🔥 | Latest

Falsified: Had to Google this doctor. Apparently she's famous for having falsified data in a study, had her papers retracted, and then got arrested for refusing to return property delivered to her by mistake.
Falsified: Had to Google this doctor. Apparently she's famous for having falsified data in a study, had her papers retracted, and then got arrested for refusing to return property delivered to her by mistake.

Had to Google this doctor. Apparently she's famous for having falsified data in a study, had her papers retracted, and then got arrested...

Falsified: Observation is Better Than Theory The observation of the Sun, Moon and Stars true path, leads me to believe Newton and all other astronomers who taught the heliocentric theory falsified the directional plane orbit of the Moon and Stars. I am not sure of the reason other than for elite status, deception and reconnection in a day when astronomy was considered among the intelligent and most others were insignificant and just peasant in their minds. They placed themselves way above those who believed in a Plane Earth. Their high mindedness space warped their mind into thinking they knew better than everyone else and they would bring new ideas to the world. As time passed they made an atheistic religion out of a fantasy sphere Earth and eventually forced it upon all mankind without verifying alleged surface curvature. They forced their conjecture in the same manner as fairy tales and myths, but all that crap is far from the truth Looking south anyone can see the Sun, Moon and Stars move CW, from left to right, from East to west. There are three witnesses of direction through observation. We sense no motion at all, yet are told to believe these dead guys because they figured it out and believe we live on a sphere spinning 1000 MPH hurling through space at some astronomical amount of speed that it's so ridiculous. All celestial bodies circle above the Plane from east to west and we observe a straight horizon and calm waters like a sheet of glass. Nothing on the face of this Earth even gives a hint "Earth is a sphere", so there is no reason to reject observational facts for the ridiculous theories and lies of a few heliocentric astronomers who had an agenda. Do you know how easy it is for some mathematician to take a Plane Earth's orbiting celestial bodies and change the distance and size, placing them far away through scale invariance and claim the Earth is orbiting a stationary Sun? And did you know, no one could tell the difference unless they understood their surroundings through observation? That's exactly what has happened and the hoax has continued through entertainment, TV and fake space programs They claim our Earth is wobbling and has an equatorial bulge as a result of Earth spinning 1000 MPH, but do you observe any ripples or any movement of the surface of this water? Not Possible on a Sphere Plat Terra LET IT BE KNOWN – Sphere Earth is a fabrication of high minded intellectual dishonest lunatics.
Falsified: Observation is Better Than Theory
 The observation of the Sun, Moon and Stars true path, leads me to believe Newton and all
 other astronomers who taught the heliocentric theory falsified the directional plane orbit of
 the Moon and Stars. I am not sure of the reason other than for elite status, deception and
 reconnection in a day when astronomy was considered among the intelligent and most others
 were insignificant and just peasant in their minds. They placed themselves way above those
 who believed in a Plane Earth. Their high mindedness space warped their mind into thinking
 they knew better than everyone else and they would bring new ideas to the world.
 As time passed they made an atheistic religion out of a fantasy sphere Earth and eventually
 forced it upon all mankind without verifying alleged surface curvature. They forced their
 conjecture in the same manner as fairy tales and myths, but all that crap is far from the truth
 Looking south anyone can see the Sun, Moon and Stars move CW, from left to right, from East
 to west. There are three witnesses of direction through observation. We sense no motion at all,
 yet are told to believe these dead guys because they figured it out and believe we live on a
 sphere spinning 1000 MPH hurling through space at some astronomical amount of speed that
 it's so ridiculous. All celestial bodies circle above the Plane from east to west and we observe
 a straight horizon and calm waters like a sheet of glass. Nothing on the face of this Earth even
 gives a hint "Earth is a sphere", so there is no reason to reject observational facts for the
 ridiculous theories and lies of a few heliocentric astronomers who had an agenda.
 Do you know how easy it is for some
 mathematician to take a Plane Earth's
 orbiting celestial bodies and change
 the distance and size, placing them far
 away through scale invariance and
 claim the Earth is orbiting a stationary
 Sun? And did you know, no one could
 tell the difference unless they
 understood their surroundings
 through observation? That's exactly
 what has happened and the hoax has
 continued through entertainment, TV
 and fake space programs
 They claim our Earth is wobbling and has an equatorial bulge as a result of Earth spinning 1000
 MPH, but do you observe any ripples or any movement of the surface of this water?
 Not Possible on a Sphere
 Plat Terra
LET IT BE KNOWN – Sphere Earth is a fabrication of high minded intellectual dishonest lunatics.

LET IT BE KNOWN – Sphere Earth is a fabrication of high minded intellectual dishonest lunatics.

