🔥 | Latest

5 Am, Being Alone, and America: This is how I like to wake my good girl. (🎥: reddit u-din7) Look bruv some of y’all smart like y’all just gon be successful in life on the strength of being hella smart alone. But some of y’all ain’t smart. Actually y’all dumb (low key 😂). But u wanna know some bruv? U CAN STILL ABSOLUTELY KILL IT IN LIFE. “Smash wayment. U saying even if I’m dumb I could kill it in corporate America? How Sway? 🤔” I’m absolutely saying that. I got clients that will take your breath away with they intellect - hell one CEO I work with is a biomedical engineer. He ain’t een have to stunt on em like that! He coulda had a lil state school MBA! Nah. He a PhD in a field that ain’t een applicable! He could be negotiating pricing on a multi million $ agreement and disagree with u and then then heck around and slice ya ear off then make u a substitute synthetic ear in a Petri dish and reattach it like “bam - no love lost - just wanted to biomedically engineer u right quick - this ear is bionic and will let u hear perfectly bless up.” But nah on the other end of the spectrum is executives who are just hella dumb. Couldn’t write an email without typos if they had a gun to they head. But u know what they are, bruv? Always and without fail? EARLY 😂. Dumb people in corporate America early as HELL bruh. U know I love our armed services and got nothing but respect for them bruv but do u know why it’s so many former soldiers - marines - Air Force in corporate America bruv? Not bc they naturally smarter - they just early! If u at ya desk sending email at 7 am bruv u look authoritative. Sharp. U feel me? Dedicated. Hell I got one client she get to work at 6! And another one that get to work at 5. FIVE 👏 A 👏 M 👏. Now look I’m not saying u HAVE to be at work at 7 am. I’m just saying if u DO, people will perceive u as a BOSS - even if u literally braindead. U feel me? Trick: I get up to pray early then go back schleep but before I do, I reply to emails from overnight. That way people like “wow he up at 5 am damn.” Nah. I’m up to email y’all a$$es before snoozing 😂. But if y’all wanna assume then good 😊. Either get to work early or email early (like my dumb a$$) - may God bless all of u in ya careers. Bless up! 😂😂😂
5 Am, Being Alone, and America: This is how I like to wake my good girl.
(🎥: reddit u-din7) Look bruv some of y’all smart like y’all just gon be successful in life on the strength of being hella smart alone. But some of y’all ain’t smart. Actually y’all dumb (low key 😂). But u wanna know some bruv? U CAN STILL ABSOLUTELY KILL IT IN LIFE. “Smash wayment. U saying even if I’m dumb I could kill it in corporate America? How Sway? 🤔” I’m absolutely saying that. I got clients that will take your breath away with they intellect - hell one CEO I work with is a biomedical engineer. He ain’t een have to stunt on em like that! He coulda had a lil state school MBA! Nah. He a PhD in a field that ain’t een applicable! He could be negotiating pricing on a multi million $ agreement and disagree with u and then then heck around and slice ya ear off then make u a substitute synthetic ear in a Petri dish and reattach it like “bam - no love lost - just wanted to biomedically engineer u right quick - this ear is bionic and will let u hear perfectly bless up.” But nah on the other end of the spectrum is executives who are just hella dumb. Couldn’t write an email without typos if they had a gun to they head. But u know what they are, bruv? Always and without fail? EARLY 😂. Dumb people in corporate America early as HELL bruh. U know I love our armed services and got nothing but respect for them bruv but do u know why it’s so many former soldiers - marines - Air Force in corporate America bruv? Not bc they naturally smarter - they just early! If u at ya desk sending email at 7 am bruv u look authoritative. Sharp. U feel me? Dedicated. Hell I got one client she get to work at 6! And another one that get to work at 5. FIVE 👏 A 👏 M 👏. Now look I’m not saying u HAVE to be at work at 7 am. I’m just saying if u DO, people will perceive u as a BOSS - even if u literally braindead. U feel me? Trick: I get up to pray early then go back schleep but before I do, I reply to emails from overnight. That way people like “wow he up at 5 am damn.” Nah. I’m up to email y’all a$$es before snoozing 😂. But if y’all wanna assume then good 😊. Either get to work early or email early (like my dumb a$$) - may God bless all of u in ya careers. Bless up! 😂😂😂

(🎥: reddit u-din7) Look bruv some of y’all smart like y’all just gon be successful in life on the strength of being hella smart alone. But s...

