🔥 | Latest

hulking: when a hulking, steroid induced greenman blows up your favorite hula hoop
 hulking: when a hulking, steroid induced greenman blows up your favorite hula hoop

when a hulking, steroid induced greenman blows up your favorite hula hoop

hulking: Can't control Hulking Out
 hulking: Can't control Hulking Out

Can't control Hulking Out

hulking: reverseharem Frank Cho added 2 new photos - with Frank D Cho. 2 hrs 0 Well, this just happened. Milo Manara, master artist and storyteller, came in at the last ten minutes of my Art and Women panel and handed me a special gift in appreciation for fighting censorship- an original watercolor painting of Spider-Woman. The packed auditorium went wild. Wow. I'm just speechless. CHO! CME CRap RGan CRP SENG DHENTAM is it time for frank cho and milo manara to die or what aawb That's basically a naked woman l'm YELLING houroftheanarchistwolf What a pervert. What the FUCK does he not know how clothes work? What the hypothetical fuck is she wearing then if we can see all that? auntiewanda It's like how bath towels in comics miraculously wrap completely around breasts. Or how even when injured and dead on the ground women in comics have to be twisted into "sexy" poses. Or how women in comics walk like they're in high heels even barefoot. OH, SURE THROW THAT IN MY FACE- LISTEN, KIDDO, IVE KNOWN CABLE A LO0ONG TIME-- It's the only way men know how to draw women, because to them female characters are only there to be sexy. They only think of "women" as exploitative costumes and camera angles, high heels and titillation. Sex objects to ogle, plot objects to further male heroes' narratives and drama, not heroes to cheer for. brithwyr I'm sorry, I was labouring under the impression that this was the crowd that thought women should wear what they want..? auntiewanda And that applies to fictional women who are depicted by men how? You can't apply agency in the plot to something metatextual when it comes to fictional characters. brithwyr Come on, let's not pretend this is a male exclusive thing. UH... GENIUS, BILLIONAIRE, PLAYBOY, PHILANTHROPIST. A auntiewanda We're going to have this argument are we? Not to mention you're deviating from the original point that attributing agency to fictional characters' clothing is asinine. What you have here are images of power, and do you really believe these characters are designed with titillating heterosexual women and bisexual and homosexual men in mind? Because I don't think you do. This is why the Hawkeye Initiative exists. Take common female poses in comics, put a man in the role, and see how "empowering" and "strong" it actually looks: You like what bub? you see, HOOK TAXI HLOO Empowerment VSNULLANE YOU DON'T REMEMBER NAMED DICONE NO. GARTHP DUSTIN? VICP I CANT RECALL LILITHP GAR? YOU ARE BORING 00000 Also: BEING A BIG IMPOSSIBLY- MUSCLED HULK IS A MALE POWER FANTASY IT HAS JACK TO DO WITH WHAT A FEMALE SUCH AS MYSELF FINDS ATTRACTIVE IM TIRED OF YOU GRIPING THAT CHICKS W COMIC BOOKS ARE SEXUALLY OBJECTIFIED! THE DUDES ARE, TOO! THEY'RE BIG IMPOSSIBLY MUSCLED HULKS! FIRST OF ALL, GOOGLE "FALSE EQUIVALENCE." AND, YOU KNOW WHAT? SEEING HIS EYES IS IMPORTANT. THEY SHOULD BE LARGE AND NTENSE HERE LET ME SHOW YOU WHAT I MEAN FIM GONNA GET THE HOTS FOR BATMAN HE HAS TO BE BULT FOR DEXTERITY NOT POWER. LETS MAKE HIM MORE LEAN. LETS THROW W SOME ROSY CHEEKS AND KISSABLE LIPS. TH-THAT ART MAKES ME FEEL UNCOMFORTABLE WELCOME TO THE BACKGROUND RADIATION OF MY LIFE. SHORTPACKEDCOM feminism-is-radical He got the painting for fighting against 'censorship. Note that they handed him a gross design of a female being objectified, because at the end of the to be allowed to day, that is all they really wa objectify