Falsified: C P TR 10/13/2019, 1:11:27 PM (12 mins) The Democrat-Government-Media Trump Coup D'etat investigation continues. So far, Robert Mueller, James Comey, Hillary Clinton, Peter Strzok, Andy McCabe and, most recently, Nancy Pelosi, Adam Schiff, and Jerrold Nadler have been implicated in the scandal. The scandal involves individual criminal acts and a conspiracy to violate the rights of U.S. Citizens, including but not limited to, Donald Trump. This is the most wide-spread scandal ever to affect the U.S. Government, including several Intelligence and Law Enforcement agencies, not limited to, rogue elements within the DOJ, FBI, CIA, NSA Among the charges being investigated are violations of 18 U.S. Code sections 241, 242 and 245. Section 242 prohibits public servants from using their positions, "under color of law," to deprive an individual of his constitutional rights. Section 241 prohibits public servants and others from conspiring to interfere with an individual's free exercise or enjoyment of constitutional rights. Section 245 prohibits public servants and others from intimidating candidates for public office. Over the past three years, the Coconspirators have also tampered with evidence and witnesses for political purposes in order to harm the President and to cover Coconspirators' own wrongdoing; destroyed, concealed, and/or falsified records in federal investigations; defrauded the United States; engaged in corruption; engaged in political Racketeering by using the threat of federal law enforcement and Congressional investigations, media leaks, and threats of criminal prosecutions to cover the Coconspirators' own crimes. All Conspirators and related activities and legal violations may be tied together using the RICO statute, 18 U.S. Code section 1962. The preceding sections would seem to apply directly to the ongoing, unrelenting attack by Democrats, RINOS and their Coconspirators against the President. Among other rights of the President infringed on by the Coconspirators are the following: A) 4th Amendment. The Coconspirators used a non-criminal FISA warrant to spy on the president, rather than a more restrictive criminal warrant. No criminal court would have issued such a spying warrant with no evidence of a crime. B) 9th Amendment and 4th Amend ment. The Coconspirators have, generally, invaded the President's Right to Privacy by illegally obtaining confidential, personal documents and information, such as certain tax forms and personal data C) Constitution, Article 2. As Chief Executive, the President is privileged to act as chief of law enforcement and foreign relations. The Coconspirators have actively impeded, interfered with, and obstructed the President's exercise of his constitutional duties and privileges by, among other things, spying on him, releasing classified and sensitive communications and information, failing to carry out his lawful orders, initiating legal and congressional proceedings under color of law, but for bad faith purposes amounting to abuse of process and obstruction of government. i STEEMIT.COM The RICO case against the Democratic Party Steemit This is a long and detailed post; so I summarize - The crimes committed by the members of the Democratic Party fall... by stevescoins Like Comment Share thankyou Ar Like Reply (5m) Democrats are all going to prison for RICO, Conspiracy, Evidence Tampering... tRUMP is Taking Them All Down! (What a barrel of kooks)
Falsified: C
 P TR
 10/13/2019, 1:11:27 PM (12 mins)
 The Democrat-Government-Media Trump Coup D'etat investigation
 continues. So far, Robert Mueller, James Comey, Hillary Clinton, Peter
 Strzok, Andy McCabe and, most recently, Nancy Pelosi, Adam Schiff, and
 Jerrold Nadler have been implicated in the scandal.
 The scandal involves individual criminal acts and a conspiracy to violate the
 rights of U.S. Citizens, including but not limited to, Donald Trump. This is the
 most wide-spread scandal ever to affect the U.S. Government, including
 several Intelligence and Law Enforcement agencies, not limited to, rogue
 elements within the DOJ, FBI, CIA, NSA
 Among the charges being investigated are violations of 18 U.S. Code
 sections 241, 242 and 245. Section 242 prohibits public servants from using
 their positions, "under color of law," to deprive an individual of his
 constitutional rights. Section 241 prohibits public servants and others from
 conspiring to interfere with an individual's free exercise or enjoyment of
 constitutional rights. Section 245 prohibits public servants and others from
 intimidating candidates for public office.
 Over the past three years, the Coconspirators have also tampered with
 evidence and witnesses for political purposes in order to harm the President
 and to cover Coconspirators' own wrongdoing; destroyed, concealed, and/or
 falsified records in federal investigations; defrauded the United States;
 engaged in corruption; engaged in political Racketeering by using the threat
 of federal law enforcement and Congressional investigations, media leaks,
 and threats of criminal prosecutions to cover the Coconspirators' own
 crimes. All Conspirators and related activities and legal violations may be
 tied together using the RICO statute, 18 U.S. Code section 1962.
 The preceding sections would seem to apply directly to the ongoing,
 unrelenting attack by Democrats, RINOS and their Coconspirators against
 the President. Among other rights of the President infringed on by the
 Coconspirators are the following:
 A) 4th Amendment. The Coconspirators used a non-criminal FISA warrant to
 spy on the president, rather than a more restrictive criminal warrant. No
 criminal court would have issued such a spying warrant with no evidence of
 a crime.
 B) 9th Amendment and 4th Amend ment. The Coconspirators have,
 generally, invaded the President's Right to Privacy by illegally obtaining
 confidential, personal documents and information, such as certain tax forms
 and personal data
 C) Constitution, Article 2. As Chief Executive, the President is privileged to
 act as chief of law enforcement and foreign relations. The Coconspirators
 have actively impeded, interfered with, and obstructed the President's
 exercise of his constitutional duties and privileges by, among other things,
 spying on him, releasing classified and sensitive communications and
 information, failing to carry out his lawful orders, initiating legal and
 congressional proceedings under color of law, but for bad faith purposes
 amounting to abuse of process and obstruction of government.
 i
 STEEMIT.COM
 The RICO case against the Democratic
 Party Steemit
 This is a long and detailed post; so I summarize -
 The crimes committed by the members of the
 Democratic Party fall... by stevescoins
 Like
 Comment
 Share
 thankyou
 Ar
 Like Reply (5m)
Democrats are all going to prison for RICO, Conspiracy, Evidence Tampering... tRUMP is Taking Them All Down! (What a barrel of kooks)

Democrats are all going to prison for RICO, Conspiracy, Evidence Tampering... tRUMP is Taking Them All Down! (What a barrel of kooks)

Falsified: 1 day ago O points You don't really expect that people in the US could have the carbon footprint of a sub Saharan African do you? I already linked to the source that shows we've made better strides that others in the treaty. Sorry you either didn't read them or choose to ignore them. If Al Gore and Barack Obama are both such strong proponents of the Paris Accords and the threat of sea level rise, it seems strange they've both invested multi millions in sea front mansions that consume more energy than (my best guess given their massive size) probably 10 normal homes. Our current president has not denied climate change, what he denied, very rightfully, is that somehow the threat is diminished if the US sticks to specific goals to reduce emissions (outside the treaty we exceeded those goals, no other signator has) all the main polluting nations get 5 years to set a benchmark / baseline of emissions (China now is building coal fired electric generation plants because that increases their baseline for subsequent years - so the treaty actually encourages 'developing nations' like India and China to pollute more) and obligate the US to give billions to those 'developing' countries to amp up clean power alternatives. It is absolutely not accepted fact that a long term increase in temperatures caused by greenhouse gas emissions is taking place or could be reversed if it were. The scientist who developed the theory was proven recently to have falsified his data:https://principia-scientific.org/what-michael-manns-hockey-stick-graph-gave-to-un-climate- fraud/ Reply Give Award Share Report Save Found this on r/insanepeoplefacebook. Kind of ironic though. Was having an argument about climate change, and turned out crazy.
Falsified: 1 day ago
 O points
 You don't really expect that people in the US could have the carbon footprint of a sub Saharan African do you? I already
 linked to the source that shows we've made better strides that others in the treaty. Sorry you either didn't read them or
 choose to ignore them. If Al Gore and Barack Obama are both such strong proponents of the Paris Accords and the
 threat of sea level rise, it seems strange they've both invested multi millions in sea front mansions that consume more
 energy than (my best guess given their massive size) probably 10 normal homes. Our current president has not denied
 climate change, what he denied, very rightfully, is that somehow the threat is diminished if the US sticks to specific goals
 to reduce emissions (outside the treaty we exceeded those goals, no other signator has) all the main polluting nations
 get 5 years to set a benchmark / baseline of emissions (China now is building coal fired electric generation plants
 because that increases their baseline for subsequent years - so the treaty actually encourages 'developing nations' like
 India and China to pollute more) and obligate the US to give billions to those 'developing' countries to amp up clean
 power alternatives. It is absolutely not accepted fact that a long term increase in temperatures caused by greenhouse
 gas emissions is taking place or could be reversed if it were. The scientist who developed the theory was proven recently
 to have falsified his data:https://principia-scientific.org/what-michael-manns-hockey-stick-graph-gave-to-un-climate-
 fraud/
 Reply Give Award Share Report Save
Found this on r/insanepeoplefacebook. Kind of ironic though. Was having an argument about climate change, and turned out crazy.

Found this on r/insanepeoplefacebook. Kind of ironic though. Was having an argument about climate change, and turned out crazy.

