🔥 | Latest

Africa, Bad, and Children: DR. BANNER? CAN I SPEAK WITH YOU A MOMENT? WHAT CAN I DO FOR YOU, SON? OF COURSE, MR. SUMMERS. PLEASE DON'T TAKE THIS THE BANNER, BUT. WHY DON'T YOURSELF? WRONG WAY, DR. MAYBE SOMEWHERE IN PRIVATE? YOU JUST KILL 3c 小) WHAT I MEAN S...WHEN YOU THINK ABOUT ALL THE BAD THINGS THAT HAVE HAPPENED BECAUSE OF THE HULK...ALL THE BAD THINGS THAT WILL HAPPEN BECAUSE OF HIM, ALL THE DAMAGE YOU'RE WELL. OVER THE YEARS I VE CERTAINLY THOUGHT ABOUT IT. OF COURSEI HAVE. BUT I'LL TELL YOU WHAT'S PREVENTED ME MOST RECENTLY: THREE MILLION CHILDREN IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA. GOING TO DO ... I'M SORRY, SIR BUT WHAT KEEPS YOU FROM JUST ENDING IT THOSE ARE THE LIVES THAT WILL BE SAVED BY THE NEW, INEXPENSIVE WATER PURIFICATION SYSTEM I JUST DEVELOPED. MANY, MANY MORE PEOPLE THAN THE HULK EVER HURT AND THAT'S JUST THIS MONTH. SIR? I'VE ADOPTED A NEW PHILOSOPHY: HULK SMASHES, BANNER BUILDS." BEING DEAD DOESNT SOLVE ANYTHING IT DOESN'T ALLOW YOU TO TRY TO BALANCE THE SCALES. IT DOESN'T SAVE THREE MILLION LIVES. 2 AND IF YOU FEEL YOU HAVE A LOT TO ATONE FOR, WELL THEN YOU'RE JUST GOING TO HAVE TO BE AN EVEN BETTER ONE. I UNDERSTAND SCOTT. YOU'VE SEEN THE MAN YOU BECOME AND YOU'RE SCARED OF WHAT YOU MIGHT DO, AND THE PEOPLE YOU MIGHT HURT. BUT WHEN YOU WORRY ABOUT THAT REMEMBER THIS-- YOU'LL ALSO BE A HERO, SCOTT "bう, why-i-love-comics: Superior Spider-Man Team-Up Special #1 - “With Mercy of the Greedy” (2013)written by Mike Coastaart by Michael Dialynas Rachelle Rosenberg
Africa, Bad, and Children: DR. BANNER?
 CAN I SPEAK
 WITH YOU A
 MOMENT?
 WHAT CAN I
 DO FOR YOU,
 SON?
 OF
 COURSE, MR.
 SUMMERS.
 PLEASE DON'T
 TAKE THIS THE
 BANNER, BUT.
 WHY DON'T
 YOURSELF?
 WRONG WAY, DR.
 MAYBE
 SOMEWHERE
 IN PRIVATE?
 YOU JUST KILL
 3c
 小)

 WHAT I MEAN
 S...WHEN YOU THINK
 ABOUT ALL THE BAD THINGS
 THAT HAVE HAPPENED BECAUSE
 OF THE HULK...ALL THE BAD
 THINGS THAT WILL HAPPEN
 BECAUSE OF HIM, ALL THE
 DAMAGE YOU'RE
 WELL. OVER
 THE YEARS I VE
 CERTAINLY THOUGHT
 ABOUT IT. OF
 COURSEI
 HAVE.
 BUT I'LL
 TELL YOU WHAT'S
 PREVENTED ME MOST
 RECENTLY: THREE
 MILLION CHILDREN IN
 SUB-SAHARAN
 AFRICA.
 GOING TO DO
 ...
 I'M SORRY, SIR
 BUT WHAT KEEPS
 YOU FROM JUST
 ENDING IT

