🔥 | Latest

Being Alone, America, and Click: Jason Fuller, Contributor Working to bring about the best in America, both on-line and off. Impeachment Is No Longer Enough; Donald Trump Must Face Justice Impeachment and removal from office are only the first steps; for treason and-if convicted in a court of law-executed. 06/11/2017 10:39 pm ET for America to be redeemed, Donald Trump must be prosecuted Donald Trump has been President of the United States for just shy of six months now. I think that most of us among the electorate knew that his presidency would be a relative disaster, but I am not sure how many among us expected the catastrophe our nation now faces. friendly-neighborhood-patriarch: hominishostilis: abstractandedgyname: siryouarebeingmocked: mississpithy: bogleech: notyourmoderate: angrybell: thinksquad: http://archive.is/5VvI5 Huffpo, everybody. Can someone tell me what high crime or misdemeanor Trump has committed that merits this? Or is the HuffPo just publishing outright fantasies? God dammit, I’m now in the position of defending Huffington. I didn’t want to be here. Okay, @angrybell … actually, @ literally everyone who reblogged this uncritically as a tacit endorsement and agreement. Such as @the-critical-feminist that I reblog this from.My first question has to be: are you serious? Don’t read that with a tone, don’t read that as an attack. That’s my first question: Are you asking a serious question about what high crimes or misdemeanors Trump has perpetrated? Are you asking a sincere question or is this the sort of rhetoric that doesn’t translate well into text? And, if you are actually asking this question, are ou going to hear the answer or are you going to immediately start concocting your counter-argument because you just know in your heart that anyone who disagrees with you must be wrong, so you start formulating a plan to prove them wrong before you actually hear what they have to say?Next: did you read the article that was posted in the link you responded to? Because the author of that article does a reasonable job of explaining their thought process behind the headline. Or did you lash out before you read the article? Okay, presuming that you did read the article in good faith, evaluate its points, perform the follow-up research to understand context, and still disagree with the central tenets and simply believe that the author’s reasoning does not hold up for whatever reasons you have chosen not to state, and you believe their source information is falsified for whatever reason you have chosen not to state, I will move on. After I have given you and yours every conceivable benefit of the doubt and every charitable assumption. Because if the article itself doesn’t convince you, there’s the fact that Donald Trump has broken literally every federal law against corruption and conflict of interest. Not one or two, not most, not all but a few. Literally every single law we have against corruption, from the Constitution to the informal guidelines circulated as a memo from the White House ethics scholars. He’s broken literally every one of those rules. He’s openly traded favors for money and favors for months now. Hell, that Chinese influence-peddler that paid him off for sixteen million dollars should have been enough to get him convicted of treason. Sharing code-word level classified information with a government on the opposite side of an ongoing military conflict isn’t *necessarily* treason, unless the information was part of a share program with an allied nation and wasn’t his to distribute. That’s aiding a foreign aggressor at the expense of a military ally, and that’s treason. Giving aid and comfort to enemies of the nation. Obstruction of justice is pretty clear-cut, that’s an impeachment, except that the justice in question is also a matter of national security, so that’s treason. Again. Defaming the former president? Misdemeanor, impeachable. The way he drags his heels nominating posts in Justice and State could be prosecuted as dereliction of duty. If he has tapes of Comey, he’s on the hook for contempt, if he doesn’t then he’s on the hook for witness tampering. Hell, deleting the covfefe tweet is destroying federal records, which is a misdemeanor, and impeachable. The man doesn’t go a week without bringing on an impeachable offense. Strictly speaking, every time he goes to Mar-A-Lago he’s committing grand larceny by fraud, because he’s taking millions of dollars of American funds for his own benefit, after promising not to do that. There are dozens, hundreds maybe, of impeachable offenses already in this 140 days, “high crimes and misdemeanors”. Actual counts of treason, punishable by death by hanging, is probably only five or six counts. Only five or six counts of high treason by our sitting president. His job does not put him above reproach. His job is to *be* above reproach. And he’s failing that job. Trump’s supporters probably believe he’s done nothing impeachable or treasonous because they spent eight years claiming on no grounds whatsoever that Obama was impeachable and treasonous, just because they didn’t like him. They now probably convince themselves that these facts about Trump are as fake as their Obama theories and they’ve ruined the gravity of these terms for themselves. “ His job does not put him above reproach. His job is to *be* above reproach. And he’s failing that job. “ I like how Bogleech doesn’t know many Trump supporters are former Obama supporters. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/04/us/obama-trump-swing-voters.html https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/10/16/17980820/trump-obama-2016-race-racism-class-economy-2018-midterm https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obama-Trump_voters It’s not even a secret. But why am I not surprised bogleech - that intellectual titan - failed to do basic research? And last time I checked, no nation required their politicans to be perfect. Which is what NYM is asking for with that quote; perfection. That’s what ‘above reproach’ means. An impossible standard, considering people “reproach” Trump for feeding fish wrong, for his skin color, for any and every little thing, even if they have to twist reality into a pretzel to do it. In fact, I’ve seen people take pictures of kids in cages from 2014, and blame Trump for it. So this: Are you asking a serious question about what high crimes or misdemeanors Trump has perpetrated? Is a question of this: Can someone tell me what high crime or misdemeanor Trump has committed that merits this? Seems you missed the part that says “merits this”. Next: did you read the article that was posted in the link you responded to? Because the author of that article does a reasonable job of explaining their thought process behind the headline. Or did you lash out before you read the article? (The underlined is in the subtitle, not the headline.) Okay, presuming that you did read the article in good faith, evaluate its points, perform the follow-up research to understand context, and still disagree with the central tenets… Context? Central tenets? Do you not know how highlighting works? You don’t need to know the context, or any other point, when you’re indicating a specific, explicit, and isolated quality. The subtitle called for Trump’s execution, we’re 5 paragraphs in and you haven’t even acknowledged that part yet. Or at all, I’m guessing, because I’m not reading further. You keep talking around it. You accuse others, preemptively, of not hearing the answer and pre-”concocting” a response, and yet you’re waffling on about shit around the one, sole, isolated thing that was indicated in the first place. This isn’t about ignoring context, this is about criticising one thing. Which is a thing people are allowed to do, by the way, just because people criticise one thing, doesn’t mean they’re criticising everything about the everyone involved, and everything said before, adjacent to, and after that one thing, and therefore are required to include all of those things in their consideration and assessment of this one thing. The specific criticism of the indicated quality is the advocation of Trump’s execution. That’s it. No context is needed to understand that this is what was said, especially since that which was said, which is being criticised, is explicit. No amount of, “So, click-bait subtitle that you don’t see until you’ve already clicked on the article link out of the way, here’s what I actually meant when I said I wanted this person tried and executed,” could excuse the use of that language, let alone actually believing in it. It’s like… it’s like if someone makes a typo, someone else is like, “Oh, seems you made a typo,” you’d jump in like, “But what about they’re perfectly reasonable spelling everywhere else? Hm? Forced to ignore contextual perfect spelling I see. They’re lack of typos everywhere else explains this typo, and vindicates it”. You and what’s his face, James, fuckin ReasonAndEmpathy or whatever now, y’all keep saying “but what of the context?” when the criterion of criticism is isolated, atomic, specific, and/or explicit. No amount of context invalidates the very specific, singular words explicitly spoken. “Sure he called for Trump to be executed, but he explains himself.” Fucking and? When did the death sentence become ok? When did that happen? Moderates are ok with the death sentence now? Aight, weird. Man this fucking post aged like fine wine, take a SIP Delicious This was quite a ride
Being Alone, America, and Click: Jason Fuller, Contributor
 Working to bring about the best in America, both on-line and off.
 Impeachment Is No Longer Enough;
 Donald Trump Must Face Justice
 Impeachment and removal from office are only the first steps;
 for treason and-if convicted in a court of law-executed.
 06/11/2017 10:39 pm ET
 for America to be redeemed, Donald Trump must be prosecuted
 Donald Trump has been President of the United States for just shy of six months now. I
 think that most of us among the electorate knew that his presidency would be a relative
 disaster, but I am not sure how many among us expected the catastrophe our nation now
 faces.
friendly-neighborhood-patriarch:

hominishostilis:

abstractandedgyname:
siryouarebeingmocked:

mississpithy:

bogleech:

notyourmoderate:

angrybell:

thinksquad:


http://archive.is/5VvI5


Huffpo, everybody. 




Can someone tell me what high crime or misdemeanor Trump has committed that merits this? Or is the HuffPo just publishing outright fantasies?

God dammit, I’m now in the position of defending Huffington. I didn’t want to be here. Okay, @angrybell … actually, @ literally everyone who reblogged this uncritically as a tacit endorsement and agreement. Such as @the-critical-feminist that I reblog this from.My first question has to be: are you serious? Don’t read that with a tone, don’t read that as an attack. That’s my first question: Are you asking a serious question about what high crimes or misdemeanors Trump has perpetrated? Are you asking a sincere question or is this the sort of rhetoric that doesn’t translate well into text? And, if you are actually asking this question, are ou going to hear the answer or are you going to immediately start concocting your counter-argument because you just know in your heart that anyone who disagrees with you must be wrong, so you start formulating a plan to prove them wrong before you actually hear what they have to say?Next: did you read the article that was posted in the link you responded to? Because the author of that article does a reasonable job of explaining their thought process behind the headline. Or did you lash out before you read the article? Okay, presuming that you did read the article in good faith, evaluate its points, perform the follow-up research to understand context, and still disagree with the central tenets and simply believe that the author’s reasoning does not hold up for whatever reasons you have chosen not to state, and you believe their source information is falsified for whatever reason you have chosen not to state, I will move on. After I have given you and yours every conceivable benefit of the doubt and every charitable assumption. Because if the article itself doesn’t convince you, there’s the fact that Donald Trump has broken literally every federal law against corruption and conflict of interest. Not one or two, not most, not all but a few. Literally every single law we have against corruption, from the Constitution to the informal guidelines circulated as a memo from the White House ethics scholars. He’s broken literally every one of those rules. He’s openly traded favors for money and favors for months now. Hell, that Chinese influence-peddler that paid him off for sixteen million dollars should have been enough to get him convicted of treason. Sharing code-word level classified information with a government on the opposite side of an ongoing military conflict isn’t *necessarily* treason, unless the information was part of a share program with an allied nation and wasn’t his to distribute. That’s aiding a foreign aggressor at the expense of a military ally, and that’s treason. Giving aid and comfort to enemies of the nation. Obstruction of justice is pretty clear-cut, that’s an impeachment, except that the justice in question is also a matter of national security, so that’s treason. Again. Defaming the former president? Misdemeanor, impeachable. The way he drags his heels nominating posts in Justice and State could be prosecuted as dereliction of duty. If he has tapes of Comey, he’s on the hook for contempt, if he doesn’t then he’s on the hook for witness tampering. Hell, deleting the covfefe tweet is destroying federal records, which is a misdemeanor, and impeachable. The man doesn’t go a week without bringing on an impeachable offense. Strictly speaking, every time he goes to Mar-A-Lago he’s committing grand larceny by fraud, because he’s taking millions of dollars of American funds for his own benefit, after promising not to do that. There are dozens, hundreds maybe, of impeachable offenses already in this 140 days, “high crimes and misdemeanors”. Actual counts of treason, punishable by death by hanging, is probably only five or six counts. Only five or six counts of high treason by our sitting president. His job does not put him above reproach. His job is to *be* above reproach. And he’s failing that job. 

Trump’s supporters probably believe he’s done nothing impeachable or treasonous because they spent eight years claiming on no grounds whatsoever that Obama was impeachable and treasonous, just because they didn’t like him. They now probably convince themselves that these facts about Trump are as fake as their Obama theories and they’ve ruined the gravity of these terms for themselves.





“

His job does not put him above reproach. His job is to *be* above reproach. And he’s failing that job.


“






I like how Bogleech doesn’t know many Trump supporters are former Obama supporters.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/04/us/obama-trump-swing-voters.html
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/10/16/17980820/trump-obama-2016-race-racism-class-economy-2018-midterm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obama-Trump_voters
It’s not even a secret. But why am I not surprised bogleech - that intellectual titan - failed to do basic research?
And last time I checked, no nation required their politicans to be perfect. Which is what NYM is asking for with that quote; perfection. That’s what ‘above reproach’ means. An impossible standard, considering people “reproach” Trump for feeding fish wrong, for his skin color, for any and every little thing, even if they have to twist reality into a pretzel to do it. In fact, I’ve seen people take pictures of kids in cages from 2014, and blame Trump for it.

So this:


Are you asking a serious question about what high crimes or misdemeanors Trump has perpetrated?


Is a question of this:


Can someone tell me what high crime or misdemeanor Trump has committed that merits this?


Seems you missed the part that says “merits this”.


Next: did you read the article that was posted in the link you responded to? Because the author of that article does a reasonable job of explaining their thought process behind the headline. Or did you lash out before you read the article? 


(The underlined is in the subtitle, not the headline.)


