🔥 | Latest

Ass, Friends, and Fucking: r/relationships u/Ahreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee 2h Me [34 M] with my girlfriend [26 F], her sister/friends are planning an intervention' because they believe I'm taking advantage of her because I'm ugly (she is blind) Relationships <p><a href="https://reylaser.tumblr.com/post/172247465846/noelleian-reylaser-is-it-bc-hes-ugly-or-is" class="tumblr_blog">reylaser</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a href="http://noelleian.tumblr.com/post/172246677717/reylaser-is-it-bc-hes-ugly-or-is-it-the-8-year" class="tumblr_blog">noelleian</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a href="https://reylaser.tumblr.com/post/171929233001/is-it-bc-hes-ugly-or-is-it-the-8-year-age" class="tumblr_blog">reylaser</a>:</p><blockquote><p>is it bc he’s ugly, or is it the 8 year age difference added on top of a disability?</p></blockquote> <p>Is it because he’s ugly, or is it because a bunch of fuddy duddies have some idiotic hang up about how a 26 year old disabled woman has to be treated like a fragile child who can’t make her own decisions? Fuck outta here with that ableist crap.<br/></p></blockquote> <p>why don’t you fuck outta here with that defense of predatory age gaps and pretending like disabled women aren’t at higher risk for abusive relationships</p></blockquote> <p>“Predatory age gap”</p><p>Fucking HELL. A 26-year-old woman is a grown ass woman and can date whoever she damn well pleases. A less than 10 year age gap between two grown people is “predatory”? Good golly damn you people are annoying.</p><p><br/></p><p>And fuck right off the assumption that blind equals stupid and incapable of knowing if she’s a good relationship or not. How fucking ablest is that?</p>
Ass, Friends, and Fucking: r/relationships
 u/Ahreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee 2h
 Me [34 M] with my girlfriend [26 F], her
 sister/friends are planning an
 intervention' because they believe I'm
 taking advantage of her because I'm ugly
 (she is blind)
 Relationships
<p><a href="https://reylaser.tumblr.com/post/172247465846/noelleian-reylaser-is-it-bc-hes-ugly-or-is" class="tumblr_blog">reylaser</a>:</p>

<blockquote><p><a href="http://noelleian.tumblr.com/post/172246677717/reylaser-is-it-bc-hes-ugly-or-is-it-the-8-year" class="tumblr_blog">noelleian</a>:</p>

<blockquote><p><a href="https://reylaser.tumblr.com/post/171929233001/is-it-bc-hes-ugly-or-is-it-the-8-year-age" class="tumblr_blog">reylaser</a>:</p><blockquote><p>is it bc he’s ugly, or is it the 8 year age difference added on top of a disability?</p></blockquote>
<p>Is it because he’s ugly, or is it because a bunch of fuddy duddies have some idiotic hang up about how a 26 year old disabled woman has to be treated like a fragile child who can’t make her own decisions? Fuck outta here with that ableist crap.<br/></p></blockquote>

<p>why don’t you fuck outta here with that defense of predatory age gaps and pretending like disabled women aren’t at higher risk for abusive relationships</p></blockquote>

<p>“Predatory age gap”</p><p>Fucking HELL. A 26-year-old woman is a grown ass woman and can date whoever she damn well pleases. A less than 10 year age gap between two grown people is “predatory”? Good golly damn you people are annoying.</p><p><br/></p><p>And fuck right off the assumption that blind equals stupid and incapable of knowing if she’s a good relationship or not. How fucking ablest is that?</p>

<p><a href="https://reylaser.tumblr.com/post/172247465846/noelleian-reylaser-is-it-bc-hes-ugly-or-is" class="tumblr_blog">reylaser</a>:</p> ...

Being Alone, Apparently, and Cars: Make a contribution The.. Guardian News Opinion Sport Culture Lifestyle US World Environment Soccer More Tennessee sheriff taped saying Ilove this shit' after ordering suspect's killing Oddie Shoupe is being sued for excessive force after telling deputies to shoot unarmed Michael Dial rather than risk damage to police cars <p><a href="https://libertarian-lady.tumblr.com/post/170595631737/a-tennessee-sheriff-is-being-sued-for-using" class="tumblr_blog">libertarian-lady</a>:</p> <blockquote><p>A Tennessee sheriff is being sued for using excessive force after he was recorded boasting he had told officers to shoot a man rather than risk damaging police cars by ramming him off the road.</p> <p>“They said ‘we’re ramming him,’” Sheriff Oddie Shoupe of White County said on tape in the aftermath of the killing of suspect Michael Dial. “I said, ‘Don’t ram him, shoot him.’ Fuck that shit. Ain’t gonna tear up my cars.”</p> <p>Shoupe arrived on the scene shortly after police had shot Dial at the conclusion of a low-speed chase, clearly upset he had missed the excitement.</p> <p>“I love this shit,” Shoupe said, apparently unaware that his comments were being picked up by another deputy’s body-worn camera. “God, I tell you what, I thrive on it.</p> <p>“If they don’t think I’ll give the damn order to kill that motherfucker they’re full of shit,” he added, laughing. “Take him out. I’m here on the damn wrong end of the county,” he said.</p> <p>Shoupe’s comments have prompted a federal lawsuit from Dial’s widow, Robyn Dial, alleging the use of excessive force against her late husband, who was unarmed.</p> <p>“It was not only inappropriate but also unconscionable for Defendant Shoupe to give the order to use deadly force,” the filing states, calling his decision proof of a “malicious and sadistic mindset”. The suit also names the county, the city of Sparta and the two officers who fired their weapons.</p> <p>“The comments as seen on the video are extremely disturbing. I’m not sure how anybody can thrive on the taking of a life, let alone somebody in law enforcement,” Dial’s attorney David Weissman told the Guardian.</p> <p>Police had initially attempted to pull Dial over in April last year for driving on a suspended licence. He drove away, but the fact that he was driving a 40-odd-year-old pickup truck with a fully loaded trailer severely restricted his speed.</p> <p>DeKalb County deputies, who began the pursuit before White County deputies took over, told investigators it was “more like a funeral procession” than a highway chase, with speeds topping out around 50mph.</p> <p>Deputies tried using a PIT (Pursuit Intervention Technique) maneuverto slow Dial’s car, a common police tactic involving a police car nudging another vehicle to turn it sideways.</p> <p>But Shoupe radioed officers to tell them to stop attempting to do that, instead ordering them to shoot the driver.</p> <p>When a deputy had successfully nudged Dial off the road, Reserve Deputy Adam West, who was in pursuit in his own personal vehicle, fired three shots as the vehicle went down into a ditch. Dial died of a gunshot wound to the head.</p> <p>In June, the county district attorney declared the shooting justified.</p> <p>Dial told Tennessee’s News Channel 5 that she believed her husband had tried to drive away from the police because he was scared, and said she could not make sense of the order to shoot. “I feel with every part of me that’s exactly what they wanted to do was kill him.”</p> <p>The sheriff’s office declined to comment to the Guardian.</p></blockquote>
Being Alone, Apparently, and Cars: Make a
 contribution
 The..
 Guardian
 News Opinion Sport Culture Lifestyle
 US World Environment Soccer More
 Tennessee sheriff taped
 saying Ilove this shit' after
 ordering suspect's killing
 Oddie Shoupe is being sued for
 excessive force after telling deputies
 to shoot unarmed Michael Dial rather
 than risk damage to police cars
<p><a href="https://libertarian-lady.tumblr.com/post/170595631737/a-tennessee-sheriff-is-being-sued-for-using" class="tumblr_blog">libertarian-lady</a>:</p>

