person

šŸ”„ | Latest

person: If thereā€™s a single line of footprints in the snow I like to walk on the opposite step to make it look like one person was hopping
person: If thereā€™s a single line of footprints in the snow I like to walk on the opposite step to make it look like one person was hopping

If thereā€™s a single line of footprints in the snow I like to walk on the opposite step to make it look like one person was hopping

person: If thereā€™s a single line of footprints in the snow I like to walk on the opposite step to make it look like one person was hopping
person: If thereā€™s a single line of footprints in the snow I like to walk on the opposite step to make it look like one person was hopping

If thereā€™s a single line of footprints in the snow I like to walk on the opposite step to make it look like one person was hopping

person: When an average person uses big words. by Jamie_Pull_That_Up MORE MEMES
person: When an average person uses big words. by Jamie_Pull_That_Up MORE MEMES

When an average person uses big words. by Jamie_Pull_That_Up MORE MEMES

person: i am a weird person.
person: i am a weird person.

i am a weird person.

person: Dating a person born on the 29th of Feb makes you a pedo by Thanos_fan MORE MEMES
person: Dating a person born on the 29th of Feb makes you a pedo by Thanos_fan MORE MEMES

Dating a person born on the 29th of Feb makes you a pedo by Thanos_fan MORE MEMES

person: Dating a person born on the 29th of Feb makes you a pedo
person: Dating a person born on the 29th of Feb makes you a pedo

Dating a person born on the 29th of Feb makes you a pedo

person: At 16 I have become the first person in human history to perform in Carnegie Hall with Lightning McQueen socks
person: At 16 I have become the first person in human history to perform in Carnegie Hall with Lightning McQueen socks

At 16 I have become the first person in human history to perform in Carnegie Hall with Lightning McQueen socks

person: Tyler is a person of the people.
person: Tyler is a person of the people.

Tyler is a person of the people.

person: Tyler is a person of the people. by Nasjere MORE MEMES
person: Tyler is a person of the people. by Nasjere MORE MEMES

Tyler is a person of the people. by Nasjere MORE MEMES

person: amyliobat: Did you know? The strict linearity of the early-game can all be blamed on One Person.
person: amyliobat: Did you know? The strict linearity of the early-game can all be blamed on One Person.

amyliobat: Did you know? The strict linearity of the early-game can all be blamed on One Person.

person: I think he married the wrong person.
person: I think he married the wrong person.

I think he married the wrong person.

person: chefpyro: diakko-blog-es: Thee face of two aristocrats and an ordinary person japanese animator 1: hey what does a british person look like japanese animator 2: like a human but more pretentious
person: chefpyro: diakko-blog-es: Thee face of two aristocrats and an ordinary person japanese animator 1: hey what does a british person look like japanese animator 2: like a human but more pretentious

chefpyro: diakko-blog-es: Thee face of two aristocrats and an ordinary person japanese animator 1: hey what does a british person look...

person: chalamets: The Last Jedi resolved the intrigue surrounding the heroine of this new sequel-trilogy, Rey, and her parentage with a gracefully simple, bold assertion: Rey isā€¦ just Rey. Not the daughter of some space aristocracy or legacy lineage, but a hero of her own making. [ā€¦] That Reyā€™s parents were ordinary people meant anyone from anywhere could be born a hero; what determined a personā€™s place in the world was who they chose to be, rather than their last name.Ā ā€œRey is our protagonist. And the truth is, in the story, the toughest possible thing for her to hear is, you know, youā€™re not gonna get the easy answer that youā€™re so-and-soā€™s daughter, this is your place,ā€ [Rian] Johnson told me after The Last Jediā€™s release. ā€œYouā€™re gonna have to stand on your own two feet and define yourself in this world.ā€ Instead of taking the baton from Last Jedi and running with it to new heights, The Rise of Skywalker retreats right back into the safety of nostalgia. [ā€¦] Itā€™s as if Abrams and Terrio scrambled for a loophole specifically to mollify the ā€œfansā€ upset that this heroā€”worse, this girlā€”dared to wield such incredible abilities with only her own strength [ā€¦]Ā Bookending the saga Anakin began with the story of a girl from nowhere who sets right what he helped unbalance might have been resonant. But who cares for that when thereā€™s another billion-dollar franchise to set up and potential spin-offs to tease? ā€” Melissa Leon, ā€˜The Rise of Skywalkerā€™ Erases the Power of Reyā€™s Story and Surrenders to Sexist Trolls
person: chalamets: The Last Jedi resolved the intrigue surrounding the heroine of this new sequel-trilogy, Rey, and her parentage with a gracefully simple, bold assertion: Rey isā€¦ just Rey. Not the daughter of some space aristocracy or legacy lineage, but a hero of her own making. [ā€¦] That Reyā€™s parents were ordinary people meant anyone from anywhere could be born a hero; what determined a personā€™s place in the world was who they chose to be, rather than their last name.Ā ā€œRey is our protagonist. And the truth is, in the story, the toughest possible thing for her to hear is, you know, youā€™re not gonna get the easy answer that youā€™re so-and-soā€™s daughter, this is your place,ā€ [Rian] Johnson told me after The Last Jediā€™s release. ā€œYouā€™re gonna have to stand on your own two feet and define yourself in this world.ā€ Instead of taking the baton from Last Jedi and running with it to new heights, The Rise of Skywalker retreats right back into the safety of nostalgia. [ā€¦] Itā€™s as if Abrams and Terrio scrambled for a loophole specifically to mollify the ā€œfansā€ upset that this heroā€”worse, this girlā€”dared to wield such incredible abilities with only her own strength [ā€¦]Ā Bookending the saga Anakin began with the story of a girl from nowhere who sets right what he helped unbalance might have been resonant. But who cares for that when thereā€™s another billion-dollar franchise to set up and potential spin-offs to tease? ā€” Melissa Leon, ā€˜The Rise of Skywalkerā€™ Erases the Power of Reyā€™s Story and Surrenders to Sexist Trolls