Okay, presuming that you did read the article in good faith, evaluate its points, perform the follow-up research to understand context, and still disagree with the central tenets…
Context? Central tenets? Do you not know how highlighting works? You don’t need to know the context, or any other point, when you’re indicating a specific, explicit, and isolated quality.
The subtitle called for Trump’s execution, we’re 5 paragraphs in and you haven’t even acknowledged that part yet. Or at all, I’m guessing, because I’m not reading further. You keep talking around it. You accuse others, preemptively, of not hearing the answer and pre-”concocting” a response, and yet you’re waffling on about shit around the one, sole, isolated thing that was indicated in the first place.
This isn’t about ignoring context, this is about criticising one thing. Which is a thing people are allowed to do, by the way, just because people criticise one thing, doesn’t mean they’re criticising everything about the everyone involved, and everything said before, adjacent to, and after that one thing, and therefore are required to include all of those things in their consideration and assessment of this one thing.
The specific criticism of the indicated quality is the advocation of Trump’s execution. That’s it. No context is needed to understand that this is what was said, especially since that which was said, which is being criticised, is explicit. No amount of, “So, click-bait subtitle that you don’t see until you’ve already clicked on the article link out of the way, here’s what I actually meant when I said I wanted this person tried and executed,” could excuse the use of that language, let alone actually believing in it.
It’s like… it’s like if someone makes a typo, someone else is like, “Oh, seems you made a typo,” you’d jump in like, “But what about they’re perfectly reasonable spelling everywhere else? Hm? Forced to ignore contextual perfect spelling I see. They’re lack of typos everywhere else explains this typo, and vindicates it”.
You and what’s his face, James, fuckin ReasonAndEmpathy or whatever now, y’all keep saying “but what of the context?” when the criterion of criticism is isolated, atomic, specific, and/or explicit. No amount of context invalidates the very specific, singular words explicitly spoken. “Sure he called for Trump to be executed, but he explains himself.” Fucking and? When did the death sentence become ok? When did that happen? Moderates are ok with the death sentence now? Aight, weird.


Man this fucking post aged like fine wine, take a SIP 

Delicious

This was quite a ride

friendly-neighborhood-patriarch: hominishostilis: abstractandedgyname: siryouarebeingmocked: mississpithy: bogleech: notyourmoderate: ...