women. They don't care about censorship in general it is about their ability to sexualise and degrade women without consequence. schnerp You can see her butthole for chrissakes pmastamonkmonk I think the best imagery l've seen to explain the difference between what men think male objectification is vs what women actually want to see is the Hugh Jackman magazine covers. EXTRA GET RIPPED IN JUST 10 MINUTES MUSC FITESS SREAKT TECHOL TORCH FAT 25 SUPERHERO SPECIALI HUGH JACKMANS The Routine That Bullt the Star of LOGAN WAYSTO BURN iTOFF BUILD YOUR BIG PECS BODY WITHOUT WEIGHTS OURTOTAL TRAINING PROGRAM 100REPSPLAN TUT IFYOU CAN SURVIVEIT, YOU WILL GROW! Hugh Jackman on a men's magazine. He's shirtless and buff and angry. He's imposing and aggressive. This is a male power fantasy, it's what men want to be and aspire to - intense masculinity. AUGUST 2013 Goods DROP 5 Ibs. NOW Housekcepin 30 Minute Dinners 5 Minute Desserts Нugh Jackman's Recipe for Get out of the kitchen FAST THE JOY OF KEEPSAKES .WITHOUT THE CLUTTER p. 101 Romance What keeps his marriage rock-solid Savings Plans for Late Starters Fix your money mistakes GOOD HOUSEKEEPING SUMMER SKIN SECRETS BEST PRODUCTS, TIPS & TRICKS OJUST JARED Hugh Jackman on a women's magazine. He looks like a dad. He looks like he's going to bake me a quiche and sit and watch Game of Thrones with me. He looks like he gives really good hugs. Men think women want big hulking naked men in loin cloths which is why they always quote He-Man as male objectification - without realizing that He Man is naked and buff in a loin cloth because MEN WANT HIM TO BE. More women would be happy to see him in a pink apron cutting vegetables and singing off- key to 70s rock. Men want objects. Women want PEOPLE. aglassroseneverfades This is the first time I have EVER seen this false equivalence articulated so well. Thank you. #important 307,579 notes False equivalence and female objectification
 hulking: reverseharem
 Frank Cho added 2 new photos - with Frank D Cho.
 2 hrs 0
 Well, this just happened.
 Milo Manara, master artist and storyteller, came in at the last ten minutes of
 my Art and Women panel and handed me a special gift in appreciation for
 fighting censorship- an original watercolor painting of Spider-Woman. The
 packed auditorium went wild.
 Wow. I'm just speechless.
 CHO!
 CME
 CRap RGan
 CRP SENG
 DHENTAM
 is it time for frank cho and milo manara to die or
 what
 aawb
 That's basically a naked woman l'm YELLING
 houroftheanarchistwolf
 What a pervert. What the FUCK does he not know
 how clothes work? What the hypothetical fuck is she
 wearing then if we can see all that?
 auntiewanda
 It's like how bath towels in comics miraculously wrap
 completely around breasts. Or how even when
 injured and dead on the ground women in comics
 have to be twisted into "sexy" poses. Or how women
 in comics walk like they're in high heels even
 barefoot.
 OH, SURE
 THROW THAT
 IN MY FACE-
 LISTEN,
 KIDDO, IVE
 KNOWN
 CABLE A
 LO0ONG
 TIME--
 It's the only way men know how to draw women,
 because to them female characters are only there to
 be sexy. They only think of "women" as exploitative
 costumes and camera angles, high heels and
 titillation. Sex objects to ogle, plot objects to further
 male heroes' narratives and drama, not heroes to
 cheer for.
 brithwyr
 I'm sorry, I was labouring under the impression that
 this was the crowd that thought women should wear
 what they want..?
 auntiewanda
 And that applies to fictional women who are
 depicted by men how? You can't apply agency in the
 plot to something metatextual when it comes to
 fictional characters.
 brithwyr
 Come on, let's not pretend this is a male exclusive
 thing.
 UH... GENIUS, BILLIONAIRE, PLAYBOY, PHILANTHROPIST.
