electoral college

๐Ÿ”ฅ | Latest

electoral college: RESPECT TO POST MALONE FOR SPEAKING OUT ON GOVERNMENT CORRUPTION AND THE JFKASSASSINATION FOLLOW @CONSPIRACYFILES.al3ๅก Evo Double tap and tag a friend! CHECK US OUT ON FACEBOOK! (Link in bio) SUBSCRIBE ON YOUTUBE! @conspiracyfiles YouTube Credits: @power1051 @postmalone Real Talk ๐Ÿ’ฏ @cthagod dumb af Post Malone dropping these truth bombs. Malone reveals that he didnโ€™t vote in the past election because "our votes are suggestions to the Electoral College, thatโ€™s why voting doesnโ€™t matter. Malone discussed the tattoo of JFK on his arm; calling him โ€œa real oneโ€ and stating he was โ€œthe only President to speak out against the crazy corruption stuff that's going on in our government nowadays." โ€œLiterally days before he died he was talking about how our government focuses on corruption instead of Truth and all the things,โ€ said Malone. โ€œThere's a great speech where he goes back and forth between the negatives and what we should be focusing on. And days after that, he died.โ€... (Comment your thoughts below) ConspiracyFiles ConspiracyFiles2 PostMalone PostMaloneWokeAF PostMaloneExposesTheUSGovernment MartialLaw WokeAF QuestionEverything MainstreamMedia CNNFakeNews CorruptGovernment FreeMasons MkUltra WakeUpSheeple Sheeple CorporationSlayer Illuninati Rothschild UncleSam UncleScam Illuminati Killuminati Bilderberg NewWorldOrder ConspiracyJokes Conspiracy ConspiracyTheory ConspiracyFact ConspiracyTheories ConspiracyFiles Follow back up page! @conspiracyfiles2 Follow @uniformedthugs Follow @celebrityfactual Follow @historypicture.s Follow @simpsonsprediction.s Follow @terrorclipz Follow @unexplainedvids Follow @th3six Follow @funnyhoodvid.z
electoral college: RESPECT TO POST MALONE FOR SPEAKING OUT ON GOVERNMENT CORRUPTION AND THE JFKASSASSINATION FOLLOW @CONSPIRACYFILES.al3ๅก Evo Double tap and tag a friend! CHECK US OUT ON FACEBOOK! (Link in bio) SUBSCRIBE ON YOUTUBE! @conspiracyfiles YouTube Credits: @power1051 @postmalone Real Talk ๐Ÿ’ฏ @cthagod dumb af Post Malone dropping these truth bombs. Malone reveals that he didnโ€™t vote in the past election because "our votes are suggestions to the Electoral College, thatโ€™s why voting doesnโ€™t matter. Malone discussed the tattoo of JFK on his arm; calling him โ€œa real oneโ€ and stating he was โ€œthe only President to speak out against the crazy corruption stuff that's going on in our government nowadays." โ€œLiterally days before he died he was talking about how our government focuses on corruption instead of Truth and all the things,โ€ said Malone. โ€œThere's a great speech where he goes back and forth between the negatives and what we should be focusing on. And days after that, he died.โ€... (Comment your thoughts below) ConspiracyFiles ConspiracyFiles2 PostMalone PostMaloneWokeAF PostMaloneExposesTheUSGovernment MartialLaw WokeAF QuestionEverything MainstreamMedia CNNFakeNews CorruptGovernment FreeMasons MkUltra WakeUpSheeple Sheeple CorporationSlayer Illuninati Rothschild UncleSam UncleScam Illuminati Killuminati Bilderberg NewWorldOrder ConspiracyJokes Conspiracy ConspiracyTheory ConspiracyFact ConspiracyTheories ConspiracyFiles Follow back up page! @conspiracyfiles2 Follow @uniformedthugs Follow @celebrityfactual Follow @historypicture.s Follow @simpsonsprediction.s Follow @terrorclipz Follow @unexplainedvids Follow @th3six Follow @funnyhoodvid.z

Double tap and tag a friend! CHECK US OUT ON FACEBOOK! (Link in bio) SUBSCRIBE ON YOUTUBE! @conspiracyfiles YouTube Credits: @power1051 @...

