◀
Share
Related
🔥 | Latest
Cbs, Immigration, and Drug: cBS
COULD SOMEBODY PLEASE
EXPLAIN TO THE DEMOCRATS
(WE NEED THEIR VOTES) THAT
OUR COUNTRY LOSES
250 BILLION DOLLARS A YEAR
ON ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION,
NOT INCLUDING THE
TERRIBLE DRUG FLOW
TOP BORDER SECURITY
INCLUDING A WALL,
IS $25 BILLION
PAYS FOR ITSELF IN TWO MONTHS.
GET IT DONE!
@realDonaldTrump
Could somebody please explain this to the Democrats?
- The U.S. loses $250 billion a year on illegal immigration.
- Top border security, including a wall, is $25 billion.
Pays for itself in two months. Get it done!
![Cbs, Immigration, and Drug: cBS
COULD SOMEBODY PLEASE
EXPLAIN TO THE DEMOCRATS
(WE NEED THEIR VOTES) THAT
OUR COUNTRY LOSES
250 BILLION DOLLARS A YEAR
ON ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION,
NOT INCLUDING THE
TERRIBLE DRUG FLOW
TOP BORDER SECURITY
INCLUDING A WALL,
IS $25 BILLION
PAYS FOR ITSELF IN TWO MONTHS.
GET IT DONE!
@realDonaldTrump
Could somebody please explain this to the Democrats?
- The U.S. loses $250 billion a year on illegal immigration.
- Top border security, including a wall, is $25 billion.
Pays for itself in two months. Get it done!]()
Could somebody please explain this to the Democrats? - The U.S. loses $250 billion a year on illegal immigration. - Top border security, i...
Anaconda, Be Like, and Jail: The state of Missouri was preparing
to release Mike Anderson from his
prison sentence when they realized he
wasn't in jail; they'd forgotten to pick
him up 13 years ago. In that time, he
turned his life around, married, had 4
kids, and started a business. They
imprisoned him for 5 months, but he
got out because the judge thought
he was a good person and jail
no longer served a purpose.
didyouknowblog.com
Photo Credit: Associated Pre
SNEAK 100
Ma boi be like via /r/memes https://ift.tt/2RB5AZe
![Anaconda, Be Like, and Jail: The state of Missouri was preparing
to release Mike Anderson from his
prison sentence when they realized he
wasn't in jail; they'd forgotten to pick
him up 13 years ago. In that time, he
turned his life around, married, had 4
kids, and started a business. They
imprisoned him for 5 months, but he
got out because the judge thought
he was a good person and jail
no longer served a purpose.
didyouknowblog.com
Photo Credit: Associated Pre
SNEAK 100
Ma boi be like via /r/memes https://ift.tt/2RB5AZe]()
Ma boi be like via /r/memes https://ift.tt/2RB5AZe
Community, Fucking, and Tumblr: This reblog was flagged
t staff
A better, more positive Tumblr
Since its founding in 2007, Tumblr has always been a place for wide open
creative self-expression at the heart of community and culture. To borrow from
our founder David Karp, we're proud to have inspired a generation of artists
writers, creators, curators, and crusaders to redefine our culture and to help
empower individuality
Over the past several months, and inspired by our storied past, we've given
serious thought to who we want to be to our community moving forward and
have been hard at work laying the foundation for a better Tumblr. We've realized
that in order to continue to fulfill our promise and place in culture, especially as it
evolves, we must change. Some of that change began with fostering more
constructive dialogue among our community members. Today, we're taking
another step by no longer allowing adult content, including explicit sexual
content and nudity (with some exceptions).
wereralph:
loveherdekay:
hrefnatheravenqueen:
FUCKING THIS POST ITSELF IS FLAGGED, I’M DYING! @staff YOUR BS IS KILLING ITSELF!!!!
SCREAMINGGG
![Community, Fucking, and Tumblr: This reblog was flagged
t staff
A better, more positive Tumblr
Since its founding in 2007, Tumblr has always been a place for wide open
creative self-expression at the heart of community and culture. To borrow from
our founder David Karp, we're proud to have inspired a generation of artists
writers, creators, curators, and crusaders to redefine our culture and to help
empower individuality
Over the past several months, and inspired by our storied past, we've given
serious thought to who we want to be to our community moving forward and
have been hard at work laying the foundation for a better Tumblr. We've realized
that in order to continue to fulfill our promise and place in culture, especially as it
evolves, we must change. Some of that change began with fostering more
constructive dialogue among our community members. Today, we're taking
another step by no longer allowing adult content, including explicit sexual
content and nudity (with some exceptions).
wereralph:
loveherdekay:
hrefnatheravenqueen:
FUCKING THIS POST ITSELF IS FLAGGED, I’M DYING! @staff YOUR BS IS KILLING ITSELF!!!!
SCREAMINGGG]()
wereralph: loveherdekay: hrefnatheravenqueen: FUCKING THIS POST ITSELF IS FLAGGED, I’M DYING! @staff YOUR BS IS KILLING ITSELF!!!! SCREAM...
Dank, Winter, and Shark: OVERVIEW
MENU
REVIEWS
ABOUT
Jean
3 reviews 1 photo
2 months ago
Did not realize they serve Shark Fin
soup!!!Read about how it causes imbalance in
ecosystem and contributing to decine of reefs.