<blockquote><p>A Tennessee sheriff is being sued for using excessive force after he was recorded boasting he had told officers to shoot a man rather than risk damaging police cars by ramming him off the road.</p>

<p>“They said ‘we’re ramming him,’” Sheriff Oddie Shoupe of White County said on tape in the aftermath of the killing of suspect Michael Dial. “I said, ‘Don’t ram him, shoot him.’ Fuck that shit. Ain’t gonna tear up my cars.”</p>

<p>Shoupe arrived on the scene shortly after police had shot Dial at the conclusion of a low-speed chase, clearly upset he had missed the excitement.</p>

<p>“I love this shit,” Shoupe said, apparently unaware that his comments were being picked up by another deputy’s body-worn camera. “God, I tell you what, I thrive on it.</p>

<p>“If they don’t think I’ll give the damn order to kill that motherfucker they’re full of shit,” he added, laughing. “Take him out. I’m here on the damn wrong end of the county,” he said.</p>

<p>Shoupe’s comments have prompted a federal lawsuit from Dial’s widow, Robyn Dial, alleging the use of excessive force against her late husband, who was unarmed.</p>

<p>“It was not only inappropriate but also unconscionable for Defendant Shoupe to give the order to use deadly force,” the filing states, calling his decision proof of a “malicious and sadistic mindset”. The suit also names the county, the city of Sparta and the two officers who fired their weapons.</p>

<p>“The comments as seen on the video are extremely disturbing. I’m not sure how anybody can thrive on the taking of a life, let alone somebody in law enforcement,” Dial’s attorney David Weissman told the Guardian.</p>

<p>Police had initially attempted to pull Dial over in April last year for driving on a suspended licence. He drove away, but the fact that he was driving a 40-odd-year-old pickup truck with a fully loaded trailer severely restricted his speed.</p>

<p>DeKalb County deputies, who began the pursuit before White County deputies took over, told investigators it was “more like a funeral procession” than a highway chase, with speeds topping out around 50mph.</p>

<p>Deputies tried using a PIT (Pursuit Intervention Technique) maneuverto slow Dial’s car, a common police tactic involving a police car nudging another vehicle to turn it sideways.</p>

<p>But Shoupe radioed officers to tell them to stop attempting to do that, instead ordering them to shoot the driver.</p>

<p>When a deputy had successfully nudged Dial off the road, Reserve Deputy Adam West, who was in pursuit in his own personal vehicle, fired three shots as the vehicle went down into a ditch. Dial died of a gunshot wound to the head.</p>

<p>In June, the county district attorney declared the shooting justified.</p>

<p>Dial told Tennessee’s News Channel 5 that she believed her husband had tried to drive away from the police because he was scared, and said she could not make sense of the order to shoot. “I feel with every part of me that’s exactly what they wanted to do was kill him.”</p>

<p>The sheriff’s office declined to comment to the Guardian.</p></blockquote>

<p><a href="https://libertarian-lady.tumblr.com/post/170595631737/a-tennessee-sheriff-is-being-sued-for-using" class="tumblr_blog">libertari...