Anaconda, Arguing, and Avon: foone Follow oone Here's the question I always have with universal translators in sci-fi: how do they know when to stop translation? Like say an alien asks about deserts on earth, and the human lists "the sahara desert, gobi desert and kalahari desert" Alien: You just said "desert" six times. :43 AM-19 Jul 2018 756 Retweets 1,883 Likes 068 ロ756 ㅇ1.SK foone @Foone 24h ("Sahara" is Arabic for "desert". "Gobi is Mongolian for "desert, and "Kalahari is Tswana for "desert foone @Foone 24h Man, the aliens are going to think we're so bad at naming. Cause really, aren't Brit: Behold, the beautiful River Avon Alien: Ahh, the River River. You humans have such a knack for naming things. foone Foone 24h Here we are in Chad, looking upon the mighty Lake Chad! Ahh yes, the land of Lake, bordering the Lake Lake. Another fine human name." foone @Foone 24h And here's Nyanza Lac, in Burundi. As you can tell by the fact that it's named Lake Lake in Bantu & French, it's a la... actually this one's a city. A city named Lake Lake strange-emily I found this thing on Facebook... and l fell down the Humans Are Weird hole yet again. ( first did before I even started my blog - Pinterest is sooo full of these posts! And I keep falling down it from time to time, when I discover something new) sirthane You could do it like Douglas Adams with some device that reads brainwaves (or whatever jargon you choose) and translates the intended meaning of the words according to the speaker. In this context, for instance, the speaker intends the word Sahara to mean the name of the place, so the translator would translate it accurately as Sahara Desert. I've thought about things like this before. Mostly about the common rip at ghost hunter shows and movies about how a x00 years old German castle has ghosts that speak perfect, crystal clear, modern English. My thoughts on a plausible explanation were that an apparition would not physically speak by causing vibrations in the air. Rather, consider the possibility that they instead push thoughts into the minds of those it interacts with causing them to experience the sensation of hearing and seeing them as a means to communicate Your brain receives thoughts of the meanings and concepts the being intends to convey. That's why you hear them in your native language, no matter what you speak or where you're at. This also comes with the bonus of explaining why proof is never found on audio or video recordings. The sights and sounds you perceive didn't actually physically happen. You could also reasonably argue that they'd still be able to interact with (push) physical objects with strong enough emotions through some means (depending on canon) while communicating in this manner by saying that expanding and contracting the air in such a way to create the sound of voice with intelligible words would require far too much precision and control ldk. It's fun stuff to think about. Source:strange-emily #brain waves #translation #ghost echnology #humans are space australians #humans are insane #humans are space oddities #humans are space orcs #humans are weird #humans 16,100 notes A neat solution to a worldbuilding problem
Anaconda, Arguing, and Avon: foone
 Follow
 oone
 Here's the question I always have with
 universal translators in sci-fi: how do
 they know when to stop translation?
 Like say an alien asks about deserts on
 earth, and the human lists "the sahara
 desert, gobi desert and kalahari desert"
 Alien: You just said "desert" six times.
 :43 AM-19 Jul 2018
 756 Retweets 1,883 Likes
 068 ロ756 ㅇ1.SK
 foone @Foone 24h
 ("Sahara" is Arabic for "desert". "Gobi is Mongolian for "desert, and "Kalahari is
 Tswana for "desert
 foone @Foone 24h
 Man, the aliens are going to think we're so bad at naming. Cause really, aren't
 Brit: Behold, the beautiful River Avon
 Alien: Ahh, the River River. You humans have such a knack for naming things.
 foone Foone 24h
 Here we are in Chad, looking upon the mighty Lake Chad!
 Ahh yes, the land of Lake, bordering the Lake Lake. Another fine human name."
 foone @Foone 24h
 And here's Nyanza Lac, in Burundi. As you can tell by the fact that it's named
 Lake Lake in Bantu & French, it's a la... actually this one's a city. A city named Lake
 Lake
 strange-emily
 I found this thing on Facebook... and l fell down the Humans Are Weird hole yet
 again. ( first did before I even started my blog - Pinterest is sooo full of these
 posts! And I keep falling down it from time to time, when I discover something
 new)
 sirthane
 You could do it like Douglas Adams with some device that reads brainwaves (or
 whatever jargon you choose) and translates the intended meaning of the words
 according to the speaker. In this context, for instance, the speaker intends the
 word Sahara to mean the name of the place, so the translator would translate it
 accurately as Sahara Desert.
 I've thought about things like this before. Mostly about the common rip at ghost
 hunter shows and movies about how a x00 years old German castle has ghosts
 that speak perfect, crystal clear, modern English. My thoughts on a plausible
 explanation were that an apparition would not physically speak by causing
 vibrations in the air. Rather, consider the possibility that they instead push
 thoughts into the minds of those it interacts with causing them to experience the
 sensation of hearing and seeing them as a means to communicate
 Your brain receives thoughts of the meanings and concepts the being intends to
 convey. That's why you hear them in your native language, no matter what you
 speak or where you're at. This also comes with the bonus of explaining why
 proof is never found on audio or video recordings. The sights and sounds you
 perceive didn't actually physically happen. You could also reasonably argue that
 they'd still be able to interact with (push) physical objects with strong enough
 emotions through some means (depending on canon) while communicating in
 this manner by saying that expanding and contracting the air in such a way to
 create the sound of voice with intelligible words would require far too much
 precision and control
 ldk. It's fun stuff to think about.
 Source:strange-emily #brain waves #translation #ghost echnology
 #humans are space australians #humans are insane #humans are space oddities
 #humans are space orcs #humans are weird #humans
 16,100 notes
A neat solution to a worldbuilding problem