Please tell owners you don't want Shark Fin
soup on the menu!
Like
Response from the owner
2 months ago
It's imitation shark fin made out of gelatin you
dense cabbage
you stupid winter melon.
![Dank, Winter, and Shark: OVERVIEW
MENU
REVIEWS
ABOUT
Jean
3 reviews 1 photo
2 months ago
Did not realize they serve Shark Fin
soup!!!Read about how it causes imbalance in
ecosystem and contributing to decine of reefs.
Please tell owners you don't want Shark Fin
soup on the menu!
Like
Response from the owner
2 months ago
It's imitation shark fin made out of gelatin you
dense cabbage
you stupid winter melon.]()
you stupid winter melon.
Facebook, Friends, and Mr. Krabs: lg
.111 53%ID 8:34 PM
Closing Theme
Song
Just Talk 3 months ago
Just imagine this one day. The last episode
of spongebob. Spongebob finally got his
drivers license. Squidward finally became a
famous musician and artist. Sandy makes
a groundbreaking scientific discovery. Mr.
Krabs makes a million dollars and retires in
style and passes his formula on to Plankton
to continue the business and they shake
hands calling eachother brothers. As for
patrick, well, he proves to the world that
mayonaise is in fact an instrument. The
gang gathers one last time to frolick in
jellyfish fields. The camera slowly zooms
out over bikini bottom as this song begins
to play and we hear that french narrator
calmly say, "Ahh, bikini bottom. Here we
leave our nautical friends. And as they say,
F is for friends who do stuff together, U
is for you and me, N is for anywhere and
anytime at all, down here in the deep blue
sea. (Credits)
2.5K ๑1
148
Something someone posted over on the Facebook page “Is Mayonnaise an Instrument”
![Facebook, Friends, and Mr. Krabs: lg
.111 53%ID 8:34 PM
Closing Theme
Song
Just Talk 3 months ago
Just imagine this one day. The last episode
of spongebob. Spongebob finally got his
drivers license. Squidward finally became a
famous musician and artist. Sandy makes
a groundbreaking scientific discovery. Mr.
Krabs makes a million dollars and retires in
style and passes his formula on to Plankton
to continue the business and they shake
hands calling eachother brothers. As for
patrick, well, he proves to the world that
mayonaise is in fact an instrument. The
gang gathers one last time to frolick in
jellyfish fields. The camera slowly zooms
out over bikini bottom as this song begins
to play and we hear that french narrator
calmly say, "Ahh, bikini bottom. Here we
leave our nautical friends. And as they say,
F is for friends who do stuff together, U
is for you and me, N is for anywhere and
anytime at all, down here in the deep blue
sea. (Credits)
2.5K ๑1
148
Something someone posted over on the Facebook page “Is Mayonnaise an Instrument”]()
Something someone posted over on the Facebook page “Is Mayonnaise an Instrument”
Facebook, Friends, and Mr. Krabs: lg
.111 53%ID 8:34 PM
Closing Theme
Song
Just Talk 3 months ago
Just imagine this one day. The last episode
of spongebob. Spongebob finally got his
drivers license. Squidward finally became a
famous musician and artist. Sandy makes
a groundbreaking scientific discovery. Mr.
Krabs makes a million dollars and retires in
style and passes his formula on to Plankton
to continue the business and they shake
hands calling eachother brothers. As for
patrick, well, he proves to the world that
mayonaise is in fact an instrument. The
gang gathers one last time to frolick in
jellyfish fields. The camera slowly zooms
out over bikini bottom as this song begins
to play and we hear that french narrator
calmly say, "Ahh, bikini bottom. Here we
leave our nautical friends. And as they say,
F is for friends who do stuff together, U
is for you and me, N is for anywhere and
anytime at all, down here in the deep blue
sea. (Credits)
2.5K ๑1
148
Something someone posted over on the Facebook page “Is Mayonnaise an Instrument” via /r/wholesomememes https://ift.tt/2Q76D6w
![Facebook, Friends, and Mr. Krabs: lg
.111 53%ID 8:34 PM
Closing Theme
Song
Just Talk 3 months ago
Just imagine this one day. The last episode
of spongebob. Spongebob finally got his
drivers license. Squidward finally became a
famous musician and artist. Sandy makes
a groundbreaking scientific discovery. Mr.