Ass, Community, and Cookies: Believe People The First Time They Show You Who They Are @balleralert Read more: www.balleralert.com Believe People The First Time They Show You Who They Are- blogged by @niksofly ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ There is a quote that says "excuses are tools of incompetence that build monuments of nothingness.” So it's safe to say these "aint sh*t" people came from poor excuses. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ I don't know if it's naivety, stupidity or willful ignorance; maybe it's good sex, but we can see people do questionable things and we will overlook it for the sake of the bigger picture. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Somehow as individuals we think we are different. He may have broke her heart, but you're special, so he won't do it to you. She lied to him because he wouldn't understand what she needed, she is honest with you. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Sorry to break it to you, but whatever individuals did prior to you , there is a great chance they'll do it with you and after you; unless they had some miraculous intervention. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ People are creatures of habit. And if their habits are doing f*ck sh*t, then by all accords, they will continue doing f*ck sh*t with and to you. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ A liar is going to always lie ; a thief will always steal; a whore will always hoe; and penis that's for everyone will continue to service the community, d*cking down all that is in need. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ That time he saw the messages in your phone and flipped his wig, punching a hole in the wall and calling you out your name should have been a revelation that he was crazy; but you thought it was cute. Now you're getting black eyes and broken ribs. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ When she popped up unannounced at your house with those dry-ass cookies, you thought she was considerate, but now your Lexus Truck has her signature and you are constantly looking over your shoulders. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Stop selling yourselves fantasies and believe a person the first time they show you who they are......to read the rest log on to BallerAlert.com (clickable link on profile)
Ass, Community, and Cookies: Believe People The First Time They
 Show You Who They Are
 @balleralert
 Read more: www.balleralert.com
Believe People The First Time They Show You Who They Are- blogged by @niksofly ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ There is a quote that says "excuses are tools of incompetence that build monuments of nothingness.” So it's safe to say these "aint sh*t" people came from poor excuses. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ I don't know if it's naivety, stupidity or willful ignorance; maybe it's good sex, but we can see people do questionable things and we will overlook it for the sake of the bigger picture. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Somehow as individuals we think we are different. He may have broke her heart, but you're special, so he won't do it to you. She lied to him because he wouldn't understand what she needed, she is honest with you. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Sorry to break it to you, but whatever individuals did prior to you , there is a great chance they'll do it with you and after you; unless they had some miraculous intervention. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ People are creatures of habit. And if their habits are doing f*ck sh*t, then by all accords, they will continue doing f*ck sh*t with and to you. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ A liar is going to always lie ; a thief will always steal; a whore will always hoe; and penis that's for everyone will continue to service the community, d*cking down all that is in need. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ That time he saw the messages in your phone and flipped his wig, punching a hole in the wall and calling you out your name should have been a revelation that he was crazy; but you thought it was cute. Now you're getting black eyes and broken ribs. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ When she popped up unannounced at your house with those dry-ass cookies, you thought she was considerate, but now your Lexus Truck has her signature and you are constantly looking over your shoulders. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Stop selling yourselves fantasies and believe a person the first time they show you who they are......to read the rest log on to BallerAlert.com (clickable link on profile)

Believe People The First Time They Show You Who They Are- blogged by @niksofly ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ There is a quote that says ...