Being Alone, Amazon, and Gif: Laura I'd like to take you up on getting coffee, by the way Mon, Jul 24, 2017, 12.00 AM Ahh I'm sorry for leaving you hanging. I might've dismissed the notification or something half asleep... But coffee would be great Stil being unemployed means Fhave free time in excess and a super flexible So just let me know when might work best for you Thu, Jul 27, 2017, 12-32 AM Wed, Aug 2,2017, 32 PM Hey Laura I know it can take forever agonizing over the perfect response, but the coffee is starting to get cold I've taken the liberty of preparing a few response choices for you, to help speed things along. Choose any letter choice you'd like to send A: I'm free to grab coffee this week i'li send you my number so we can coordinate a meet up B This week is kinda busy for me, but next week for surel I'i give you my number so we could coordinate a meet- C: I would like to grab coffee eventually but rm not quite sure when. 'll give you my number so we can figure out the when on a better platform D: Sorryi don't think I'm up for coffee anymore... you're just too intimidatingly attractive and intelligent for me. I'u still give you my number though, maybe we could meet up some time soon: Fri Aug 11, 2017, 324 AM Atter popular demand, we've decided to add a bonus answer choice, See the amendment in its entirety below E: I'd like more time to choose among options A-D, please bear with mel Sat, Aug 12, 2017, 12:26 AM While you decide among choices A-E I've written a limerick to pass the time There once was a match who's named Laura Who jammed to Chopin on Pandora, When she said she'd meet Drew For a hot Java brew She first had to grow coffee fora. Thu, Aug 24, 2017, 1:08 PM Limerícks are boring, lambic pentameter or bust Beneath the churning froth of pick-up ines, The sexting, whirling cesspool of regret, An empty cave extends like twisting mines The ghosts of voices echo in duet A conversation stalled for thirty days Still sometimes he'd return if memry served He'd rack his mind for further clever ways, To keep the chat that time forgot preserved, But life moves fast indeed for life in prime, From seeds to sprouts to trees to leaves wind-blown And so, our Laura ever lost to time And Drew forever in Starbucks alone 32017, all rights reserved Tue, Aug 29, 2017, 4:46 PM Ok I've contacted Amazon about publishing the book I wrote about this conversation, they said it could be online in three weeks ifi could slim it down 800 pages or so, I'll keep you posted through the editing process Mon, Sep 25, 2017,10:01 PM The book is finally supposed to be online tomorrow, and this bit of breaking news just published online thought you might want to see: Wed, Now 8.2017. 1137 PM We have a problem Laura the Weinsteirn Company was our sole investor the movie's in shambles now and there's no going back Today 8:15 PM Oh my god Oh my god GIF Not really sure who was more surprised here
Being Alone, Amazon, and Gif: Laura
 I'd like to take you up on getting
 coffee, by the way
 Mon, Jul 24, 2017, 12.00 AM
 Ahh I'm sorry for leaving you hanging.
 I might've dismissed the notification
 or something half asleep... But coffee
 would be great
 Stil being unemployed means Fhave
 free time in excess and a super flexible
 So just let me know when might work
 best for you
 Thu, Jul 27, 2017, 12-32 AM
 Wed, Aug 2,2017,
 32 PM
 Hey Laura I know it can take forever
 agonizing over the perfect response,
 but the coffee is starting to get cold
 I've taken the liberty of preparing a
 few response choices for you, to help
 speed things along. Choose any letter
 choice you'd like to send
 A: I'm free to grab coffee this week
 i'li send you my number so we can
 coordinate a meet up
 B This week is kinda busy for me, but
 next week for surel I'i give you my
 number so we could coordinate a meet-
 C: I would like to grab coffee eventually
 but rm not quite sure when. 'll give you
 my number so we can figure out the
 when on a better platform
 D: Sorryi don't think I'm up for coffee
 anymore... you're just too intimidatingly
 attractive and intelligent for me. I'u still
 give you my number though, maybe we
 could meet up some time soon:
 Fri Aug 11, 2017, 324 AM
 Atter popular demand, we've decided
 to add a bonus answer choice, See the
 amendment in its entirety below
 E: I'd like more time to choose among
 options A-D, please bear with mel
 Sat, Aug 12, 2017, 12:26 AM
 While you decide among choices A-E
 I've written a limerick to pass the time
 There once was a match who's named
 Laura
 Who jammed to Chopin on Pandora,
 When she said she'd meet Drew
 For a hot Java brew
 She first had to grow coffee fora.
 Thu, Aug 24, 2017, 1:08 PM
 Limerícks are boring, lambic
 pentameter or bust
 Beneath the churning froth of pick-up
 ines,
 The sexting, whirling cesspool of regret,
 An empty cave extends like twisting
 mines
 The ghosts of voices echo in duet
 A conversation stalled for thirty days
 Still sometimes he'd return if memry
 served
 He'd rack his mind for further clever
 ways,
 To keep the chat that time forgot
 preserved,
 But life moves fast indeed for life in
 prime,
 From seeds to sprouts to trees to
 leaves wind-blown
 And so, our Laura ever lost to time
 And Drew forever in Starbucks alone
 32017, all rights reserved
 Tue, Aug 29, 2017, 4:46 PM
 Ok I've contacted Amazon about
 publishing the book I wrote about this
 conversation, they said it could be
 online in three weeks ifi could slim it
 down 800 pages or so, I'll keep you
 posted through the editing process
 Mon, Sep 25, 2017,10:01 PM
 The book is finally supposed to
 be online tomorrow, and this bit of
 breaking news just published online
 thought you might want to see:
 Wed, Now 8.2017. 1137 PM
 We have a problem Laura the Weinsteirn
 Company was our sole investor the
 movie's in shambles now and there's no
 going back
 Today 8:15 PM
 Oh my god
 Oh my god
 GIF
Not really sure who was more surprised here

Not really sure who was more surprised here

Anime, Be Like, and Beautiful: tumblngkori: jekoh: transtrendsetter: takayababy: xekstrin: this is Hourou Musuko, an anime/manga about a young trans girl and her friends, all figuring out their gender identity and sexual orientations yo yo i just double-checked and it is a real thing and also available on crunchyroll for free! It’s also on KissAnime for free which is a website I recommend 1000 times more since they provide HQ anime without having to pay anything, and they have a wider selection than Crunchyroll I watched the first episode. I can’t vouch for the rest of it but the first episode made my heart swell a bit. A lot of it is about finding those people that you can make your guides and role models, and that’s not something I feel like we get to see a lot, we see the kids just left to forge through on their own in the big and scary.Wavedash why did you do this to me. The anime seems to grab just a slice of the full manga’s story (obviously) but despite Horou Musuko being one of my favorite manga of all time, I never did finish the anime.  I didn’t think it was all that interesting an adaptation, and it’s so good as a comic. The Horou Musuko manga is not only good, it’s really important.  It follow a transgendered girl and a transgendered boy and it follows them encountering and stuggling with: dysphoria trans* objectification the intersection of gender identity and sexuality passing puberty what adult life will be like as a trans person experimenting with (“trying on”) gender signifiers evolving identities binary questioning being a partner to a trans person All while mired in Japanese society and expectations. Luckily for EVERYONE, Fantagraphics press is translating and publishing the comic is BEAUTIFUL hardbound volumes. But if you don’t have the money, I know you can easily find scanlations online, which are translated all the way to the end (Fantagraphics is about half way.) That comic about trans youth you were always looking for? Here it is.
Anime, Be Like, and Beautiful: tumblngkori:
jekoh:

transtrendsetter:

takayababy:

xekstrin:

this is Hourou Musuko, an anime/manga about a young trans girl and her friends, all figuring out their gender identity and sexual orientations

yo yo i just double-checked and it is a real thing and also available on crunchyroll for free!