Krabs makes a million dollars and retires in
style and passes his formula on to Plankton
to continue the business and they shake
hands calling eachother brothers. As for
patrick, well, he proves to the world that
mayonaise is in fact an instrument. The
gang gathers one last time to frolick in
jellyfish fields. The camera slowly zooms
out over bikini bottom as this song begins
to play and we hear that french narrator
calmly say, "Ahh, bikini bottom. Here we
leave our nautical friends. And as they say,
F is for friends who do stuff together, U
is for you and me, N is for anywhere and
anytime at all, down here in the deep blue
sea. (Credits)
2.5K ๑1
148
Something someone posted over on the Facebook page “Is Mayonnaise an Instrument” via /r/wholesomememes https://ift.tt/2Q76D6w]()
Something someone posted over on the Facebook page “Is Mayonnaise an Instrument” via /r/wholesomememes https://ift.tt/2Q76D6w
Tumblr, Blog, and Com: s bella
Follow
@shaladin
a story in two parts
amb leakira
@softadora
amb leakira
@softadora
l don't know his name but I see his
face everywhere and I would do
anything for him
I finally have a name to ur stupid face. i
hate you
8/18/18, 10:58 AM
9:00 AM - 18 Aug 2018
edgybumbleebee:
eijiroukiriot:
this is the funniest tweet i’ve seen in months bye
Discovering bakugo
![Tumblr, Blog, and Com: s bella
Follow
@shaladin
a story in two parts
amb leakira
@softadora
amb leakira
@softadora
l don't know his name but I see his
face everywhere and I would do
anything for him
I finally have a name to ur stupid face. i
hate you
8/18/18, 10:58 AM
9:00 AM - 18 Aug 2018
edgybumbleebee:
eijiroukiriot:
this is the funniest tweet i’ve seen in months bye
Discovering bakugo]()
edgybumbleebee: eijiroukiriot: this is the funniest tweet i’ve seen in months bye Discovering bakugo
Basketball, Dating, and Lol: Don't cry because it's over, smile
because you got free drinks and
your vagina licked nonstop for a
few months.
Also smile that ur not pregnant unless you were dating a basketball player then that sucks sis bc you could have really hit the jackpot...... (jk!! To all da basketball players I’m currently dating. don’t block me LOL)
![Basketball, Dating, and Lol: Don't cry because it's over, smile
because you got free drinks and
your vagina licked nonstop for a
few months.
Also smile that ur not pregnant unless you were dating a basketball player then that sucks sis bc you could have really hit the jackpot...... (jk!! To all da basketball players I’m currently dating. don’t block me LOL)]()
Also smile that ur not pregnant unless you were dating a basketball player then that sucks sis bc you could have really hit the jackpot........
Anaconda, Apparently, and Fire: JANUARY NOVEMBER
TheAew JJork Eimes
TheAewJjorkTimes
FACT CHECK
CALIFORNIA TODAY
California Today: 100 Million Dead
Trees Prompt Fears of Giant Wildfires
Trump's Misleading Claims About
California's Fire Mismanagement'
Patches of dead and dying trees near Cressman, Calif
By Thomas Fuller
lan. 19, 2018
By Kendra Pierre-Louis
This week a group of scientists warned in the journal BioScience President Trump took to Twitter over the weekend, blaming the
that the dead trees could produce wildfires on a scale and of an
infernos on forest management...
intensity that California has never seen
Stephens, a professor of fire science at Berkeley and the lead
coming into home areas, starting more fires."..
Restrictions on logging have allowed forests to accumulate an
His statements, which drew outrage from local leaders and
It's something that is going to be much more severe," said Scott firefighters, oversimplified the causes of California's wildfires...
author of the study. "You could have higher amounts of embers The administration and Republicans in Congress have supported
calls by the timber industry to clear out potential fuel by letting
the land be logged...
overload of vegetation.
Unbiased Amer
BACK IN JANUARY, THE NEW YORK TIMES AGREED WITH PRESIDENT TRUMP THAT CALIFORNIA NEEDED TO IMPROVE ITS FORESTRY MANAGEMENT
Editorial by Kevin Ryan
The deadliest and most destructive fire in California's history was finally brought under control by firefighters yesterday, more than two weeks after it erupted. So far 87 people are confirmed to have been killed in the blaze, and many are still missing.
But the media firestorm continues over President Trump’s assertion that poor forest management contributed to the disaster. After Trump tweeted that better forest management could have prevented, or at least mitigated, the damage caused by the devastating wildfires, the media and California politicians said his assertion was false.
A spokesman for California Governor Jerry Brown said that the president's assertion was “inane” and “uninformed.” The New York Times wrote a piece entitled “Trump’s Misleading Claims About California’s Fire ‘Mismanagement’”
Yet just a few months back, both Governor Brown and The New York Times said basically the same thing as Trump.
In a January article, the Times wrote that “A group of scientists warned in the journal BioScience that [100 million] dead trees could produce wildfires on a scale and of an intensity that California has never seen,” and that “scientists say they cannot even calculate the damage the dead-tree fires might cause; it exceeds what their current fire behavior modeling can simulate.”
“‘It’s something that is going to be much more severe,’ said Scott Stephens, a professor of fire science at Berkeley and the lead author of the study. ‘You could have higher amounts of embers coming into home areas, starting more fires.’”
The Times article even pointed the finger at California’s forestry regulations, saying “California forests are much more vulnerable now because, paradoxically, they have been better protected. In their natural state, forests were regularly thinned by fire but the billions of dollars that the state spends aggressively fighting wildfires and restrictions on logging have allowed forests to accumulate an overload of vegetation… That’s a scenario that could nudge the state into rethinking its forest management.“
And yet, fast forward to today, and The New York Times is suddenly interviewing “experts” to contradict its previous assertions now that President Trump has also questioned California’s forest management.
“President Trump’s statements, which drew outrage from local leaders and firefighters, oversimplified the cause of California’s wildfires.” The Times says that the logging advocated by Trump, Republicans, and, apparently, The New York Times last January, would not have helped because “logging gets rid of trees, but it does not get rid of the kindling — brush, bushes and twigs. Logging does, however, enable the spread of cheatgrass, a highly combustible weed, which makes a forest more likely to burn.”