Falsified: 1 hr Exactly Both acid rain and the ozone were caused by humans and then fixed by laws like the clean air act though So if this is trying to dissuade that global warming isnt real then it's doing a poor job. Occupy Democrats Logic 5 hrs EECUP Logic (GC) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ozone depletion realPolitiDiva TM @realPolitiDiva http://www.nationalgeographic.com /environment/global-warming/acid -rain/ 1970:The new ice age!We're all gonna EN.WIKIPEDIA.ORG die! Ozone depletion - Wikipedia 1980:Acid rain! We're all gonna die! Like Reply 48m 1990:The ozone layer is gone! We're dmao sometimes I all gonna die! 2000:Global warming is melting the forget how funny you are Like Reply 23m glaciers!We're all gonna die! e same for you, keep hitting up the research. 2010s:Climate Change! In 12 years, we're all gonna die! cthe fact you think Like Reply 15m that acid rain didn't exist before Those same PHD's "findings" are what the above post is based on. So apparently just because you have a PHD doesn't mean you're right or that you don't lie and willingly commit fraud. So yeah. I don't really buy the bull your PHD's are pushing. 10 years from now it will just be something else humans started burning coal and that acid rain and the ozone Especially cringe because they even write simple articles for the average person so they don't have to read all the research were fixed through laws shows an unbelievable amount of willful ignorance Like Reply jargon and data that they're not going to understand anyway. 21m Like Reply 14m Not saying their wasn't but it's already been measured that it's significantly increased after the industrial revolution and then Like Reply 13m Sure they increase, especially in areas like cities. But guess what. More people than ever are driving cars. There are more I mean not really they still talk about acid rain a lot and the again after the combustion engine. Then decreased after the clean air act. There's kind of a whole in the Ozone was caused emissions than ever before. But by chemicals that are now banned. Also yeah that's kinda reason these people have research jobs and PhDs that says this. Kinda cringe on here's the kicker. The environmentalists stopped talking about it and the ozone. Why? Because they came to the point where they were busted for falsifying research repeatedly. And also dumbing it down to "simple articles for the average person" how research works....there's always something new like knowledge isnt static you know. So if some research is falsified your part tbh. and it destroies the credibility of all research then that means all https://education.seattlepi.com /acid-rain-problem-today-100 -years-ago-3926.html cops are bad seeing as there's a few bad apples, with that logic DUOATION OETTICDLcOM Like Reply 21m PhoteGrid Climate change deniers should be treated like anti vaxxers
Falsified: 1 hr
 Exactly
 Both acid rain and the ozone were
 caused by humans and then fixed by
 laws like the clean air act though
 So if this is trying to dissuade that
 global warming isnt real then it's doing
 a poor job.
 Occupy Democrats Logic
 5 hrs
 EECUP
 Logic
 (GC)
 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ozone
 depletion
 realPolitiDiva TM
 @realPolitiDiva
 http://www.nationalgeographic.com
 /environment/global-warming/acid
 -rain/
 1970:The new ice age!We're all gonna
 EN.WIKIPEDIA.ORG
 die!
 Ozone depletion - Wikipedia
 1980:Acid rain! We're all gonna die!
 Like Reply
 48m
 1990:The ozone layer is gone! We're
 dmao sometimes I
 all gonna die!
 2000:Global warming is melting the
 forget how funny you are
 Like Reply
 23m
 glaciers!We're all gonna die!
 e same for you, keep
 hitting up the research.
 2010s:Climate Change! In 12 years,
 we're all gonna die!
 cthe fact you think
 Like Reply
 15m
 that acid rain didn't exist before
 Those same PHD's "findings" are
 what the above post is based on.
 So apparently just because you
 have a PHD doesn't mean you're
 right or that you don't lie and
 willingly commit fraud. So yeah.
 I don't really buy the bull your
 PHD's are pushing. 10 years
 from now it will just be
 something else
 humans started burning coal and
 that acid rain and the ozone
 Especially cringe because they
 even write simple articles for the
 average person so they don't
 have to read all the research
 were fixed through laws shows
 an unbelievable amount of willful
 ignorance
 Like Reply
 jargon and data that they're not
 going to understand anyway.
 21m
 Like Reply
 14m
 Not saying their wasn't but it's
 already been measured that it's
 significantly increased after the
 industrial revolution and then
 Like Reply
 13m
 Sure they increase, especially in
 areas like cities. But guess
 what. More people than ever
 are driving cars. There are more
 I mean not really they still talk
 about acid rain a lot and the
 again after the combustion
 engine. Then decreased after the
 clean air act. There's kind of a
 whole in the Ozone was caused
 emissions than ever before. But
 by chemicals that are now
 banned. Also yeah that's kinda
 reason these people have
 research jobs and PhDs that
 says this. Kinda cringe on
 here's the kicker. The
 environmentalists stopped
 talking about it and the ozone.
 Why? Because they came to the
 point where they were busted for
 falsifying research repeatedly.
 And also dumbing it down to
 "simple articles for the average
 person"
 how research works....there's
 always something new like
 knowledge isnt static you know.
 So if some research is falsified
 your part tbh.
 and it destroies the credibility of
 all research then that means all
 https://education.seattlepi.com
 /acid-rain-problem-today-100
 -years-ago-3926.html
 cops are bad seeing as there's a
 few bad apples, with that logic
 DUOATION OETTICDLcOM
 Like Reply
 21m
 PhoteGrid
Climate change deniers should be treated like anti vaxxers

Climate change deniers should be treated like anti vaxxers

Falsified: Reality can be whatever I want. Me: your whole belief is based on one falsified study that’s never been able to be replicated. ANTI-Vaxxers:
Falsified: Reality can be whatever I want.
Me: your whole belief is based on one falsified study that’s never been able to be replicated. ANTI-Vaxxers:

Me: your whole belief is based on one falsified study that’s never been able to be replicated. ANTI-Vaxxers:

Falsified: Environment Our world has a disposable plastics problem. Exhibit: plastics storm raging in Croatia. ( gfycat.com) 15.5k submitted 16 hours ago 537 comments share save hide give award report crosspost sorted by: best v you are viewing a single comment's thread. view the rest of the comments - This was taken during sanation works on large landfill that is just 50meters away and workers were unprepared for the high winds. Trash was picked up next day by cleaning crews. This is what place looks like today https://www.index.hr/mobile/clanak.aspx?category3Dvijesti&id3D2056659 and in future it will be an urban forest so #trashtag was already made last year when this video was taken. edit: as another Croatian user pointed out plastic bags weren't even from a landfill - they were from recycling yard down the street. So this was a problem that lasted one day, one year ago, meanwhile we have real problems like factories in China not having pollution filters or Indian plastic production, its easy to cry at this video but real problems are nowhere this dramatic, they are sponsored by governments and industry, of course recyling helps but in big scheme of things it has basically little effects, we need to change goverments and companies. edit2: this is already too long but I need to say that this is how fake news are made. This happened in my city and we invested millions in sanating this landfill, our terrible bus station got put on hold, our traffic problems, everything got put on hold to fix this problem and this video was taken in middle of sanation works. It just shows hypocrisy, we could leave this landfill for 60 more years and no one would bat an eye, we try to fix it and some bags got away from nearby recycling yard and all the people starg juding us and telling us to pick up the trash, nice metaphor for how we ignore real problems and flame up at non existing ones (like reddit and flat earthers or antivaxx people - yes they exists but you are making way too big story of it while ignorin real problems) permalink embed save parent report give award reply Came here to basically say this... this is typical social media bullshit. Obviously we have a plastic problem, but we don't need to post falsified crap to highlight that. permalink embed save parent report give award reply I don't know how these posts reach front page. 93% upvoted? Why would there be a trash bag storm in the middle of Croatia unrelated to a very isolated incident? OP Lies for Upvotes. Instantly called out
Falsified: Environment Our world has a disposable plastics problem. Exhibit: plastics storm raging in Croatia. ( gfycat.com)
 15.5k
 submitted 16 hours ago
 537 comments share save hide give award report crosspost
 sorted by: best v
 you are viewing a single comment's thread.
 view the rest of the comments -
 This was taken during sanation works on large landfill that is just 50meters away and workers were unprepared for
 the high winds. Trash was picked up next day by cleaning crews. This is what place looks like today
 https://www.index.hr/mobile/clanak.aspx?category3Dvijesti&id3D2056659 and in future it will be an urban forest so
 #trashtag was already made last year when this video was taken.
 edit: as another Croatian user pointed out plastic bags weren't even from a landfill - they were from recycling yard
 down the street. So this was a problem that lasted one day, one year ago, meanwhile we have real problems like
 factories in China not having pollution filters or Indian plastic production, its easy to cry at this video but real
 problems are nowhere this dramatic, they are sponsored by governments and industry, of course recyling helps but in
 big scheme of things it has basically little effects, we need to change goverments and companies.
 edit2: this is already too long but I need to say that this is how fake news are made. This happened in my city and we
 invested millions in sanating this landfill, our terrible bus station got put on hold, our traffic problems, everything got
 put on hold to fix this problem and this video was taken in middle of sanation works. It just shows hypocrisy, we could
 leave this landfill for 60 more years and no one would bat an eye, we try to fix it and some bags got away from
 nearby recycling yard and all the people starg juding us and telling us to pick up the trash, nice metaphor for how we
 ignore real problems and flame up at non existing ones (like reddit and flat earthers or antivaxx people - yes they
 exists but you are making way too big story of it while ignorin real problems)
 permalink embed
 save parent report give award reply
 Came here to basically say this... this is typical social media bullshit. Obviously we have a plastic problem, but we
 don't need to post falsified crap to highlight that.
 permalink embed save parent report give award reply
 I don't know how these posts reach front page. 93% upvoted? Why would there be a trash bag storm in the middle of
 Croatia unrelated to a very isolated incident?
OP Lies for Upvotes. Instantly called out

OP Lies for Upvotes. Instantly called out

Falsified: Jason Fuller, Contributor Working to bring about the best in America, both on-line and off. Impeachment Is No Longer Enough; Donald Trump Must Face Justice Impeachment and removal from office are only the first steps; for treason and-if convicted in a court of law-executed. 06/11/2017 10:39 pm ET for America to be redeemed, Donald Trump must be prosecuted Donald Trump has been President of the United States for just shy of six months now. I think that most of us among the electorate knew that his presidency would be a relative disaster, but I am not sure how many among us expected the catastrophe our nation now faces. friendly-neighborhood-patriarch: hominishostilis: abstractandedgyname: siryouarebeingmocked: mississpithy: bogleech: notyourmoderate: angrybell: thinksquad: http://archive.is/5VvI5 Huffpo, everybody. Can someone tell me what high crime or misdemeanor Trump has committed that merits this? Or is the HuffPo just publishing outright fantasies? God dammit, I’m now in the position of defending Huffington. I didn’t want to be here. Okay, @angrybell … actually, @ literally everyone who reblogged this uncritically as a tacit endorsement and agreement. Such as @the-critical-feminist that I reblog this from.My first question has to be: are you serious? Don’t read that with a tone, don’t read that as an attack. That’s my first question: Are you asking a serious question about what high crimes or misdemeanors Trump has perpetrated? Are you asking a sincere question or is this the sort of rhetoric that doesn’t translate well into text? And, if you are actually asking this question, are ou going to hear the answer or are you going to immediately start concocting your counter-argument because you just know in your heart that anyone who disagrees with you must be wrong, so you start formulating a plan to prove them wrong before you actually hear what they have to say?Next: did you read the article that was posted in the link you responded to? Because the author of that article does a reasonable job of explaining their thought process behind the headline. Or did you lash out before you read the article? Okay, presuming that you did read the article in good faith, evaluate its points, perform the follow-up research to understand context, and still disagree with the central tenets and simply believe that the author’s reasoning does not hold up for whatever reasons you have chosen not to state, and you believe their source information is falsified for whatever reason you have chosen not to state, I will move on. After I have given you and yours every conceivable benefit of the doubt and every charitable assumption. Because if the article itself doesn’t convince you, there’s the fact that Donald Trump has broken literally every federal law against corruption and conflict of interest. Not one or two, not most, not all but a few. Literally every single law we have against corruption, from the Constitution to the informal guidelines circulated as a memo from the White House ethics scholars. He’s broken literally every one of those rules. He’s openly traded favors for money and favors for months now. Hell, that Chinese influence-peddler that paid him off for sixteen million dollars should have been enough to get him convicted of treason. Sharing code-word level classified information with a government on the opposite side of an ongoing military conflict isn’t *necessarily* treason, unless the information was part of a share program with an allied nation and wasn’t his to distribute. That’s aiding a foreign aggressor at the expense of a military ally, and that’s treason. Giving aid and comfort to enemies of the nation. Obstruction of justice is pretty clear-cut, that’s an impeachment, except that the justice in question is also a matter of national security, so that’s treason. Again. Defaming the former president? Misdemeanor, impeachable. The way he drags his heels nominating posts in Justice and State could be prosecuted as dereliction of duty. If he has tapes of Comey, he’s on the hook for contempt, if he doesn’t then he’s on the hook for witness tampering. Hell, deleting the covfefe tweet is destroying federal records, which is a misdemeanor, and impeachable. The man doesn’t go a week without bringing on an impeachable offense. Strictly speaking, every time he goes to Mar-A-Lago he’s committing grand larceny by fraud, because he’s taking millions of dollars of American funds for his own benefit, after promising not to do that. There are dozens, hundreds maybe, of impeachable offenses already in this 140 days, “high crimes and misdemeanors”. Actual counts of treason, punishable by death by hanging, is probably only five or six counts. Only five or six counts of high treason by our sitting president. His job does not put him above reproach. His job is to *be* above reproach. And he’s failing that job. Trump’s supporters probably believe he’s done nothing impeachable or treasonous because they spent eight years claiming on no grounds whatsoever that Obama was impeachable and treasonous, just because they didn’t like him. They now probably convince themselves that these facts about Trump are as fake as their Obama theories and they’ve ruined the gravity of these terms for themselves. “ His job does not put him above reproach. His job is to *be* above reproach. And he’s failing that job. “ I like how Bogleech doesn’t know many Trump supporters are former Obama supporters. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/04/us/obama-trump-swing-voters.html https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/10/16/17980820/trump-obama-2016-race-racism-class-economy-2018-midterm https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obama-Trump_voters It’s not even a secret. But why am I not surprised bogleech - that intellectual titan - failed to do basic research? And last time I checked, no nation required their politicans to be perfect. Which is what NYM is asking for with that quote; perfection. That’s what ‘above reproach’ means. An impossible standard, considering people “reproach” Trump for feeding fish wrong, for his skin color, for any and every little thing, even if they have to twist reality into a pretzel to do it. In fact, I’ve seen people take pictures of kids in cages from 2014, and blame Trump for it. So this: Are you asking a serious question about what high crimes or misdemeanors Trump has perpetrated? Is a question of this: Can someone tell me what high crime or misdemeanor Trump has committed that merits this? Seems you missed the part that says “merits this”. Next: did you read the article that was posted in the link you responded to? Because the author of that article does a reasonable job of explaining their thought process behind the headline. Or did you lash out before you read the article? (The underlined is in the subtitle, not the headline.) Okay, presuming that you did read the article in good faith, evaluate its points, perform the follow-up research to understand context, and still disagree with the central tenets… Context? Central tenets? Do you not know how highlighting works? You don’t need to know the context, or any other point, when you’re indicating a specific, explicit, and isolated quality. The subtitle called for Trump’s execution, we’re 5 paragraphs in and you haven’t even acknowledged that part yet. Or at all, I’m guessing, because I’m not reading further. You keep talking around it. You accuse others, preemptively, of not hearing the answer and pre-”concocting” a response, and yet you’re waffling on about shit around the one, sole, isolated thing that was indicated in the first place. This isn’t about ignoring context, this is about criticising one thing. Which is a thing people are allowed to do, by the way, just because people criticise one thing, doesn’t mean they’re criticising everything about the everyone involved, and everything said before, adjacent to, and after that one thing, and therefore are required to include all of those things in their consideration and assessment of this one thing. The specific criticism of the indicated quality is the advocation of Trump’s execution. That’s it. No context is needed to understand that this is what was said, especially since that which was said, which is being criticised, is explicit. No amount of, “So, click-bait subtitle that you don’t see until you’ve already clicked on the article link out of the way, here’s what I actually meant when I said I wanted this person tried and executed,” could excuse the use of that language, let alone actually believing in it. It’s like… it’s like if someone makes a typo, someone else is like, “Oh, seems you made a typo,” you’d jump in like, “But what about they’re perfectly reasonable spelling everywhere else? Hm? Forced to ignore contextual perfect spelling I see. They’re lack of typos everywhere else explains this typo, and vindicates it”. You and what’s his face, James, fuckin ReasonAndEmpathy or whatever now, y’all keep saying “but what of the context?” when the criterion of criticism is isolated, atomic, specific, and/or explicit. No amount of context invalidates the very specific, singular words explicitly spoken. “Sure he called for Trump to be executed, but he explains himself.” Fucking and? When did the death sentence become ok? When did that happen? Moderates are ok with the death sentence now? Aight, weird. Man this fucking post aged like fine wine, take a SIP Delicious This was quite a ride
Falsified: Jason Fuller, Contributor
 Working to bring about the best in America, both on-line and off.
 Impeachment Is No Longer Enough;
 Donald Trump Must Face Justice
 Impeachment and removal from office are only the first steps;
 for treason and-if convicted in a court of law-executed.
 06/11/2017 10:39 pm ET
 for America to be redeemed, Donald Trump must be prosecuted
 Donald Trump has been President of the United States for just shy of six months now. I
 think that most of us among the electorate knew that his presidency would be a relative
 disaster, but I am not sure how many among us expected the catastrophe our nation now
 faces.
friendly-neighborhood-patriarch:

hominishostilis:

abstractandedgyname:
siryouarebeingmocked:

mississpithy:

bogleech:

notyourmoderate:

angrybell:

thinksquad:


http://archive.is/5VvI5


Huffpo, everybody. 




Can someone tell me what high crime or misdemeanor Trump has committed that merits this? Or is the HuffPo just publishing outright fantasies?

God dammit, I’m now in the position of defending Huffington. I didn’t want to be here. Okay, @angrybell … actually, @ literally everyone who reblogged this uncritically as a tacit endorsement and agreement. Such as @the-critical-feminist that I reblog this from.My first question has to be: are you serious? Don’t read that with a tone, don’t read that as an attack. That’s my first question: Are you asking a serious question about what high crimes or misdemeanors Trump has perpetrated? Are you asking a sincere question or is this the sort of rhetoric that doesn’t translate well into text? And, if you are actually asking this question, are ou going to hear the answer or are you going to immediately start concocting your counter-argument because you just know in your heart that anyone who disagrees with you must be wrong, so you start formulating a plan to prove them wrong before you actually hear what they have to say?Next: did you read the article that was posted in the link you responded to? Because the author of that article does a reasonable job of explaining their thought process behind the headline. Or did you lash out before you read the article? Okay, presuming that you did read the article in good faith, evaluate its points, perform the follow-up research to understand context, and still disagree with the central tenets and simply believe that the author’s reasoning does not hold up for whatever reasons you have chosen not to state, and you believe their source information is falsified for whatever reason you have chosen not to state, I will move on. After I have given you and yours every conceivable benefit of the doubt and every charitable assumption. Because if the article itself doesn’t convince you, there’s the fact that Donald Trump has broken literally every federal law against corruption and conflict of interest. Not one or two, not most, not all but a few. Literally every single law we have against corruption, from the Constitution to the informal guidelines circulated as a memo from the White House ethics scholars. He’s broken literally every one of those rules. He’s openly traded favors for money and favors for months now. Hell, that Chinese influence-peddler that paid him off for sixteen million dollars should have been enough to get him convicted of treason. Sharing code-word level classified information with a government on the opposite side of an ongoing military conflict isn’t *necessarily* treason, unless the information was part of a share program with an allied nation and wasn’t his to distribute. That’s aiding a foreign aggressor at the expense of a military ally, and that’s treason. Giving aid and comfort to enemies of the nation. Obstruction of justice is pretty clear-cut, that’s an impeachment, except that the justice in question is also a matter of national security, so that’s treason. Again. Defaming the former president? Misdemeanor, impeachable. The way he drags his heels nominating posts in Justice and State could be prosecuted as dereliction of duty. If he has tapes of Comey, he’s on the hook for contempt, if he doesn’t then he’s on the hook for witness tampering. Hell, deleting the covfefe tweet is destroying federal records, which is a misdemeanor, and impeachable. The man doesn’t go a week without bringing on an impeachable offense. Strictly speaking, every time he goes to Mar-A-Lago he’s committing grand larceny by fraud, because he’s taking millions of dollars of American funds for his own benefit, after promising not to do that. There are dozens, hundreds maybe, of impeachable offenses already in this 140 days, “high crimes and misdemeanors”. Actual counts of treason, punishable by death by hanging, is probably only five or six counts. Only five or six counts of high treason by our sitting president. His job does not put him above reproach. His job is to *be* above reproach. And he’s failing that job. 

Trump’s supporters probably believe he’s done nothing impeachable or treasonous because they spent eight years claiming on no grounds whatsoever that Obama was impeachable and treasonous, just because they didn’t like him. They now probably convince themselves that these facts about Trump are as fake as their Obama theories and they’ve ruined the gravity of these terms for themselves.





“

His job does not put him above reproach. His job is to *be* above reproach. And he’s failing that job.


“






I like how Bogleech doesn’t know many Trump supporters are former Obama supporters.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/04/us/obama-trump-swing-voters.html
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/10/16/17980820/trump-obama-2016-race-racism-class-economy-2018-midterm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obama-Trump_voters
It’s not even a secret. But why am I not surprised bogleech - that intellectual titan - failed to do basic research?
And last time I checked, no nation required their politicans to be perfect. Which is what NYM is asking for with that quote; perfection. That’s what ‘above reproach’ means. An impossible standard, considering people “reproach” Trump for feeding fish wrong, for his skin color, for any and every little thing, even if they have to twist reality into a pretzel to do it. In fact, I’ve seen people take pictures of kids in cages from 2014, and blame Trump for it.

