🔥 | Latest

Beijing, Definitely, and Guns: BANG BANG WE CAN END GUN VIOLENCE. xphilosoraptorx: unlimited-shitpost-works: siryouarebeingmocked: 8lastrat8: american–support: kasaron: allriot-political-tshirts: American citizens own 40% of all guns in the world. Out of more than one billion firearms in the world, American citizens hold 393 million, for a population of roughly 326 million. That’s a lot of guns! The last time the US federal government managed to pass laws that limit the spread and use of guns was 25 years ago. It was 1994. The Federal Assault Weapons Ban was temporary. It expired in 2004, resulting in a massive increase in mass shootings across the country. Republicans are running out of excuses, blaming the latest incidents in Drayton and El Paso on video games. We can end gun violence. Let’s start with gun control. What sort of gun control legislation would you like to see be put into place? OP, that claim of shootings increased is false. The violence and shootings didn’t change in that decade from the previous decade, and in fact, violence has been on the decline. WHAT HAS CHANGED is how much media is shoved down your throat. Thats it. The nonstop spam from legacy media of a single event for a month, if not months on end is what changed. It used to be a 5, maybe 10 minute story has now turned into a 4 week “constant coverage” of spewing the same info daily, with nothing added. After the early 90s, we saw a sharp decline and its been declining ever since. Meanwhile, ownership is at an alltime high, increasing, as if a plethora of armed citizens reduces the audacity of a potential killer to attempt knowing they’ll get capped. What has also changed is the increase in the absolutely terrible idea of “gun free zones” seeing as approximately 85-95% of these shootings are occuring in these zones. Seems like that’s your problem. Hmm, this graph seems to showcase that despite the US owning vastly more guns… homicide rate is lower than a hefty chunk of even the non gun owners… I’d just like to know how they propose to take our guns. If I got one logical explanation from one of these half wits that didn’t include magic or ridiculous gestapo tactics we could have a conversation but, every F’ing time it devolves into name calling, insults, and slander. They simply can’t explain how to take the guns away. Not a single one of them has ever responded to me without crass vulgarities and irrational screeching. myamberreason said:  Anyway, guys, why you need THAT many guns? I understand owned a few for protection or legal hunting, but why do you have around 40% of firearms in the world?? I’m sorry, are you implying the Yanks should meet international proportional quotas on guns? We do own a few for self-defense and hunting. It’s just that the rest of the world doesn’t own very many guns. The reason we all have so many guns is very simple: logistics. The point of the second amendment is for us, the citizens of the USA, to be “shit your pants, wake up in a cold sweat” terrifying to the people running this country, so much so that they involuntarily have second, third, even fourth thoughts about ever violating our rights. The 2nd amendment is the most important and most powerful of all the amendments. Every single right and amendment could taken away, and we could regain them all with that one. And I’m not the only one who recognizes the importance of the 2nd.And it definitely terrifies Beijing. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: I don’t have to justify an amount of guns to you any more than I have to justify how many video games or coffee cups I have.
Beijing, Definitely, and Guns: BANG
 BANG
 WE CAN END GUN VIOLENCE.
xphilosoraptorx:

unlimited-shitpost-works:
siryouarebeingmocked:


8lastrat8:

american–support:

kasaron:


allriot-political-tshirts:


American citizens own 40% of all guns in the world. 

Out of more than one billion firearms in the world, American citizens hold 393 million, for a population of roughly 326 million. That’s a lot of guns!

The last time the US federal government managed to pass laws that limit the spread and use of guns was 25 years ago. It was 1994. The Federal Assault Weapons Ban was temporary. It expired in 2004, resulting in a massive increase in mass shootings across the country. Republicans are running out of excuses, blaming the latest incidents in Drayton and El Paso on video games.

We can end gun violence. Let’s start with gun control.


What sort of gun control legislation would you like to see be put into place?


OP, that claim of shootings increased is false. The violence and shootings didn’t change in that decade from the previous decade, and in fact, violence has been on the decline. 
WHAT HAS CHANGED is how much media is shoved down your throat. Thats it. The nonstop spam from legacy media of a single event for a month, if not months on end is what changed. It used to be a 5, maybe 10 minute story has now turned into a 4 week “constant coverage” of spewing the same info daily, with nothing added. 
After the early 90s, we saw a sharp decline and its been declining ever since. 
Meanwhile, ownership is at an alltime high, increasing, as if a plethora of armed citizens reduces the audacity of a potential killer to attempt knowing they’ll get capped.
What has also changed is the increase in the absolutely terrible idea of “gun free zones” seeing as approximately 85-95% of these shootings are occuring in these zones. Seems like that’s your problem. 
Hmm, this graph seems to showcase that despite the US owning vastly more guns… homicide rate is lower than a hefty chunk of even the non gun owners…


I’d just like to know how they propose to take our guns. If I got one logical explanation from one of these half wits that didn’t include magic or ridiculous gestapo tactics we could have a conversation but, every F’ing time it devolves into name calling, insults, and slander. They simply can’t explain how to take the guns away. Not a single one of them has ever responded to me without crass vulgarities and irrational screeching. 



myamberreason said: 
Anyway, guys, why you need THAT many guns? I understand owned a few for protection or legal hunting, but why do you have around 40% of firearms in the world??


I’m sorry, are you implying the Yanks should meet international proportional quotas on guns?


We do own a few for self-defense and hunting.  It’s just that the rest of the world doesn’t own very many guns.