America, Arguing, and Crime: ITS EASY TO FORGET THAT FOR DECADES THE U.S. HAD A HEALTHCARE SYSTEM THAT WAS THE ENVY OF THE WORLD. WE HAD THE FINEST DOCTORS AND HOSPITALS, PATIENTS RECEIVED HIGH QUALITY, AFFORDABLE MEDICAL CARE, AND THOUSANDS OF PRIVATELY FUNDED CHARITIES PROVIDED HEALTH SERVICES FOR THE PO0 RON PAUL TURNING POINT USA <p><a href="http://redbloodedamerica.tumblr.com/post/165630900777/bushmeat-said-when-they-tell-you-how-ghastly" class="tumblr_blog">redbloodedamerica</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a href="http://bushmeat.tumblr.com/" title="bushmeat">bushmeat</a> said:</p><blockquote><p>When they tell you how ghastly socialised healthcare is, remember what they are saying is absolute bullshit <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-40608253">http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-40608253</a></p></blockquote><p>If I had a nickel every time some leftist moron linked to a World Healthcare Organization or Commonwealth Fund study, well, I would have a shitload of nickels.</p><p>Since my previous source’s website is currently down–<a href="http://redbloodedamerica.tumblr.com/post/142352613032/that-red-guy-montypla-weaselwonderworld">which I’ve used in the past</a> to slap this idiotic notion that other countries’ healthcare systems are somehow superior the US’s private system–I’ll instead point to this <a href="https://object.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa654.pdf">other great explanation</a> by the folks over at CATO on why this pathetic claim is always made by these left-wing think-tanks:</p><blockquote><p><i> The debate over how to reform America’s health care sector often involves comparisons between the United States and other countries, and with good reason. Looking at other countries can help us learn which policies, if any, to emulate, and which to avoid. </i></p><p><i>There have been many attempts at international health care system comparisons.Among the most influential are the World Health Report 2000 published by the World Health Organization, several studies published by the Commonwealth Fund, and individual measures such as infant mortality and “mortality amenable to health care.” Generally in these studies, the United States performs poorly in comparison to Europe, Australia, and Japan. Therefore, scholars often use the studies to argue for adding even more government regulations to our already highly regulated health care system. </i></p><p><i>However, these studies suffer from several problems. First, they often rely on unadjusted aggregate data—such as life expectancy, or mortality from heart disease—that can be affected by many non–health care factors, including nutrition, exercise, and even crime rates. Second,they often use process measures, such as how many patients have received a pap smear or mammogram in the past three years. Process measures tell us what doctors do, but provide only an indirect measure of doctors’ productivity. Third, some of these studies inappropriately incorporate their own biases about financing in their statistics, which makes market-driven health systems appear worse even if their outcomes are similar or better. </i></p><p><i>An additional limitation of these studies is the omission of any measure of innovation. None of the best-known studies factor in the contribution of various countries to the advances that have come to characterize the current practice of health care in the developed world. </i></p><p><i>Every single health care test or treatment must be invented at some point. We would be living in a different world today were it not for the remarkable genius and hard work of health care inventors in the past, as well as investments from government health agencies and pharmaceutical and medical device companies. The health care issues commonly considered most important today—controlling costs and covering the uninsured— arguably should be regarded as secondary to innovation, inasmuch as a treatment must first be invented before its costs can be reduced and its use extended to everyone. </i><br/></p></blockquote><p>Furthermore, from another Glen Whitman <a href="https://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/bp101.pdf">article</a>:</p><blockquote><p><i> Those who cite the WHO rankings typically present them as an objective measure of the relative performance of national health care systems. They are not. The WHO rankings depend crucially on a number of underlying assumptions- some of them logically incoherent, some characterized by substantial uncertainty, and some rooted in ideological beliefs and values that not everyone shares. <br/></i></p><p><i> The WHO health care rankings result from an index of health-related statistics. As with any index, it is important to consider how it was constructed, as the construction affects the results. </i><br/></p><p><i> There is good reason to account for the quality of care received by a country’s worst-off or poorest citizens. Yet the Health Distribution and Responsiveness Distribution factors do not do that.Instead, they measure relative differences in quality, without regard to the absolute level of quality. To account for the quality of care received by the worst-off, the index could include a factor that measures health among the poor, or a health care system’s responsiveness to the poor. This would, in essence, give greater weight to the well-being of the worst off.  Alternatively, a separate health performance index could be constructed for poor households or members of disadvantaged minorities. These approaches would surely have problems of their own, but they would at least be focused on the absolute level of health care quality, which should be the paramount concern. <br/></i></p><p><i> The WHO rankings, by purporting to measure the efficacy of health care systems, implicitly take all differences in health outcomes not explained by spending or literacy and attribute them entirely to health care system performance. Nothing else, from tobacco use to nutrition to sheer luck, is taken into account. </i></p><p><i>To some extent, the exclusion of other variables is simply the result of inadequacies in the data. It is difficult to get information on all relevant factors, and even more difficult to account for their expected effects on health. But some factors are deliberately excluded by the WHO analysis on the basis of paternalistic assumptions about the proper role of health systems. An earlier paper laying out the WHO methodological framework asserts, “Problems such as tobacco consumption, diet, and unsafe sexual activity must be included in an assessment of health system performance.” </i></p><p><i>In other words, the WHO approach holds health systems responsible not just for treating lung cancer, but for preventing smoking in the first place; not just for treating heart disease, but for getting people to exercise and lay off the fatty foods. <br/></i></p><p><i> Second, the WHO approach fails to consider people’s willingness to trade off health against other values. Some people are happy to give up a few potential months or even years of life in exchange for the pleasures of smoking, eating, having sex, playing sports, and so on. The WHO approach, rather than taking the public’s preferences as given, deems some preferences better than others (and then praises or blames the health system for them). </i></p><p><i>A superior (though still imperfect) approach would take people’s health-related behavior as given, and then ask which health systems do the best job of dealing with whatever health conditions arise.<br/></i></p></blockquote><p>In other words, its a bunch of meaningless cherry-picked measurements framed in a way to make the private system appear terrible in order to push for more socialized medicine.  </p><p>Despite all of it’s flaws, which are usually thanks to government market intervention, the United States still has the best health care system on the entire goddamn planet per capita.  It’s most likely that the life-saving equipment and procedures that are used in other hellholes using slave healthcare to save lives are thanks to us.  </p><p>You’re welcome.</p><figure class="tmblr-full" data-orig-height="250" data-orig-width="450"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/b97a460c917c68f3900de0bc46e50c59/tumblr_inline_owpcxquafE1r1jtxd_540.gif" data-orig-height="250" data-orig-width="450"/></figure></blockquote>
America, Arguing, and Crime: ITS EASY TO FORGET THAT
 FOR DECADES THE U.S. HAD A
 HEALTHCARE SYSTEM THAT WAS THE
 ENVY OF THE WORLD. WE HAD THE
 FINEST DOCTORS AND HOSPITALS,
 PATIENTS RECEIVED HIGH QUALITY,
 AFFORDABLE MEDICAL CARE, AND
 THOUSANDS OF PRIVATELY FUNDED
 CHARITIES PROVIDED HEALTH
 SERVICES FOR THE PO0
 RON PAUL
 TURNING
 POINT USA
<p><a href="http://redbloodedamerica.tumblr.com/post/165630900777/bushmeat-said-when-they-tell-you-how-ghastly" class="tumblr_blog">redbloodedamerica</a>:</p>

<blockquote><p><a href="http://bushmeat.tumblr.com/" title="bushmeat">bushmeat</a> said:</p><blockquote><p>When they tell you how ghastly socialised healthcare is, remember what they are saying is absolute bullshit

<a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-40608253">http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-40608253</a></p></blockquote><p>If I had a nickel every time some leftist moron linked to a World Healthcare Organization or Commonwealth Fund study, well, I would have a shitload of nickels.</p><p>Since my previous source’s website is currently down–<a href="http://redbloodedamerica.tumblr.com/post/142352613032/that-red-guy-montypla-weaselwonderworld">which I’ve used in the past</a> to slap this idiotic notion that other countries’ healthcare systems are somehow superior the US’s private system–I’ll instead point to this <a href="https://object.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa654.pdf">other great explanation</a> by the folks over at CATO on why this pathetic claim is always made by these left-wing think-tanks:</p><blockquote><p><i>