So this:


Are you asking a serious question about what high crimes or misdemeanors Trump has perpetrated?


Is a question of this:


Can someone tell me what high crime or misdemeanor Trump has committed that merits this?


Seems you missed the part that says “merits this”.


Next: did you read the article that was posted in the link you responded to? Because the author of that article does a reasonable job of explaining their thought process behind the headline. Or did you lash out before you read the article? 


(The underlined is in the subtitle, not the headline.)


Okay, presuming that you did read the article in good faith, evaluate its points, perform the follow-up research to understand context, and still disagree with the central tenets…
Context? Central tenets? Do you not know how highlighting works? You don’t need to know the context, or any other point, when you’re indicating a specific, explicit, and isolated quality.
The subtitle called for Trump’s execution, we’re 5 paragraphs in and you haven’t even acknowledged that part yet. Or at all, I’m guessing, because I’m not reading further. You keep talking around it. You accuse others, preemptively, of not hearing the answer and pre-”concocting” a response, and yet you’re waffling on about shit around the one, sole, isolated thing that was indicated in the first place.
This isn’t about ignoring context, this is about criticising one thing. Which is a thing people are allowed to do, by the way, just because people criticise one thing, doesn’t mean they’re criticising everything about the everyone involved, and everything said before, adjacent to, and after that one thing, and therefore are required to include all of those things in their consideration and assessment of this one thing.
The specific criticism of the indicated quality is the advocation of Trump’s execution. That’s it. No context is needed to understand that this is what was said, especially since that which was said, which is being criticised, is explicit. No amount of, “So, click-bait subtitle that you don’t see until you’ve already clicked on the article link out of the way, here’s what I actually meant when I said I wanted this person tried and executed,” could excuse the use of that language, let alone actually believing in it.
It’s like… it’s like if someone makes a typo, someone else is like, “Oh, seems you made a typo,” you’d jump in like, “But what about they’re perfectly reasonable spelling everywhere else? Hm? Forced to ignore contextual perfect spelling I see. They’re lack of typos everywhere else explains this typo, and vindicates it”.
You and what’s his face, James, fuckin ReasonAndEmpathy or whatever now, y’all keep saying “but what of the context?” when the criterion of criticism is isolated, atomic, specific, and/or explicit. No amount of context invalidates the very specific, singular words explicitly spoken. “Sure he called for Trump to be executed, but he explains himself.” Fucking and? When did the death sentence become ok? When did that happen? Moderates are ok with the death sentence now? Aight, weird.


Man this fucking post aged like fine wine, take a SIP 

Delicious

This was quite a ride

friendly-neighborhood-patriarch: hominishostilis: abstractandedgyname: siryouarebeingmocked: mississpithy: bogleech: notyourmoderate...

Falsified: February 25, 2016 at 11:15 am Vaccines are full of poisons, human diploid cell from aborted babies, animal DNA, cancer causing things (enzymes, viruses (SV-40) and other compounds like formaldehyde and so on. There is not ONE SINGLE INGREDIENT that promotes heath in a vaccine! I am very piS$ed that when my kids were little I was NOT given all the ingredients in the vaccines and now knowing there have never been adequate safety tests or studies on vaccinated -vs- unvaccinated...AND we can't sue the manufacturers when something goes wrong, makes me realize that we have ALL been the test subjects and the Nuremberg Code has been VIOLATED! As has the Hippocratic Oath of all doctors who gave vaccines to children! I have lost faith in allopathic medicine and pharmaceutical companies! My kids have been poisoned and their future is now uncertain thanks to all the cr@]p they have crammed in them! NO MORE! Reply March 1, 2016 at 9:57 am Well I guess my kids will have to be home schooled! The government has to keep the population down and will make everyone weak, sick, or die! Reply March 10, 2016 at 1:07 am Yes, well: Did you ever notice that everyone who is vaccinated seems tyo be always sick in one way or another? My friends, neighbors, co-workers who are all vaccinated seem always sick with one thing or another Just saying: Im old enough to remember the culture of the medical community and political people of the early 1970os on. There was a culture in Western New York, that if a doctor said anything about a vaccination causing a reaction (now termed an "Event"), the doctor would mysteriously lose their license to practice medicine in New York State. Wow, corrupt or what. A politician my parents grew up with, went to grammar school with, and said at one meeting: "This is how we do business now". Didn't know what that meant back then, but I do now as proven by Dr. Pan from California taking money to push mandatory vacc. If it was safe and proven so, why would they push for mandatory vacc? A friend of mine (who was the Mayor of a small town in New York Southern Tier, always said: "Follow the money" and "If you had a government mandated profit of billions per year, would you let it go for a few nameless faces?" Problem is, I would. Re I was old enough to remember my vaccine episode (Sept 1970, I was 5 years old). The "culture" back then was deny, deny, deny. And if that didn't work, lie. My wife's eldest child had over 30 seizures from the DPT (later found in hospital records), but at the time, she was told she was a nervous new mother and her dog just scared him. How many others are told the same lies? In 1970, the doctors said there was nothing wrong when my mother told the intake nurse that I had progressive pain in, and progressing up my forearms, less use of my hands over the previous weeks, and greater difficulty in breathing since the MMR booster. By late September, I was in an oxygen tent, great birthday present for a five year old! In about 1996, almost verbatim to what my mother told the intake nurse was published a type of GBS (Guillain-Barre Syndrome) in Cambridge University Press, but my mother didn't use specific scientific & medical terms, she was just smart as a tack. You are NOT going to mandate and subject me again to such torture! In 1998 I started to have seizures of an undetermined source. After extensive testing, it was determined I have demyelination of the nerves in my brain from a severe "something in my childhood". Congressman Bill Posev wants an investigation into the allegations of Dr. William Thompson (CDC), which are that Dr Thompson himself falsified the data of the 2003 study of the MMR vaccine in which he states he was part of the fraud, and he and his fellow CDC study personnel destroyed documents related to the study "The government has to keep the population down and will make everyone weak, sick, or die!" - Anti Vaxxer
Falsified: February 25, 2016 at 11:15 am
 Vaccines are full of poisons, human diploid cell from aborted babies, animal DNA, cancer causing
 things (enzymes, viruses (SV-40) and other compounds like formaldehyde and so on. There is not
 ONE SINGLE INGREDIENT that promotes heath in a vaccine! I am very piS$ed that when my kids
 were little I was NOT given all the ingredients in the vaccines and now knowing there have never
 been adequate safety tests or studies on vaccinated -vs- unvaccinated...AND we can't sue the
 manufacturers when something goes wrong, makes me realize that we have ALL been the test
 subjects and the Nuremberg Code has been VIOLATED! As has the Hippocratic Oath of all doctors
 who gave vaccines to children! I have lost faith in allopathic medicine and pharmaceutical
 companies! My kids have been poisoned and their future is now uncertain thanks to all the cr@]p
 they have crammed in them! NO MORE!
 Reply
 March 1, 2016 at 9:57 am
 Well I guess my kids will have to be home schooled! The government has to keep the
 population down and will make everyone weak, sick, or die!
 Reply
 March 10, 2016 at 1:07 am
 Yes, well: Did you ever notice that everyone who is vaccinated seems tyo be always
 sick in one way or another? My friends, neighbors, co-workers who are all vaccinated
 seem always sick with one thing or another
 Just saying: Im old enough to remember the culture of the medical community and
 political people of the early 1970os on. There was a culture in Western New York, that if
 a doctor said anything about a vaccination causing a reaction (now termed an
 "Event"), the doctor would mysteriously lose their license to practice medicine in New
 York State. Wow, corrupt or what. A politician my parents grew up with, went to
 grammar school with, and said at one meeting: "This is how we do business now".
 Didn't know what that meant back then, but I do now as proven by Dr. Pan from
 California taking money to push mandatory vacc. If it was safe and proven so, why
 would they push for mandatory vacc? A friend of mine (who was the Mayor of a small
 town in New York Southern Tier, always said: "Follow the money" and "If you had a
 government mandated profit of billions per year, would you let it go for a few
 nameless faces?" Problem is, I would.
 Re
 I was old enough to remember my vaccine episode (Sept 1970, I was 5 years old). The
 "culture" back then was deny, deny, deny. And if that didn't work, lie.
 My wife's eldest child had over 30 seizures from the DPT (later found in hospital
 records), but at the time, she was told she was a nervous new mother and her dog just
 scared him.
 How many others are told the same lies?
 In 1970, the doctors said there was nothing wrong when my mother told the intake
 nurse that I had progressive pain in, and progressing up my forearms, less use of my
 hands over the previous weeks, and greater difficulty in breathing since the MMR
 booster. By late September, I was in an oxygen tent, great birthday present for a five
 year old! In about 1996, almost verbatim to what my mother told the intake nurse was
 published a type of GBS (Guillain-Barre Syndrome) in Cambridge University Press,
 but my mother didn't use specific scientific & medical terms, she was just smart as a
 tack. You are NOT going to mandate and subject me again to such torture!
 In 1998 I started to have seizures of an undetermined source. After extensive testing,
 it was determined I have demyelination of the nerves in my brain from a severe
 "something in my childhood".
 Congressman Bill Posev wants an investigation into the allegations of Dr. William
 Thompson (CDC), which are that Dr Thompson himself falsified the data of the 2003
 study of the MMR vaccine in which he states he was part of the fraud, and he and his
 fellow CDC study personnel destroyed documents related to the study
"The government has to keep the population down and will make everyone weak, sick, or die!" - Anti Vaxxer