That’s basically the opposite of what the Times’ said earlier this year.
And it’s not just the media reversing itself to discredit Trump. Governor Brown’s office was calling for the same changes to logging regulations just a few months ago. In order to mitigate the fire danger from dead trees, Brown proposed that landowners be permitted to cut trees up to 36 inches in diameter, a jump from the current 26 inches, on properties that are 300 acres or less without getting a timber harvest permit and would also be able to build roads up to 600 feet long.
Of course the environmental lobby opposed it. And now huge swaths of land that environmentalists were “protecting” are now embers.
But Brown, and the media, would rather reverse their recent calls for safer forestry management than to agree with the president.
SOURCES: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/19/us/california-today-100-million-dead-trees-prompt-fears-of-giant-wildfires.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/12/us/politics/fact-check-trump-california-fire-tweet.html
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-hammered-for-california-wildfire-claims-but-gov-brown-has-also-backed-new-forest-management-measures
![Anaconda, Apparently, and Fire: JANUARY NOVEMBER
TheAew JJork Eimes
TheAewJjorkTimes
FACT CHECK
CALIFORNIA TODAY
California Today: 100 Million Dead
Trees Prompt Fears of Giant Wildfires
Trump's Misleading Claims About
California's Fire Mismanagement'
Patches of dead and dying trees near Cressman, Calif
By Thomas Fuller
lan. 19, 2018
By Kendra Pierre-Louis
This week a group of scientists warned in the journal BioScience President Trump took to Twitter over the weekend, blaming the
that the dead trees could produce wildfires on a scale and of an
infernos on forest management...
intensity that California has never seen
Stephens, a professor of fire science at Berkeley and the lead
coming into home areas, starting more fires."..
Restrictions on logging have allowed forests to accumulate an
His statements, which drew outrage from local leaders and
It's something that is going to be much more severe," said Scott firefighters, oversimplified the causes of California's wildfires...
author of the study. "You could have higher amounts of embers The administration and Republicans in Congress have supported
calls by the timber industry to clear out potential fuel by letting
the land be logged...
overload of vegetation.
Unbiased Amer
BACK IN JANUARY, THE NEW YORK TIMES AGREED WITH PRESIDENT TRUMP THAT CALIFORNIA NEEDED TO IMPROVE ITS FORESTRY MANAGEMENT
Editorial by Kevin Ryan
The deadliest and most destructive fire in California's history was finally brought under control by firefighters yesterday, more than two weeks after it erupted. So far 87 people are confirmed to have been killed in the blaze, and many are still missing.
But the media firestorm continues over President Trump’s assertion that poor forest management contributed to the disaster. After Trump tweeted that better forest management could have prevented, or at least mitigated, the damage caused by the devastating wildfires, the media and California politicians said his assertion was false.
A spokesman for California Governor Jerry Brown said that the president's assertion was “inane” and “uninformed.” The New York Times wrote a piece entitled “Trump’s Misleading Claims About California’s Fire ‘Mismanagement’”
Yet just a few months back, both Governor Brown and The New York Times said basically the same thing as Trump.
In a January article, the Times wrote that “A group of scientists warned in the journal BioScience that [100 million] dead trees could produce wildfires on a scale and of an intensity that California has never seen,” and that “scientists say they cannot even calculate the damage the dead-tree fires might cause; it exceeds what their current fire behavior modeling can simulate.”
“‘It’s something that is going to be much more severe,’ said Scott Stephens, a professor of fire science at Berkeley and the lead author of the study. ‘You could have higher amounts of embers coming into home areas, starting more fires.’”
The Times article even pointed the finger at California’s forestry regulations, saying “California forests are much more vulnerable now because, paradoxically, they have been better protected. In their natural state, forests were regularly thinned by fire but the billions of dollars that the state spends aggressively fighting wildfires and restrictions on logging have allowed forests to accumulate an overload of vegetation… That’s a scenario that could nudge the state into rethinking its forest management.“
And yet, fast forward to today, and The New York Times is suddenly interviewing “experts” to contradict its previous assertions now that President Trump has also questioned California’s forest management.
“President Trump’s statements, which drew outrage from local leaders and firefighters, oversimplified the cause of California’s wildfires.” The Times says that the logging advocated by Trump, Republicans, and, apparently, The New York Times last January, would not have helped because “logging gets rid of trees, but it does not get rid of the kindling — brush, bushes and twigs. Logging does, however, enable the spread of cheatgrass, a highly combustible weed, which makes a forest more likely to burn.”
That’s basically the opposite of what the Times’ said earlier this year.
And it’s not just the media reversing itself to discredit Trump. Governor Brown’s office was calling for the same changes to logging regulations just a few months ago. In order to mitigate the fire danger from dead trees, Brown proposed that landowners be permitted to cut trees up to 36 inches in diameter, a jump from the current 26 inches, on properties that are 300 acres or less without getting a timber harvest permit and would also be able to build roads up to 600 feet long.
Of course the environmental lobby opposed it. And now huge swaths of land that environmentalists were “protecting” are now embers.
But Brown, and the media, would rather reverse their recent calls for safer forestry management than to agree with the president.