A neat solution to a worldbuilding problem

Bodies , Energy, and Facts: FACTSBRAIN#005 Like all living things, humans are bioluminescent (meaning we glow) We glow brightest during the afternoon es factsbrain.com natsulasommer: prettyinpwn: natsulasommer: hikikotaku: hikikotaku: hikikotaku: factsbrain: Like all living things, humans are bio­luminescent (meaning we glow) – We glow brightest during the afternoon. - weird, interesting  funny facts what i’ve been staring at this for like 5 minutes. so.. what. i don’t think people glow. but this is telling me that we actually emit visible light.. especially in the afternoon?? am i reading this right or what “all living things” plants. when do the plants glow science side of tumblr pls I’m not from the science side of tumblr, but here’s the answer anyways:  Basically, all living things are bioluminescent because every living thing has chemical reactions occurring in their cells. The energy created from these chemical reactions physically manifests as light, thus… all living things naturally glow.  However, this glow cannot be seen by the human eye. In fact, the only way they’ve ever captured this light is through special cameras. Using these ultra special cameras, they’ve imaged subjects’ bodies over 24 hour periods. It has been found out that humans emit the most of this glow during the afternoon (about 4 PM), it is the weakest in the morning (about 10 AM), and the brightest light is emitted from the cheeks, neck, and forehead. The light is about a thousand times weaker than what humans can perceive.  Basically, it’s a side effect of metabolic reactions. It’s been suspected that humans are bioluminescent for years, but they weren’t able to confirm it until recently thanks to technology and a man named Masaki Kobayashi from the Tohoku Institute of Technology.  Sources: http://scienceblogs.com/notrocketscience/2009/07/20/photographing-the-glow-of-the-human-body/ http://www.theguardian.com/science/blog/2009/jul/17/human-bioluminescence http://www.livescience.com/7799-strange-humans-glow-visible-light.html 10/10 explaination 10/10 source 10/10 time to answer overall 10/10 you are now offiicially from the science side of tumblr. and thank you
Bodies , Energy, and Facts: FACTSBRAIN#005
 Like all living things, humans are
 bioluminescent (meaning we glow)
 We glow brightest during the afternoon
 es
 factsbrain.com
natsulasommer:

prettyinpwn:

natsulasommer:

hikikotaku:

hikikotaku:

hikikotaku:

factsbrain:

Like all living things, humans are bio­luminescent (meaning we glow) – We glow brightest during the afternoon. - weird, interesting  funny facts

what

i’ve been staring at this for like 5 minutes. so.. what. i don’t think people glow. but this is telling me that we actually emit visible light.. especially in the afternoon?? am i reading this right or what

“all living things” plants. when do the plants glow

science side of tumblr pls

I’m not from the science side of tumblr, but here’s the answer anyways:
 Basically, all living things are bioluminescent because every living thing has chemical reactions occurring in their cells. The energy created from these chemical reactions physically manifests as light, thus… all living things naturally glow.
 However, this glow cannot be seen by the human eye. In fact, the only way they’ve ever captured this light is through special cameras. Using these ultra special cameras, they’ve imaged subjects’ bodies over 24 hour periods. It has been found out that humans emit the most of this glow during the afternoon (about 4 PM), it is the weakest in the morning (about 10 AM), and the brightest light is emitted from the cheeks, neck, and forehead.
The light is about a thousand times weaker than what humans can perceive.
 Basically, it’s a side effect of metabolic reactions. It’s been suspected that humans are bioluminescent for years, but they weren’t able to confirm it until recently thanks to technology and a man named Masaki Kobayashi from the Tohoku Institute of Technology.
 Sources:
http://scienceblogs.com/notrocketscience/2009/07/20/photographing-the-glow-of-the-human-body/
http://www.theguardian.com/science/blog/2009/jul/17/human-bioluminescence
http://www.livescience.com/7799-strange-humans-glow-visible-light.html

10/10 explaination
10/10 source
10/10 time to answer
overall 10/10
you are now offiicially from the science side of tumblr.
and thank you

natsulasommer: prettyinpwn: natsulasommer: hikikotaku: hikikotaku: hikikotaku: factsbrain: Like all living things, humans are bio­lum...

