) Valkyrie is better and more powerful than Jane Foster, and C) Jane Foster was always Thorā€™s inferior.Ā  Whatā€™s ridiculous is that Ragnorak had a ā€œsorry Jane dumped youā€ throwaway line to explain Portmanā€™s absence. And instead of saying that Jane and Thor broke up in interviews, a line that does not spoil literally anything about the film,Ā Feige chose to attack Janeā€™s strength and capability, which would have been a very special dig at Portman.Ā  Do you want to know what none of this sounds like? Taika Waititiā€™s opinion. Waititi is a master storyteller who does not sacrifice his feminist views for laughs. You can bet that Feigeā€™s ridiculous slams on Portman and her character Janeā€“ disguised asĀ ā€œpromotionā€ for WAITITIā€™S FILMā€“ would have troubled him immensely. This is a man with aĀ Māori father, who had to use his motherā€™s maiden nameā€“ Cohenā€“ for earlier work because an indigenous last name kept him away from opportunity. This man does NOT fuck around with entertainment that gets its power off of sexism and inequality. He knows from experience just how infuriating it is when it comes to directors missing out on opportunities because they arenā€™t a white man.Ā  So how does he fix this? How does he fix the idea that Jane Foster canā€™t go to space, or that sheā€™s not powerful enough for Thor, the god of thunder?Ā  He makes her Thor.Ā  Waititi saw Portman / Jane Fosterā€™s name dragged through the mud by Kevin Feige in order to promote his movie, and when he got hired to direct again, he decided to right those wrongs. This picture means everything. He is on his knee, handing her Thorā€™s hammer, essentially saying, you will never have to go through that shit with me. With me, youā€™re a god. And the expression on her face, after Marvel attempted to break her, doesnā€™t need words.Ā  What a photo. What a film. What a man.Ā 
God, Monster, and Movies: INTERNATIONAL INTERNATIONAL SAN DIEGO AN DIE ECON CONCON CON INTERNA INTER INTERNATIONAL 1N DIEG0 OIEGO SAN DIEGO CON OUG NO CON DIEGO CON INTERNATIONAL ONAL INTERNATIONAL IN E WATIONAL TERNATIONA SAN DIEGO CON SAN OIEG0 0 93 eONCON CO SAN OIEG N OIEG CO INTERNATIO COMICE CO OM feministscoundrel: This photo means a lot to me. And Iā€™ll tell you why.Ā  Natalie Portman, as we know, was shut out of Marvel. She chose not to sign any new contract not just because of the way her character was treated (though there is that) but because Thor: The Dark World was slated to be the first Marvel movie directed by a woman, her friend (and eventual Wonder Woman director) Patty Jenkins. Portman hadnā€™t planned on being in The Dark World, but lept at the chance to be a part of feminist history and to be directed in what would have beenJenkinā€™s first film since her 2003 Oscar-winningĀ Monster. Portman signed a new contract with Marvel. They fired Jenkins soon after. Portman was crushed because she essentially had been duped into a contract for a film that would keep her away from her young son and force her back into a one-dimensional role under yet another male director. And we all remember how awful that movie was.Ā  When it came time for the third Thor movie, they tried to get Portman under contract again. And she said no. Marvel decided to spin the story to make it seem like it was all their idea. At first, they went for the lame and nonsensical:Ā  When Marvel Studios President Kevin Feige was asked about why she wouldnā€™t be in the third film, and said there were ā€œmany reasons, many of which are in the film, so you will see thatā€ continuing with ā€œThere are only a couple of scenes on Earth in this movie. The majority, 95 percent of the movie, takes place in the cosmos.ā€ (x) Seeing as The Dark World also took place in space, this answer didnā€™t have a lot of credibility. When Portman said she was ā€œdoneā€ with the Marvel Universe, Feige got vicious in interviews, telling reporters that Valkyrie was in Ragnorak to be better than Jane Foster and a better match for Thor.Ā  ā€œWe wanted Thor to encounter somebody that was near his equal and that his relationship with Jane may have evolved in unexpected ways in between The Dark World and Ragnarok, and we wanted to pit him against a character who was much more his equal and in many ways his superior.ā€ (x) Feige implies that A) Valkyrie was in Ragnorak to be a romantic interest for Thor, B) Valkyrie is better and more powerful than Jane Foster, and C) Jane Foster was always Thorā€™s inferior.Ā  Whatā€™s ridiculous is that Ragnorak had a ā€œsorry Jane dumped youā€ throwaway line to explain Portmanā€™s absence. And instead of saying that Jane and Thor broke up in interviews, a line that does not spoil literally anything about the film,Ā Feige chose to attack Janeā€™s strength and capability, which would have been a very special dig at Portman.Ā  Do you want to know what none of this sounds like? Taika Waititiā€™s opinion. Waititi is a master storyteller who does not sacrifice his feminist views for laughs. You can bet that Feigeā€™s ridiculous slams on Portman and her character Janeā€“ disguised asĀ ā€œpromotionā€ for WAITITIā€™S FILMā€“ would have troubled him immensely. This is a man with aĀ Māori father, who had to use his motherā€™s maiden nameā€“ Cohenā€“ for earlier work because an indigenous last name kept him away from opportunity. This man does NOT fuck around with entertainment that gets its power off of sexism and inequality. He knows from experience just how infuriating it is when it comes to directors missing out on opportunities because they arenā€™t a white man.Ā  So how does he fix this? How does he fix the idea that Jane Foster canā€™t go to space, or that sheā€™s not powerful enough for Thor, the god of thunder?Ā  He makes her Thor.Ā  Waititi saw Portman / Jane Fosterā€™s name dragged through the mud by Kevin Feige in order to promote his movie, and when he got hired to direct again, he decided to right those wrongs. This picture means everything. He is on his knee, handing her Thorā€™s hammer, essentially saying, you will never have to go through that shit with me. With me, youā€™re a god. And the expression on her face, after Marvel attempted to break her, doesnā€™t need words.Ā  What a photo. What a film. What a man.Ā 

feministscoundrel: This photo means a lot to me. And Iā€™ll tell you why.Ā  Natalie Portman, as we know, was shut out of Marvel. She chose not ...