 THOSE ARE
 THE LIVES THAT
 WILL BE SAVED BY THE
 NEW, INEXPENSIVE WATER
 PURIFICATION SYSTEM I
 JUST DEVELOPED. MANY,
 MANY MORE PEOPLE THAN
 THE HULK EVER HURT
 AND THAT'S JUST
 THIS MONTH.
 SIR?
 I'VE ADOPTED
 A NEW PHILOSOPHY:
 HULK SMASHES, BANNER
 BUILDS." BEING DEAD
 DOESNT SOLVE ANYTHING
 IT DOESN'T ALLOW YOU
 TO TRY TO BALANCE THE
 SCALES. IT DOESN'T
 SAVE THREE MILLION
 LIVES.
 2

 AND IF YOU FEEL YOU
 HAVE A LOT TO ATONE
 FOR, WELL THEN YOU'RE
 JUST GOING TO HAVE
 TO BE AN EVEN
 BETTER ONE.
 I UNDERSTAND
 SCOTT. YOU'VE SEEN
 THE MAN YOU BECOME
 AND YOU'RE SCARED OF
 WHAT YOU MIGHT DO,
 AND THE PEOPLE YOU
 MIGHT HURT. BUT WHEN
 YOU WORRY ABOUT THAT
 REMEMBER THIS--
 YOU'LL ALSO BE A
 HERO, SCOTT
 "bう,
why-i-love-comics:

Superior Spider-Man Team-Up Special #1 - “With Mercy of the Greedy” (2013)written by Mike Coastaart by Michael Dialynas  Rachelle Rosenberg

why-i-love-comics: Superior Spider-Man Team-Up Special #1 - “With Mercy of the Greedy” (2013)written by Mike Coastaart by Michael Dialynas ...

Crazy, Dumb, and Food: The Hill @thehill Follow Restaurants in Austin now banned from throwing away food hill.cm/GarAUL3 5:40 PM 2 Oct 2018 TEXAS @UTProbs Follow Austin, TX just banned restaurants from throwing away uneaten food. They have to donate the food to people, send it to local animal farms, or compost it It's crazy that ppl are upset about this... THIS. IS. A. GOOD. THING The Hill thehill Restaurants in Austin now banned from throwing away food hill.cm/GarAUL3 ヒ, 12:16 PM 3 Oct 2018 600 e蒘40. 6,025 Retweets 16,640 Likes spillybun: greater-than-the-sword: orangehatposts: patron-saint-of-smart-asses: I would rather that giving away unused food would be an option rather than obligatory, but I’m interested to see how this plays out. Always seemed dumb that they just threw it away, having them be forced to donate it isn’t good but I suppose it’s better than nothing? Would be better to give them incentive like a tax break or something if they donate their uneaten but still perfectly edible food The use of force is (most likely) unnecessary, all you have to do is remove their legal liability for donating it and they will. Also yeah a tax break I love how they’re acting like restaurants are just greedy and chose to throw out all the food instead of it being the government that was keeping them from doing charity, as the government often does because the government wants to be the one people are forced to rely on for what they need. “The government made it harder to do something! Clearly the answer here is more government!”
Crazy, Dumb, and Food: The Hill
 @thehill
 Follow
 Restaurants in Austin now banned from
 throwing away food hill.cm/GarAUL3
 5:40 PM 2 Oct 2018

 TEXAS
 @UTProbs
 Follow
 Austin, TX just banned restaurants from
 throwing away uneaten food. They have
 to donate the food to people, send it to
 local animal farms, or compost it
 It's crazy that ppl are upset about this...
 THIS. IS. A. GOOD. THING
 The Hill thehill
 Restaurants in Austin now banned from throwing away
 food hill.cm/GarAUL3
 ヒ,
 12:16 PM 3 Oct 2018
 600 e蒘40.
 6,025 Retweets 16,640 Likes
spillybun:

greater-than-the-sword:


orangehatposts:


patron-saint-of-smart-asses:
I would rather that giving away unused food would be an option rather than obligatory, but I’m interested to see how this plays out.
Always seemed dumb that they just threw it away, having them be forced to donate it isn’t good but I suppose it’s better than nothing? Would be better to give them incentive like a tax break or something if they donate their uneaten but still perfectly edible food


