🔥 | Latest

Church, Doctor, and Fucking: 5909 "I decided that never again would there be a pregnant woman in Auschwitz." patron-saint-of-smart-asses: everybody-look-right: washingtonstateconservative: ctrlgeek: webbgirl34: thebigsisteryouneveraskedfor: Gisella Perl was forced to work as a doctor in Auschwitz concentration camp during the holocaust. She was ordered to report ever pregnant women do the physician Dr. Josef Mengele, who would then use the women for cruel experiments (e.g. vivisections) before killing them. She saved hundreds of women by performing abortions on them before their pregnancy was discovered, without having access to basic medical supplies. She became known as the “Angel of Auschwitz”. After being rescued from Bergen-Belsen concentration camp she tried to commit suicide, but survived, recovered and kept working as a gynecologist, delivering more than 3000 babies. I want to nail this to the forehead of every anti-abortionist who uses the word “Holocaust” when talking about legal abortions. Yeah… she became a gynecologist and was extremely pro-life after she got out of the camps. In an interview with Nadine Brozan for the New York Times in 1982, Dr. Perl recalled her initial experiences with Dr. Mengele’s “cure” for pregnancy in Auschwitz. ”Dr. Mengele told me that it was my duty to report every pregnant woman to him,” Dr. Perl said. ”He said that they would go to another camp for better nutrition, even for milk. So women began to run directly to him, telling him, ‘I am pregnant.’ I learned that they were all taken to the research block to be used as guinea pigs, and then two lives would be thrown into the crematorium. I decided that never again would there be a pregnant woman in Auschwitz.” Let’s analyze the situation: mother and child alike were both going to be killed anyway if the pregnancy was discovered. Leaving wasn’t an option. Freedom was nonexistent, and the perspectives of all involved were colored by living in hell on earth.   After the war, she dedicated her life to Holocaust remembrance, infertility treatment, and delivering babies – not destroying them. The New York Times quotes her as saying, “No one will ever know what it meant to me to destroy those babies, but if I had not done it, both mother and child would have been cruelly murdered.” Perl never pretended they weren’t babies, that their lives didn’t matter, or that their deaths weren’t cruel. Holy crap. I literally got a ton of shit a few months ago for saying that maybe, just maybe, Perl’s actions don’t justify abortion as a whole. Well, it goes to show that I should’ve done more research, to find out  that Perl herself doesn’t pretend that was she did was right, or that it justifies abortion now. There was another woman, a midwife, who was devout Catholic and helped to care for pregnant women and hide the babies, and continued her work in midwifery after the war. Last I heard she was in the canonization process in the Catholic Church. Fucking THANK YOU I’m so tired of pro-choicers using her as a “gotcha”. She had to do a terrible thing in a terrible circumstance. That has literally no relation to first world abortion legislation today.
Church, Doctor, and Fucking: 5909
 "I decided that
 never again would
 there be a
 pregnant woman
 in Auschwitz."
patron-saint-of-smart-asses:

everybody-look-right:
washingtonstateconservative:

ctrlgeek:

webbgirl34:

thebigsisteryouneveraskedfor:

Gisella Perl was forced to work as a doctor in Auschwitz concentration camp during the holocaust.
She was ordered to report ever pregnant women do the physician Dr. Josef Mengele, who would then use the women for cruel experiments (e.g. vivisections) before killing them.
She saved hundreds of women by performing abortions on them before their pregnancy was discovered, without having access to basic medical supplies. She became known as the “Angel of Auschwitz”.
After being rescued from Bergen-Belsen concentration camp she tried to commit suicide, but survived, recovered and kept working as a gynecologist, delivering more than 3000 babies.

I want to nail this to the forehead of every anti-abortionist who uses the word “Holocaust” when talking about legal abortions.

Yeah… she became a gynecologist and was extremely pro-life after she got out of the camps.

In an interview with Nadine Brozan for the New York Times in 1982, Dr. Perl recalled her initial experiences with Dr. Mengele’s “cure” for pregnancy in Auschwitz. ”Dr. Mengele told me that it was my duty to report every pregnant woman to him,” Dr. Perl said. ”He said that they would go to another camp for better nutrition, even for milk. So women began to run directly to him, telling him, ‘I am pregnant.’ I learned that they were all taken to the research block to be used as guinea pigs, and then two lives would be thrown into the crematorium. I decided that never again would there be a pregnant woman in Auschwitz.”
Let’s analyze the situation: mother and child alike were both going to be killed anyway if the pregnancy was discovered. Leaving wasn’t an option. Freedom was nonexistent, and the perspectives of all involved were colored by living in hell on earth. 
 After the war, she dedicated her life to Holocaust remembrance, infertility treatment, and delivering babies – not destroying them. The New York Times quotes her as saying, “No one will ever know what it meant to me to destroy those babies, but if I had not done it, both mother and child would have been cruelly murdered.” Perl never pretended they weren’t babies, that their lives didn’t matter, or that their deaths weren’t cruel.