chalamets: The Last Jedi resolved the intrigue surrounding the heroine of this new sequel-trilogy, Rey, and her parentage with a gracefu...

person: People are like fruits, you knowā€¦ [OC] Please add more fruit-person analogies it comments šŸŒ
person: People are like fruits, you knowā€¦ [OC] Please add more fruit-person analogies it comments šŸŒ

People are like fruits, you knowā€¦ [OC] Please add more fruit-person analogies it comments šŸŒ

person: She never forgets to be a horrible person
person: She never forgets to be a horrible person

She never forgets to be a horrible person

person: Am I a bad person because I think this is funny -or- because I think ā€œgrandma.jarā€ would be funnier?
person: Am I a bad person because I think this is funny -or- because I think ā€œgrandma.jarā€ would be funnier?

Am I a bad person because I think this is funny -or- because I think ā€œgrandma.jarā€ would be funnier?

person: jylljylljyll: watart: velvet74sub: simiperfect: theladyjanedoe: asubmissiveview: lessonsintrance: dreamytigergirl: kakaphoe: rikzpt: rikzpt: konigstigerr: unlimited-shitpost-works: ima-fuckingt4ble: my-little-ninja: dasha-loses-it: femburton: i think about this a lot The guy got his life and career destroyed by his divorce, cut him some slack. he was also sexually assaulted by a man who could destroy his career protect him reblog if the man on the right is just as beautiful as the man on the left people grow old? like, thatā€™s a thing that happens? leave my guy alone. This man deserves everything let him he happy Okā€¦ This is what happened to Fraser -His wife ditched him and asked for 900k a year, -He was sexually assaulted which he said kicked him into a deep depression -He stated that the stunts from the 3rd Mummy movie completely destroyed his body and he was in and out of the hospital for 7 years even having to get surgery to repair his vocal cords. -He apparently blamed himself for all this which only worsened his depression. This man has literally been through hell this past decade so please lets cut him some slack and wish him the best All this but also that picture on the right is a really bad paparazzi photo compared with a professional quality movie promo still. No one looks good when some random person snaps you on the street, regardless of who you are. Compare with this image from the GQ article last February: Proper lighting, professional setting, good angles etc. The dude is 49 and has had a rough couple of decades, but heā€™s still lovely to look at, and Iā€™ll fight anyone who says otherwise. Plus, now heā€™s in Doom Patrol, which makes me happy af. And letā€™s not forget he was probably slightly to severely dehydrated to look that buff in he first photo.And Iā€™m so pleased he got work again he seems like a good sort, and from the stealth pilot in Titans, Doom Patrol looks like it should be good. It shouldnā€™t even matter what heā€™s been through. Body shaming of ANYONE is wrong. ALL OF THIS Plus 2019 Brendan is still slaying, so btfu This post keeps getting better and Iā€™m here for it I love this whole thread The last time I saw this it was only at the first ā€˜cut him some slackā€™ part and it just progressively gets better each time. Tavaly novemberben
person: jylljylljyll: watart: velvet74sub: simiperfect: theladyjanedoe: asubmissiveview: lessonsintrance: dreamytigergirl: kakaphoe: rikzpt: rikzpt: konigstigerr: unlimited-shitpost-works: ima-fuckingt4ble: my-little-ninja: dasha-loses-it: femburton: i think about this a lot The guy got his life and career destroyed by his divorce, cut him some slack. he was also sexually assaulted by a man who could destroy his career protect him reblog if the man on the right is just as beautiful as the man on the left people grow old? like, thatā€™s a thing that happens? leave my guy alone. This man deserves everything let him he happy Okā€¦ This is what happened to Fraser -His wife ditched him and asked for 900k a year, -He was sexually assaulted which he said kicked him into a deep depression -He stated that the stunts from the 3rd Mummy movie completely destroyed his body and he was in and out of the hospital for 7 years even having to get surgery to repair his vocal cords. -He apparently blamed himself for all this which only worsened his depression. This man has literally been through hell this past decade so please lets cut him some slack and wish him the best All this but also that picture on the right is a really bad paparazzi photo compared with a professional quality movie promo still. No one looks good when some random person snaps you on the street, regardless of who you are. Compare with this image from the GQ article last February: Proper lighting, professional setting, good angles etc. The dude is 49 and has had a rough couple of decades, but heā€™s still lovely to look at, and Iā€™ll fight anyone who says otherwise. Plus, now heā€™s in Doom Patrol, which makes me happy af. And letā€™s not forget he was probably slightly to severely dehydrated to look that buff in he first photo.And Iā€™m so pleased he got work again he seems like a good sort, and from the stealth pilot in Titans, Doom Patrol looks like it should be good. It shouldnā€™t even matter what heā€™s been through. Body shaming of ANYONE is wrong. ALL OF THIS Plus 2019 Brendan is still slaying, so btfu This post keeps getting better and Iā€™m here for it I love this whole thread The last time I saw this it was only at the first ā€˜cut him some slackā€™ part and it just progressively gets better each time. Tavaly novemberben

jylljylljyll: watart: velvet74sub: simiperfect: theladyjanedoe: asubmissiveview: lessonsintrance: dreamytigergirl: kakaphoe: r...