The reason we all have so many guns is very simple: logistics. The point of the second amendment is for us, the citizens of the USA, to be “shit your pants, wake up in a cold sweat” terrifying to the people running this country, so much so that they involuntarily have second, third, even fourth thoughts about ever violating our rights. The 2nd amendment is the most important and most powerful of all the amendments. Every single right and amendment could taken away, and we could regain them all with that one. And I’m not the only one who recognizes the importance of the 2nd.And it definitely terrifies Beijing.

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: I don’t have to justify an amount of guns to you any more than I have to justify how many video games or coffee cups I have.

xphilosoraptorx: unlimited-shitpost-works: siryouarebeingmocked: 8lastrat8: american–support: kasaron: allriot-political-tshirts: A...

Tumblr, Twitter, and Control: 回。 。4G42 11:15 PM Enjoy Free Twitter with MTN! Learn more @_clvrarose if a penis is being forced into a woman's vagina, it will hurt therefore the body will try to self lubricate because that's what it does 5:53 PM 29 Mar 17 6,728 RETWEETS 7,003 LIKES @_clvrarose 29 Mar Replying to @_clvrarose it is not a conscious thing, it's literally the body's reaction: it doesn't mean the woman is enjoying it Tweet your reply 4G 11:15 PM Enjoy Free Twitter with MTN! Learn more Tweet 1,643 2,505 @_clvrarose 29 Mar even if it physically "feels good", even if she has an orgasm, it doesn't mean she wanted it or enjoyed it 1,309 2,174 @_clvrarose 29 Mar the body reacts, like that's what it does... it's not hard to understand 1,083 1,949 a_clvrarose 29 Mar same way that those who are ticklish may not like being tickled or the sensation but they still laugh when tickled 1,938 3,185 Tweet your reply 4G 11:15 PM Enjoy Free Twitter with MTN! Learn more Tweet @_clvrarose 29 Mar just because they are laughing doesn't mean they find it enjoyable, it's just their body's reaction... they have no real control 1,370 2,300 @_clvrarose 29 Mar some of vou really need to understand the effects and implications of what you say, it truly doesn't make sense R1,020 1,887 @_clvrarose 29 Mar do you know how many men ang women who have been raped HATE themselves because they had an orgasm during the attack? 1,557 2,495 Tweet your reply 牁 4G42 11:16 PM Enjoy Free Twitter with MTN! Learn more @_clvrarose 29 Mar they didn't enjoy the attack, but they feel conflicted because their body responded in a way as if they did, their body turned against them 1,168 1,937 @clvrarose 29 Mar if a man gets hard or ejaculates during a sexual attack, it doesn't mean he enjoyed it either-they are involuntary responses 998 1,576 @_clvrarose 29 Mar if you are reading this and cannot fathom the fact that rape victims can orgasm during their attack... and it was still RAPE. Block me. Now. Tweet your reply chocolatehighhh: Please reblog this every time you see it
Tumblr, Twitter, and Control: 回。
 。4G42 11:15 PM
 Enjoy Free Twitter with MTN! Learn more
 @_clvrarose
 if a penis is being forced into a
 woman's vagina, it will hurt therefore
 the body will try to self lubricate
 because that's what it does
 5:53 PM 29 Mar 17
 6,728 RETWEETS 7,003 LIKES
 @_clvrarose 29 Mar
 Replying to @_clvrarose
 it is not a conscious thing, it's literally
 the body's reaction: it doesn't mean
 the woman is enjoying it
 Tweet your reply

 4G 11:15 PM
 Enjoy Free Twitter with MTN! Learn more
 Tweet
 1,643 2,505
 @_clvrarose 29 Mar
 even if it physically "feels good", even if
 she has an orgasm, it doesn't mean
 she wanted it or enjoyed it
 1,309 2,174
 @_clvrarose 29 Mar
 the body reacts, like that's what it
 does... it's not hard to understand
 1,083 1,949
 a_clvrarose 29 Mar
 same way that those who are ticklish
 may not like being tickled or the
 sensation but they still laugh when
 tickled
 1,938 3,185
 Tweet your reply

 4G 11:15 PM
 Enjoy Free Twitter with MTN! Learn more
 Tweet
 @_clvrarose 29 Mar
 just because they are laughing doesn't
 mean they find it enjoyable, it's just
 their body's reaction... they have no
 real control
 1,370 2,300
 @_clvrarose 29 Mar
 some of vou really need to understand
 the effects and implications of what
 you say, it truly doesn't make sense
 R1,020 1,887
 @_clvrarose 29 Mar
 do you know how many men ang
 women who have been raped HATE
 themselves because they had an
 orgasm during the attack?
 1,557 2,495
 Tweet your reply

 牁 4G42 11:16 PM
 Enjoy Free Twitter with MTN! Learn more
 @_clvrarose 29 Mar
 they didn't enjoy the attack, but they
 feel conflicted because their body
 responded in a way as if they did, their
 body turned against them
 1,168 1,937
 @clvrarose 29 Mar
 if a man gets hard or ejaculates during
 a sexual attack, it doesn't mean he
 enjoyed it either-they are involuntary
 responses
 998
 1,576
 @_clvrarose 29 Mar
 if you are reading this and cannot
 fathom the fact that rape victims can
 orgasm during their attack... and it
 was still RAPE. Block me. Now.
 Tweet your reply
chocolatehighhh:
Please reblog this every time you see it

chocolatehighhh: Please reblog this every time you see it