SOURCES: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/19/us/california-today-100-million-dead-trees-prompt-fears-of-giant-wildfires.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/12/us/politics/fact-check-trump-california-fire-tweet.html
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-hammered-for-california-wildfire-claims-but-gov-brown-has-also-backed-new-forest-management-measures](https://pics.conservativememes.com/january-november-theaew-jjork-eimes-theaewjjorktimes-fact-check-california-today-38002597.png)
![Anaconda, Apparently, and Fire: JANUARY NOVEMBER
TheAew JJork Eimes
TheAewJjorkTimes
FACT CHECK
CALIFORNIA TODAY
California Today: 100 Million Dead
Trees Prompt Fears of Giant Wildfires
Trump's Misleading Claims About
California's Fire Mismanagement'
Patches of dead and dying trees near Cressman, Calif
By Thomas Fuller
lan. 19, 2018
By Kendra Pierre-Louis
This week a group of scientists warned in the journal BioScience President Trump took to Twitter over the weekend, blaming the
that the dead trees could produce wildfires on a scale and of an
infernos on forest management...
intensity that California has never seen
Stephens, a professor of fire science at Berkeley and the lead
coming into home areas, starting more fires."..
Restrictions on logging have allowed forests to accumulate an
His statements, which drew outrage from local leaders and
It's something that is going to be much more severe," said Scott firefighters, oversimplified the causes of California's wildfires...
author of the study. "You could have higher amounts of embers The administration and Republicans in Congress have supported
calls by the timber industry to clear out potential fuel by letting
the land be logged...
overload of vegetation.
Unbiased Amer
BACK IN JANUARY, THE NEW YORK TIMES AGREED WITH PRESIDENT TRUMP THAT CALIFORNIA NEEDED TO IMPROVE ITS FORESTRY MANAGEMENT
Editorial by Kevin Ryan
The deadliest and most destructive fire in California's history was finally brought under control by firefighters yesterday, more than two weeks after it erupted. So far 87 people are confirmed to have been killed in the blaze, and many are still missing.
But the media firestorm continues over President Trump’s assertion that poor forest management contributed to the disaster. After Trump tweeted that better forest management could have prevented, or at least mitigated, the damage caused by the devastating wildfires, the media and California politicians said his assertion was false.
A spokesman for California Governor Jerry Brown said that the president's assertion was “inane” and “uninformed.” The New York Times wrote a piece entitled “Trump’s Misleading Claims About California’s Fire ‘Mismanagement’”
Yet just a few months back, both Governor Brown and The New York Times said basically the same thing as Trump.
In a January article, the Times wrote that “A group of scientists warned in the journal BioScience that [100 million] dead trees could produce wildfires on a scale and of an intensity that California has never seen,” and that “scientists say they cannot even calculate the damage the dead-tree fires might cause; it exceeds what their current fire behavior modeling can simulate.”
“‘It’s something that is going to be much more severe,’ said Scott Stephens, a professor of fire science at Berkeley and the lead author of the study. ‘You could have higher amounts of embers coming into home areas, starting more fires.’”
The Times article even pointed the finger at California’s forestry regulations, saying “California forests are much more vulnerable now because, paradoxically, they have been better protected. In their natural state, forests were regularly thinned by fire but the billions of dollars that the state spends aggressively fighting wildfires and restrictions on logging have allowed forests to accumulate an overload of vegetation… That’s a scenario that could nudge the state into rethinking its forest management.“
And yet, fast forward to today, and The New York Times is suddenly interviewing “experts” to contradict its previous assertions now that President Trump has also questioned California’s forest management.
“President Trump’s statements, which drew outrage from local leaders and firefighters, oversimplified the cause of California’s wildfires.” The Times says that the logging advocated by Trump, Republicans, and, apparently, The New York Times last January, would not have helped because “logging gets rid of trees, but it does not get rid of the kindling — brush, bushes and twigs. Logging does, however, enable the spread of cheatgrass, a highly combustible weed, which makes a forest more likely to burn.”
That’s basically the opposite of what the Times’ said earlier this year.
And it’s not just the media reversing itself to discredit Trump. Governor Brown’s office was calling for the same changes to logging regulations just a few months ago. In order to mitigate the fire danger from dead trees, Brown proposed that landowners be permitted to cut trees up to 36 inches in diameter, a jump from the current 26 inches, on properties that are 300 acres or less without getting a timber harvest permit and would also be able to build roads up to 600 feet long.
Of course the environmental lobby opposed it. And now huge swaths of land that environmentalists were “protecting” are now embers.
But Brown, and the media, would rather reverse their recent calls for safer forestry management than to agree with the president.
SOURCES: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/19/us/california-today-100-million-dead-trees-prompt-fears-of-giant-wildfires.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/12/us/politics/fact-check-trump-california-fire-tweet.html
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-hammered-for-california-wildfire-claims-but-gov-brown-has-also-backed-new-forest-management-measures]()
BACK IN JANUARY, THE NEW YORK TIMES AGREED WITH PRESIDENT TRUMP THAT CALIFORNIA NEEDED TO IMPROVE ITS FORESTRY MANAGEMENT Editorial by Kevi...