 A auntiewanda
 We're going to have this argument are we? Not to
 mention you're deviating from the original point that
 attributing agency to fictional characters' clothing is
 asinine.
 What you have here are images of power, and do you
 really believe these characters are designed with
 titillating heterosexual women and bisexual and
 homosexual men in mind? Because I don't think you
 do.
 This is why the Hawkeye Initiative exists. Take
 common female poses in comics, put a man in the
 role, and see how "empowering" and "strong" it
 actually looks:
 You like what
 bub?
 you see,
 HOOK
 TAXI
 HLOO Empowerment
 VSNULLANE
 YOU DON'T
 REMEMBER
 NAMED DICONE
 NO.
 GARTHP
 DUSTIN?
 VICP
 I CANT
 RECALL
 LILITHP
 GAR?
 YOU
 ARE BORING
 00000
 Also:
 BEING A BIG IMPOSSIBLY-
 MUSCLED HULK IS A MALE POWER
 FANTASY IT HAS JACK TO DO WITH
 WHAT A FEMALE SUCH AS MYSELF
 FINDS ATTRACTIVE
 IM TIRED OF YOU GRIPING THAT CHICKS W COMIC BOOKS
 ARE SEXUALLY OBJECTIFIED! THE DUDES ARE, TOO!
 THEY'RE BIG IMPOSSIBLY MUSCLED
 HULKS!
 FIRST
 OF ALL, GOOGLE "FALSE
 EQUIVALENCE."
 AND, YOU KNOW WHAT? SEEING HIS EYES
 IS IMPORTANT. THEY SHOULD BE LARGE
 AND NTENSE
 HERE LET ME SHOW YOU
 WHAT I MEAN
 FIM GONNA
 GET THE HOTS FOR
 BATMAN HE HAS TO BE
 BULT FOR DEXTERITY
 NOT POWER. LETS
 MAKE HIM MORE
 LEAN.
 LETS
 THROW W SOME ROSY
 CHEEKS AND KISSABLE
 LIPS.
 TH-THAT ART MAKES ME FEEL
 UNCOMFORTABLE
 WELCOME TO
 THE BACKGROUND
 RADIATION OF MY
 LIFE.
 SHORTPACKEDCOM
 feminism-is-radical
 He got the painting for fighting against 'censorship.
 Note that they handed him a gross design of a
 female being objectified, because at the end of the
 to be allowed to
 day, that is all they really wa
 objectify women. They don't care about censorship
 in general it is about their ability to sexualise and
 degrade women without consequence.
 schnerp
 You can see her butthole for chrissakes
 pmastamonkmonk
 I think the best imagery l've seen to explain the
 difference between what men think male
 objectification is vs what women actually want to see
 is the Hugh Jackman magazine covers.
 EXTRA GET RIPPED IN JUST 10 MINUTES
 MUSC
 FITESS
 SREAKT
 TECHOL
 TORCH
 FAT
 25
 SUPERHERO
 SPECIALI
 HUGH
 JACKMANS
 The Routine
 That Bullt
 the Star of
 LOGAN
 WAYSTO
 BURN
 iTOFF
 BUILD
 YOUR
 BIG
 PECS
 BODY
 WITHOUT
 WEIGHTS
 OURTOTAL
 TRAINING
 PROGRAM
 100REPSPLAN
 TUT
 IFYOU CAN SURVIVEIT, YOU WILL GROW!
 Hugh Jackman on a men's magazine. He's shirtless
 and buff and angry. He's imposing and aggressive.
 This is a male power fantasy, it's what men want to
 be and aspire to - intense masculinity.
 AUGUST 2013
 Goods
 DROP
 5 Ibs.
 NOW
 Housekcepin
 30 Minute
 Dinners
 5 Minute
 Desserts
 Нugh
 Jackman's
 Recipe for
 Get out of the kitchen FAST
 THE JOY OF
 KEEPSAKES
 .WITHOUT THE
 CLUTTER p. 101
 Romance
 What keeps his
 marriage rock-solid
 Savings
 Plans
 for Late
 Starters
 Fix your
 money mistakes
 GOOD
 HOUSEKEEPING
 SUMMER
 SKIN SECRETS
 BEST PRODUCTS,
 TIPS & TRICKS
 OJUST
 JARED
 Hugh Jackman on a women's magazine. He looks
 like a dad. He looks like he's going to bake me a
 quiche and sit and watch Game of Thrones with me.
 He looks like he gives really good hugs.
 Men think women want big hulking naked men in loin
 cloths which is why they always quote He-Man as
 male objectification - without realizing that He Man
 is naked and buff in a loin cloth because MEN WANT
 HIM TO BE. More women would be happy to see him
 in a pink apron cutting vegetables and singing off-
 key to 70s rock.
 Men want objects. Women want PEOPLE.
 aglassroseneverfades
 This is the first time I have EVER seen this false
 equivalence articulated so well. Thank you.
 #important
 307,579 notes
False equivalence and female objectification