electoral college: let's get it popping. Biden/Obama 2020 yeah yeah i know @WeCloutChase The 22nd amendment would allow Joe Biden to run as President and Barrack Obama as his VP. Just saying. Show this thread 600 coolmanfromthepast: libertarirynn: coolmanfromthepast: libertarirynn: coolmanfromthepast: libertarirynn: hst3000: libertarirynn: The constitutionality of this would likely be questioned by the electoral college but it miiiight get through depending on how strictly they interpret the 22nd amendment, since Obama would not technically be being โ€œelectedโ€ to the office of president, which is the explicit provisional language in the amendment (Not that somebody couldnโ€™t theoretically hold the office more than twice, but that they could not be elected to it twice). All that said it would be a shitshow but mighty entertaining. 12th amendment, guys: No person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States. Obama is an unconstitutional selection. Not exactly: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/08/06/could-joe-biden-pick-barack-obama-as-his-running-mate-yes-but/?utm_term=.dc9a5700ef57 All the WaPo article means is thatย โ€œItโ€™s okay when Democrats violate the Constitution!โ€ It literally does not say that at all and I question if you even read it. I read it.ย  An alleged Constitutional scholar completely dismisses an entire amendment.ย ย  Except he doesnโ€™t. He explicitly explained the argument that one would use against that amendment. And again he uses a Republican example too (Jeb Bush/George Bush) so he absolutely did not say โ€œit would be OK if liberals did itโ€œ. He didnโ€™t say would be โ€œOKโ€ with him at all, he was just laying out the argument. Yโ€™all need to learn that theoretical arguments are not endorsements. The law is full of crazy loopholes that people literally spend years arguing back-and-forth as a career. You donโ€™t get to just throw up your hands and say โ€œthat sounds stupid so itโ€™s not realโ€. Itโ€™s insanely stupid, and it disturbs me that anyone would even consider this idea.ย  Crazy Uncle Joe would be an absolutely horrible President, even more of a puppet than Obama.ย ย  Friend, buddy, pal, chum. I am not even sort of saying that this would be a good idea and I donโ€™t even think itโ€™s on the table. Biden has shown no interest in running, much less appointing Obama as VP. He would be an idiot to do that because it almost certainly wouldnโ€™t make it through the electoral college. This is just a thought exercise, nothing more.
electoral college: let's get it popping. Biden/Obama 2020 yeah yeah i know @WeCloutChase The 22nd amendment would allow Joe Biden to run as President and Barrack Obama as his VP. Just saying. Show this thread 600 coolmanfromthepast: libertarirynn: coolmanfromthepast: libertarirynn: coolmanfromthepast: libertarirynn: hst3000: libertarirynn: The constitutionality of this would likely be questioned by the electoral college but it miiiight get through depending on how strictly they interpret the 22nd amendment, since Obama would not technically be being โ€œelectedโ€ to the office of president, which is the explicit provisional language in the amendment (Not that somebody couldnโ€™t theoretically hold the office more than twice, but that they could not be elected to it twice). All that said it would be a shitshow but mighty entertaining. 12th amendment, guys: No person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States. Obama is an unconstitutional selection. Not exactly: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/08/06/could-joe-biden-pick-barack-obama-as-his-running-mate-yes-but/?utm_term=.dc9a5700ef57 All the WaPo article means is thatย โ€œItโ€™s okay when Democrats violate the Constitution!โ€ It literally does not say that at all and I question if you even read it. I read it.ย  An alleged Constitutional scholar completely dismisses an entire amendment.ย ย  Except he doesnโ€™t. He explicitly explained the argument that one would use against that amendment. And again he uses a Republican example too (Jeb Bush/George Bush) so he absolutely did not say โ€œit would be OK if liberals did itโ€œ. He didnโ€™t say would be โ€œOKโ€ with him at all, he was just laying out the argument. Yโ€™all need to learn that theoretical arguments are not endorsements. The law is full of crazy loopholes that people literally spend years arguing back-and-forth as a career. You donโ€™t get to just throw up your hands and say โ€œthat sounds stupid so itโ€™s not realโ€. Itโ€™s insanely stupid, and it disturbs me that anyone would even consider this idea.ย  Crazy Uncle Joe would be an absolutely horrible President, even more of a puppet than Obama.ย ย  Friend, buddy, pal, chum. I am not even sort of saying that this would be a good idea and I donโ€™t even think itโ€™s on the table. Biden has shown no interest in running, much less appointing Obama as VP. He would be an idiot to do that because it almost certainly wouldnโ€™t make it through the electoral college. This is just a thought exercise, nothing more.