person: lemonsgivelife: debthestoner: rrdcooc: addakax: mysticalalleycat: politicalcdnmama: theresagooseinthemainframe: 0-memento-mori-0: justaplate: claydart: starlitskyes: frosttrix: extremedistressorstellarblowjob: queen-of-heck: brightoncemore: todayiwrotenothing: gay-jesus-probably: solongstarbird: akamine-chan: phantomofthebookstore: dragonastra: jasperzilla: moose-shampoo: if youā€™ve ever wondered what itā€™s like to live in the midwest, this is it.Ā  You missed some of the best ones the best part about it is that the art installation isnā€™t actually called the Bean. Itā€™s called Cloud Gate, and artist Anish Kapoor (yes, THAT Anish Kapoor) hates that we call it the Bean. But i mean, look at it. Itā€™s a bean. How could you forget this one though I HAD NO FUCKING IDEA THAT THE BEAN WAS CREATED BY ANISH KAPOOR. someone help me why is anish kapoor important what did he do? Alright sit down for some Art World Drama bcause this is what I live for. So, sometime last year (?) science invented Vantablack, which is the darkest possible shade of black. Art world got incredibly excited. But as it needs to be very carefully made in a lab, itā€™s hard to get a hold of, and is extremely expensive. Enter Anish Kapoor, aka FuckFace McGee. Anish Kapoor buys the rights to Vantablack. He is the only human being on the planet that can legally use it, and heā€™s kind of a prick about it. Art world is not thrilled with that. Enter Stuart Semple. Stuart Semple is an artist, and also makes pigments to sell in his free time. Stuart Semple is astoundingly pissed about this Vantablack nonsense, and Anish Kapoorā€™s dickery. Stuart Semple makes a new pigment, the brightest shade of pink ever, called Pinkest Pink, and puts it for sale on the internet. To be bought by everybody except Anish Kapoor. Literally, to purchase, you need to confirm that you are not Anish Kapoor, do not associate with him, and will not sell or give the pigment to Anish Kapoor or his associates. Art world has a good laugh, everyone buys Pinkest Pink because itā€™s awesome, and damn it we deserve something. Anish Kapoor however is a penis, and will not take this lying down, because HOW DARE he not have literally everything. Anish Kapoor gets his London associates to buy him a thing of Pinkest Pink, and being such a classy human being, posts a picture to instagram of him with his middle finger covered in Pinkest Pink, captioned withĀ ā€œUp yours. #pinkā€ Everyone flips shit, because. Yā€™know. Fuck that guy. Especially Stuart Semple. For context here, Anish Kapoor is one of the richest artists on the planet, and has repeatedly been referred to as everything wrong with the art world, and the epitome of the art worlds elitism problem. Heā€™s a giant douchebag. Meanwhile Stuart Semple makes pigments just to get them out there. He turns 0 profit from his now enourmously popular pigments. Stuart Semple launches an investigation as to who the fuck leaked Pinkest Pink, and plans to strike back. He does so by releasing two new products. First is Diamond Dust, which is a glitter made from glass, so that a painting is still visible after itā€™s applied, but glitters like a mofo. Itā€™s the most reflective glitter out there, and is available to everyone who isnā€™t Anish Kapoor. And it being made of glass, if you stick your finger in there, itā€™s going to hurt quite a bit, so that was Stuart Sempleā€™s way of sayingĀ ā€œshove your middle finger in this, asshole, see what happensā€. Except without saying that, because he can get an insult across while still being fucking classy. He also releases Black 2.0, created with the help of over a thousand artists worldwide. Black 2.0 is the answer to Vantablack. Black 2.0 is a slightly less black black, but looks functionally the same to the human eye. Itā€™s completely safe, smells like cherries, and costs four pounds. Vantablack is highly toxic, potentially explosive, needs to be applied in a special laboratory and sealed properly, canā€™t be moved across borders, can reach 300 degrees celsius if youā€™re not extremely careful, and costs thousands of dollars. Anish Kapoor is the only human being who can use Vantablack. He is the only human being who cannot use Black 2.0. So I think we can guess who got the better deal. And thus the feud ends, Kapoor defeated. ā€¦But not quite. Kapoor, in this entire afair, has made exactly two comments to the public. The first being his charming message about aquiring Pinkest Pink, the second being claiming to Buzzfeed that he and his small army of lawyers will be suing Semple, an extremely poor artist who cannot afford a lawyer. No lawsuit has been made yet, fyi. The point is, Kapoor is a prick, and doesnā€™t like talking to the lower classes. So one day in July 2017, he decides he needs another floor on his London studio apartment, and starts making arrangements to have it built. His neighbors are fucking pissed, because this will ruin the light of their apartments. They call to Semple to save them, or at the very least piss Kapoor off some more. Semple answers to the call, and releases two new paints, Phaze and Shift, as always, banned to Kapoor. They change colours, Phaze with temperature, and Shift is just iridescent. Shift needs to be painted over Black 2.0 to work, and Phaze just works on its own. So thatā€™s been the art world for the last two years. Basically, get fucked Anish Kapoor your bean sucks and so does your vantablack. Stuart Semple is organising a bean-kissing event for Anish Kapoorā€™s birthday. Reblogging for ā€œBy attending this event you confirm that you are not Anish Kapoor, you are in no way affiliated with Anish Kapoor, you are not attending on behalf of Anish Kapoor or an associate of Anish Kapoor. To the best of your knowledge, information, and belief this event will not be attended by Anish Kapoor.ā€ ALSO HE JUST POSTED THIS!!!!!! LIGHTEST LIGHT! I know this isnā€™t my art blog but this entire post gives me life im sorry is that man holding a real actual miniature star in his hands Yā€™all missed the best part about the lightest light, called aptlyĀ ā€˜Litā€™. This is from their product page: Two things: 1.Ā ā€œAnish Kapoor is however a penisā€ is the best line in this post. 2. I wish to be half as petty and half as awesome as Stuart Semple I hope Stuart Semple is making a lot of money. What a good person. Go support him the paintā€™s are pretty cheap and you get the added bonus of being one of many to help piss off Anish Kapoor He is my fucking role model for pettiness oh my god It got better! Iā€™m also excited because he just released biodegradable glitter in non plastic containers! How amazing is that?! Stuart Semple, good guy for the planet and artists, fighter against the rich elite artist like asshole Kapoor. An older project, but he also did this: (x) oh dude hes metal as fuckĀ  Every addition to this post is better than the last. Me, being gay and having my blood drawn: soā€¦what do you need my blood for again? Stuart Semple: gonna make an anti-government t-shirt with it. Me: Me: :) Be a Stuart Semple in 2020. Use your petty to inspire and drive you.