Holy crap. I literally got a ton of shit a few months ago for saying that maybe, just maybe, Perl’s actions don’t justify abortion as a whole. Well, it goes to show that I should’ve done more research, to find out  that Perl herself doesn’t pretend that was she did was right, or that it justifies abortion now.

There was another woman, a midwife, who was devout Catholic and helped to care for pregnant women and hide the babies, and continued her work in midwifery after the war. Last I heard she was in the canonization process in the Catholic Church.

Fucking THANK YOU I’m so tired of pro-choicers using her as a “gotcha”. She had to do a terrible thing in a terrible circumstance. That has literally no relation to first world abortion legislation today.

patron-saint-of-smart-asses: everybody-look-right: washingtonstateconservative: ctrlgeek: webbgirl34: thebigsisteryouneveraskedfor: Gis...

Family, Friends, and Tumblr: :O ENY hellosaladd: Unique Owl Post with Acceptance Letter Pendant Locket Necklace. The Perfect Holiday Gift for your Friends and Family! = GET YOURS HERE =
Family, Friends, and Tumblr: :O
 ENY
hellosaladd:
Unique Owl Post with Acceptance Letter Pendant Locket Necklace. The Perfect Holiday Gift for your Friends and Family!
= GET YOURS HERE =

hellosaladd: Unique Owl Post with Acceptance Letter Pendant Locket Necklace. The Perfect Holiday Gift for your Friends and Family! = GET YOU...

God, Love, and Naruto: midnight-revelation: madmadamemimble: littlemissh0ney: UNMUTE FOR THE LOVE OF GOD the lip syncing has me shook to absolute death You CAN’T WATCH ONE WITHOUT THE OTHER HALF!
God, Love, and Naruto: midnight-revelation:

madmadamemimble:

littlemissh0ney:
UNMUTE FOR THE LOVE OF GOD

the lip syncing has me shook to absolute death


You CAN’T WATCH ONE WITHOUT THE OTHER HALF!

midnight-revelation: madmadamemimble: littlemissh0ney: UNMUTE FOR THE LOVE OF GOD the lip syncing has me shook to absolute death You CA...