coolmanfromthepast: libertarirynn: coolmanfromthepast: libertarirynn: coolmanfromthepast: libertarirynn: hst3000: libertarirynn:...

electoral college: let's get it popping. Biden/Obama 2020 yeah yeah i know @WeCloutChase The 22nd amendment would allow Joe Biden to run as President and Barrack Obama as his VP. Just saying. Show this thread 600 urben911: libertarirynn: hst3000: libertarirynn: coolmanfromthepast: libertarirynn: hst3000: libertarirynn: The constitutionality of this would likely be questioned by the electoral college but it miiiight get through depending on how strictly they interpret the 22nd amendment, since Obama would not technically be being โ€œelectedโ€ to the office of president, which is the explicit provisional language in the amendment (Not that somebody couldnโ€™t theoretically hold the office more than twice, but that they could not be elected to it twice). All that said it would be a shitshow but mighty entertaining. 12th amendment, guys: No person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States. Obama is an unconstitutional selection. Not exactly: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/08/06/could-joe-biden-pick-barack-obama-as-his-running-mate-yes-but/?utm_term=.dc9a5700ef57 All the WaPo article means is thatย โ€œItโ€™s okay when Democrats violate the Constitution!โ€ It literally does not say that at all and I question if you even read it. I haveโ€ฆ opinionsโ€ฆ on Dorf. Obama is ineligible for the office. Saying โ€˜well heโ€™s only ineligible to be ELECTEDโ€™ is stupid shenanigans. Like saying youโ€™re allowed to be in a house because while they said โ€˜donโ€™t come in this doorโ€™ you came in through the WINDOW. You canโ€™t back door a non citizen into the presidency this way, I see no reason why this would be different for term limitations. You can call it โ€œstupid shenanigansโ€ all you want but this is how the law works. Every phrase, comma, and word choice matters. If there is even a window there is a lawyer who will argue that point. Iโ€™m certainly not in support of this idea, Iโ€™m just saying you canโ€™t hand wave a legal argument because youโ€™re pretty sure it meant something thatโ€™s not explicitly stated. The fact is the amendment could have explicitly said โ€œno former president can ever hold the office more than twice under any circumstancesโ€, but it doesnโ€™t say that, it says they cannot be elected. There is a difference. Iโ€™m pretty sure from the wording of the amendment it would be perfectly legal. If they ran as biden/Obama that would be legal because Obama isnโ€™t being elected as president. If something happened to Biden where the vp would have to take over then you could have Obama in the white house legally. At least thatโ€™s what I get from the wording of the constitution. THANK YOU.It really isnโ€™t that complicated.
electoral college: let's get it popping. Biden/Obama 2020 yeah yeah i know @WeCloutChase The 22nd amendment would allow Joe Biden to run as President and Barrack Obama as his VP. Just saying. Show this thread 600 urben911: libertarirynn: hst3000: libertarirynn: coolmanfromthepast: libertarirynn: hst3000: libertarirynn: The constitutionality of this would likely be questioned by the electoral college but it miiiight get through depending on how strictly they interpret the 22nd amendment, since Obama would not technically be being โ€œelectedโ€ to the office of president, which is the explicit provisional language in the amendment (Not that somebody couldnโ€™t theoretically hold the office more than twice, but that they could not be elected to it twice). All that said it would be a shitshow but mighty entertaining. 12th amendment, guys: No person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States. Obama is an unconstitutional selection. Not exactly: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/08/06/could-joe-biden-pick-barack-obama-as-his-running-mate-yes-but/?utm_term=.dc9a5700ef57 All the WaPo article means is thatย โ€œItโ€™s okay when Democrats violate the Constitution!โ€ It literally does not say that at all and I question if you even read it. I haveโ€ฆ opinionsโ€ฆ on Dorf. Obama is ineligible for the office. Saying โ€˜well heโ€™s only ineligible to be ELECTEDโ€™ is stupid shenanigans. Like saying youโ€™re allowed to be in a house because while they said โ€˜donโ€™t come in this doorโ€™ you came in through the WINDOW. You canโ€™t back door a non citizen into the presidency this way, I see no reason why this would be different for term limitations. You can call it โ€œstupid shenanigansโ€ all you want but this is how the law works. Every phrase, comma, and word choice matters. If there is even a window there is a lawyer who will argue that point. Iโ€™m certainly not in support of this idea, Iโ€™m just saying you canโ€™t hand wave a legal argument because youโ€™re pretty sure it meant something thatโ€™s not explicitly stated. The fact is the amendment could have explicitly said โ€œno former president can ever hold the office more than twice under any circumstancesโ€, but it doesnโ€™t say that, it says they cannot be elected. There is a difference. Iโ€™m pretty sure from the wording of the amendment it would be perfectly legal. If they ran as biden/Obama that would be legal because Obama isnโ€™t being elected as president. If something happened to Biden where the vp would have to take over then you could have Obama in the white house legally. At least thatโ€™s what I get from the wording of the constitution. THANK YOU.It really isnโ€™t that complicated.