It’s also on KissAnime for free which is a website I recommend 1000 times more since they provide HQ anime without having to pay anything, and they have a wider selection than Crunchyroll

I watched the first episode. I can’t vouch for the rest of it but the first episode made my heart swell a bit. A lot of it is about finding those people that you can make your guides and role models, and that’s not something I feel like we get to see a lot, we see the kids just left to forge through on their own in the big and scary.Wavedash why did you do this to me.

The anime seems to grab just a slice of the full manga’s story (obviously) but despite Horou Musuko being one of my favorite manga of all time, I never did finish the anime.  I didn’t think it was all that interesting an adaptation, and it’s so good as a comic.
The Horou Musuko manga is not only good, it’s really important.  It follow a transgendered girl and a transgendered boy and it follows them encountering and stuggling with:
dysphoria
trans* objectification
the intersection of gender identity and sexuality
passing
puberty
what adult life will be like as a trans person
experimenting with (“trying on”) gender signifiers
evolving identities
binary questioning
being a partner to a trans person
All while mired in Japanese society and expectations.
Luckily for EVERYONE, Fantagraphics press is translating and publishing the comic is BEAUTIFUL hardbound volumes.
But if you don’t have the money, I know you can easily find scanlations online, which are translated all the way to the end (Fantagraphics is about half way.)
That comic about trans youth you were always looking for?
Here it is.

tumblngkori: jekoh: transtrendsetter: takayababy: xekstrin: this is Hourou Musuko, an anime/manga about a young trans girl and her frien...