"The government has to keep the population down and will make everyone weak, sick, or die!" - Anti Vaxxer

Falsified: 100% They have a great sets for different hair types, and some amazing hair masques to help with hydration! No pressure, I just like to share great products to my friends that I've been using and believe in them I've been using them for over a year and my hair is so healthy from all the damag I did to it over the years.I won't go back to anything else!V/V! If you're interested I'd love to grab tea or coffee or a phone date to talk more! Also I will send you the Facebook invite hut I will have a Monet mingle at the on Tuesday 6:30-8:3 on FB, and also! Creat will invite you your friends t today. I esterday,305PM Hey I told you several times I've heard of Monat and not interested. As a matter of fact, I had a gf try and sell them to me I am not interested. I don't have damaged hair, I don't have growth issues, it's thick and healthy and from my owrn maintenance, products I use and overal good genes. 100% esterday, 3.05 PM Hey Itold you several times I've heard of Monat and not interested. As a matter of fact, I had a gf try and sell them to me I am not interested. I don't have damaged hair, I don't have growth issues, it's thick and healthy and from my own maintenance, products I use and overall I'm sorry but while l'd like to thank you for the bday wishes I feel they aren't genuine as you immediately followed in with this info. I'd appreciate you not messaging me regarding this product You're a dumb constipated bitch this 12 18 AM Lmao. Wow. Really showing true colors 2iS AM 100% 12 18 AM Lmao. Wow. Really showing true colors If someone doesn't want YOUR product bc you try and overpitch something I've tried telling you I'm not interested in. Take note and move on. And being honest with you doesn't make me a bitch. And you calling me names or bringing up health issues is immature and uncalled for CConstipated bitch? No, what I am is educated in your product nd don't want your product. I did all these things as I mentioned I have Ш a gf who previously tried selling it to me. So what you should do is educate yourself in why I'm not interested. Also I'm not constipated. Let's try I have an inflamed colon that had me in the ER for gastrointestinal issues and in the process of trying to figure out if I have crohns or 3 Have a good one update: she changed her IG name fromto Still hasn't taken accountability for her actions, instead falsified a police report to claim her phone was stolen and that she wasn't the person who messaged me. Instead of contacting me herseif she chose to have a mutual friend reach out to me She was not only representing Monat when messaging me but now has illegally created a false police report I've since spoken to Sargent oPolce Dept who stated there was no case number that matched as this was a False statement. That cases are currently in the 3000s not 1000s, that when a statement is made citizens are given a yellow carbon copy, and that the signature did not match the Officer listed and this was fraudulent It is being investigated as now if the officer is anyhow involved could jeopardze their job as wel All becausecouldn't take accountability for her own actions went as far as lying about a police report So she will be under investigation not just with Monat but with PD Oh holy hell, this is hardcore MLM dedication
Falsified: 100%
 They have a great sets for different hair
 types, and some amazing hair masques
 to help with hydration! No pressure, I just
 like to share great products to my friends
 that I've been using and believe in them
 I've been using them for over a year and
 my hair is so healthy from all the damag
 I did to it over the years.I won't go back
 to anything else!V/V! If you're
 interested I'd love to grab tea or coffee or
 a phone date to talk more!
 Also I will send you the Facebook invite
 hut I will have a Monet mingle at the
 on
 Tuesday 6:30-8:3
 on FB, and
 also! Creat
 will invite you
 your friends
 t today. I
 esterday,305PM
 Hey I told you several times I've heard
 of Monat and not interested. As a matter
 of fact, I had a gf try and sell them to me
 I am not interested. I don't have damaged
 hair, I don't have growth issues, it's thick
 and healthy and from my owrn
 maintenance, products I use and overal
 good genes.
 100%
 esterday, 3.05 PM
 Hey Itold you several times I've heard
 of Monat and not interested. As a matter
 of fact, I had a gf try and sell them to me
 I am not interested. I don't have damaged
 hair, I don't have growth issues, it's thick
 and healthy and from my own
 maintenance, products I use and overall
 I'm sorry but while l'd like to thank you for
 the bday wishes I feel they aren't genuine
 as you immediately followed in with this
 info.
 I'd appreciate you not messaging me
 regarding this product
 You're a dumb constipated bitch
 this
 12 18 AM
 Lmao. Wow. Really showing true colors
 2iS AM
 100%
 12 18 AM
 Lmao. Wow. Really showing true colors
 If someone doesn't want YOUR product
 bc you try and overpitch something I've
 tried telling you I'm not interested in. Take
 note and move on.
 And being honest with you doesn't make
 me a bitch. And you calling me names or
 bringing up health issues is immature and
 uncalled for
 CConstipated bitch? No, what I am is
 educated in your product
 nd don't want your product.
 I did all these things as I mentioned I have
 Ш
 a gf who previously tried selling it to me.
 So what you should do is educate
 yourself in why I'm not interested. Also
 I'm not constipated. Let's try I have an
 inflamed colon that had me in the ER for
 gastrointestinal issues and in the process
 of trying to figure out if I have crohns or
 3
 Have a good one
 update: she changed her IG name fromto
 Still hasn't taken accountability for her actions, instead falsified a police
 report to claim her phone was stolen and that she wasn't the person who
 messaged me. Instead of contacting me herseif she chose to have a mutual
 friend reach out to me
 She was not only representing Monat when messaging me but now has
 illegally created a false police report I've since spoken to Sargent
 oPolce Dept who stated there was no case number that
 matched as this was a False statement. That cases are currently in the
 3000s not 1000s, that when a statement is made citizens are given a yellow
 carbon copy, and that the signature did not match the Officer listed and this
 was fraudulent It is being investigated as now if the officer is anyhow
 involved could jeopardze their job as wel
 All becausecouldn't take accountability for her own actions went as
 far as lying about a police report
 So she will be under investigation not just with Monat but with PD
Oh holy hell, this is hardcore MLM dedication