urben911: libertarirynn: hst3000: libertarirynn: coolmanfromthepast: libertarirynn: hst3000: libertarirynn: The constitutionality...

electoral college: let's get it popping. Biden/Obama 2020 yeah yeah i know @WeCloutChase The 22nd amendment would allow Joe Biden to run as President and Barrack Obama as his VP. Just saying. Show this thread 600 hst3000: libertarirynn: hst3000: libertarirynn: coolmanfromthepast: libertarirynn: hst3000: libertarirynn: The constitutionality of this would likely be questioned by the electoral college but it miiiight get through depending on how strictly they interpret the 22nd amendment, since Obama would not technically be being โ€œelectedโ€ to the office of president, which is the explicit provisional language in the amendment (Not that somebody couldnโ€™t theoretically hold the office more than twice, but that they could not be elected to it twice). All that said it would be a shitshow but mighty entertaining. 12th amendment, guys: No person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States. Obama is an unconstitutional selection. Not exactly: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/08/06/could-joe-biden-pick-barack-obama-as-his-running-mate-yes-but/?utm_term=.dc9a5700ef57 All the WaPo article means is thatย โ€œItโ€™s okay when Democrats violate the Constitution!โ€ It literally does not say that at all and I question if you even read it. I haveโ€ฆ opinionsโ€ฆ on Dorf. Obama is ineligible for the office. Saying โ€˜well heโ€™s only ineligible to be ELECTEDโ€™ is stupid shenanigans. Like saying youโ€™re allowed to be in a house because while they said โ€˜donโ€™t come in this doorโ€™ you came in through the WINDOW. You canโ€™t back door a non citizen into the presidency this way, I see no reason why this would be different for term limitations. You can call it โ€œstupid shenanigansโ€ all you want but this is how the law works. Every phrase, comma, and word choice matters. If there is even a window there is a lawyer who will argue that point. Iโ€™m certainly not in support of this idea, Iโ€™m just saying you canโ€™t hand wave a legal argument because youโ€™re pretty sure it meant something thatโ€™s not explicitly stated. The fact is the amendment could have explicitly said โ€œno former president can ever hold the office more than twice under any circumstancesโ€, but it doesnโ€™t say that, it says they cannot be elected. There is a difference. Being elected is the default way to become president. I donโ€™t doubt someone would argue it, but itโ€™s a STUPID ARGUMENT. The rest of the argument in that article is โ€˜well thereโ€™s no law saying the parties canโ€™t run a dog for electionโ€™ type of crap. โ€œBeing elected is the default way to become presidentโ€ Yes but itโ€™s not the only way. Teddy Roosevelt not initially get elected to the office, he became president when McKinley died. Whether or not itโ€™s a stupid argument is beside the point. Weโ€™re talking about theoretical legality.
electoral college: let's get it popping. Biden/Obama 2020 yeah yeah i know @WeCloutChase The 22nd amendment would allow Joe Biden to run as President and Barrack Obama as his VP. Just saying. Show this thread 600 hst3000: libertarirynn: hst3000: libertarirynn: coolmanfromthepast: libertarirynn: hst3000: libertarirynn: The constitutionality of this would likely be questioned by the electoral college but it miiiight get through depending on how strictly they interpret the 22nd amendment, since Obama would not technically be being โ€œelectedโ€ to the office of president, which is the explicit provisional language in the amendment (Not that somebody couldnโ€™t theoretically hold the office more than twice, but that they could not be elected to it twice). All that said it would be a shitshow but mighty entertaining. 12th amendment, guys: No person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States. Obama is an unconstitutional selection. Not exactly: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/08/06/could-joe-biden-pick-barack-obama-as-his-running-mate-yes-but/?utm_term=.dc9a5700ef57 All the WaPo article means is thatย โ€œItโ€™s okay when Democrats violate the Constitution!โ€ It literally does not say that at all and I question if you even read it. I haveโ€ฆ opinionsโ€ฆ on Dorf. Obama is ineligible for the office. Saying โ€˜well heโ€™s only ineligible to be ELECTEDโ€™ is stupid shenanigans. Like saying youโ€™re allowed to be in a house because while they said โ€˜donโ€™t come in this doorโ€™ you came in through the WINDOW. You canโ€™t back door a non citizen into the presidency this way, I see no reason why this would be different for term limitations. You can call it โ€œstupid shenanigansโ€ all you want but this is how the law works. Every phrase, comma, and word choice matters. If there is even a window there is a lawyer who will argue that point. Iโ€™m certainly not in support of this idea, Iโ€™m just saying you canโ€™t hand wave a legal argument because youโ€™re pretty sure it meant something thatโ€™s not explicitly stated. The fact is the amendment could have explicitly said โ€œno former president can ever hold the office more than twice under any circumstancesโ€, but it doesnโ€™t say that, it says they cannot be elected. There is a difference. Being elected is the default way to become president. I donโ€™t doubt someone would argue it, but itโ€™s a STUPID ARGUMENT. The rest of the argument in that article is โ€˜well thereโ€™s no law saying the parties canโ€™t run a dog for electionโ€™ type of crap. โ€œBeing elected is the default way to become presidentโ€ Yes but itโ€™s not the only way. Teddy Roosevelt not initially get elected to the office, he became president when McKinley died. Whether or not itโ€™s a stupid argument is beside the point. Weโ€™re talking about theoretical legality.