The debate over how to reform America’s
health care sector often involves comparisons
between the United States and other countries,
and with good reason. Looking at other
countries can help us learn which policies, if
any, to emulate, and which to avoid. </i></p><p><i>There have been many attempts at international
health care system comparisons.Among
the most influential are the World Health Report
2000 published by the World Health Organization, several studies published by the
Commonwealth Fund, and individual measures
such as infant mortality and “mortality
amenable to health care.” Generally in these
studies, the United States performs poorly in
comparison to Europe, Australia, and Japan.
Therefore, scholars often use the studies to
argue for adding even more government regulations
to our already highly regulated health
care system. </i></p><p><i>However, these studies suffer from several
problems. First, they often rely on unadjusted
aggregate data—such as life expectancy, or
mortality from heart disease—that can be
affected by many non–health care factors,
including nutrition, exercise, and even crime
rates. Second,they often use process measures,
such as how many patients have received a pap
smear or mammogram in the past three years.
Process measures tell us what doctors do, but
provide only an indirect measure of doctors’
productivity. Third, some of these studies
inappropriately incorporate their own biases
about financing in their statistics, which
makes market-driven health systems appear
worse even if their outcomes are similar or better. </i></p><p><i>An additional limitation of these studies
is the omission of any measure of innovation.
None of the best-known studies factor in the
contribution of various countries to the
advances that have come to characterize the
current practice of health care in the developed
world. </i></p><p><i>Every single health care test or treatment
must be invented at some point. We would be
living in a different world today were it not
for the remarkable genius and hard work of
health care inventors in the past, as well as
investments from government health agencies
and pharmaceutical and medical device
companies. The health care issues commonly
considered most important today—controlling
costs and covering the uninsured—
arguably should be regarded as secondary to
innovation, inasmuch as a treatment must
first be invented before its costs can be
reduced and its use extended to everyone.

</i><br/></p></blockquote><p>Furthermore, from another Glen Whitman <a href="https://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/bp101.pdf">article</a>:</p><blockquote><p><i>

Those who cite the WHO rankings typically present them as an objective measure of the relative performance of national health care systems. They are not. The WHO rankings depend crucially on a number of underlying assumptions- some of them logically incoherent, some characterized by substantial uncertainty, and some rooted in ideological beliefs and values that not everyone shares.

<br/></i></p><p><i>

The WHO health care rankings result
from an index of health-related statistics. As
with any index, it is important to consider
how it was constructed, as the construction
affects the results.

</i><br/></p><p><i>

There is good reason to account for the
quality of care received by a country’s worst-off
or poorest citizens. Yet the Health Distribution
and Responsiveness Distribution factors
do not do that.Instead, they measure relative
differences in quality, without regard to the
absolute level of quality. To account for the
quality of care received by the worst-off, the
index could include a factor that measures
health among the poor, or a health care system’s
responsiveness to the poor. This would,
in essence, give greater weight to the well-being
of the worst off.  Alternatively, a separate health
performance index could be constructed for
poor households or members of disadvantaged
minorities. These approaches would
surely have problems of their own, but they
would at least be focused on the absolute level
of health care quality, which should be the
paramount concern.

<br/></i></p><p><i>

The WHO rankings, by purporting to
measure the efficacy of health care systems,
implicitly take all differences in health outcomes
not explained by spending or literacy
and attribute them entirely to health care system
performance. Nothing else, from tobacco
use to nutrition to sheer luck, is taken into
account. </i></p><p><i>To some extent, the exclusion of other
variables is simply the result of inadequacies
in the data. It is difficult to get information
on all relevant factors, and even more difficult
to account for their expected effects on
health. But some factors are deliberately
excluded by the WHO analysis on the basis of
paternalistic assumptions about the proper
role of health systems. An earlier paper laying
out the WHO methodological framework
asserts, “Problems such as tobacco consumption,
diet, and unsafe sexual activity must be
included in an assessment of health system
performance.” </i></p><p><i>In other words, the WHO approach holds
health systems responsible not just for treating
lung cancer, but for preventing smoking
in the first place; not just for treating heart
disease, but for getting people to exercise and
lay off the fatty foods.

<br/></i></p><p><i>

Second, the WHO approach fails to consider
people’s willingness to trade off health
against other values. Some people are happy
to give up a few potential months or even
years of life in exchange for the pleasures of
smoking, eating, having sex, playing sports,
and so on. The WHO approach, rather than
taking the public’s preferences as given,
deems some preferences better than others
(and then praises or blames the health system
for them). </i></p><p><i>A superior (though still imperfect) approach
would take people’s health-related
behavior as given, and then ask which health
systems do the best job of dealing with whatever
health conditions arise.<br/></i></p></blockquote><p>In other words, its a bunch of meaningless cherry-picked measurements framed in a way to make the private system appear terrible in order to push for more socialized medicine.  </p><p>Despite all of it’s flaws, which are usually thanks to government market intervention, the United States still has the best health care system on the entire goddamn planet per capita.  It’s most likely that the life-saving equipment and procedures that are used in other hellholes using slave healthcare to save lives are thanks to us.  </p><p>You’re welcome.</p><figure class="tmblr-full" data-orig-height="250" data-orig-width="450"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/b97a460c917c68f3900de0bc46e50c59/tumblr_inline_owpcxquafE1r1jtxd_540.gif" data-orig-height="250" data-orig-width="450"/></figure></blockquote>

<p><a href="http://redbloodedamerica.tumblr.com/post/165630900777/bushmeat-said-when-they-tell-you-how-ghastly" class="tumblr_blog">redblood...