Bad, Books, and England: My favorbe thing about Thomas the Tanis Eagine is that it canonicaly takes place in a troin post-apocolypse here the island of Sodor is the only sale zose in a totaltarian dyanepio in which steom tvaina ane routinet loled and their body parta ae sold or caneibalied far epair If you thnkm kidding you need to read the original coud you please direct me to a sou?uld feel much It book me so long to ind this quote onine but I did i because t' so much dker than one ighe expect from Thomes the Tank Engine Engi ntheOthr Raay arent sale n Ther costrolers ate cruel They dont e ned arry more hey putm on cold damp sedings and then Pancy nearly aobbed Thiry. they cut tham up "The Bhateas of England·Stepney tho 6habe Engine Res Awdry Wibert. London:Egmant Publishing 1963 This lustration, by Gumar d Peter Edwad ccompanied the above teat in the orginal book and depicts a peir of unfrtunate Other Ralway engines the early thomas the tank engine books are prety istrationa # pou watched thr shom, is ike1hat it book the second holf of thea sars no Mucking dark nd surreal iem cominced they wwa esult of reverend haucaons of his own death Eecuse me but the eery est atory is the Raway Se is in a tutnel and ea paint jab ain, so taheay maagement seas off the tonne They esemoblly let ou becuse andther engine breaks doen or sometherg, bute eriginal plan was to ust him in here fonevr On the show didet hey aiss hook up one esgine to a generator, so he'd never move agoin? hat was Eteral ose of the nesk Its on some other post en he mas chiino res! This also nappened die books, to ar' egne relened to only as No. 2, but the selevision series named "Shadger", ๒the episode "Grangur Smudge said Dake Washow-ot. He rode roughily and often came off the rais 1 warned him to We do here sold but Smudger aghed ามารา oneday. Manager said he woo gong to make him useul at lost Smudger stopped taughing he Wewhy What did he do! tumed hrn mo อ generator He's st8there behind our shed Hell never mave again deducecanse This is so fucked up No isten Ckay so we see Ratway Management doing al the shi right but auppopedly its so much wor in the Othar Ray mean, sure, you migt ge turned into generator or tricked into a tunnel for not dong ล% pouhf told, bet at least yoere not cut up and sold for parts ghe? is ngt so bed on the isond of Sodat right Or frayee 1hara jat what ณ.hay Managemen wants the engines to think Maybe the island of Sodor is the real sotaltarion regime, and the engine cnzens (slaves) are fed propaganda, ustrated in helish grays and sulfuric yellows, about how bad is everywhe t elle, ฮ1 all the Other Railways aiway Manaemet eare abou you Trust Ralway Manegement lay on Your Track It Could Be So 0 Much Worse Wt the fuck is this rain based 1984 buishe awesomacious: Thomas the tank engine.
Bad, Books, and England: My favorbe thing about Thomas the Tanis Eagine is that it
 canonicaly takes place in a troin post-apocolypse here
 the island of Sodor is the only sale zose in a totaltarian
 dyanepio in which steom tvaina ane routinet loled and
 their body parta ae sold or caneibalied far epair
 If you thnkm kidding you need to read the original
 coud you please direct me to a sou?uld feel much
 It book me so long to ind this quote onine but I did i
 because t' so much dker than one ighe expect from
 Thomes the Tank Engine
 Engi ntheOthr Raay arent sale n Ther
 costrolers ate cruel They dont e ned arry more
 hey putm on cold damp sedings and then Pancy
 nearly aobbed Thiry. they cut tham up
 "The Bhateas of England·Stepney tho 6habe
 Engine Res Awdry Wibert. London:Egmant
 Publishing 1963
 This lustration, by Gumar d Peter Edwad
 ccompanied the above teat in the orginal book and
 depicts a peir of unfrtunate Other Ralway engines
 the early thomas the tank engine books are prety
 istrationa # pou watched thr shom, is ike1hat it book
 the second holf of thea sars no Mucking dark
 nd surreal iem cominced they wwa esult of reverend
 haucaons of his own death
 Eecuse me but the eery est atory is the Raway Se is
 in a tutnel and
 ea paint jab
 ain, so taheay maagement seas off the tonne
 They esemoblly let ou becuse andther engine
 breaks doen or sometherg, bute eriginal plan was to
 ust him in here fonevr
 On the show didet hey aiss hook up one esgine to a
 generator, so he'd never move agoin? hat was Eteral
 ose of the nesk Its on some other post en he
 mas chiino
 res! This also nappened die books, to ar' egne
 relened to only as No. 2, but the selevision series
 named "Shadger", ๒the episode "Grangur
 Smudge said Dake Washow-ot. He rode
 roughily and often came off the rais 1 warned him to
 We do here sold but Smudger aghed
 ามารา oneday. Manager said he woo gong to make
 him useul at lost Smudger stopped taughing he
 Wewhy What did he do!
 tumed hrn mo อ generator He's st8there behind
 our shed Hell never mave again
 deducecanse
 This is so fucked up
 No isten
 Ckay so we see Ratway Management doing al the shi
 right but auppopedly its so much wor in the Othar
 Ray mean, sure, you migt ge turned into
 generator or tricked into a tunnel for not dong ล% pouhf
 told, bet at least yoere not cut up and sold for parts
 ghe? is ngt so bed on the isond of Sodat right
 Or frayee 1hara jat what ณ.hay Managemen wants the
 engines to think
 Maybe the island of Sodor is the real sotaltarion regime,
 and the engine cnzens (slaves) are fed propaganda,
 ustrated in helish grays and sulfuric yellows, about how
 bad is everywhe t elle, ฮ1 all the Other Railways
 aiway Manaemet eare abou you
 Trust Ralway Manegement
 lay on Your Track
 It Could Be So
 0 Much Worse
 Wt the fuck is this rain based 1984 buishe
awesomacious:

Thomas the tank engine.

awesomacious: Thomas the tank engine.