False equivalence and female objectification

hulking: I thought about hulking giving ant man a taco when I was watching Gotham
 hulking: I thought about hulking giving ant man a taco when I was watching Gotham

I thought about hulking giving ant man a taco when I was watching Gotham

hulking: Frank Cho added 2 new photos with Frank D Cho. 2 hrs Well, this just happened. Milo Manara, master artist and storyteller, came in at the last ten minutes of my Art and Women panel and handed me a special gift in appreciation for fighting censorship- an original watercolor painting of Spider-Woman. The packed auditorium went wild. Wow. I'm just speechless CHO! NERT SE prasLE THE caMERa 2G CRap! IG a stock N HEET CRP SERNG P 1RT ENTM FR MA RA what-the-fandomm: 2sunchild2: kukumomoart: chancethereaper: aglassroseneverfades: pmastamonkmonk: schnerp: feminism-is-radical: auntiewanda: brithwyr: auntiewanda: brithwyr: auntiewanda: houroftheanarchistwolf: aawb: starsapphire: is it time for frank cho and milo manara to die or what That’s basically a naked woman I’m YELLING What a pervert. What the FUCK does he not know how clothes work? What the hypothetical fuck is she wearing then if we can see all that? It’s like how bath towels in comics miraculously wrap completely around breasts. Or how even when injured and dead on the ground women in comics have to be twisted into “sexy” poses. Or how women in comics walk like they’re in high heels even barefoot.  It’s the only way men know how to draw women, because to them female characters are only there to be sexy. They only think of “women” as exploitative costumes and camera angles, high heels and titillation. Sex objects to ogle, plot objects to further male heroes’ narratives and drama, not heroes to cheer for.  I’m sorry, I was labouring under the impression that this was the crowd that thought women should wear what they want..? And that applies to fictional women who are depicted by men how? You can’t apply agency in the plot to something metatextual when it comes to fictional characters.  Come on, let’s not pretend this is a male exclusive thing. We’re going to have this argument are we? Not to mention you’re deviating from the original point that attributing agency to fictional characters’ clothing is asinine.  What you have here are images of power, and do you really believe these characters are designed with titillating heterosexual women and bisexual and homosexual men in mind? Because I don’t think you do. This is why the Hawkeye Initiative exists. Take common female poses in comics, put a man in the role, and see how “empowering” and “strong” it actually looks:  Also:  He got the painting for fighting against ‘censorship.’ Note that they handed him a gross design of a female being objectified, because at the end of the day, that is all they really want, to be allowed to objectify women. They don’t care about censorship in general it is about their ability to sexualise and degrade women without consequence. You can see her butthole for chrissakes I think the best imagery I’ve seen to explain the difference between what men think male objectification is vs what women actually want to see is the Hugh Jackman magazine covers. Hugh Jackman on a men’s magazine. He’s shirtless and buff and angry. He’s imposing and aggressive. This is a male power fantasy, it’s what men want to be and aspire to - intense masculinity. Hugh Jackman on a women’s magazine.  He looks like a dad. He looks like he’s going to bake me a quiche and sit and watch Game of Thrones with me. He looks like he gives really good hugs. Men think women want big hulking naked men in loin cloths which is why they always quote He-Man as male objectification - without realizing that He Man is naked and buff in a loin cloth because MEN WANT HIM TO BE. More women would be happy to see him in a pink apron cutting vegetables and singing off-key to 70s rock. Men want objects. Women want PEOPLE. This is the first time I have EVER seen this false equivalence articulated so well. Thank you. bro you can literally see every fold of her pussy that just isn’t how fabric works Lol body painting literally Clothes don’t suction themselves around tiddies.If that was the case I’d be wearing hoodies all year i mean there is dangerous objectification for male characters, but it’s not prevalent in written or drawn sources because that doesn’t harm the person and therefore isn’t relevant. it’s only something to bring into the conversation when you’re talking about how it affects the actors.male actors are sometimes forced to starve for days so that they can get scenes where their muscles are stood out (there’s a really good post with article links about this i’ll try to find it), but these drawings don’t affect an actual personit’s a completely different subjectand i mean for god’s sake you can’t counter the fact that someone deliberately drew her with her coochie out with some bullshit about how male characters are hyper-masculine in a glorified way
 hulking: Frank Cho added 2 new photos with Frank D Cho.
 2 hrs
 Well, this just happened.
 Milo Manara, master artist and storyteller, came in at the last ten minutes of
 my Art and Women panel and handed me a special gift in appreciation for
 fighting censorship- an original watercolor painting of Spider-Woman. The
 packed auditorium went wild.
 Wow. I'm just speechless
 CHO!
 NERT SE
 prasLE THE
 caMERa 2G
 CRap! IG a
 stock N HEET
 CRP SERNG P
 1RT
 ENTM
 FR
 MA
 RA
what-the-fandomm:

2sunchild2:

kukumomoart:
chancethereaper:

aglassroseneverfades:

pmastamonkmonk:

schnerp:

feminism-is-radical:

auntiewanda:

brithwyr:

auntiewanda:

brithwyr:

auntiewanda:

houroftheanarchistwolf:

aawb:

starsapphire:

is it time for frank cho and milo manara to die or what

That’s basically a naked woman I’m YELLING

What a pervert. What the FUCK does he not know how clothes work? What the hypothetical fuck is she wearing then if we can see all that?

It’s like how bath towels in comics miraculously wrap completely around breasts. Or how even when injured and dead on the ground women in comics have to be twisted into “sexy” poses. Or how women in comics walk like they’re in high heels even barefoot. 
It’s the only way men know how to draw women, because to them female characters are only there to be sexy. They only think of “women” as exploitative costumes and camera angles, high heels and titillation. Sex objects to ogle, plot objects to further male heroes’ narratives and drama, not heroes to cheer for. 

I’m sorry, I was labouring under the impression that this was the crowd that thought women should wear what they want..?

And that applies to fictional women who are depicted by men how? You can’t apply agency in the plot to something metatextual when it comes to fictional characters. 

Come on, let’s not pretend this is a male exclusive thing.

We’re going to have this argument are we? Not to mention you’re deviating from the original point that attributing agency to fictional characters’ clothing is asinine. 
What you have here are images of power, and do you really believe these characters are designed with titillating heterosexual women and bisexual and homosexual men in mind? Because I don’t think you do.
This is why the Hawkeye Initiative exists. Take common female poses in comics, put a man in the role, and see how “empowering” and “strong” it actually looks: 
Also: 

He got the painting for fighting against ‘censorship.’ Note that they handed him a gross design of a female being objectified, because at the end of the day, that is all they really want, to be allowed to objectify women. They don’t care about censorship in general it is about their ability to sexualise and degrade women without consequence.


You can see her butthole for chrissakes

I think the best imagery I’ve seen to explain the difference between what men think male objectification is vs what women actually want to see is the Hugh Jackman magazine covers.
Hugh Jackman on a men’s magazine. He’s shirtless and buff and angry. He’s imposing and aggressive. This is a male power fantasy, it’s what men want to be and aspire to - intense masculinity.
Hugh Jackman on a women’s magazine.  He looks like a dad. He looks like he’s going to bake me a quiche and sit and watch Game of Thrones with me. He looks like he gives really good hugs.
Men think women want big hulking naked men in loin cloths which is why they always quote He-Man as male objectification - without realizing that He Man is naked and buff in a loin cloth because MEN WANT HIM TO BE. More women would be happy to see him in a pink apron cutting vegetables and singing off-key to 70s rock.
Men want objects. Women want PEOPLE. 