Anaconda, Bodies , and Books: The most likely chemical in chocolate that might explain its feel-good effect is PEA, of which there can be up to 700 mg in a 100 g bar (0.7%). Most chocolate contains much less than this, and a more typical amount would be 50-100 mg. In its pure state PEA is an oily liquid with a fishlike smell, and it can be made in the laboratory from ammonia. (PEA has the curious property of absorbing carbon dioxide from the air.) When people are injected with PEA, the level of glucose in their blood goes up and so does their blood pressure. These effects combine to produce a feeling of well-being and alertness. PEA may trigger the release of dopamine, which is the brain chemical that makes us feel happy, in which case PEA would be acting in the same way as amphetamines such as ecstasy. PEA and ecstasy molecules are roughly the same shape and size, and this has led to the suggestion that they might work in the same way, but scientific proof is lacking that they do. Our own bodies produce tiny but detectable amounts of PEA naturally, and it is formed from an essential dietary amino acid called phenylalanine. The level of natural PEA varies and it increases when we are under stress. It is also higher than normal in schizophrenics and hyperactive children, but this is more likely to be a symptom of these conditions rather than their cause. Not everyone can cope with a sudden influx of PEA, which is why some people are sensitive to chocolate, often suffering a violent headache if they eat too much. This happens because the excess PEA constricts the walls of blood vessels in the brain. The human body has little use for PEA and employs an enzyme, monoamine oxidase, to dispose of it. People whose bodies are intolerant of chocolate appear to have difficulty making enough of the enzyme to prevent the PEA building up to levels that triggers migraines. symbisexual-disaster: Trying to learn more about chocolate and PEA, thought this was an interesting resource! Link In order to get his fix, Venom probably stops the MAO enzyme from getting rid of the PEA. Then he just sucks it up himself so that Eddie doesn’t get headaches. If I’m understanding this right, a chocolate-intolerant person would greatly benefit from bonding with a symbiote. Since chocolate-intolerants don’t make enough of the MAO enzyme, they need to either a) not eat chocolate ever if they don’t want a migraine or b) hook up with a symbiote that will slurp it up for them!  So it might be fun to write either Eddie or an OC who could never enjoy chocolate before, but after bonding, somehow is actually able to? Fun fun. 
Anaconda, Bodies , and Books: The most likely chemical in chocolate that might explain its feel-good effect is PEA, of which there can
 be up to 700 mg in a 100 g bar (0.7%). Most chocolate contains much less than this, and a more typical
 amount would be 50-100 mg. In its pure state PEA is an oily liquid with a fishlike smell, and it can be made
 in the laboratory from ammonia. (PEA has the curious property of absorbing carbon dioxide from the air.)
 When people are injected with PEA, the level of glucose in their blood goes up and so does their blood
 pressure. These effects combine to produce a feeling of well-being and alertness. PEA may trigger the
 release of dopamine, which is the brain chemical that makes us feel happy, in which case PEA would be
 acting in the same way as amphetamines such as ecstasy. PEA and ecstasy molecules are roughly the same
 shape and size, and this has led to the suggestion that they might work in the same way, but scientific proof
 is lacking that they do.
 Our own bodies produce tiny but detectable amounts of PEA naturally, and it is formed from an essential
 dietary amino acid called phenylalanine. The level of natural PEA varies and it increases when we are under
 stress. It is also higher than normal in schizophrenics and hyperactive children, but this is more likely to be a
 symptom of these conditions rather than their cause.
 Not everyone can cope with a sudden influx of PEA, which is why some people are sensitive to chocolate,
 often suffering a violent headache if they eat too much. This happens because the excess PEA constricts the
 walls of blood vessels in the brain. The human body has little use for PEA and employs an enzyme,
 monoamine oxidase, to dispose of it. People whose bodies are intolerant of chocolate appear to have
 difficulty making enough of the enzyme to prevent the PEA building up to levels that triggers migraines.
symbisexual-disaster:
Trying to learn more about chocolate and PEA, thought this was an interesting resource! Link
In order to get his fix, Venom probably stops the MAO enzyme from getting rid of the PEA. Then he just sucks it up himself so that Eddie doesn’t get headaches.
If I’m understanding this right, a chocolate-intolerant person would greatly benefit from bonding with a symbiote. Since chocolate-intolerants don’t make enough of the MAO enzyme, they need to either a) not eat chocolate ever if they don’t want a migraine or b) hook up with a symbiote that will slurp it up for them! 
So it might be fun to write either Eddie or an OC who could never enjoy chocolate before, but after bonding, somehow is actually able to? Fun fun. 

symbisexual-disaster: Trying to learn more about chocolate and PEA, thought this was an interesting resource! Link In order to get his fix, ...

Facts, Fucking, and Target: Fucking aphdub: FUN FACTS WITH APHThere is a village in Austria called ‘Fucking.’ Their sign got stolen often before they made it theft-proof. ♦ ♦
Facts, Fucking, and Target: Fucking
aphdub:

FUN FACTS WITH APHThere is a village in Austria called ‘Fucking.’ Their sign got stolen often before they made it theft-proof. ♦ ♦

aphdub: FUN FACTS WITH APHThere is a village in Austria called ‘Fucking.’ Their sign got stolen often before they made it theft-proof. ♦ ♦