hst3000: libertarirynn: hst3000: libertarirynn: coolmanfromthepast: libertarirynn: hst3000: libertarirynn: The constitutionality...

electoral college: let's get it popping. Biden/Obama 2020 yeah yeah i know @WeCloutChase The 22nd amendment would allow Joe Biden to run as President and Barrack Obama as his VP. Just saying. Show this thread 600 coolmanfromthepast: libertarirynn: coolmanfromthepast: libertarirynn: hst3000: libertarirynn: The constitutionality of this would likely be questioned by the electoral college but it miiiight get through depending on how strictly they interpret the 22nd amendment, since Obama would not technically be being โ€œelectedโ€ to the office of president, which is the explicit provisional language in the amendment (Not that somebody couldnโ€™t theoretically hold the office more than twice, but that they could not be elected to it twice). All that said it would be a shitshow but mighty entertaining. 12th amendment, guys: No person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States. Obama is an unconstitutional selection. Not exactly: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/08/06/could-joe-biden-pick-barack-obama-as-his-running-mate-yes-but/?utm_term=.dc9a5700ef57 All the WaPo article means is thatย โ€œItโ€™s okay when Democrats violate the Constitution!โ€ It literally does not say that at all and I question if you even read it. I read it.ย  An alleged Constitutional scholar completely dismisses an entire amendment.ย ย  Except he doesnโ€™t. He explicitly explained the argument that one would use against that amendment. And again he uses a Republican example too (Jeb Bush/George Bush) so he absolutely did not say โ€œit would be OK if liberals did itโ€œ. He didnโ€™t say would be โ€œOKโ€ with him at all, he was just laying out the argument. Yโ€™all need to learn that theoretical arguments are not endorsements. The law is full of crazy loopholes that people literally spend years arguing back-and-forth as a career. You donโ€™t get to just throw up your hands and say โ€œthat sounds stupid so itโ€™s not realโ€.
electoral college: let's get it popping. Biden/Obama 2020 yeah yeah i know @WeCloutChase The 22nd amendment would allow Joe Biden to run as President and Barrack Obama as his VP. Just saying. Show this thread 600 coolmanfromthepast: libertarirynn: coolmanfromthepast: libertarirynn: hst3000: libertarirynn: The constitutionality of this would likely be questioned by the electoral college but it miiiight get through depending on how strictly they interpret the 22nd amendment, since Obama would not technically be being โ€œelectedโ€ to the office of president, which is the explicit provisional language in the amendment (Not that somebody couldnโ€™t theoretically hold the office more than twice, but that they could not be elected to it twice). All that said it would be a shitshow but mighty entertaining. 12th amendment, guys: No person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States. Obama is an unconstitutional selection. Not exactly: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/08/06/could-joe-biden-pick-barack-obama-as-his-running-mate-yes-but/?utm_term=.dc9a5700ef57 All the WaPo article means is thatย โ€œItโ€™s okay when Democrats violate the Constitution!โ€ It literally does not say that at all and I question if you even read it. I read it.ย  An alleged Constitutional scholar completely dismisses an entire amendment.ย ย  Except he doesnโ€™t. He explicitly explained the argument that one would use against that amendment. And again he uses a Republican example too (Jeb Bush/George Bush) so he absolutely did not say โ€œit would be OK if liberals did itโ€œ. He didnโ€™t say would be โ€œOKโ€ with him at all, he was just laying out the argument. Yโ€™all need to learn that theoretical arguments are not endorsements. The law is full of crazy loopholes that people literally spend years arguing back-and-forth as a career. You donโ€™t get to just throw up your hands and say โ€œthat sounds stupid so itโ€™s not realโ€.