Bad, Books, and England: My favorbe thing about Thomas the Tanis Eagine is that it canonicaly takes place in a troin post-apocolypse here the island of Sodor is the only sale zose in a totaltarian dyanepio in which steom tvaina ane routinet loled and their body parta ae sold or caneibalied far epair If you thnkm kidding you need to read the original coud you please direct me to a sou?uld feel much It book me so long to ind this quote onine but I did i because t' so much dker than one ighe expect from Thomes the Tank Engine Engi ntheOthr Raay arent sale n Ther costrolers ate cruel They dont e ned arry more hey putm on cold damp sedings and then Pancy nearly aobbed Thiry. they cut tham up "The Bhateas of England·Stepney tho 6habe Engine Res Awdry Wibert. London:Egmant Publishing 1963 This lustration, by Gumar d Peter Edwad ccompanied the above teat in the orginal book and depicts a peir of unfrtunate Other Ralway engines the early thomas the tank engine books are prety istrationa # pou watched thr shom, is ike1hat it book the second holf of thea sars no Mucking dark nd surreal iem cominced they wwa esult of reverend haucaons of his own death Eecuse me but the eery est atory is the Raway Se is in a tutnel and ea paint jab ain, so taheay maagement seas off the tonne They esemoblly let ou becuse andther engine breaks doen or sometherg, bute eriginal plan was to ust him in here fonevr On the show didet hey aiss hook up one esgine to a generator, so he'd never move agoin? hat was Eteral ose of the nesk Its on some other post en he mas chiino res! This also nappened die books, to ar' egne relened to only as No. 2, but the selevision series named "Shadger", ๒the episode "Grangur Smudge said Dake Washow-ot. He rode roughily and often came off the rais 1 warned him to We do here sold but Smudger aghed ามารา oneday. Manager said he woo gong to make him useul at lost Smudger stopped taughing he Wewhy What did he do! tumed hrn mo อ generator He's st8there behind our shed Hell never mave again deducecanse This is so fucked up No isten Ckay so we see Ratway Management doing al the shi right but auppopedly its so much wor in the Othar Ray mean, sure, you migt ge turned into generator or tricked into a tunnel for not dong ล% pouhf told, bet at least yoere not cut up and sold for parts ghe? is ngt so bed on the isond of Sodat right Or frayee 1hara jat what ณ.hay Managemen wants the engines to think Maybe the island of Sodor is the real sotaltarion regime, and the engine cnzens (slaves) are fed propaganda, ustrated in helish grays and sulfuric yellows, about how bad is everywhe t elle, ฮ1 all the Other Railways aiway Manaemet eare abou you Trust Ralway Manegement lay on Your Track It Could Be So 0 Much Worse Wt the fuck is this rain based 1984 buishe Thomas the tank engine.
Bad, Books, and England: My favorbe thing about Thomas the Tanis Eagine is that it
 canonicaly takes place in a troin post-apocolypse here
 the island of Sodor is the only sale zose in a totaltarian
 dyanepio in which steom tvaina ane routinet loled and
 their body parta ae sold or caneibalied far epair
 If you thnkm kidding you need to read the original
 coud you please direct me to a sou?uld feel much
 It book me so long to ind this quote onine but I did i
 because t' so much dker than one ighe expect from
 Thomes the Tank Engine
 Engi ntheOthr Raay arent sale n Ther
 costrolers ate cruel They dont e ned arry more
 hey putm on cold damp sedings and then Pancy
 nearly aobbed Thiry. they cut tham up
 "The Bhateas of England·Stepney tho 6habe
 Engine Res Awdry Wibert. London:Egmant
 Publishing 1963
 This lustration, by Gumar d Peter Edwad
 ccompanied the above teat in the orginal book and
 depicts a peir of unfrtunate Other Ralway engines
 the early thomas the tank engine books are prety
 istrationa # pou watched thr shom, is ike1hat it book
 the second holf of thea sars no Mucking dark
 nd surreal iem cominced they wwa esult of reverend
 haucaons of his own death
 Eecuse me but the eery est atory is the Raway Se is
 in a tutnel and
 ea paint jab
 ain, so taheay maagement seas off the tonne
 They esemoblly let ou becuse andther engine
 breaks doen or sometherg, bute eriginal plan was to
 ust him in here fonevr
 On the show didet hey aiss hook up one esgine to a
 generator, so he'd never move agoin? hat was Eteral
 ose of the nesk Its on some other post en he
 mas chiino
 res! This also nappened die books, to ar' egne
 relened to only as No. 2, but the selevision series
 named "Shadger", ๒the episode "Grangur
 Smudge said Dake Washow-ot. He rode
 roughily and often came off the rais 1 warned him to
 We do here sold but Smudger aghed
 ามารา oneday. Manager said he woo gong to make
 him useul at lost Smudger stopped taughing he
 Wewhy What did he do!
 tumed hrn mo อ generator He's st8there behind
 our shed Hell never mave again
 deducecanse
 This is so fucked up
 No isten
 Ckay so we see Ratway Management doing al the shi
 right but auppopedly its so much wor in the Othar
 Ray mean, sure, you migt ge turned into
 generator or tricked into a tunnel for not dong ล% pouhf
 told, bet at least yoere not cut up and sold for parts
 ghe? is ngt so bed on the isond of Sodat right
 Or frayee 1hara jat what ณ.hay Managemen wants the
 engines to think
 Maybe the island of Sodor is the real sotaltarion regime,
 and the engine cnzens (slaves) are fed propaganda,
 ustrated in helish grays and sulfuric yellows, about how
 bad is everywhe t elle, ฮ1 all the Other Railways
 aiway Manaemet eare abou you
 Trust Ralway Manegement
 lay on Your Track
 It Could Be So
 0 Much Worse
 Wt the fuck is this rain based 1984 buishe
Thomas the tank engine.

Thomas the tank engine.