Ass, Facebook, and Fucking: TLC Amber Rachdi @AmberRachdi Jun 22 l here is no secret to #weightloss: the cure is widely known. Fewer calories consumed, more activity - how you get her i up to you! <p><a href="http://the-mighty-birdy.tumblr.com/post/165403586928/fakepalestine-leveractionlady" class="tumblr_blog">the-mighty-birdy</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a href="http://fakepalestine.tumblr.com/post/165403489138/leveractionlady" class="tumblr_blog">fakepalestine</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://leveractionlady.tumblr.com/post/147300597244">leveractionlady</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://john-paul-jonesing-for-liberty.tumblr.com/post/147300470032">john-paul-jonesing-for-liberty</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://ariaofdoom.tumblr.com/post/147299175056">ariaofdoom</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://arizonagunguy.tumblr.com/post/147293666923">arizonagunguy</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://anti-fattitude.tumblr.com/post/143133857263">anti-fattitude</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://angryinkeddrunk.tumblr.com/post/143069313824">angryinkeddrunk</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://professorlogan81.tumblr.com/post/143043194500">professorlogan81</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://aubscares.tumblr.com/post/134803616382">aubscares</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://southparkconservative.tumblr.com/post/133558849149">southparkconservative</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://crazed-devils-advocate.tumblr.com/post/133553638235">crazed-devils-advocate</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://demolishfatacceptance.tumblr.com/post/133529897894">demolishfatacceptance</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>Every fat activist says that ‘not everyone can lose weight’.</p> <p>Amber Rachdi was 600 lbs. 600 freaking lbs. See those legs; yea that’s lymphedema that was caused by her morbid obesity. </p> <p>And now look at her. Imagine her life if fat acceptance found her before the health intervention did. </p> </blockquote> <p>Yes.</p> </blockquote> <p>Love ya, Babe! You accomplish miracles by force of will, which is very difficult for many brought up on the I-want-it-now philosophy. Bravo! <br/></p> </blockquote> <p>AMBER! I AM SO PROUD OF YOU WHOEVER YOU ARE! This is so inspiring and amazing. Good for you!</p> </blockquote> <p>You keep it up!</p> </blockquote> <p>WOW now this is motivating </p> </blockquote> <p>WOW. Go Amber! You can see how happy she is and how much better she feels now, just look at that glow in her face.</p> </blockquote> <p>That’s fucking nuts</p> </blockquote> <p>I watched her episode of My 600lb Life and she’s the only one I’ve seen that actually wanted to change her life and understood how important it was.</p> </blockquote> <p>I feel like I need to add this because she went so much farther in her journey than the last photo shows. This is from her public Facebook profile.</p> <figure class="tmblr-full" data-orig-height="960" data-orig-width="960"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/457802ad4d111ff369c7e1c5693de7ea/tumblr_inline_oa7t4dXFEu1qi80gl_540.jpg" data-orig-height="960" data-orig-width="960"/></figure><p>She kicked ass and took names and saved her own life.  </p> </blockquote> <p>That is awesome!</p> </blockquote> <p>wow </p></blockquote> <p>Good on her, man</p></blockquote>
Ass, Facebook, and Fucking: TLC

 Amber Rachdi @AmberRachdi Jun 22
 l here is no secret to #weightloss: the cure
 is widely known. Fewer calories
 consumed, more activity - how you get
 her i up to you!
<p><a href="http://the-mighty-birdy.tumblr.com/post/165403586928/fakepalestine-leveractionlady" class="tumblr_blog">the-mighty-birdy</a>:</p>

<blockquote><p><a href="http://fakepalestine.tumblr.com/post/165403489138/leveractionlady" class="tumblr_blog">fakepalestine</a>:</p>

<blockquote><p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://leveractionlady.tumblr.com/post/147300597244">leveractionlady</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://john-paul-jonesing-for-liberty.tumblr.com/post/147300470032">john-paul-jonesing-for-liberty</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://ariaofdoom.tumblr.com/post/147299175056">ariaofdoom</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://arizonagunguy.tumblr.com/post/147293666923">arizonagunguy</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://anti-fattitude.tumblr.com/post/143133857263">anti-fattitude</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://angryinkeddrunk.tumblr.com/post/143069313824">angryinkeddrunk</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://professorlogan81.tumblr.com/post/143043194500">professorlogan81</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://aubscares.tumblr.com/post/134803616382">aubscares</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://southparkconservative.tumblr.com/post/133558849149">southparkconservative</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://crazed-devils-advocate.tumblr.com/post/133553638235">crazed-devils-advocate</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://demolishfatacceptance.tumblr.com/post/133529897894">demolishfatacceptance</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Every fat activist says that ‘not everyone can lose weight’.</p>
<p>Amber Rachdi was 600 lbs. 600 freaking lbs. See those legs; yea that’s 

lymphedema that was caused by her morbid obesity. </p>
<p>And now look at her. Imagine her life if fat acceptance found her before the health intervention did. </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Yes.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Love ya, Babe! You accomplish miracles by force of will, which is very difficult for many brought up on the I-want-it-now philosophy. Bravo! <br/></p>
</blockquote>
<p>AMBER! I AM SO PROUD OF YOU WHOEVER YOU ARE! This is so inspiring and amazing. Good for you!</p>
</blockquote>
<p>You keep it up!</p>
</blockquote>
<p>WOW now this is motivating </p>
</blockquote>
<p>WOW. Go Amber! You can see how happy she is and how much better she feels now, just look at that glow in her face.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>That’s fucking nuts</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I watched her episode of My 600lb Life and she’s the only one I’ve seen that actually wanted to change her life and understood how important it was.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I feel like I need to add this because she went so much farther in her journey than the last photo shows. This is from her public Facebook profile.</p>
<figure class="tmblr-full" data-orig-height="960" data-orig-width="960"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/457802ad4d111ff369c7e1c5693de7ea/tumblr_inline_oa7t4dXFEu1qi80gl_540.jpg" data-orig-height="960" data-orig-width="960"/></figure><p>She kicked ass and took names and saved her own life.  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>That is awesome!</p>
</blockquote>

<p>wow </p></blockquote>

<p>Good on her, man</p></blockquote>

<p><a href="http://the-mighty-birdy.tumblr.com/post/165403586928/fakepalestine-leveractionlady" class="tumblr_blog">the-mighty-birdy</a>:</p...