Animals, Ass, and Birthday: SNEp DUMBO OFFICIAL TRAILER takineko: libertarirynn: futched: libertarirynn: dragonkyng: libertarirynn: friendly-neighborhood-patriarch: the-mighty-birdy: animationtidbits: Dumbo - Official Trailer Yo quick question why HELLO DARKNESS MY OLD FRIEND There are just so many problems here In the original movie the animals talk and baby Jumbo is called “Dumbo“ by the mean mom elephants. Why in the world do these kids who are supposed to be his friends call him Dumbo? Who thought it was a good idea to make a talking animal movie human centered? That stupid ass slowed down indie remix of “baby mine” is as hilarious as it is awful. Somebody tell Hollywood that you don’t need a slowed down indie remix in every movie trailer. Horrifying CGI is horrifying Why do we keep letting Tim Burton ruin Disney Classics? 1. Becuase its been a weird thing that Dumbo’s name has only ever been an insult and he never had a real name. 2. Not a rehash of the original? Isnt that a good thing? 3. No comment on that. 4. I’ve seen worse 5. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ He absolutely did have a real name did you not read right there where I said it was Jumbo? Literally the whole point of a remake is to be a remake of the original? Change it too much and it’s a reboot. 1. Call me crazy but I swear Jumbo was his mom’s name, and one of the elephants was like “oh look, he’s like a little Jumbo!” And that one bitch was like “with those ears? Nah, he’s Dumbo.” 2. The point is to make money, but I wouldn’t be surprised if this was more of a tax/copyright/contract thing. His name was definitely Jumbo Jr. because the stork character sings “happy birthday Jumbo Jr.“ at the very beginning of the movie do not fight me on this. Their family last name was JumboHis mom was called Mrs. Jumbo right? In the clip above she very specifically says that his name is Jumbo jr. I’m going to assume that as circus elephants, they don’t have surnames.
Animals, Ass, and Birthday: SNEp
 DUMBO
 OFFICIAL
 TRAILER
takineko:

libertarirynn:
futched:


libertarirynn:


dragonkyng:


libertarirynn:


friendly-neighborhood-patriarch:

the-mighty-birdy:


animationtidbits:

Dumbo - Official Trailer

Yo quick question
why


HELLO DARKNESS MY OLD FRIEND 

There are just so many problems here
In the original movie the animals talk and baby Jumbo is called “Dumbo“ by the mean mom elephants. Why in the world do these kids who are supposed to be his friends call him Dumbo?
Who thought it was a good idea to make a talking animal movie human centered?
That stupid ass slowed down indie remix of “baby mine” is as hilarious as it is awful. Somebody tell Hollywood that you don’t need a slowed down indie remix in every movie trailer.
Horrifying CGI is horrifying
Why do we keep letting Tim Burton ruin Disney Classics?


1. Becuase its been a weird thing that Dumbo’s name has only ever been an insult and he never had a real name.
2. Not a rehash of the original? Isnt that a good thing?
3. No comment on that.
4. I’ve seen worse
5. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯


He absolutely did have a real name did you not read right there where I said it was Jumbo?
Literally the whole point of a remake is to be a remake of the original? Change it too much and it’s a reboot.


1. Call me crazy but I swear Jumbo was his mom’s name, and one of the elephants was like “oh look, he’s like a little Jumbo!” And that one bitch was like “with those ears? Nah, he’s Dumbo.”
2. The point is to make money, but I wouldn’t be surprised if this was more of a tax/copyright/contract thing.


His name was definitely Jumbo Jr. because the stork character sings “happy birthday Jumbo Jr.“ at the very beginning of the movie do not fight me on this.

Their family last name was JumboHis mom was called Mrs. Jumbo right?

In the clip above she very specifically says that his name is Jumbo jr. I’m going to assume that as circus elephants, they don’t have surnames.

takineko: libertarirynn: futched: libertarirynn: dragonkyng: libertarirynn: friendly-neighborhood-patriarch: the-mighty-birdy: a...

Animals, Ass, and Birthday: SNEp DUMBO OFFICIAL TRAILER futched: libertarirynn: dragonkyng: libertarirynn: friendly-neighborhood-patriarch: the-mighty-birdy: animationtidbits: Dumbo - Official Trailer Yo quick question why HELLO DARKNESS MY OLD FRIEND There are just so many problems hereIn the original movie the animals talk and baby Jumbo is called “Dumbo“ by the mean mom elephants. Why in the world do these kids who are supposed to be his friends call him Dumbo?Who thought it was a good idea to make a talking animal movie human centered?That stupid ass slowed down indie remix of “baby mine” is as hilarious as it is awful. Somebody tell Hollywood that you don’t need a slowed down indie remix in every movie trailer.Horrifying CGI is horrifyingWhy do we keep letting Tim Burton ruin Disney Classics? 1. Becuase its been a weird thing that Dumbo’s name has only ever been an insult and he never had a real name.2. Not a rehash of the original? Isnt that a good thing?3. No comment on that.4. I’ve seen worse5. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ He absolutely did have a real name did you not read right there where I said it was Jumbo?Literally the whole point of a remake is to be a remake of the original? Change it too much and it’s a reboot. 1. Call me crazy but I swear Jumbo was his mom’s name, and one of the elephants was like “oh look, he’s like a little Jumbo!” And that one bitch was like “with those ears? Nah, he’s Dumbo.”2. The point is to make money, but I wouldn’t be surprised if this was more of a tax/copyright/contract thing. His name was definitely Jumbo Jr. because the stork character sings “happy birthday Jumbo Jr.“ at the very beginning of the movie do not fight me on this.
Animals, Ass, and Birthday: SNEp
 DUMBO
 OFFICIAL
 TRAILER
futched:

libertarirynn:

dragonkyng:

libertarirynn:

friendly-neighborhood-patriarch:
the-mighty-birdy:


animationtidbits:

Dumbo - Official Trailer

Yo quick question
why


HELLO DARKNESS MY OLD FRIEND 
There are just so many problems hereIn the original movie the animals talk and baby Jumbo is called “Dumbo“ by the mean mom elephants. Why in the world do these kids who are supposed to be his friends call him Dumbo?Who thought it was a good idea to make a talking animal movie human centered?That stupid ass slowed down indie remix of “baby mine” is as hilarious as it is awful. Somebody tell Hollywood that you don’t need a slowed down indie remix in every movie trailer.Horrifying CGI is horrifyingWhy do we keep letting Tim Burton ruin Disney Classics?

1. Becuase its been a weird thing that Dumbo’s name has only ever been an insult and he never had a real name.2. Not a rehash of the original? Isnt that a good thing?3. No comment on that.4. I’ve seen worse5. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

He absolutely did have a real name did you not read right there where I said it was Jumbo?Literally the whole point of a remake is to be a remake of the original? Change it too much and it’s a reboot.

1. Call me crazy but I swear Jumbo was his mom’s name, and one of the elephants was like “oh look, he’s like a little Jumbo!” And that one bitch was like “with those ears? Nah, he’s Dumbo.”2. The point is to make money, but I wouldn’t be surprised if this was more of a tax/copyright/contract thing.

His name was definitely Jumbo Jr. because the stork character sings “happy birthday Jumbo Jr.“ at the very beginning of the movie do not fight me on this.

futched: libertarirynn: dragonkyng: libertarirynn: friendly-neighborhood-patriarch: the-mighty-birdy: animationtidbits: Dumbo - Offic...

Chicago, Church, and Hello: your-fave-is-catholic: Your Fave Is Catholic: John Mulaney Known for: Emmy Award winning television actor, stand-up comedian, producer. He is probably best known for being a cast member on the hit television show Saturday Night Live, but other television shows under his belt include Best Week Ever, Mayne Street, Ugly Americans, Kroll Show, The Jim Gaffigan Show, Big Mouth, several more appearances here there. He also has had his own stand-up comedy specials, those being The Top Part, John Mulaney: New In Town, John Mulaney: The Comeback Kid, John Mulaney: Kid Gorgeous at Radio City. Additionally, he also is part of the comedy act The Oh, Hello Show with fellow comedian Nick Kroll. He is also going to be the voice of Peter Porker/Spider Ham in the upcoming film Spider Man: Into the Spider-Verse.  Evidence of Faith: Various sources confirm that John’s father, Charles W. “Chip” Mulaney, Jr., was an Irish Catholic man. Because of this, it’s safe to say that he raised John as a Catholic. In an interview with St. Louis Today, John also confirms that he attended at Jesuit run high School (St. Ignatius in Chicago) was greatly inspired with the great missionary work adventures his teachers would go on. Additionally, somebody here on Tumblr informed the mod of some other evidence as well. In his stand-up special Kid Gorgeous at Radio City, he does a routine where he talks about going to church as a kid, that while he may poke fun at the Catholic faith, he gets offended when non-Catholics poke fun at it, since his parents are still highly religious. Lastly, in an interview with Stephen Colbert, he talks about his experience as an altar boy how they both chose their Confirmation names after their late brothers.
Chicago, Church, and Hello: your-fave-is-catholic:
Your Fave Is Catholic: John Mulaney
Known for: Emmy Award winning television actor, stand-up comedian,  producer. He is probably best known for being a cast member on the hit television show Saturday Night Live, but other television shows under his belt include Best Week Ever, Mayne Street, Ugly Americans, Kroll Show, The Jim Gaffigan Show, Big Mouth,  several more appearances here  there. He also has had his own stand-up comedy specials, those being The Top Part, John Mulaney: New In Town, John Mulaney: The Comeback Kid,  John Mulaney: Kid Gorgeous at Radio City. Additionally, he also is part of the comedy act The Oh, Hello Show with fellow comedian Nick Kroll. He is also going to be the voice of Peter Porker/Spider Ham in the upcoming film Spider Man: Into the Spider-Verse. 
Evidence of Faith: Various sources confirm that John’s father, Charles W. “Chip” Mulaney, Jr., was an Irish Catholic man. Because of this, it’s safe to say that he raised John as a Catholic. In an interview with St. Louis Today, John also confirms that he attended at Jesuit run high School (St. Ignatius in Chicago)  was greatly inspired with the great missionary work  adventures his teachers would go on. Additionally, somebody here on Tumblr informed the mod of some other evidence as well. In his stand-up special Kid Gorgeous at Radio City, he does a routine where he talks about going to church as a kid,  that while he may poke fun at the Catholic faith, he gets offended when non-Catholics poke fun at it, since his parents are still highly religious. Lastly, in an interview with Stephen Colbert, he talks about his experience as an altar boy  how they both chose their Confirmation names after their late brothers.