This is the first time I have EVER seen this false equivalence articulated so well. Thank you.

bro you can literally see every fold of her pussy that just isn’t how fabric works

Lol body painting literally


Clothes don’t suction themselves around tiddies.If that was the case I’d be wearing hoodies all year

i mean there is dangerous objectification for male characters, but it’s not prevalent in written or drawn sources because that doesn’t harm the person and therefore isn’t relevant. it’s only something to bring into the conversation when you’re talking about how it affects the actors.male actors are sometimes forced to starve for days so that they can get scenes where their muscles are stood out (there’s a really good post with article links about this i’ll try to find it), but these drawings don’t affect an actual personit’s a completely different subjectand i mean for god’s sake you can’t counter the fact that someone deliberately drew her with her coochie out with some bullshit about how male characters are hyper-masculine in a glorified way

what-the-fandomm: 2sunchild2: kukumomoart: chancethereaper: aglassroseneverfades: pmastamonkmonk: schnerp: feminism-is-radical: au...

hulking: ww LV 47 Hulking Tank Playing borderlands 2 and this happened. Both Gettle and Mobely both dropped their legendaries at the same time. WHAT ARE THE ODDS
 hulking: ww
 LV 47 Hulking Tank
Playing borderlands 2 and this happened. Both Gettle and Mobely both dropped their legendaries at the same time. WHAT ARE THE ODDS

Playing borderlands 2 and this happened. Both Gettle and Mobely both dropped their legendaries at the same time. WHAT ARE THE ODDS