coolmanfromthepast: libertarirynn: coolmanfromthepast: libertarirynn: hst3000: libertarirynn: The constitutionality of this would li...

electoral college: let's get it popping. Biden/Obama 2020 yeah yeah i know @WeCloutChase The 22nd amendment would allow Joe Biden to run as President and Barrack Obama as his VP. Just saying. Show this thread 600 hst3000: libertarirynn: coolmanfromthepast: libertarirynn: hst3000: libertarirynn: The constitutionality of this would likely be questioned by the electoral college but it miiiight get through depending on how strictly they interpret the 22nd amendment, since Obama would not technically be being โ€œelectedโ€ to the office of president, which is the explicit provisional language in the amendment (Not that somebody couldnโ€™t theoretically hold the office more than twice, but that they could not be elected to it twice). All that said it would be a shitshow but mighty entertaining. 12th amendment, guys: No person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States. Obama is an unconstitutional selection. Not exactly: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/08/06/could-joe-biden-pick-barack-obama-as-his-running-mate-yes-but/?utm_term=.dc9a5700ef57 All the WaPo article means is thatย โ€œItโ€™s okay when Democrats violate the Constitution!โ€ It literally does not say that at all and I question if you even read it. I haveโ€ฆ opinionsโ€ฆ on Dorf. Obama is ineligible for the office. Saying โ€˜well heโ€™s only ineligible to be ELECTEDโ€™ is stupid shenanigans. Like saying youโ€™re allowed to be in a house because while they said donโ€™t come in this doorโ€™ you came in through the WINDOW. You canโ€™t back door a non citizen into the presidency this way, I see no reason why this would be different for term limitations. You can call it โ€œstupid shenanigansโ€ all you want but this is how the law works. Every phrase, comma, and word choice matters. If there is even a window there is a lawyer who will argue that point. Iโ€™m certainly not in support of this idea, Iโ€™m just saying you canโ€™t hand wave a legal argument because youโ€™re pretty sure it meant something thatโ€™s not explicitly stated. The fact is the amendment could have explicitly said โ€œno former president can ever hold the office more than twice under any circumstancesโ€, but it doesnโ€™t say that, it says they cannot be elected. There is a difference.
electoral college: let's get it popping. Biden/Obama 2020 yeah yeah i know @WeCloutChase The 22nd amendment would allow Joe Biden to run as President and Barrack Obama as his VP. Just saying. Show this thread 600 hst3000: libertarirynn: coolmanfromthepast: libertarirynn: hst3000: libertarirynn: The constitutionality of this would likely be questioned by the electoral college but it miiiight get through depending on how strictly they interpret the 22nd amendment, since Obama would not technically be being โ€œelectedโ€ to the office of president, which is the explicit provisional language in the amendment (Not that somebody couldnโ€™t theoretically hold the office more than twice, but that they could not be elected to it twice). All that said it would be a shitshow but mighty entertaining. 12th amendment, guys: No person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States. Obama is an unconstitutional selection. Not exactly: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/08/06/could-joe-biden-pick-barack-obama-as-his-running-mate-yes-but/?utm_term=.dc9a5700ef57 All the WaPo article means is thatย โ€œItโ€™s okay when Democrats violate the Constitution!โ€ It literally does not say that at all and I question if you even read it. I haveโ€ฆ opinionsโ€ฆ on Dorf. Obama is ineligible for the office. Saying โ€˜well heโ€™s only ineligible to be ELECTEDโ€™ is stupid shenanigans. Like saying youโ€™re allowed to be in a house because while they said donโ€™t come in this doorโ€™ you came in through the WINDOW. You canโ€™t back door a non citizen into the presidency this way, I see no reason why this would be different for term limitations. You can call it โ€œstupid shenanigansโ€ all you want but this is how the law works. Every phrase, comma, and word choice matters. If there is even a window there is a lawyer who will argue that point. Iโ€™m certainly not in support of this idea, Iโ€™m just saying you canโ€™t hand wave a legal argument because youโ€™re pretty sure it meant something thatโ€™s not explicitly stated. The fact is the amendment could have explicitly said โ€œno former president can ever hold the office more than twice under any circumstancesโ€, but it doesnโ€™t say that, it says they cannot be elected. There is a difference.