person: lemonsgivelife: debthestoner: rrdcooc: addakax: mysticalalleycat: politicalcdnmama: theresagooseinthemainframe: 0-memento-mori-0: justaplate: claydart: starlitskyes: frosttrix: extremedistressorstellarblowjob: queen-of-heck: brightoncemore: todayiwrotenothing: gay-jesus-probably: solongstarbird: akamine-chan: phantomofthebookstore: dragonastra: jasperzilla: moose-shampoo: if youā€™ve ever wondered what itā€™s like to live in the midwest, this is it.Ā  You missed some of the best ones the best part about it is that the art installation isnā€™t actually called the Bean. Itā€™s called Cloud Gate, and artist Anish Kapoor (yes, THAT Anish Kapoor) hates that we call it the Bean. But i mean, look at it. Itā€™s a bean. How could you forget this one though I HAD NO FUCKING IDEA THAT THE BEAN WAS CREATED BY ANISH KAPOOR. someone help me why is anish kapoor important what did he do? Alright sit down for some Art World Drama bcause this is what I live for. So, sometime last year (?) science invented Vantablack, which is the darkest possible shade of black. Art world got incredibly excited. But as it needs to be very carefully made in a lab, itā€™s hard to get a hold of, and is extremely expensive. Enter Anish Kapoor, aka FuckFace McGee. Anish Kapoor buys the rights to Vantablack. He is the only human being on the planet that can legally use it, and heā€™s kind of a prick about it. Art world is not thrilled with that. Enter Stuart Semple. Stuart Semple is an artist, and also makes pigments to sell in his free time. Stuart Semple is astoundingly pissed about this Vantablack nonsense, and Anish Kapoorā€™s dickery. Stuart Semple makes a new pigment, the brightest shade of pink ever, called Pinkest Pink, and puts it for sale on the internet. To be bought by everybody except Anish Kapoor. Literally, to purchase, you need to confirm that you are not Anish Kapoor, do not associate with him, and will not sell or give the pigment to Anish Kapoor or his associates. Art world has a good laugh, everyone buys Pinkest Pink because itā€™s awesome, and damn it we deserve something. Anish Kapoor however is a penis, and will not take this lying down, because HOW DARE he not have literally everything. Anish Kapoor gets his London associates to buy him a thing of Pinkest Pink, and being such a classy human being, posts a picture to instagram of him with his middle finger covered in Pinkest Pink, captioned withĀ ā€œUp yours. #pinkā€ Everyone flips shit, because. Yā€™know. Fuck that guy. Especially Stuart Semple. For context here, Anish Kapoor is one of the richest artists on the planet, and has repeatedly been referred to as everything wrong with the art world, and the epitome of the art worlds elitism problem. Heā€™s a giant douchebag. Meanwhile Stuart Semple makes pigments just to get them out there. He turns 0 profit from his now enourmously popular pigments. Stuart Semple launches an investigation as to who the fuck leaked Pinkest Pink, and plans to strike back. He does so by releasing two new products. First is Diamond Dust, which is a glitter made from glass, so that a painting is still visible after itā€™s applied, but glitters like a mofo. Itā€™s the most reflective glitter out there, and is available to everyone who isnā€™t Anish Kapoor. And it being made of glass, if you stick your finger in there, itā€™s going to hurt quite a bit, so that was Stuart Sempleā€™s way of sayingĀ ā€œshove your middle finger in this, asshole, see what happensā€. Except without saying that, because he can get an insult across while still being fucking classy. He also releases Black 2.0, created with the help of over a thousand artists worldwide. Black 2.0 is the answer to Vantablack. Black 2.0 is a slightly less black black, but looks functionally the same to the human eye. Itā€™s completely safe, smells like cherries, and costs four pounds. Vantablack is highly toxic, potentially explosive, needs to be applied in a special laboratory and sealed properly, canā€™t be moved across borders, can reach 300 degrees celsius if youā€™re not extremely careful, and costs thousands of dollars. Anish Kapoor is the only human being who can use Vantablack. He is the only human being who cannot use Black 2.0. So I think we can guess who got the better deal. And thus the feud ends, Kapoor defeated. ā€¦But not quite. Kapoor, in this entire afair, has made exactly two comments to the public. The first being his charming message about aquiring Pinkest Pink, the second being claiming to Buzzfeed that he and his small army of lawyers will be suing Semple, an extremely poor artist who cannot afford a lawyer. No lawsuit has been made yet, fyi. The point is, Kapoor is a prick, and doesnā€™t like talking to the lower classes. So one day in July 2017, he decides he needs another floor on his London studio apartment, and starts making arrangements to have it built. His neighbors are fucking pissed, because this will ruin the light of their apartments. They call to Semple to save them, or at the very least piss Kapoor off some more. Semple answers to the call, and releases two new paints, Phaze and Shift, as always, banned to Kapoor. They change colours, Phaze with temperature, and Shift is just iridescent. Shift needs to be painted over Black 2.0 to work, and Phaze just works on its own. So thatā€™s been the art world for the last two years. Basically, get fucked Anish Kapoor your bean sucks and so does your vantablack. Stuart Semple is organising a bean-kissing event for Anish Kapoorā€™s birthday. Reblogging for ā€œBy attending this event you confirm that you are not Anish Kapoor, you are in no way affiliated with Anish Kapoor, you are not attending on behalf of Anish Kapoor or an associate of Anish Kapoor. To the best of your knowledge, information, and belief this event will not be attended by Anish Kapoor.ā€ ALSO HE JUST POSTED THIS!!!!!! LIGHTEST LIGHT! I know this isnā€™t my art blog but this entire post gives me life im sorry is that man holding a real actual miniature star in his hands Yā€™all missed the best part about the lightest light, called aptlyĀ ā€˜Litā€™. This is from their product page: Two things: 1.Ā ā€œAnish Kapoor is however a penisā€ is the best line in this post. 2. I wish to be half as petty and half as awesome as Stuart Semple I hope Stuart Semple is making a lot of money. What a good person. Go support him the paintā€™s are pretty cheap and you get the added bonus of being one of many to help piss off Anish Kapoor He is my fucking role model for pettiness oh my god It got better! Iā€™m also excited because he just released biodegradable glitter in non plastic containers! How amazing is that?! Stuart Semple, good guy for the planet and artists, fighter against the rich elite artist like asshole Kapoor. An older project, but he also did this: (x) oh dude hes metal as fuckĀ  Every addition to this post is better than the last. Me, being gay and having my blood drawn: soā€¦what do you need my blood for again? Stuart Semple: gonna make an anti-government t-shirt with it. Me: Me: :) Be a Stuart Semple in 2020. Use your petty to inspire and drive you.