The use of force is (most likely) unnecessary, all you have to do is remove their legal liability for donating it and they will. Also yeah a tax break 


I love how they’re acting like restaurants are just greedy and chose to throw out all the food instead of it being the government that was keeping them from doing charity, as the government often does because the government wants to be the one people are forced to rely on for what they need.


“The government made it harder to do something! Clearly the answer here is more government!”

spillybun: greater-than-the-sword: orangehatposts: patron-saint-of-smart-asses: I would rather that giving away unused food would be an...

Memes, 🤖, and Cat: LAD BIBL E The way this Sphinx cat eats though...who else is this greedy? 😂😂 @don.sphynx_fluffy
Memes, 🤖, and Cat: LAD
 BIBL E
The way this Sphinx cat eats though...who else is this greedy? 😂😂 @don.sphynx_fluffy

The way this Sphinx cat eats though...who else is this greedy? 😂😂 @don.sphynx_fluffy

Bad, Children, and Chill: * Watch Dra Cuddy:Mother Gothel by Aveku-chan-Kataang Customization /Wallpaper/ People / Females @2011-2016 Aveku-chan-Kataang YES! C'MON! 8DDD galotheshroom: ava-burton-writing: dragonenby: writingwithcolor: so-many-miles-to-go: aworldinneedofmagic: the-independent-jew: so-many-miles-to-go: smol-mother-rose: so-many-miles-to-go: Yeah, there’s a reason for that. It’s called: antisemitic caricature. I don’t understand what’s Jewish about mother gothel… she has a typical Disney face doesn’t she? Is it the curly hair..? I mean her nose and everything else seem normal? I’m sorry, I’m just trying to figure it out, you don’t have to answer if you don’t want to. dark curly hair - long hooked nose - darker complexion than the blond blue eyed heroine 9and really the rest of the cast - portrayed as greedy and evil. Lisa Edelstein is Jewish.  As are Idina Menzel and Amy Winehouse, both of whom I have seen compared in looks to Gothel.  Gothel’s design is a pretty clear caricature of ethnically Jewish women.   This is a pretty good contrast between Rapunzel and Gothel.  Rapunzel has the “typical Disney face”: Here’s a more close up look at her features. The hooked nose becomes even more pronounced as she becomes “eviler.” If you wanted to claim that there was noting out of the ordinary for Disney animation when it came to Gothel’s features, you would have to find at least one Disney princess or heroine with similar characteristics (long hooked nose and dark curly hair, etc). But here is what we have is - small noses that turn up at the end: wide, flatter noses (though cheers to Disney for not putting button noses on their characters of color, although Esmerelda’s clothing design deserves another essay on Rromani stereotypes and there are some major issues with Pocahontas as well) And then a few misc noses (again, props for Jasmine’s nose not being a button): Apart from just the design of Gothel, there’s also the whole: “obviously ‘other’ (read Jewish) woman kidnaps the pretty blonde (read: gentile) kid to use her for ritualistic/magical purposes” Like that right there on top of the aesthetic Jewish-coding is what pushed the antisemitic caricature over the top for me.  It harkens back to antisemitic blood libel that claimed that Jews stole gentile children for all manner of nefarious reasons. Even when Gothel is in “mother” role to Rapunzel, she’s is shown as nagging and passive aggressive, both antisemitic stereotypes of Jewish women. There is no one thing that makes her an antisemitic caricature, but the design, plus the storyline she plays out, plus her characterization cement the overall character as antisemitic.   Jew-coding a villain is not in itself always antisemitic when there are also Jewish coded heroes. Rapunzel does not have that. Having a villain steal a baby for magical/ritualistic reasons is not always antisemitic as long as the villain is not Jew-coded.  Rapunzel fails this as well. Having a nagging and passive aggressive mother character is not antisemitic provided that she is not, again, coded as Jewish.  Rapunzel fails once again. Hope this helps. EDIT: @ariminak pointed out that some of my wording made it sound like Gothel’s features only stereotypically caricatured Ashkenazi women when in fact that is not the case.  I changed the language to remove that phrasing and make it clear that any ethnically Jewish women can be affected by this type of aesthetic trope. If you reblogged the old version, could you please delete it and reblog this one instead. Spread this version so people recognize that this stuff harms all Jewish women. omfg can y’all chill the fuck out, any race can be portrayed as hero or villain, it’s a fucking kids movie not a political statement So I’m guessing you’re white and a gentile. As such, you’ve more than likely grown up looking at tv and movies and fairytales and seeing your face in those of the heroes. Jewish people don’t get that.  