Anaconda, Apparently, and Fire: JANUARY NOVEMBER
TheAew JJork Eimes
TheAewJjorkTimes
FACT CHECK
CALIFORNIA TODAY
California Today: 100 Million Dead
Trees Prompt Fears of Giant Wildfires
Trump's Misleading Claims About
California's Fire Mismanagement'
Patches of dead and dying trees near Cressman, Calif
By Thomas Fuller
lan. 19, 2018
By Kendra Pierre-Louis
This week a group of scientists warned in the journal BioScience President Trump took to Twitter over the weekend, blaming the
that the dead trees could produce wildfires on a scale and of an
infernos on forest management...
intensity that California has never seen
Stephens, a professor of fire science at Berkeley and the lead
coming into home areas, starting more fires."..
Restrictions on logging have allowed forests to accumulate an
His statements, which drew outrage from local leaders and
It's something that is going to be much more severe," said Scott firefighters, oversimplified the causes of California's wildfires...
author of the study. "You could have higher amounts of embers The administration and Republicans in Congress have supported
calls by the timber industry to clear out potential fuel by letting
the land be logged...
overload of vegetation.
Unbiased Amer
BACK IN JANUARY, THE NEW YORK TIMES AGREED WITH PRESIDENT TRUMP THAT CALIFORNIA NEEDED TO IMPROVE ITS FORESTRY MANAGEMENT
Editorial by Kevin Ryan
The deadliest and most destructive fire in California's history was finally brought under control by firefighters yesterday, more than two weeks after it erupted. So far 87 people are confirmed to have been killed in the blaze, and many are still missing.
But the media firestorm continues over President Trump’s assertion that poor forest management contributed to the disaster. After Trump tweeted that better forest management could have prevented, or at least mitigated, the damage caused by the devastating wildfires, the media and California politicians said his assertion was false.
A spokesman for California Governor Jerry Brown said that the president's assertion was “inane” and “uninformed.” The New York Times wrote a piece entitled “Trump’s Misleading Claims About California’s Fire ‘Mismanagement’”
Yet just a few months back, both Governor Brown and The New York Times said basically the same thing as Trump.
In a January article, the Times wrote that “A group of scientists warned in the journal BioScience that [100 million] dead trees could produce wildfires on a scale and of an intensity that California has never seen,” and that “scientists say they cannot even calculate the damage the dead-tree fires might cause; it exceeds what their current fire behavior modeling can simulate.”
“‘It’s something that is going to be much more severe,’ said Scott Stephens, a professor of fire science at Berkeley and the lead author of the study. ‘You could have higher amounts of embers coming into home areas, starting more fires.’”
The Times article even pointed the finger at California’s forestry regulations, saying “California forests are much more vulnerable now because, paradoxically, they have been better protected. In their natural state, forests were regularly thinned by fire but the billions of dollars that the state spends aggressively fighting wildfires and restrictions on logging have allowed forests to accumulate an overload of vegetation… That’s a scenario that could nudge the state into rethinking its forest management.“
And yet, fast forward to today, and The New York Times is suddenly interviewing “experts” to contradict its previous assertions now that President Trump has also questioned California’s forest management.
“President Trump’s statements, which drew outrage from local leaders and firefighters, oversimplified the cause of California’s wildfires.” The Times says that the logging advocated by Trump, Republicans, and, apparently, The New York Times last January, would not have helped because “logging gets rid of trees, but it does not get rid of the kindling — brush, bushes and twigs. Logging does, however, enable the spread of cheatgrass, a highly combustible weed, which makes a forest more likely to burn.”
That’s basically the opposite of what the Times’ said earlier this year.
And it’s not just the media reversing itself to discredit Trump. Governor Brown’s office was calling for the same changes to logging regulations just a few months ago. In order to mitigate the fire danger from dead trees, Brown proposed that landowners be permitted to cut trees up to 36 inches in diameter, a jump from the current 26 inches, on properties that are 300 acres or less without getting a timber harvest permit and would also be able to build roads up to 600 feet long.
Of course the environmental lobby opposed it. And now huge swaths of land that environmentalists were “protecting” are now embers.
But Brown, and the media, would rather reverse their recent calls for safer forestry management than to agree with the president.
SOURCES: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/19/us/california-today-100-million-dead-trees-prompt-fears-of-giant-wildfires.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/12/us/politics/fact-check-trump-california-fire-tweet.html
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-hammered-for-california-wildfire-claims-but-gov-brown-has-also-backed-new-forest-management-measures
![Anaconda, Apparently, and Fire: JANUARY NOVEMBER
TheAew JJork Eimes
TheAewJjorkTimes
FACT CHECK
CALIFORNIA TODAY
California Today: 100 Million Dead
Trees Prompt Fears of Giant Wildfires
Trump's Misleading Claims About
California's Fire Mismanagement'
Patches of dead and dying trees near Cressman, Calif
By Thomas Fuller
lan. 19, 2018
By Kendra Pierre-Louis
This week a group of scientists warned in the journal BioScience President Trump took to Twitter over the weekend, blaming the
that the dead trees could produce wildfires on a scale and of an
infernos on forest management...
intensity that California has never seen
Stephens, a professor of fire science at Berkeley and the lead
coming into home areas, starting more fires."..