lemonsgivelife: debthestoner: rrdcooc: addakax: mysticalalleycat: politicalcdnmama: theresagooseinthemainframe: 0-memento-mori-0:...

person: thebaconsandwichofregret: asexual-not-asexual-detective: Am I the only one who thinks that hitting a kid and abuse are different things? Like, if I ever had a kid, I wouldnā€™t spank their ass raw or something like that. But a bop on the mouth or the ear pull or a smack upside the head? Yea. Those are behavior modifiers. Except theyā€™re not. The studies done by the trained psychologists in this joke show that little kids donā€™t associate being hit with the thing theyā€™ve done wrong. Very small children only understand consequences that are directly caused by the thing they did. Steal a biscuit, biscuit tastes good. Then for no reason mummy hit me. Very different to stole a biscuit, now no biscuit after dinner because I stole a biscuit. And they also show that when a child is old enough to understand why they are being hit that non-physical punishment is equally as effective and less mentally harmful in the long run. Do you know who benefits the most from hitting as a punishment? The parent. It gives a satisfaction rush. Parents do it because it makes them feel good. Basically kids have two stages: too young to understand why they are being hit so physical punishment is useless for anything other than teaching a child that bigger stronger people can hit you whenever they like (Which sounds like the same lesson you would learn from abuse) And the second stage is old enough to be reasoned with so many punishment options are available and you chose physical violence because it makes *you* feel better, which is an abusive action. The only time a person should ever use violence against another human being, of any age, is to stop that person from being violent themselves.
person: thebaconsandwichofregret: asexual-not-asexual-detective: Am I the only one who thinks that hitting a kid and abuse are different things? Like, if I ever had a kid, I wouldnā€™t spank their ass raw or something like that. But a bop on the mouth or the ear pull or a smack upside the head? Yea. Those are behavior modifiers. Except theyā€™re not. The studies done by the trained psychologists in this joke show that little kids donā€™t associate being hit with the thing theyā€™ve done wrong. Very small children only understand consequences that are directly caused by the thing they did. Steal a biscuit, biscuit tastes good. Then for no reason mummy hit me. Very different to stole a biscuit, now no biscuit after dinner because I stole a biscuit. And they also show that when a child is old enough to understand why they are being hit that non-physical punishment is equally as effective and less mentally harmful in the long run. Do you know who benefits the most from hitting as a punishment? The parent. It gives a satisfaction rush. Parents do it because it makes them feel good. Basically kids have two stages: too young to understand why they are being hit so physical punishment is useless for anything other than teaching a child that bigger stronger people can hit you whenever they like (Which sounds like the same lesson you would learn from abuse) And the second stage is old enough to be reasoned with so many punishment options are available and you chose physical violence because it makes *you* feel better, which is an abusive action. The only time a person should ever use violence against another human being, of any age, is to stop that person from being violent themselves.