Beautiful, Children, and Fake: amusewithaview incorrectdiscworldquotes roachpatrol magica-tenore-regina lizthefangirl ademigodgirl rainbow-bear A king has no sons, no daughters, and no queen. For this reason he must decide who will take the throne after he dies. To do this he decides that he will give all of the children of the kingdom a single seed. Whichever child has the largest, most beautiful plant will earn the throne, this being a metaphor for the kingdom. At the end of the contest all of the children came to the palace with their enormous and beautiful plants in hand. After he looks at all of the children's pots, he finally decides that the little girl with an empty pot will be the next Queen. Why did he choose this little girl over all of the other children with their beautiful plants The seeds were all dead (burned, fake, etc.). The other kids cheated and got different seeds and planted them. The little girl didn't cheat and was not able to grow anything because the seed was dead. She was the only one who didn't cheat. damn Nothing like original fairy tales! i get the moral it's trying to convey but that king is an idiot and the kingdom's doomed. you don't appoint an honest kid who will forthrightly admit a failure like that to leadership of a country, you put that kid in charge of like... the army, or something. the department of agriculture i'd send out dead seeds, then appoint the kid with the biggest and most beautiful plant anyway. ideally the same kind of plant as the dead seeds were from. and ideally a kid with a really good pokerface. that kid knows a) how to perceive failure early (a well developed second plant means they knew how soon the first seeds should sprout and didn't fuck around when they didn't) b) how to fix the situation (a second plant of the same species means they got someone to help them identify the seeds and plant more, or are observant enough to do it themselves) c) how to get the best people for a job in to do it (kids aren't great gardeners. a beautiful science project probably means mom did all the work-just what you want from a child ruler and their regent) all around, that kid (or their mom) is the kind of devious results-oriented bald-faced liar you want to go toe-to-toe with the lords of your country and the rulers of your neighbors. not a little kid who admits defeat so early and in a situation with such high stakes. whoops i didn't grow a plant' sounds a lot less sweet when you phrase it like 'i give up on ruling my country you know, i think i'd also send agents out to encourage the kids to destroy each other's plants. let's see who's good at seige warfare, too Did Lord Vetinari write that post? Reblogging for the Machiavellian addition How to choose an heir to the throne
Beautiful, Children, and Fake: amusewithaview
 incorrectdiscworldquotes
 roachpatrol
 magica-tenore-regina
 lizthefangirl
 ademigodgirl
 rainbow-bear
 A king has no sons, no daughters, and no queen. For this
 reason he must decide who will take the throne after he
 dies. To do this he decides that he will give all of the
 children of the kingdom a single seed. Whichever child has
 the largest, most beautiful plant will earn the throne, this
 being a metaphor for the kingdom. At the end of the
 contest all of the children came to the palace with their
 enormous and beautiful plants in hand. After he looks at all
 of the children's pots, he finally decides that the little girl
 with an empty pot will be the next Queen. Why did he
 choose this little girl over all of the other children with their
 beautiful plants
 The seeds were all dead (burned, fake, etc.). The other kids
 cheated and got different seeds and planted them. The little
 girl didn't cheat and was not able to grow anything because
 the seed was dead. She was the only one who didn't cheat.
 damn
 Nothing like original fairy tales!
 i get the moral it's trying to convey but that king is an idiot and the
 kingdom's doomed. you don't appoint an honest kid who will forthrightly
 admit a failure like that to leadership of a country, you put that kid in
 charge of like... the army, or something. the department of agriculture
 i'd send out dead seeds, then appoint the kid with the biggest and most
 beautiful plant anyway. ideally the same kind of plant as the dead
 seeds were from. and ideally a kid with a really good pokerface. that kid
 knows
 a) how to perceive failure early (a well developed second plant means
 they knew how soon the first seeds should sprout and didn't fuck
 around when they didn't)
 b) how to fix the situation (a second plant of the same species means
 they got someone to help them identify the seeds and plant more, or
 are observant enough to do it themselves)
 c) how to get the best people for a job in to do it (kids aren't great
 gardeners. a beautiful science project probably means mom did all the
 work-just what you want from a child ruler and their regent)
 all around, that kid (or their mom) is the kind of devious results-oriented
 bald-faced liar you want to go toe-to-toe with the lords of your country
 and the rulers of your neighbors. not a little kid who admits defeat so
 early and in a situation with such high stakes. whoops i didn't grow a
 plant' sounds a lot less sweet when you phrase it like 'i give up on
 ruling my country
 you know, i think i'd also send agents out to encourage the kids to
 destroy each other's plants. let's see who's good at seige warfare, too
 Did Lord Vetinari write that post?
 Reblogging for the Machiavellian addition
How to choose an heir to the throne