When we are portrayed in live action, our characters are more often than not whitewashed and in other media, our features are used and caricaturized to create “evil looking” villains. You don’t see it because you’ve been ingrained with the idea that “ethnic” features are just “how you make a character look evil.”  You don’t look at Gothel and see your mother.  You don’t see yourself and your people.  You don’t see decades of propaganda aimed at fostering hate against you and ultimately seeking to destroy you.   But seeing how you also seem to think that saying you’re not attracted to an entire race of people ISN’T racist, you really don’t get any say on any of this. So really, you need to chill the fuck out and stop telling marginalized people to stop talking about the tools of our own marginalization. Let’s play a game I like to call: Movie Villain or Antisemitic Propaganda: Many “evil witch” tropes were built on European antisemitic stereotypes, not just in appearance but in the storylines they play out as well. Greediness, stealing children, killing children, hunger for power, etc.  Every time a movie villain design uses stereotyped Jewish features to communicate “evilness” to an audience, they perpetuate the marginalization of the people they are using.  One big issue I have is that Gothel’s didn’t start out as the antisemitic caricature that made it to screen.  Much of the early concept art has a more dark romanticism feel.   They changed the original design. Presumably to make Gothel more “other” from the good characters in the movie.  At some point, a decision was made that dark curly hair and a hooked nose wound better convey their villain. It really doesn’t matter if any of this was intentional, I’d actually bet that it wasn’t.  However, antisemitic tropes are so engrained in our societies that people like you, even when confronted with a step by step break down of what it is, feel comfortable thinking that there’s nothing wrong with it and mocking those calling it out as if we are overreacting. You seem to have completely ignored the majority of my post.  It is the character design, plus the characterization, plus the story line that mirrors blood libel that makes Gothel an antisemitic character.  It’s not just about someone of a certain race or ethnicity being a villain.  It’s about how stereotypes of a certain ethnic group are understood as “villainous” due to villains being repeatedly coded as Jewish over decades of film and tv. And contrary to your naive belief, all media is political to some extent. Every time a historically present minority is not included in film (ex: lily-white Harlem in Fantastical Beasts) or when a minority character is whitewashed, or when the “ethnic” features of a minority are used almost universally to portray bad guys, it is a political and social issue.  When you never see yourselves as the people who play the hero or even see your people existing in a portrayal of a place where they should be, it is not benign. Reblogging again for these additions. I’m not Jewish, but I can imagine seeing yourself villanized again and again must wear on you so hard (like queer coded villains do on me). The stereotypes are so insidious, I didn’t even realize she was Jewish coded until I saw this post for the first time, and since then I’ve been able to pick up on more anti-semitic media. Stay cognizant! This is a writing blog so fellow writers! Please take a good look at your villains— even if they’re not Jewish, it can be antisemitic. Thanks. - A Jew™️ I feel like you guys want to be offended. its called shape theory and character design. I haven’t met a single Jew that has a hooked nose and jews are not the only the only ethnicity with lightish brown skin and curly black hair. for example, ME I’m Mexican and have those features I have met a woman for MADRID who looks EXACTLY like the woman above. and her accent sounds a lot more Spanish than Jewish (which would make sense because Rapunzel takes place in Germany and Spain is pretty damn close by. Also she just straight up does not have a hooked nose. Not anything like those caricatures anyway. In the shot where she’s in profile it doesn’t look hooked at all.
Bad, Children, and Chill: * Watch
 Dra Cuddy:Mother Gothel
 by Aveku-chan-Kataang
 Customization /Wallpaper/ People / Females @2011-2016 Aveku-chan-Kataang
 YES! C'MON! 8DDD
galotheshroom:
ava-burton-writing:

dragonenby:

writingwithcolor:

so-many-miles-to-go:

aworldinneedofmagic:

the-independent-jew:

so-many-miles-to-go:

smol-mother-rose:

so-many-miles-to-go:


Yeah, there’s a reason for that.
It’s called: antisemitic caricature.


I don’t understand what’s Jewish about mother gothel… she has a typical Disney face doesn’t she? Is it the curly hair..? I mean her nose and everything else seem normal? 
I’m sorry, I’m just trying to figure it out, you don’t have to answer if you don’t want to.

dark curly hair - long hooked nose - darker complexion than the blond blue eyed heroine 9and really the rest of the cast - portrayed as greedy and evil.
Lisa Edelstein is Jewish.  As are Idina Menzel and Amy Winehouse, both of whom I have seen compared in looks to Gothel.  Gothel’s design is a pretty clear caricature of ethnically Jewish women.  
This is a pretty good contrast between Rapunzel and Gothel.  Rapunzel has the “typical Disney face”:
Here’s a more close up look at her features.
The hooked nose becomes even more pronounced as she becomes “eviler.”
If you wanted to claim that there was noting out of the ordinary for Disney animation when it came to Gothel’s features, you would have to find at least one Disney princess or heroine with similar characteristics (long hooked nose and dark curly hair, etc).
But here is what we have is -
small noses that turn up at the end:
wide, flatter noses (though cheers to Disney for not putting button noses on their characters of color, although Esmerelda’s clothing design deserves another essay on Rromani stereotypes and there are some major issues with Pocahontas as well)
And then a few misc noses (again, props for Jasmine’s nose not being a button):
Apart from just the design of Gothel, there’s also the whole: “obviously ‘other’ (read Jewish) woman kidnaps the pretty blonde (read: gentile) kid to use her for ritualistic/magical purposes”
Like that right there on top of the aesthetic Jewish-coding is what pushed the antisemitic caricature over the top for me.  It harkens back to antisemitic blood libel that claimed that Jews stole gentile children for all manner of nefarious reasons. Even when Gothel is in “mother” role to Rapunzel, she’s is shown as nagging and passive aggressive, both antisemitic stereotypes of Jewish women.
There is no one thing that makes her an antisemitic caricature, but the design, plus the storyline she plays out, plus her characterization cement the overall character as antisemitic.  
Jew-coding a villain is not in itself always antisemitic when there are also Jewish coded heroes. Rapunzel does not have that.
Having a villain steal a baby for magical/ritualistic reasons is not always antisemitic as long as the villain is not Jew-coded.  Rapunzel fails this as well.
Having a nagging and passive aggressive mother character is not antisemitic provided that she is not, again, coded as Jewish.  Rapunzel fails once again.
Hope this helps.
EDIT: @ariminak pointed out that some of my wording made it sound like Gothel’s features only stereotypically caricatured Ashkenazi women when in fact that is not the case.  I changed the language to remove that phrasing and make it clear that any ethnically Jewish women can be affected by this type of aesthetic trope. If you reblogged the old version, could you please delete it and reblog this one instead.