thebaconsandwichofregret: asexual-not-asexual-detective: Am I the only one who thinks that hitting a kid and abuse are different things?...

person: When you reach out to an intelligent person but they donā€™t want to be rude
person: When you reach out to an intelligent person but they donā€™t want to be rude

When you reach out to an intelligent person but they donā€™t want to be rude

person: xiss0r: Made my own color palette challenge!Send me(or the person who rbs this) a character(or characters) and a palette!Ā 
person: xiss0r: Made my own color palette challenge!Send me(or the person who rbs this) a character(or characters) and a palette!Ā 

xiss0r: Made my own color palette challenge!Send me(or the person who rbs this) a character(or characters) and a palette!Ā 

person: chocolatesprinklesroyale: whyyoustabbedme: White domestic abuser = troubled Black person who kneels = thug Got it. Donā€™t forget the part where he survived fighting with cops.
person: chocolatesprinklesroyale: whyyoustabbedme: White domestic abuser = troubled Black person who kneels = thug Got it. Donā€™t forget the part where he survived fighting with cops.

chocolatesprinklesroyale: whyyoustabbedme: White domestic abuser = troubled Black person who kneels = thug Got it. Donā€™t forget the par...

person: blackwitchmagicwoman: auroraluciferi: askmace: scholarlyapproach: DONā€™T LET THIS HAPPEN TO CEREAL!!! Listen in the past the poor have had to improvise cheap food theĀ richĀ never wanted as a means to survive. And over the many years of innovation made the food taste good until eventually the richĀ where like: ā€œOh hay you actuallyĀ likeĀ that garbage? Why on earth would you like it?ā€ Then they try it, love it, start buyingĀ it, and then drive the price up so much it becomes a luxuryĀ good. They do this and its devastating, the food typically never becomesĀ affordable again. It donā€™t matter how cheap the foo dis to produce, it doesnā€™t matter if there is almost no meat on the bone or its super difficult to eat and messy. Once the poor discover how to make some bit of cheap food taste good, the rich take it away via driving the price of it up. THEY DID THIS TO RIBS. Ribs were garage meat.Ā Just look at them, there is hardly any meat on the bone, you have to eat them by hand usually, and they are messy. They where an undesirable cheap sourceĀ of junk meat. But the poor being the poor made them taste good. (Because they donā€™t have much to choose from.) The rich discovered the meals the poor made with them and decided they liked ribs too. People discovered they could sell a few ribs to rich people and make way more money then selling lots of ribs to poor people and the price was driven up. DONā€™T LET THIS HAPPEN TO CEREAL!!! They did the same to brisket.Ā  You used to be able to get brisket for less than a dollar a pound, which meant you could get a twenty pound brisket fairly cheaply.Ā  And then you smoked it, sliced it, and had meat for weeks if not a full month.Ā  And it was tasty.Ā  I grew up eating brisket at least once a month because my family could afford it. It was a cheap meat because no rich person looks at the dangly part of the neck of a cow and goesĀ ā€˜ooh, that looks tasty!ā€™. But then Food Network started showcasing things like barbecued brisket.Ā  Rich people started showing up at places that werenā€™t just Rib Crib to get their barbeque.Ā  And the price of brisket went up.Ā  A lot. I regularly see it for over five dollars a pound in stores now.Ā  And while yeah, that might not seem like a lot when youā€™re talking only a pound or two of meat, brisket is normally sold in ten to twenty pound sizes.Ā  Itā€™s become completely unaffordable to the people that made it delicious. Sushi used to be really cheap, too, until it becameĀ ā€˜trendyā€™.Ā  Guess why youā€™re now paying twelve dollars for your order of California rolls?Ā  Because rich people discovered something that poor people had been eating for ages. Noticed the prices of fajita meat, chicken thighs, or ham hocks has gone up recently?Ā  You guessed it.Ā  Rich people are taking our food and now weā€™re scrambling to afford the things that we grew up eating. Lobster is a perfect example of this phenomenon.Ā For hundreds of years, lobster was regarded as a sort of insect larvae from the depth of the sea. It had zero appeal as aĀ ā€œluxury foodā€ until people living in NY and Boston developed a taste for it. Before the 19th century, it was considered a ā€œpoverty foodā€ or used as fertilizer and bait - some household servants specified in employment agreements that they would not eat lobster more than twice a week.It was also commonly served at prisons, which tells you something about prison food. Only by cleverly marketing lobster as an indulgence for the privileged made it cost so much. It became a vehicle for enormous profit spawning a multi-billion dollar global industry in the process. This mythical affection for lobster flesh - not its practical value in terms of taste, nutrition, or any other reasonable consideration - drives its value. LMAO. Wait.