How to choose an heir to the throne

Beautiful, Children, and Fake: amusewithaview incorrectdiscworldquotes roachpatrol magica-tenore-regina lizthefangirl ademigodgirl rainbow-bear A king has no sons, no daughters, and no queen. For this reason he must decide who will take the throne after he dies. To do this he decides that he will give all of the children of the kingdom a single seed. Whichever child has the largest, most beautiful plant will earn the throne, this being a metaphor for the kingdom. At the end of the contest all of the children came to the palace with their enormous and beautiful plants in hand. After he looks at all of the children's pots, he finally decides that the little girl with an empty pot will be the next Queen. Why did he choose this little girl over all of the other children with their beautiful plants The seeds were all dead (burned, fake, etc.). The other kids cheated and got different seeds and planted them. The little girl didn't cheat and was not able to grow anything because the seed was dead. She was the only one who didn't cheat. damn Nothing like original fairy tales! i get the moral it's trying to convey but that king is an idiot and the kingdom's doomed. you don't appoint an honest kid who will forthrightly admit a failure like that to leadership of a country, you put that kid in charge of like... the army, or something. the department of agriculture i'd send out dead seeds, then appoint the kid with the biggest and most beautiful plant anyway. ideally the same kind of plant as the dead seeds were from. and ideally a kid with a really good pokerface. that kid knows a) how to perceive failure early (a well developed second plant means they knew how soon the first seeds should sprout and didn't fuck around when they didn't) b) how to fix the situation (a second plant of the same species means they got someone to help them identify the seeds and plant more, or are observant enough to do it themselves) c) how to get the best people for a job in to do it (kids aren't great gardeners. a beautiful science project probably means mom did all the work-just what you want from a child ruler and their regent) all around, that kid (or their mom) is the kind of devious results-oriented bald-faced liar you want to go toe-to-toe with the lords of your country and the rulers of your neighbors. not a little kid who admits defeat so early and in a situation with such high stakes. whoops i didn't grow a plant' sounds a lot less sweet when you phrase it like 'i give up on ruling my country you know, i think i'd also send agents out to encourage the kids to destroy each other's plants. let's see who's good at seige warfare, too Did Lord Vetinari write that post? Reblogging for the Machiavellian addition How to choose an heir to the throne
Beautiful, Children, and Fake: amusewithaview
 incorrectdiscworldquotes
 roachpatrol
 magica-tenore-regina
 lizthefangirl
 ademigodgirl
 rainbow-bear
 A king has no sons, no daughters, and no queen. For this
 reason he must decide who will take the throne after he
 dies. To do this he decides that he will give all of the
 children of the kingdom a single seed. Whichever child has
 the largest, most beautiful plant will earn the throne, this
 being a metaphor for the kingdom. At the end of the
 contest all of the children came to the palace with their
 enormous and beautiful plants in hand. After he looks at all
 of the children's pots, he finally decides that the little girl
 with an empty pot will be the next Queen. Why did he
 choose this little girl over all of the other children with their
 beautiful plants
 The seeds were all dead (burned, fake, etc.). The other kids
 cheated and got different seeds and planted them. The little
 girl didn't cheat and was not able to grow anything because
 the seed was dead. She was the only one who didn't cheat.
 damn
 Nothing like original fairy tales!
 i get the moral it's trying to convey but that king is an idiot and the
 kingdom's doomed. you don't appoint an honest kid who will forthrightly
 admit a failure like that to leadership of a country, you put that kid in
 charge of like... the army, or something. the department of agriculture
 i'd send out dead seeds, then appoint the kid with the biggest and most
 beautiful plant anyway. ideally the same kind of plant as the dead
 seeds were from. and ideally a kid with a really good pokerface. that kid
 knows
 a) how to perceive failure early (a well developed second plant means
 they knew how soon the first seeds should sprout and didn't fuck
 around when they didn't)
 b) how to fix the situation (a second plant of the same species means
 they got someone to help them identify the seeds and plant more, or
 are observant enough to do it themselves)
 c) how to get the best people for a job in to do it (kids aren't great
 gardeners. a beautiful science project probably means mom did all the
 work-just what you want from a child ruler and their regent)
 all around, that kid (or their mom) is the kind of devious results-oriented
 bald-faced liar you want to go toe-to-toe with the lords of your country
 and the rulers of your neighbors. not a little kid who admits defeat so
 early and in a situation with such high stakes. whoops i didn't grow a
 plant' sounds a lot less sweet when you phrase it like 'i give up on
 ruling my country
 you know, i think i'd also send agents out to encourage the kids to
 destroy each other's plants. let's see who's good at seige warfare, too
 Did Lord Vetinari write that post?
 Reblogging for the Machiavellian addition
How to choose an heir to the throne

How to choose an heir to the throne