hst3000: libertarirynn: coolmanfromthepast: libertarirynn: hst3000: libertarirynn: The constitutionality of this would likely be que...

electoral college: let's get it popping. Biden/Obama 2020 yeah yeah i know @WeCloutChase The 22nd amendment would allow Joe Biden to run as President and Barrack Obama as his VP. Just saying. Show this thread 600 terrapinfox: libertarirynn: hst3000: libertarirynn: The constitutionality of this would likely be questioned by the electoral college but it miiiight get through depending on how strictly they interpret the 22nd amendment, since Obama would not technically be being โ€œelectedโ€ to the office of president, which is the explicit provisional language in the amendment (Not that somebody couldnโ€™t theoretically hold the office more than twice, but that they could not be elected to it twice). All that said it would be a shitshow but mighty entertaining. 12th amendment, guys: No person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States. Obama is an unconstitutional selection. Not exactly: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/08/06/could-joe-biden-pick-barack-obama-as-his-running-mate-yes-but/?utm_term=.dc9a5700ef57 i read that article and it still doesnโ€™t seem possible givenย โ€œNo person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.โ€and at first i thought thisโ€™d be a good way to secure trump his second term, butโ€ฆ judging by the sheer amount of lunatics in usa atm, a kinda technicality shadow president could have a chance, which would be terrifying and dangerous tbh. The article lose things out pretty clearly, and I summarize it in the OP: the exact wording of the 22nd amendment says that a person cannot be ELECTED more than twice to the office of president. It does not prohibit someone becoming president through a line of succession, Having not been directly elected to the office. A former president would not be constitutionally ineligible based on those parameters.Itโ€™s a loophole in the wording but the law is literally build on loopholes. A constitutional lawyer could and would argue this if they tried to make it happen. Now this article also points out they almost certainly wouldnโ€™t try to make it happen because of the backlash and lack of likelihood that the electoral college would approve such a ticket. But it is theoretically possible.
electoral college: let's get it popping. Biden/Obama 2020 yeah yeah i know @WeCloutChase The 22nd amendment would allow Joe Biden to run as President and Barrack Obama as his VP. Just saying. Show this thread 600 terrapinfox: libertarirynn: hst3000: libertarirynn: The constitutionality of this would likely be questioned by the electoral college but it miiiight get through depending on how strictly they interpret the 22nd amendment, since Obama would not technically be being โ€œelectedโ€ to the office of president, which is the explicit provisional language in the amendment (Not that somebody couldnโ€™t theoretically hold the office more than twice, but that they could not be elected to it twice). All that said it would be a shitshow but mighty entertaining. 12th amendment, guys: No person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States. Obama is an unconstitutional selection. Not exactly: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/08/06/could-joe-biden-pick-barack-obama-as-his-running-mate-yes-but/?utm_term=.dc9a5700ef57 i read that article and it still doesnโ€™t seem possible givenย โ€œNo person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.โ€and at first i thought thisโ€™d be a good way to secure trump his second term, butโ€ฆ judging by the sheer amount of lunatics in usa atm, a kinda technicality shadow president could have a chance, which would be terrifying and dangerous tbh. The article lose things out pretty clearly, and I summarize it in the OP: the exact wording of the 22nd amendment says that a person cannot be ELECTED more than twice to the office of president. It does not prohibit someone becoming president through a line of succession, Having not been directly elected to the office. A former president would not be constitutionally ineligible based on those parameters.Itโ€™s a loophole in the wording but the law is literally build on loopholes. A constitutional lawyer could and would argue this if they tried to make it happen. Now this article also points out they almost certainly wouldnโ€™t try to make it happen because of the backlash and lack of likelihood that the electoral college would approve such a ticket. But it is theoretically possible.

terrapinfox: libertarirynn: hst3000: libertarirynn: The constitutionality of this would likely be questioned by the electoral college...