Oh holy hell, this is hardcore MLM dedication

Falsified: JUSTICE NEWS Department of Justice Office of Public Affairs FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Monday, March 25, 2019 Duke University Agrees to Pay U.S. $112.5 Million to Settle False Claims Act Allegations Related to Scientific Research Misconduct Duke University has agreed to pay the government $112.5 million to resolve allegations that it violated the False Claims Act by submitting applications and progress reports that contained falsified research on federal grants to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Justice Department announced today The resources utilized by NIH and EPA to fund important research and clinical programs across the nation are limited," said Assistant Attorney General Jody Hunt for the Department of Justice's Civil Division. "Today's settlement demonstrates that the Department of Justice will pursue grantees that knowingly falsify research and undermine the integrity of federal funding decisions." Taxpayers expect and deserve that federal grant dollars will be used efficiently and honestly. Individuals and institutions that receive research funding from the federal government must be scrupulous in conducting research for the common good and rigorous in rooting out fraud," said Matthew G.T. Martin, United States Attorney for the Middle District of North Carolina. "May this serve as a lesson that the use of false or fabricated data in grant applications or reports is completely unacceptable. Duke is a private university located in Durham, North Carolina. Duke receives millions of dollars in funding from NIH and the EPA for hundreds of grants each year. The settlement resolves allegations that between 2006 and 2018, Duke knowingly submitted and caused to be submitted claims to the NIH and to the EPA that contained falsified or fabricated data or statements in thirty (30) grants, causing the NIH and EPA to pay out grants funds they otherwise would not have. Specifically, the United States contends that the results of certain research related to mice conducted by a Duke research technician in its Airway Physiology Laboratory, as well as statements based on those research results, were falsified and/or fabricated. "Duke knowingly, the government contended, falsified data to claim millions of grant dollars from the National Institutes of Health," said Maureen R. Dixon, Special Agent in Charge, Office of Inspector General for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. "OIG and our law enforcement partners will continue to hold such grantees fully accountable regardless of the length or complexity of the investigations. This settlement sends a strong message that fraud and dishonesty will not be tolerated in the research funding process said EPA Acting Region 4 Administrator Mary S. Walker. "We will continue to take appropriate legal measures to ensure a fiscally sound system that protects grant funds." The allegations were originally brought in a lawsuit filed by Joseph Thomas, a former Duke employee, under the qui tam, or whistleblower, provisions of the False Claims Act, which permit private individuals to sue on behalf of the government and share in any recovery. The Act permits the government to intervene in and take over the whistleblower's suit, or, as in this case, for the whistleblower to pursue the action on the government's behalf. Mr. Thomas will receive $33,750,0oo from the settlement. Duke University Agrees to Pay U.S. - $112.5 Million to Settle False Claims Act Allegations Related to Scientific Research Misconduct
Falsified: JUSTICE NEWS
 Department of Justice
 Office of Public Affairs
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
 Monday, March 25, 2019
 Duke University Agrees to Pay U.S. $112.5 Million to Settle False Claims Act Allegations
 Related to Scientific Research Misconduct
 Duke University has agreed to pay the government $112.5 million to resolve allegations that it violated the False Claims Act
 by submitting applications and progress reports that contained falsified research on federal grants to the National Institutes
 of Health (NIH) and to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Justice Department announced today
 The resources utilized by NIH and EPA to fund important research and clinical programs across the nation are limited,"
 said Assistant Attorney General Jody Hunt for the Department of Justice's Civil Division. "Today's settlement demonstrates
 that the Department of Justice will pursue grantees that knowingly falsify research and undermine the integrity of federal
 funding decisions."
 Taxpayers expect and deserve that federal grant dollars will be used efficiently and honestly. Individuals and institutions
 that receive research funding from the federal government must be scrupulous in conducting research for the common good
 and rigorous in rooting out fraud," said Matthew G.T. Martin, United States Attorney for the Middle District of North
 Carolina. "May this serve as a lesson that the use of false or fabricated data in grant applications or reports is completely
 unacceptable.
 Duke is a private university located in Durham, North Carolina. Duke receives millions of dollars in funding from NIH and
 the EPA for hundreds of grants each year. The settlement resolves allegations that between 2006 and 2018, Duke knowingly
 submitted and caused to be submitted claims to the NIH and to the EPA that contained falsified or fabricated data or
 statements in thirty (30) grants, causing the NIH and EPA to pay out grants funds they otherwise would not have.
 Specifically, the United States contends that the results of certain research related to mice conducted by a Duke research
 technician in its Airway Physiology Laboratory, as well as statements based on those research results, were falsified and/or
 fabricated.
 "Duke knowingly, the government contended, falsified data to claim millions of grant dollars from the National Institutes of
 Health," said Maureen R. Dixon, Special Agent in Charge, Office of Inspector General for the U.S. Department of Health and
 Human Services. "OIG and our law enforcement partners will continue to hold such grantees fully accountable regardless
 of the length or complexity of the investigations.
 This settlement sends a strong message that fraud and dishonesty will not be tolerated in the research funding process
 said EPA Acting Region 4 Administrator Mary S. Walker. "We will continue to take appropriate legal measures to ensure a
 fiscally sound system that protects grant funds."
 The allegations were originally brought in a lawsuit filed by Joseph Thomas, a former Duke employee, under the qui tam, or
 whistleblower, provisions of the False Claims Act, which permit private individuals to sue on behalf of the government and
 share in any recovery. The Act permits the government to intervene in and take over the whistleblower's suit, or, as in this
 case, for the whistleblower to pursue the action on the government's behalf. Mr. Thomas will receive $33,750,0oo from the
 settlement.
Duke University Agrees to Pay U.S. - $112.5 Million to Settle False Claims Act Allegations Related to Scientific Research Misconduct

Duke University Agrees to Pay U.S. - $112.5 Million to Settle False Claims Act Allegations Related to Scientific Research Misconduct