hulking: 6:52 189% satan-in-a-box riddlemeinthedark emmafrost-archive Frank Cho added 2 new photos - with Frank D Cho. 2 hrs Well, this just happened. Milo Manara, master artist and storyteller, came in at the last ten minutes of my Art and Women panel and handed me a special gift in appreciation for fighting censorship- an original watercolor painting of Spider-Woman. The packed auditorium went wild. Wow. I'm just speech less CHO! is it time for frank cho and milo manara to die or what aawb That's basically a naked woman l'm YELLING houroftheanarchistwolf What a pervert. What the FUCK does he not know how clothes work? What the hypothetical fuck is she wearing then if we can see all that? auntiewanda It's like how bath towels in comics miracu lously wrap completely around breasts. Or how even when injured and dead on the ground women in comics have to be twisted into "sexy" poses. Or how women in comics walk like they're in high heels even barefoot OH, SURE, THROW THAT IN MY FACE LISTEN KIDDO,IVE KNOWN CABLE A LO0ONG TIME-- It's the only way men know how to draw women, because to them female characters are only there to be sexy. They only think of "women" as exploitative costumes and camera angles, high heels and titillation. Sex objects to ogle, plot objects to further male heroes' narratives and drama, not heroes to cheer for. brithwyr I'm sorry, I was labouring under the impres- sion that this was the crowd that thought women should wear what they want..? auntiewanda And that applies to fictional women who are depicted by men how? You can't apply agency in the plot to something metatextual when it comes to fictional characters. brithwyr Come on, let's not pretend this is a male exclusive thing. UH... GENIUS, BILLIONAIRE, PLAYBOY, PHILANTHROPIST auntiewanda We're going to have this argument are we? Not to mention you're deviating from the original point that attributing agency to fictional characters' clothing is asinine. What you have here are images of power, and do you really believe these characters are designed with titillating heterosexual women and bisexual and homosexual men in mind? Because I don't think you do. This is why the Hawkeye Initiative exists. Take common female poses in comics, put a man in the role, and see how "empowering" and "strong" it actually looks: L what you see HOOR bub? TAXI Empowerment YOU DON'T REMEMBER ANYONE NAMED DICK GARTHP DUSTINP vic? I CANT RECALL LILITHP GAR? ARE BORING Also: TM TIRED OF YOU GRIPNG THAT CHICKS IN COMIC BOOKS ARE SEXUALLY OUJECTIFIED! THE DUDES ARE TOO! THEYRE BIG UMPOSSIBLYMUSCLED HULKS BEWG A BIG MPOSSIBLY MUSCLED HULK IS A MALE POWER FANTASY IT HAS JACK TO DO WITH WHAT AFEMALE SUCH AS MYSELF FWDS ATTRACTIVE FIRST OF ALL GOOGLE "FALSE EQUMALENCE AND YOU KNOW WHAT? SEENG HIS EYES IS MPORTANT. THEY SHOULD BE LARGE AND INTENSE HERE LET ME SHOW YOU WHAT I MEAN FIMGONNA GET THE HOTS FOR BATMAN HE HAS TO BE BULT FOR DEXTERITY NOT POWER LETS MAKE HM MORE LEAN LETS THROW IN SOME ROSY CHEEKS AND KISSABLE LIPS TH THAT ART MAKES ME FEEL UNCOMFORTABLE WELCOME TO THE BACKGROUND RADIATION OF TY LIFE feminism-is-radical He got the painting for fighting against 'censorship. Note that they handed him a gross design of a female being objectified, because at the end of the day, that is all they really want, to be allowed to objectify women. They don't care about censorship in general it is about their ability to sexualise and degrade women without consequence. schnerp You can see her butthole for chrissakes pmastamonkmonk I think the best imagery I've seen to explain the difference between what men think male objectification is vs what women actually want to see is the Hugh Jackman magazine covers EXTRA GET RIPPED IN JUST 10 MINUTES- MUS BREAKTRU TEC WEIGHT LOSS FIT SS TORCH FAT 25 SUPERHERO SPECIAL HUGH JACKMAN The Routine That Bellt the Star of LOGAN WAYST BURN ITOFF BUILD YOUR BIG PECS BODY WITHOUT WEIGHTS OUR TOTAL TRAINING PROGRAM 100 REPSPLAN IF YOU CAN SURVIVEIT, YOU WILL GROW! Hugh Jackman on a men's magazine. He's shirtless and buff and angry. He's imposing and aggressive. This is a male power fantasy, it's what men want to be and aspire to - intense masculinity. AUGUST 2013 Gool DROP 5 lbs NOW Frousekeoping 30Minute Dinners Desserts 5 Minute Hugh Jackman's Get out of the kitchen FAST Recipe for Romance THE JOY OF KEEPSAKES ...WITHOUT THE CLUTTER p. 10 What keeps his marriage rock-solid Savings Plans for Late Starters Fix your money mistakes SUMMER SKIN SECRETS BEST PRODUCTS TIPS& TRICKS OJUST JARED Hugh Jackman on a women's magazine. He looks like a dad. He looks like he's going to bake me a quiche and sit and watch Game of Thrones with me. He looks like he gives really good hugs Men think women want big hulking naked men in loin cloths which is why they always quote He-Man as male objectification - without realizing that He Man is naked and buff in a loin cloth because MEN WANT HIM TO BE. More women would be happy to see him in a pink apron cutting vegetables and singing off-key to 70s rock. Men want objects. Women want PEOPLE. aglassroseneverfades This is the first time I have EVER seen this false equivalence articulated so well. Thank you. Source: emmafrost-archive 291,323 notes SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT AD s 5G-Ready. The new Galaxy S10 5G. Requires optimal 5G connection; see carrierfor network availability. Men vs women in comics
 hulking: 6:52
 189%
 satan-in-a-box
 riddlemeinthedark
 emmafrost-archive
 Frank Cho added 2 new photos - with Frank D Cho.