Restrictions on logging have allowed forests to accumulate an
His statements, which drew outrage from local leaders and
It's something that is going to be much more severe," said Scott firefighters, oversimplified the causes of California's wildfires...
author of the study. "You could have higher amounts of embers The administration and Republicans in Congress have supported
calls by the timber industry to clear out potential fuel by letting
the land be logged...
overload of vegetation.
Unbiased Amer
BACK IN JANUARY, THE NEW YORK TIMES AGREED WITH PRESIDENT TRUMP THAT CALIFORNIA NEEDED TO IMPROVE ITS FORESTRY MANAGEMENT
Editorial by Kevin Ryan
The deadliest and most destructive fire in California's history was finally brought under control by firefighters yesterday, more than two weeks after it erupted. So far 87 people are confirmed to have been killed in the blaze, and many are still missing.
But the media firestorm continues over President Trump’s assertion that poor forest management contributed to the disaster. After Trump tweeted that better forest management could have prevented, or at least mitigated, the damage caused by the devastating wildfires, the media and California politicians said his assertion was false.
A spokesman for California Governor Jerry Brown said that the president's assertion was “inane” and “uninformed.” The New York Times wrote a piece entitled “Trump’s Misleading Claims About California’s Fire ‘Mismanagement’”
Yet just a few months back, both Governor Brown and The New York Times said basically the same thing as Trump.
In a January article, the Times wrote that “A group of scientists warned in the journal BioScience that [100 million] dead trees could produce wildfires on a scale and of an intensity that California has never seen,” and that “scientists say they cannot even calculate the damage the dead-tree fires might cause; it exceeds what their current fire behavior modeling can simulate.”
“‘It’s something that is going to be much more severe,’ said Scott Stephens, a professor of fire science at Berkeley and the lead author of the study. ‘You could have higher amounts of embers coming into home areas, starting more fires.’”
The Times article even pointed the finger at California’s forestry regulations, saying “California forests are much more vulnerable now because, paradoxically, they have been better protected. In their natural state, forests were regularly thinned by fire but the billions of dollars that the state spends aggressively fighting wildfires and restrictions on logging have allowed forests to accumulate an overload of vegetation… That’s a scenario that could nudge the state into rethinking its forest management.“
And yet, fast forward to today, and The New York Times is suddenly interviewing “experts” to contradict its previous assertions now that President Trump has also questioned California’s forest management.
“President Trump’s statements, which drew outrage from local leaders and firefighters, oversimplified the cause of California’s wildfires.” The Times says that the logging advocated by Trump, Republicans, and, apparently, The New York Times last January, would not have helped because “logging gets rid of trees, but it does not get rid of the kindling — brush, bushes and twigs. Logging does, however, enable the spread of cheatgrass, a highly combustible weed, which makes a forest more likely to burn.”
That’s basically the opposite of what the Times’ said earlier this year.
And it’s not just the media reversing itself to discredit Trump. Governor Brown’s office was calling for the same changes to logging regulations just a few months ago. In order to mitigate the fire danger from dead trees, Brown proposed that landowners be permitted to cut trees up to 36 inches in diameter, a jump from the current 26 inches, on properties that are 300 acres or less without getting a timber harvest permit and would also be able to build roads up to 600 feet long.
Of course the environmental lobby opposed it. And now huge swaths of land that environmentalists were “protecting” are now embers.
But Brown, and the media, would rather reverse their recent calls for safer forestry management than to agree with the president.
SOURCES: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/19/us/california-today-100-million-dead-trees-prompt-fears-of-giant-wildfires.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/12/us/politics/fact-check-trump-california-fire-tweet.html
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-hammered-for-california-wildfire-claims-but-gov-brown-has-also-backed-new-forest-management-measures](https://pics.conservativememes.com/january-november-theaew-jjork-eimes-theaewjjorktimes-fact-check-california-today-37997924.png)
![Anaconda, Apparently, and Fire: JANUARY NOVEMBER
TheAew JJork Eimes
TheAewJjorkTimes
FACT CHECK
CALIFORNIA TODAY
California Today: 100 Million Dead
Trees Prompt Fears of Giant Wildfires
Trump's Misleading Claims About
California's Fire Mismanagement'
Patches of dead and dying trees near Cressman, Calif
By Thomas Fuller
lan. 19, 2018
By Kendra Pierre-Louis
This week a group of scientists warned in the journal BioScience President Trump took to Twitter over the weekend, blaming the
that the dead trees could produce wildfires on a scale and of an
infernos on forest management...
intensity that California has never seen
Stephens, a professor of fire science at Berkeley and the lead
coming into home areas, starting more fires."..
Restrictions on logging have allowed forests to accumulate an
His statements, which drew outrage from local leaders and
It's something that is going to be much more severe," said Scott firefighters, oversimplified the causes of California's wildfires...
author of the study. "You could have higher amounts of embers The administration and Republicans in Congress have supported
calls by the timber industry to clear out potential fuel by letting
the land be logged...
overload of vegetation.
Unbiased Amer
BACK IN JANUARY, THE NEW YORK TIMES AGREED WITH PRESIDENT TRUMP THAT CALIFORNIA NEEDED TO IMPROVE ITS FORESTRY MANAGEMENT
Editorial by Kevin Ryan
The deadliest and most destructive fire in California's history was finally brought under control by firefighters yesterday, more than two weeks after it erupted. So far 87 people are confirmed to have been killed in the blaze, and many are still missing.