America, Dank, and Fail: Fig. 1: Capitalism explained by Capitalists Fig, 2: Socialism explained by Socialists Demand Supply Equilibrium Value (relative to inflation, btw) Tax Compensation (Businesses and Rich don't pay taxes they tag them to the prices) +Labor Costs This system will evenutally eliminate the poor and rich Higher Value EquilibriumValue and create one big "working Pensions class," free to reap the whole Value fruits of their labor and those least fortunate members of society will be assisted Price (Higher than equilibrium, as result of costs) Is the price too high for a particular consumer? (Y/N) Equilibrium Value Cost- Fail Equilibrium Value > Cost Win Social Bureacracy Potential sales lost: Potential Capital lost Potential Job Growth lost MiddlePrograms Class $Sale $ Regulation Sales Profit Profits Profit - Shares - Executive Income The employed get money to spend in the market, in turn not only funding other workers via trade, but the businesses who employ more workers; the result is a self-sufficient economy without recourse to government (taxes and labor costs would reduce in the absence of intervention, lowering prices and improving the number of sales.) Capital - Marketing - Research and Development nsion laxes Job Growth All in all, the businessman and shareholders get rich, con- sumers get what they want, workers get their cut, and the poor find jobs Woot Fig. 3: Socialism explained by Capitalists Fig. 4: Capitalism explained by Socialists 19 2 This sytem wil evernutalty ellminato tho poor and rich1. The aim of socialism is to bring the lower and croato one big "workin classes into the middle class and dissolve the class, free to reap the whole PoorPensions u e ubos and oeupper classes; what is not realized here is the east fortunate members of existance of a centralized bureaucracy would only sockety w5 isedset up a new upper class of "bureaucratic elites Socia MiddleProgram Bureacracy privileging themselves with the primary hold on capital and resources as they monopolize distribu- tion; this solution to "class warfare" defeats itself 2. While some individuals are truly disadvantaged and in need of help, automatically labeling the poor as "in need" is a sure way to keep them so. Not only is the welfare system flawed in acting as a "free lunch" to the unwilling, but also a trap, waiting to backfire as soon as individuals standard of living raises to a point where they no longer qualify for aid, but will not maintain a good standard of living for some time until they are independant RichLabor Taxes 4 . The services provided by bureaucracy are poor and make for a tax more expensive than any bill or pricetag on the narket; they are poor for the same reason a diabetic has more incentive to excercise than a perfectly fit individual here's always the threat of health, metaphorically job security. Also, they are more expensive due to added-on ureaucratic costs (paperwork, wages, etc.) and the cost for the actual services themselves, even more so for high- end service. 4. By putting the tax burden on the rich and business, one is sure to hamper industry; every cent of a rofit taxed is a cent lost to being able to provide more jobs, better goods and services, and a better working facility This is to assume that the bureaucracy won't own and manage the workplaces, in which the threat of failure and rofit loss would not factor in decision-making for the company's (worker's) best interests. 5. The fallacy in criticizing he rich as greedy, manipulative, and authoritative is that socialism's alternative, bureaucracy, is in essence no differ nt the problem now is the cronies are working together instead of competing. 6. Like taxation, regulation is a hin- rance to industry; instead of directly cutting into capital, it is a loss of potential gains. While they are good meaning egulations hinder the efficiency and production capabilities of the workplace, only hurting the worker in the end. 7 Soviet Russia, China and North Korea are/were socialist economies; next up, America <p>🅱hit on yourself via /r/dank_meme <a href="http://ift.tt/2eGiP9n">http://ift.tt/2eGiP9n</a></p>
America, Dank, and Fail: Fig. 1: Capitalism
 explained by Capitalists
 Fig, 2: Socialism
 explained by Socialists
 Demand Supply
 Equilibrium Value (relative to inflation, btw)
 Tax Compensation (Businesses and Rich don't pay taxes
 they tag them to the prices)
 +Labor Costs
 This system will evenutally
 eliminate the poor and rich
 Higher
 Value EquilibriumValue
 and create one big "working
 Pensions
 class," free to reap the whole
 Value
 fruits of their labor and those
 least fortunate members of
 society will be assisted
 Price (Higher than equilibrium, as result of costs)
 Is the price too high for a particular consumer? (Y/N)
 Equilibrium Value Cost- Fail
 Equilibrium Value > Cost Win
 Social
 Bureacracy
 Potential sales lost:
 Potential Capital lost
 Potential Job Growth lost
 MiddlePrograms
 Class
 $Sale $
 Regulation
 Sales Profit
 Profits
 Profit
 - Shares
 - Executive Income
 The employed get money to spend in the market, in turn not
 only funding other workers via trade, but the businesses who
 employ more workers; the result is a self-sufficient economy
 without recourse to government (taxes and labor costs would
 reduce in the absence of intervention, lowering prices and
 improving the number of sales.)
 Capital
 - Marketing
 - Research and Development
 nsion
 laxes
 Job Growth
 All in all, the businessman and shareholders get rich, con-
 sumers get what they want, workers get their cut, and the
 poor find jobs
 Woot
 Fig. 3: Socialism
 explained by Capitalists
 Fig. 4: Capitalism
 explained by Socialists
 19
 2
 This sytem wil evernutalty
 ellminato tho poor and rich1. The aim of socialism is to bring the lower
 and croato one big "workin classes into the middle class and dissolve the
 class, free to reap the whole
 PoorPensions u e ubos and oeupper classes; what is not realized here is the
 east fortunate members of
 existance of a centralized bureaucracy would only
 sockety w5 isedset up a new upper class of "bureaucratic elites
 Socia
 MiddleProgram
 Bureacracy privileging themselves with the primary hold on
 capital and resources as they monopolize distribu-
 tion; this solution to "class warfare" defeats itself
 2. While some individuals are truly disadvantaged
 and in need of help, automatically labeling the poor
 as "in need" is a sure way to keep them so. Not
 only is the welfare system flawed in acting as a
 "free lunch" to the unwilling, but also a trap, waiting
 to backfire as soon as individuals standard of living
 raises to a point where they no longer qualify for
 aid, but will not maintain a good standard of living
 for some time until they are independant
 RichLabor
 Taxes
 4
 . The services provided by bureaucracy are poor and make for a tax more expensive than any bill or pricetag on the
 narket; they are poor for the same reason a diabetic has more incentive to excercise than a perfectly fit individual
 here's always the threat of health, metaphorically job security. Also, they are more expensive due to added-on
 ureaucratic costs (paperwork, wages, etc.) and the cost for the actual services themselves, even more so for high-
 end service. 4. By putting the tax burden on the rich and business, one is sure to hamper industry; every cent of a
 rofit taxed is a cent lost to being able to provide more jobs, better goods and services, and a better working facility
 This is to assume that the bureaucracy won't own and manage the workplaces, in which the threat of failure and
 rofit loss would not factor in decision-making for the company's (worker's) best interests. 5. The fallacy in criticizing
 he rich as greedy, manipulative, and authoritative is that socialism's alternative, bureaucracy, is in essence no differ
 nt the problem now is the cronies are working together instead of competing. 6. Like taxation, regulation is a hin-
 rance to industry; instead of directly cutting into capital, it is a loss of potential gains. While they are good meaning
 egulations hinder the efficiency and production capabilities of the workplace, only hurting the worker in the end. 7
 Soviet Russia, China and North Korea are/were socialist economies; next up, America
<p>🅱hit on yourself via /r/dank_meme <a href="http://ift.tt/2eGiP9n">http://ift.tt/2eGiP9n</a></p>