 2 hrs
 Well, this just happened.
 Milo Manara, master artist and storyteller, came in at the last ten minutes of
 my Art and Women panel and handed me a special gift in appreciation for
 fighting censorship- an original watercolor painting of Spider-Woman. The
 packed auditorium went wild.
 Wow. I'm just speech less
 CHO!
 is it time for frank cho and milo manara to
 die or what
 aawb
 That's basically a naked woman l'm YELLING
 houroftheanarchistwolf
 What a pervert. What the FUCK does he
 not know how clothes work? What the
 hypothetical fuck is she wearing then if we
 can see all that?
 auntiewanda
 It's like how bath towels in comics miracu
 lously wrap completely around breasts. Or
 how even when injured and dead on the
 ground women in comics have to be twisted
 into "sexy" poses. Or how women in comics
 walk like they're in high heels even barefoot
 OH, SURE,
 THROW THAT
 IN MY FACE
 LISTEN
 KIDDO,IVE
 KNOWN
 CABLE A
 LO0ONG
 TIME--
 It's the only way men know how to draw
 women, because to them female characters
 are only there to be sexy. They only think
 of "women" as exploitative costumes and
 camera angles, high heels and titillation. Sex
 objects to ogle, plot objects to further male
 heroes' narratives and drama, not heroes to
 cheer for.
 brithwyr
 I'm sorry, I was labouring under the impres-
 sion that this was the crowd that thought
 women should wear what they want..?
 auntiewanda
 And that applies to fictional women who
 are depicted by men how? You can't apply
 agency in the plot to something metatextual
 when it comes to fictional characters.
 brithwyr
 Come on, let's not pretend this is a male
 exclusive thing.
 UH... GENIUS, BILLIONAIRE, PLAYBOY, PHILANTHROPIST
 auntiewanda
 We're going to have this argument are we?
 Not to mention you're deviating from the
 original point that attributing agency to
 fictional characters' clothing is asinine.
 What you have here are images of power,
 and do you really believe these characters
 are designed with titillating heterosexual
 women and bisexual and homosexual men in
 mind? Because I don't think you do.
 This is why the Hawkeye Initiative exists.
 Take common female poses in comics, put a
 man in the role, and see how "empowering"
 and "strong" it actually looks:
 L
 what you see
 HOOR
 bub?
 TAXI
 Empowerment
 YOU DON'T
 REMEMBER ANYONE
 NAMED DICK
 GARTHP
 DUSTINP
 vic?
 I CANT
 RECALL
 LILITHP
 GAR?
 ARE BORING
 Also:
 TM TIRED OF YOU GRIPNG THAT CHICKS IN COMIC BOOKS
 ARE SEXUALLY OUJECTIFIED! THE DUDES ARE TOO!
 THEYRE BIG UMPOSSIBLYMUSCLED
 HULKS
 BEWG A BIG MPOSSIBLY
 MUSCLED HULK IS A MALE POWER
 FANTASY IT HAS JACK TO DO WITH
 WHAT AFEMALE SUCH AS MYSELF
 FWDS ATTRACTIVE
 FIRST
 OF ALL GOOGLE "FALSE
 EQUMALENCE
 AND YOU KNOW WHAT? SEENG HIS EYES
 IS MPORTANT. THEY SHOULD BE LARGE
 AND INTENSE
 HERE LET ME SHOW YOU
 WHAT I MEAN
 FIMGONNA
 GET THE HOTS FOR
 BATMAN HE HAS TO BE
 BULT FOR DEXTERITY
 NOT POWER LETS
 MAKE HM MORE
 LEAN
 LETS
 THROW IN SOME ROSY
 CHEEKS AND KISSABLE
 LIPS
 TH THAT ART MAKES ME FEEL
 UNCOMFORTABLE
 WELCOME TO
 THE BACKGROUND
 RADIATION OF TY
 LIFE
 feminism-is-radical
 He got the painting for fighting against
 'censorship. Note that they handed him a
 gross design of a female being objectified,
 because at the end of the day, that is all
 they really want, to be allowed to objectify
 women. They don't care about censorship
 in general it is about their ability to sexualise
 and degrade women without consequence.
 schnerp
 You can see her butthole for chrissakes
 pmastamonkmonk
 I think the best imagery I've seen to explain
 the difference between what men think male
 objectification is vs what women actually
 want to see is the Hugh Jackman magazine
 covers
 EXTRA GET RIPPED IN JUST 10 MINUTES-
 MUS
 BREAKTRU
 TEC
 WEIGHT LOSS
 FIT SS
 TORCH
 FAT
 25
 SUPERHERO
 SPECIAL
 HUGH
 JACKMAN
 The Routine
 That Bellt
 the Star of
 LOGAN
 WAYST
 BURN
 ITOFF
 BUILD
 YOUR
 BIG
 PECS
 BODY
 WITHOUT
 WEIGHTS
 OUR TOTAL
 TRAINING
 PROGRAM
 100 REPSPLAN
 IF YOU CAN SURVIVEIT, YOU WILL GROW!
 Hugh Jackman on a men's magazine. He's
 shirtless and buff and angry. He's imposing
 and aggressive. This is a male power fantasy,
 it's what men want to be and aspire to -
 intense masculinity.
 AUGUST 2013
 Gool
 DROP
 5 lbs
 NOW
 Frousekeoping
 30Minute
 Dinners
 Desserts
 5 Minute
 Hugh
 Jackman's
 Get out of the kitchen FAST
 Recipe for
 Romance
 THE JOY OF
 KEEPSAKES
 ...WITHOUT THE
 CLUTTER p. 10
 What keeps his
 marriage rock-solid
 Savings
 Plans
 for Late
 Starters
 Fix your
 money mistakes
 SUMMER
 SKIN SECRETS
 BEST PRODUCTS
 TIPS& TRICKS
 OJUST
 JARED
 Hugh Jackman on a women's magazine. He
 looks like a dad. He looks like he's going to
 bake me a quiche and sit and watch Game of
 Thrones with me. He looks like he gives really
 good hugs
 Men think women want big hulking naked
 men in loin cloths which is why they always
 quote He-Man as male objectification -
 without realizing that He Man is naked and
 buff in a loin cloth because MEN WANT HIM
 TO BE. More women would be happy to see
 him in a pink apron cutting vegetables and
 singing off-key to 70s rock.
 Men want objects. Women want PEOPLE.
 aglassroseneverfades
 This is the first time I have EVER seen this
 false equivalence articulated so well. Thank
 you.
 Source: emmafrost-archive
 291,323 notes
 SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
 AD s
 5G-Ready.
 The new Galaxy S10 5G.
 Requires optimal 5G connection; see carrierfor network availability.
Men vs women in comics