person: blackwitchmagicwoman: auroraluciferi: askmace: scholarlyapproach: DONā€™T LET THIS HAPPEN TO CEREAL!!! Listen in the past the poor have had to improvise cheap food theĀ richĀ never wanted as a means to survive. And over the many years of innovation made the food taste good until eventually the richĀ where like: ā€œOh hay you actuallyĀ likeĀ that garbage? Why on earth would you like it?ā€ Then they try it, love it, start buyingĀ it, and then drive the price up so much it becomes a luxuryĀ good. They do this and its devastating, the food typically never becomesĀ affordable again. It donā€™t matter how cheap the foo dis to produce, it doesnā€™t matter if there is almost no meat on the bone or its super difficult to eat and messy. Once the poor discover how to make some bit of cheap food taste good, the rich take it away via driving the price of it up. THEY DID THIS TO RIBS. Ribs were garage meat.Ā Just look at them, there is hardly any meat on the bone, you have to eat them by hand usually, and they are messy. They where an undesirable cheap sourceĀ of junk meat. But the poor being the poor made them taste good. (Because they donā€™t have much to choose from.) The rich discovered the meals the poor made with them and decided they liked ribs too. People discovered they could sell a few ribs to rich people and make way more money then selling lots of ribs to poor people and the price was driven up. DONā€™T LET THIS HAPPEN TO CEREAL!!! They did the same to brisket.Ā  You used to be able to get brisket for less than a dollar a pound, which meant you could get a twenty pound brisket fairly cheaply.Ā  And then you smoked it, sliced it, and had meat for weeks if not a full month.Ā  And it was tasty.Ā  I grew up eating brisket at least once a month because my family could afford it. It was a cheap meat because no rich person looks at the dangly part of the neck of a cow and goesĀ ā€˜ooh, that looks tasty!ā€™. But then Food Network started showcasing things like barbecued brisket.Ā  Rich people started showing up at places that werenā€™t just Rib Crib to get their barbeque.Ā  And the price of brisket went up.Ā  A lot. I regularly see it for over five dollars a pound in stores now.Ā  And while yeah, that might not seem like a lot when youā€™re talking only a pound or two of meat, brisket is normally sold in ten to twenty pound sizes.Ā  Itā€™s become completely unaffordable to the people that made it delicious. Sushi used to be really cheap, too, until it becameĀ ā€˜trendyā€™.Ā  Guess why youā€™re now paying twelve dollars for your order of California rolls?Ā  Because rich people discovered something that poor people had been eating for ages. Noticed the prices of fajita meat, chicken thighs, or ham hocks has gone up recently?Ā  You guessed it.Ā  Rich people are taking our food and now weā€™re scrambling to afford the things that we grew up eating. Lobster is a perfect example of this phenomenon.Ā For hundreds of years, lobster was regarded as a sort of insect larvae from the depth of the sea. It had zero appeal as aĀ ā€œluxury foodā€ until people living in NY and Boston developed a taste for it. Before the 19th century, it was considered a ā€œpoverty foodā€ or used as fertilizer and bait - some household servants specified in employment agreements that they would not eat lobster more than twice a week.It was also commonly served at prisons, which tells you something about prison food. Only by cleverly marketing lobster as an indulgence for the privileged made it cost so much. It became a vehicle for enormous profit spawning a multi-billion dollar global industry in the process. This mythical affection for lobster flesh - not its practical value in terms of taste, nutrition, or any other reasonable consideration - drives its value. LMAO. Wait.

blackwitchmagicwoman: auroraluciferi: askmace: scholarlyapproach: DONā€™T LET THIS HAPPEN TO CEREAL!!! Listen in the past the poor have...