Spread this version so people recognize that this stuff harms all Jewish women. 

omfg can y’all chill the fuck out, any race can be portrayed as hero or villain, it’s a fucking kids movie not a political statement

So I’m guessing you’re white and a gentile. As such, you’ve more than likely grown up looking at tv and movies and fairytales and seeing your face in those of the heroes.
Jewish people don’t get that.  When we are portrayed in live action, our characters are more often than not whitewashed and in other media, our features are used and caricaturized to create “evil looking” villains.
You don’t see it because you’ve been ingrained with the idea that “ethnic” features are just “how you make a character look evil.”  You don’t look at Gothel and see your mother.  You don’t see yourself and your people.  You don’t see decades of propaganda aimed at fostering hate against you and ultimately seeking to destroy you.  
But seeing how you also seem to think that saying you’re not attracted to an entire race of people ISN’T racist, you really don’t get any say on any of this.
So really, you need to chill the fuck out and stop telling marginalized people to stop talking about the tools of our own marginalization.
Let’s play a game I like to call: Movie Villain or Antisemitic Propaganda:
Many “evil witch” tropes were built on European antisemitic stereotypes, not just in appearance but in the storylines they play out as well. Greediness, stealing children, killing children, hunger for power, etc.  Every time a movie villain design uses stereotyped Jewish features to communicate “evilness” to an audience, they perpetuate the marginalization of the people they are using. 
One big issue I have is that Gothel’s didn’t start out as the antisemitic caricature that made it to screen.  Much of the early concept art has a more dark romanticism feel.  
They changed the original design. Presumably to make Gothel more “other” from the good characters in the movie.  At some point, a decision was made that dark curly hair and a hooked nose wound better convey their villain.
It really doesn’t matter if any of this was intentional, I’d actually bet that it wasn’t.  However, antisemitic tropes are so engrained in our societies that people like you, even when confronted with a step by step break down of what it is, feel comfortable thinking that there’s nothing wrong with it and mocking those calling it out as if we are overreacting.
You seem to have completely ignored the majority of my post.  It is the character design, plus the characterization, plus the story line that mirrors blood libel that makes Gothel an antisemitic character.  It’s not just about someone of a certain race or ethnicity being a villain.  It’s about how stereotypes of a certain ethnic group are understood as “villainous” due to villains being repeatedly coded as Jewish over decades of film and tv.
And contrary to your naive belief, all media is political to some extent. Every time a historically present minority is not included in film (ex: lily-white Harlem in Fantastical Beasts) or when a minority character is whitewashed, or when the “ethnic” features of a minority are used almost universally to portray bad guys, it is a political and social issue.  When you never see yourselves as the people who play the hero or even see your people existing in a portrayal of a place where they should be, it is not benign.

Reblogging again for these additions.


I’m not Jewish, but I can imagine seeing yourself villanized again and again must wear on you so hard (like queer coded villains do on me). The stereotypes are so insidious, I didn’t even realize she was Jewish coded until I saw this post for the first time, and since then I’ve been able to pick up on more anti-semitic media.
Stay cognizant!  

This is a writing blog so fellow writers! Please take a good look at your villains— even if they’re not Jewish, it can be antisemitic. Thanks. - A Jew™️

I feel like you guys want to be offended. its called shape theory and character design. I haven’t met a single Jew that has a hooked nose and jews are not the only the only ethnicity with lightish brown skin and curly black hair. for example, ME I’m Mexican and have those features I have met a woman for MADRID who looks EXACTLY like the woman above. and her accent sounds a lot more Spanish than Jewish (which would make sense because Rapunzel takes place in Germany and Spain is pretty damn close by.


Also she just straight up does not have a hooked nose. Not anything like those caricatures anyway. In the shot where she’s in profile it doesn’t look hooked at all.

galotheshroom: ava-burton-writing: dragonenby: writingwithcolor: so-many-miles-to-go: aworldinneedofmagic: the-independent-jew: so-man...