Men vs women in comics

hulking: DISORDERLY Oct. 1- A group of students playing hide and seek in the Harris Fine Arts Center at 11 p.m. caused a faculty member to call the University Police. The police arrived but were not able to find any of the students owl-librarian #you just made it a higher stakes game of hide and seek deadmomjokes Having gone to this University, and having personally played hide and seek in the Harris Fine Arts Center, I guarantee you that NOBODY finds hiders unless they, too, are familiar with the bowels of the HFAC. Once you get down to the practice-room levels, time stops completely and you could walk up the back stair and end up in 1967. The halls change at least 8 times an hour, there's no way you're getting back out the same way you came in. When the lights start going off at 10 the whole bottom 3 floors descend into some subsection of the fey realm. I once hid up on the balcony stage access fire-escape thing of a lower-level theater, and 3 faculty walked by under me and not a one of them noticed the hulking, wheezing asthmatic lurking above them, half dangling off a rickety metal ladder that probably wasn't supposed to be climbed. A fellow hider friend came and found me, and we sat up there for 30 minutes listening to some distant clicking sound before we realized nobody was actually going to find us. We had no cell service, and no internet to reach anyone. We got lost trying to get back out, and once we resurfaced, everyone else was gone, the building was empty, and we just went home to eat ice cream. Nobody knew where we had disappeared to, and nobody bothered to check if we were there before leaving. For all I know, they just assumed we had been lost to the gaping maw of the HFAC basement and when they saw us at church on Sunday it was probably like they'd seen a ghost. None of us ever mentioned it again. Basically what I'm saying is Campus Police had no hope of finding them in the first place and probably lost an officer or two if they actually conducted a real search, because nobody except Senior art majors or veteran custodians actually knows how to navigate that building and make it out in the same dimension they entered from. Not at 11pm anyway. wearemage I mean that's some fine scenario material, isn't it? None Shall Leave
 hulking: DISORDERLY
 Oct. 1- A group of students
 playing hide and seek in the
 Harris Fine Arts Center at 11
 p.m. caused a faculty member
 to call the University Police.
 The police arrived but were
 not able to find any of the
 students
 owl-librarian
 #you just made it a higher stakes game of hide and seek
 deadmomjokes
 Having gone to this University, and having personally played hide and seek
 in the Harris Fine Arts Center, I guarantee you that NOBODY finds hiders
 unless they, too, are familiar with the bowels of the HFAC. Once you get
 down to the practice-room levels, time stops completely and you could
 walk up the back stair and end up in 1967. The halls change at least 8
 times an hour, there's no way you're getting back out the same way you
 came in. When the lights start going off at 10 the whole bottom 3 floors
 descend into some subsection of the fey realm. I once hid up on the
 balcony stage access fire-escape thing of a lower-level theater, and 3
 faculty walked by under me and not a one of them noticed the hulking,
 wheezing asthmatic lurking above them, half dangling off a rickety metal
 ladder that probably wasn't supposed to be climbed. A fellow hider friend
 came and found me, and we sat up there for 30 minutes listening to some
 distant clicking sound before we realized nobody was actually going to find
 us. We had no cell service, and no internet to reach anyone. We got lost
 trying to get back out, and once we resurfaced, everyone else was gone,
 the building was empty, and we just went home to eat ice cream. Nobody
 knew where we had disappeared to, and nobody bothered to check if we
 were there before leaving. For all I know, they just assumed we had been
 lost to the gaping maw of the HFAC basement and when they saw us at
 church on Sunday it was probably like they'd seen a ghost. None of us
 ever mentioned it again.
 Basically what I'm saying is Campus Police had no hope of finding them in
 the first place and probably lost an officer or two if they actually conducted
 a real search, because nobody except Senior art majors or veteran
 custodians actually knows how to navigate that building and make it out in
 the same dimension they entered from. Not at 11pm anyway.
 wearemage
 I mean that's some fine scenario material, isn't it?
None Shall Leave

None Shall Leave

hulking: Untitled - Notepad File Edit Format View Help Shorthand descriptions of the OTF group because you can't remember for SHIT mf Shen Magic she-elf that leads the group. Pale white-violet skin with glazed eyes and broken fingers (following an encounter with the so- called heroes) wildcat - Fire elemental cat. Big and hulking, scary anthro guy, but his real name is Carter. lol Arland - Techy dorky dark elf. He invents medicines n shit. Twisted sense of humor and justice Tammy Fatty funny mole person. Pretty sure I stole her name from the movie Tammy. Hope that's not too obvious. Just keep that movie in mind Shuvo he's that water dragon you can never remember exists. But cause they live in the desert he's usually in rough shape. Super happy whenever he gets to swim. otherwise he's usually cranky cause yknow desert. Be nice to shuvo The twins - apparently I never gave them individual names. Wtf is wrong with me. Twin life elves who need names asap Reos - rich metal man. No other character traits at this time apparently. Try again later Nicole backstab rather than speak to the manager directly Karen, but she has blue eyes and hair features, and prefers to X I am writing a short story for myself and like 3 people at 1:30am. Here's the notepad I am using to keep track of a group of characters because I know them, I just forget their names
 hulking: Untitled - Notepad
 File Edit Format View Help
 Shorthand descriptions of the OTF group because you can't remember for
 SHIT mf
 Shen Magic she-elf that leads the group. Pale white-violet skin with
 glazed eyes and broken fingers (following an encounter with the so-
 called heroes)
 wildcat - Fire elemental cat. Big and hulking, scary anthro guy, but
 his real name is Carter. lol
 Arland - Techy dorky dark elf. He invents medicines n shit. Twisted
 sense of humor and justice
 Tammy Fatty funny mole person. Pretty sure I stole her name from the
 movie Tammy. Hope that's not too obvious. Just keep that movie in mind
 Shuvo
 he's that water dragon you can never remember exists. But cause
 they live in the desert he's usually in rough shape. Super happy
 whenever he gets to swim. otherwise he's usually cranky cause yknow
 desert. Be nice to shuvo
 The twins - apparently I never gave them individual names. Wtf is wrong
 with me. Twin life elves who need names asap
 Reos - rich metal man. No other character traits at this time
 apparently. Try again later
 Nicole
 backstab rather than speak to the manager directly
 Karen, but she has blue eyes and hair features, and prefers to
 X
I am writing a short story for myself and like 3 people at 1:30am. Here's the notepad I am using to keep track of a group of characters because I know them, I just forget their names

I am writing a short story for myself and like 3 people at 1:30am. Here's the notepad I am using to keep track of a group of characters b...