person: S tumblintuck Follow O dear-tumbir PETA you guys remember when PETA stole people pets off their porches and euthanized them? you guys remember how it came out that PETA kills about 90% of the animals it takes in, including healthy and adoptable puppies and kittens, stating " We could become a no-kill shelter immediately. It means we wouldn't do as much work"? you guys remember when PETA advocated killing all pit bulls for the crime of being pit bulls? you guys remember when PETA handed out these comics to children when there were no adults looking? you guys remember when they made a porn site and then filled it with videos of animal abuse, and (also in that link) claimed cats should be vegetarian? you guys remember when PETA lied about sheep shearing, got caught, and defended the lie as true even after they admitted the sheep in their picture wasn't even real? you guys remember when they tried to excuse their horrifying ways by claiming that the person who exposed them was manipulating the facts by taking them and putting them in the wrong context? Because I remember. I remember everything. And I'm gonna make sure everyone else remembers too. testingforcake23 Why would they kill pit bulls they're sweeties a dear-tumbir Because PETA does not care about animals. they do not care that these dogs live and breathe and feel and want love like every other dog. they do not care about the history of human/dog bonding and co-evolution, they do not care that dogs and human beings have relied on each other for millennia, they do not care that its cruel and morally repugnant to put down an animal just because you can, they do not care about animals. PETA cares about money and publicity, its a corporation run by a psychopath who is afraid of pitts as it states in the link: she was apparently bit by one, and now she hates them. PETA doesn't give a rats ass about animals. They just want to kill and make money off of idiots who fall of their spiel. testingforcake23 Some celebs support them i-n-m-h ah c'mon, dear-tumbir, I think you're being a bit harsh. I mean, okay, PETA's done some questionable things, but it's not like they've also -spread false information about milk causing autism based on outdated bullshit information -used holocaust imagery to compare the meat industry to concentration camps (no pictures) -used a young man's brutal death as a way to say "yeah that's awful but it happens to animals every day and nobody cares about that" (tw: no pictures but the way the guy died is described and it is really horrible) -dressed up in KKK robes and protested outside of the Westminister Dog Show to protest breeding/pure bred dogs (tw: racism) -offered to pay the water bill for literally the poorest neighborhood in Detroit if and only if they all went vegan for a month (tw: self-righteous shitheads) -and they definitely didn't have two of their workers accept perfectly healthy animals from an animal hospital, with the implication that they would give them good homes, clarify that these animals were all healthy and well-tempered, and then euthanized them all in the back of a kill-van before dumping their dead bodies behind a grocery store (tw: PICTURES OF DEAD ANIMALS, animal death) -and they totally didn't get off pretty much scot-free for it because PETA has loads of money and lawyers to defend themselves, which coincidentally might be why the Cerate family hasn't seen justice for their kidnapped and murdered dog, Maya. (tw: animal death) Nah. PETA's not that bad. /the heaviest of all my fucking sarcasm, I am salty as a fucking winter road, lord do I fucking hate PETA) a dear-tumbir Did you think i was fucking joking, PETA? I will make sure everyone fucking remembers what you've done. adear-tumbir Bringing it back, because it's charity season and people need to know NOT to give charity to these fuckers. Source: dear-tumbir 312,250 notes While weā€™re remembering ancient memes, let me remind you
person: S tumblintuck Follow O dear-tumbir PETA you guys remember when PETA stole people pets off their porches and euthanized them? you guys remember how it came out that PETA kills about 90% of the animals it takes in, including healthy and adoptable puppies and kittens, stating " We could become a no-kill shelter immediately. It means we wouldn't do as much work"? you guys remember when PETA advocated killing all pit bulls for the crime of being pit bulls? you guys remember when PETA handed out these comics to children when there were no adults looking? you guys remember when they made a porn site and then filled it with videos of animal abuse, and (also in that link) claimed cats should be vegetarian? you guys remember when PETA lied about sheep shearing, got caught, and defended the lie as true even after they admitted the sheep in their picture wasn't even real? you guys remember when they tried to excuse their horrifying ways by claiming that the person who exposed them was manipulating the facts by taking them and putting them in the wrong context? Because I remember. I remember everything. And I'm gonna make sure everyone else remembers too. testingforcake23 Why would they kill pit bulls they're sweeties a dear-tumbir Because PETA does not care about animals. they do not care that these dogs live and breathe and feel and want love like every other dog. they do not care about the history of human/dog bonding and co-evolution, they do not care that dogs and human beings have relied on each other for millennia, they do not care that its cruel and morally repugnant to put down an animal just because you can, they do not care about animals. PETA cares about money and publicity, its a corporation run by a psychopath who is afraid of pitts as it states in the link: she was apparently bit by one, and now she hates them. PETA doesn't give a rats ass about animals. They just want to kill and make money off of idiots who fall of their spiel. testingforcake23 Some celebs support them i-n-m-h ah c'mon, dear-tumbir, I think you're being a bit harsh. I mean, okay, PETA's done some questionable things, but it's not like they've also -spread false information about milk causing autism based on outdated bullshit information -used holocaust imagery to compare the meat industry to concentration camps (no pictures) -used a young man's brutal death as a way to say "yeah that's awful but it happens to animals every day and nobody cares about that" (tw: no pictures but the way the guy died is described and it is really horrible) -dressed up in KKK robes and protested outside of the Westminister Dog Show to protest breeding/pure bred dogs (tw: racism) -offered to pay the water bill for literally the poorest neighborhood in Detroit if and only if they all went vegan for a month (tw: self-righteous shitheads) -and they definitely didn't have two of their workers accept perfectly healthy animals from an animal hospital, with the implication that they would give them good homes, clarify that these animals were all healthy and well-tempered, and then euthanized them all in the back of a kill-van before dumping their dead bodies behind a grocery store (tw: PICTURES OF DEAD ANIMALS, animal death) -and they totally didn't get off pretty much scot-free for it because PETA has loads of money and lawyers to defend themselves, which coincidentally might be why the Cerate family hasn't seen justice for their kidnapped and murdered dog, Maya. (tw: animal death) Nah. PETA's not that bad. /the heaviest of all my fucking sarcasm, I am salty as a fucking winter road, lord do I fucking hate PETA) a dear-tumbir Did you think i was fucking joking, PETA? I will make sure everyone fucking remembers what you've done. adear-tumbir Bringing it back, because it's charity season and people need to know NOT to give charity to these fuckers. Source: dear-tumbir 312,250 notes While weā€™re remembering ancient memes, let me remind you

While weā€™re remembering ancient memes, let me remind you