<p>🅱hit on yourself via /r/dank_meme <a href="http://ift.tt/2eGiP9n">http://ift.tt/2eGiP9n</a></p>

Be Like, Deep Throat, and Dope: Hoes be like "l can count how many niggas i've fucked with one hand" I advise you not to ask a girl her body count. There's a chance you might hear some shit you didn't want to. I was tryna to hook up with this one girl from school. Her name was Debbie but the homies called her deep throat. Head game gonna feel like getting your ears cleaned with a Q tip while reaching climax. I'm not the type of guy to listen to other guys when it come to girls. I rather keep it real and get to know them myself before making judgement. Debbie was pretty cool. Me and her had a lot in common and she seem dope. My homies saw me walk her to class one time and tried to have a intervention with me. I'm hard headed and didn't listen to them. At the end of the day your homies ain't gonna be laid up watching dragon ball super with you. (unless you into that ). I'm on FaceTime having a heart to heart with her. She ask me if I'm a virgin. I be hesitant to answer this question because if I say yes then she might think I'm a fuck boy, but if I say no the she might be down so she can take my V card. Hoes collect virginities like Pokémon. I asked her how many dudes she been with. She pulled out a Dick‘e -Dex (similar to the PokeDex) but it and recorded the vital info of the dudes that hit. Debbie listed my niggas, her niggas, my niggas niggas, and they niggas niggas niggas, more niggas then a lil wayne verse. After listening her List more dudes than avogordos number I was still in the mindset to fuck. That means her sex experience is max prestige and that's a Win. I had to act unsurprised like "oh ok cool" It was good until she said "Yea well that's the past tho my next man is gonna be husband. I spit out drink like triple H laughing. What you talking about sis? How you gonna play me like that? I hung my phone up with God level swiftness. Be careful kings.
Be Like, Deep Throat, and Dope: Hoes be like "l can count how
 many niggas i've fucked with one
 hand"
I advise you not to ask a girl her body count. There's a chance you might hear some shit you didn't want to. I was tryna to hook up with this one girl from school. Her name was Debbie but the homies called her deep throat. Head game gonna feel like getting your ears cleaned with a Q tip while reaching climax. I'm not the type of guy to listen to other guys when it come to girls. I rather keep it real and get to know them myself before making judgement. Debbie was pretty cool. Me and her had a lot in common and she seem dope. My homies saw me walk her to class one time and tried to have a intervention with me. I'm hard headed and didn't listen to them. At the end of the day your homies ain't gonna be laid up watching dragon ball super with you. (unless you into that ). I'm on FaceTime having a heart to heart with her. She ask me if I'm a virgin. I be hesitant to answer this question because if I say yes then she might think I'm a fuck boy, but if I say no the she might be down so she can take my V card. Hoes collect virginities like Pokémon. I asked her how many dudes she been with. She pulled out a Dick‘e -Dex (similar to the PokeDex) but it and recorded the vital info of the dudes that hit. Debbie listed my niggas, her niggas, my niggas niggas, and they niggas niggas niggas, more niggas then a lil wayne verse. After listening her List more dudes than avogordos number I was still in the mindset to fuck. That means her sex experience is max prestige and that's a Win. I had to act unsurprised like "oh ok cool" It was good until she said "Yea well that's the past tho my next man is gonna be husband. I spit out drink like triple H laughing. What you talking about sis? How you gonna play me like that? I hung my phone up with God level swiftness. Be careful kings.

I advise you not to ask a girl her body count. There's a chance you might hear some shit you didn't want to. I was tryna to hook up with thi...