But the media firestorm continues over President Trump’s assertion that poor forest management contributed to the disaster. After Trump tweeted that better forest management could have prevented, or at least mitigated, the damage caused by the devastating wildfires, the media and California politicians said his assertion was false.
A spokesman for California Governor Jerry Brown said that the president's assertion was “inane” and “uninformed.” The New York Times wrote a piece entitled “Trump’s Misleading Claims About California’s Fire ‘Mismanagement’”
Yet just a few months back, both Governor Brown and The New York Times said basically the same thing as Trump.
In a January article, the Times wrote that “A group of scientists warned in the journal BioScience that [100 million] dead trees could produce wildfires on a scale and of an intensity that California has never seen,” and that “scientists say they cannot even calculate the damage the dead-tree fires might cause; it exceeds what their current fire behavior modeling can simulate.”
“‘It’s something that is going to be much more severe,’ said Scott Stephens, a professor of fire science at Berkeley and the lead author of the study. ‘You could have higher amounts of embers coming into home areas, starting more fires.’”
The Times article even pointed the finger at California’s forestry regulations, saying “California forests are much more vulnerable now because, paradoxically, they have been better protected. In their natural state, forests were regularly thinned by fire but the billions of dollars that the state spends aggressively fighting wildfires and restrictions on logging have allowed forests to accumulate an overload of vegetation… That’s a scenario that could nudge the state into rethinking its forest management.“
And yet, fast forward to today, and The New York Times is suddenly interviewing “experts” to contradict its previous assertions now that President Trump has also questioned California’s forest management.
“President Trump’s statements, which drew outrage from local leaders and firefighters, oversimplified the cause of California’s wildfires.” The Times says that the logging advocated by Trump, Republicans, and, apparently, The New York Times last January, would not have helped because “logging gets rid of trees, but it does not get rid of the kindling — brush, bushes and twigs. Logging does, however, enable the spread of cheatgrass, a highly combustible weed, which makes a forest more likely to burn.”
That’s basically the opposite of what the Times’ said earlier this year.
And it’s not just the media reversing itself to discredit Trump. Governor Brown’s office was calling for the same changes to logging regulations just a few months ago. In order to mitigate the fire danger from dead trees, Brown proposed that landowners be permitted to cut trees up to 36 inches in diameter, a jump from the current 26 inches, on properties that are 300 acres or less without getting a timber harvest permit and would also be able to build roads up to 600 feet long.
Of course the environmental lobby opposed it. And now huge swaths of land that environmentalists were “protecting” are now embers.
But Brown, and the media, would rather reverse their recent calls for safer forestry management than to agree with the president.
SOURCES: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/19/us/california-today-100-million-dead-trees-prompt-fears-of-giant-wildfires.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/12/us/politics/fact-check-trump-california-fire-tweet.html
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-hammered-for-california-wildfire-claims-but-gov-brown-has-also-backed-new-forest-management-measures]()
BACK IN JANUARY, THE NEW YORK TIMES AGREED WITH PRESIDENT TRUMP THAT CALIFORNIA NEEDED TO IMPROVE ITS FORESTRY MANAGEMENT Editorial by Kevi...
Memes, Money, and Cocaine: Ernie is astonished at the
size of the brick of cocaine
Bert managed to buy with
this month's rent money
Don’t worry bout Bert, he delivers via /r/memes https://ift.tt/2Kz5izC
![Memes, Money, and Cocaine: Ernie is astonished at the
size of the brick of cocaine
Bert managed to buy with
this month's rent money
Don’t worry bout Bert, he delivers via /r/memes https://ift.tt/2Kz5izC]()
Don’t worry bout Bert, he delivers via /r/memes https://ift.tt/2Kz5izC
Clothes, Parents, and Streets: K Otis Owill Williams
Tuesday at 5:19 AM .S
This young man I hired as a temporary
helper off the streets no home no clothes
living under a bridge 7 months ago. Well
he has not missed a day, has never been
late, not one compliant, has reunited with
his parents, has a car, has clothes on his
back and now he's officially a WM
employee with benefits..An amazing
awesomacious:
Everyone deserves a second chance!
![Clothes, Parents, and Streets: K Otis Owill Williams
Tuesday at 5:19 AM .S
This young man I hired as a temporary
helper off the streets no home no clothes
living under a bridge 7 months ago. Well
he has not missed a day, has never been
late, not one compliant, has reunited with
his parents, has a car, has clothes on his
back and now he's officially a WM
employee with benefits..An amazing
awesomacious:
Everyone deserves a second chance!]()
awesomacious: Everyone deserves a second chance!
Lol, Memes, and Period: If we "talked" for less than 3 months
we did not talk, man. You was within
your 90 day probation period and
failed. Ihere's no record of you over
here. lol
Thank you, next. FOLLOW @northwitch69 @northwitch69 @northwitch69 @northwitch69
![Lol, Memes, and Period: If we "talked" for less than 3 months
we did not talk, man. You was within
your 90 day probation period and
failed. Ihere's no record of you over
here. lol
Thank you, next. FOLLOW @northwitch69 @northwitch69 @northwitch69 @northwitch69]()
Thank you, next. FOLLOW @northwitch69 @northwitch69 @northwitch69 @northwitch69