your-fave-is-catholic: Your Fave Is Catholic: John Mulaney Known for: Emmy Award winning television actor, stand-up comedian, producer. He ...

Candy, Cars, and Children: Slate.com 5 hrs . Slate Dear Prudie: Do I have to give them candy? aT T-T Help! Kids From Poorer Neighborhoods Keep Trick- or-Treating in Mine. Slate.com Dear Prudence, I live in one of the wealthiest neighborhoods in the country, but on one of the more "modest" streets-mostly doctors and lawyers and family business owners. (A few blocks away are billionaires, families with famous last names, media moguls, etc.) I have noticed that on Halloween, what seems like 75 percent of the trick-or-treaters are clearly not from this neighborhood. Kids arrive in overflowing cars from less fortunate areas. I feel this is inappropriate. Halloween isn't a social service or a charity in which l have to buy candy for less fortunate children Obviously this makes me feel like a terrible person, because what's the big deal about making less fortunate kids happy on a holiday? But it just bugs me, because we already pay more than enough taxes toward actual social services. Should Halloween be a neighborhood activity, or is it legitimately a free-for-all in which people hunt down the best candy grounds for their kids? 91.6K 705 Slate Slate.com's Post See More buchergenuss32: wahbegan: teaboot: ryulongd: rune-midgarts: goodtimegang: brakehagev2: guys this is actually real like a real person wrote this “more than enough” oh you fucking saints, absolutely pouring wealth onto the unfortunates lol this is amazing Dear Prudie, I think I just witnessed a murder You fucking monster GET HER PRUDENCE Link!
Candy, Cars, and Children: Slate.com
 5 hrs .
 Slate
 Dear Prudie: Do I have to give them candy?
 aT
 T-T
 Help! Kids From Poorer Neighborhoods Keep Trick-
 or-Treating in Mine.
 Slate.com

 Dear Prudence,
 I live in one of the wealthiest neighborhoods
 in the country, but on one of the more
 "modest" streets-mostly doctors and
 lawyers and family business owners. (A few
 blocks away are billionaires, families with
 famous last names, media moguls, etc.) I
 have noticed that on Halloween, what seems
 like 75 percent of the trick-or-treaters are
 clearly not from this neighborhood. Kids
 arrive in overflowing cars from less fortunate
 areas. I feel this is inappropriate. Halloween
 isn't a social service or a charity in which l
 have to buy candy for less fortunate children
 Obviously this makes me feel like a terrible
 person, because what's the big deal about
 making less fortunate kids happy on a
 holiday? But it just bugs me, because we
 already pay more than enough taxes toward
 actual social services. Should Halloween be a
 neighborhood activity, or is it legitimately a
 free-for-all in which people hunt down the
 best candy grounds for their kids?
 91.6K 705
 Slate
 Slate.com's Post
 See More
buchergenuss32:

wahbegan:
teaboot:

ryulongd:

rune-midgarts:

goodtimegang:

brakehagev2:

guys this is actually real like a real person wrote this

“more than enough” oh you fucking saints, absolutely pouring wealth onto the unfortunates


lol this is amazing 

Dear Prudie,
I think I just witnessed a murder

You fucking monster

GET HER PRUDENCE

Link!

buchergenuss32: wahbegan: teaboot: ryulongd: rune-midgarts: goodtimegang: brakehagev2: guys this is actually real like a real person w...