🔥 | Latest

Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton, and Presidential Election: Hillary Clinton moments after learning of Donald Trumps victory in the 2016 Presidential election (colorized)
Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton, and Presidential Election: Hillary Clinton moments after learning of Donald Trumps victory in the 2016 Presidential election (colorized)

Hillary Clinton moments after learning of Donald Trumps victory in the 2016 Presidential election (colorized)

Dude, Facts, and I Bet: 12 hrs Now I hope all dumbies realize. RUSSIA DID NOT RIG THE 2016 Election!!! If ya don't believe me. Go listen to the Ex. FBl director.under oath. In front of Senate panel. (Even though, He's a damn liar. And a political hack!) Now. Carry on! EE P.s. Let's discuss policies. Not conspiracies!! Like -Comment ·Share 4 zombies have no ears for the truth, or any other opinion.regardless! Like Reply- 1-11 hrs id any of you actually watch it or are you just letting Brietbart tell you what to think? Like Reply 38 mins Edited No l spent two hours of my time watching comey lie a little and then destroy the liberal Tarrative with the truth. I bet you didn't watch it though. Like Reply 39 mins Wait so Comey is liar that tells the truth? Which is it? Like Reply - 36 mins He lied to the American people about Hillary's email probe. Lied to the President about telling him hes not apart of the investigation. Mislead the American Public. Only when confronted by Congress who have classified clearance did he tell the truth. And tell the American people.. the truth... Just like he told the President. That he wasn't being investigated Like Reply 26 mins i feel sorry for you. I wonder when your going to wake up and smell the roses.. Your just so far gone into madness its pathetic. So how about you do yourself a favor. Disappear like Hillary. Then you can come back blame the democrat party, the Russians, and the American people Like Reply 25 mins Edited So you believe people you think are liars - is that what you're saying? Like Reply 23 mins Edited he's proven to be a liar. You should know. I'm sure you and ur liberal buddies were calling him vile when he came out against Hillary. And changed ur tune when you thought he was investigating the President. Like Reply 13 mins So according to you: he's proven to be a liar but you believe him. Like Reply 12 mins he's proven to be a liar. Unti he had to provide facts This is even low for you. Dude get a new political party. Or ideology Like Reply 11 mins You win the gold medal in mental gymnastics. Congrats Like Reply 6 mins you could win a noble peace prize in ignorance. Like Reply 4 mins Write a reply.. memehumor: Go listen to him… even if he’s a liar and political hack!
Dude, Facts, and I Bet: 12 hrs
 Now I hope all dumbies realize. RUSSIA DID NOT RIG THE 2016
 Election!!!
 If ya don't believe me. Go listen to the Ex. FBl director.under oath. In front
 of Senate panel.
 (Even though, He's a damn liar. And a political hack!)
 Now. Carry on! EE
 P.s. Let's discuss policies. Not conspiracies!!
 Like -Comment ·Share
 4
 zombies have no ears for the truth, or any other
 opinion.regardless!
 Like Reply- 1-11 hrs
 id any of you actually watch it or are you just letting
 Brietbart tell you what to think?
 Like Reply 38 mins Edited
 No
 l spent two hours of my time watching comey
 lie a little and then destroy the liberal Tarrative with the truth. I bet you
 didn't watch it though.
 Like Reply 39 mins
 Wait so Comey is liar that tells the truth?
 Which is it?
 Like Reply - 36 mins
 He lied to the American people
 about Hillary's email probe. Lied to the President about telling him hes
 not apart of the investigation. Mislead the American Public. Only when
 confronted by Congress who have classified clearance did he tell the
 truth. And tell the American people.. the truth... Just like he told the
 President. That he wasn't being investigated
 Like Reply 26 mins
 i feel sorry for you. I wonder
 when your going to wake up and smell the roses.. Your just so far
 gone into madness its pathetic. So how about you do yourself a favor.
 Disappear like Hillary. Then you can come back blame the democrat
 party, the Russians, and the American people
 Like Reply 25 mins Edited
 So you believe people you think are liars - is
 that what you're saying?
 Like Reply 23 mins Edited
 he's proven to be a liar. You
 should know. I'm sure you and ur liberal buddies were calling him vile
 when he came out against Hillary. And changed ur tune when you
 thought he was investigating the President.
 Like Reply 13 mins
 So according to you: he's proven to be a liar
 but you believe him.
 Like Reply 12 mins
 he's proven to be a liar. Unti
 he had to provide facts
 This is even low for you.
 Dude get a new political party. Or ideology
 Like Reply 11 mins
 You win the gold medal in mental
 gymnastics. Congrats
 Like Reply 6 mins
 you could win a noble peace
 prize in ignorance.
 Like Reply 4 mins
 Write a reply..
memehumor:

Go listen to him… even if he’s a liar and political hack!

memehumor: Go listen to him… even if he’s a liar and political hack!

France, Election, and Americans: Americans watching France have a successful election (2017)
France, Election, and Americans: Americans watching France have a successful election (2017)

Americans watching France have a successful election (2017)

Ben Carson, cnn.com, and Empire: Robert Reich 9 hrs G Update for Trump voters 1. He said he wouldn't bomb Syria. You bought it. Then he bombed Syria 2. He said he'd build a wall along the border with Mexico. You bought it. Now his secretary of homeland security says it's unlikely that we will build a wall." 3. He said he'd clean the Washington swamp. You bought it. Then he brought into his administration more billionaires, CEOs, and Wall Street moguls than in any administration in history, to make laws that will enrich their businesses 4. He said he'd repeal Obamacare and replace it with something "wonderful." You bought it. Then he didn't. 5. He said he'd use his business experience to whip the White House into shape. You bought it. Then he created the most chaotic, dysfunctional back-stabbing White House in modern history, in which no one is in charge 6. He said he'd release his tax returns, eventually. You bought it. He hasn't, and says he never will 7. He said he'd divest himself from his financial empire, to avoid any conflicts of interest. You bought it. He remains heavily involved in his businesses, makes money off of foreign dignitaries staying at his Washington hotel, gets China to give the Trump brand trademark and copyright rights, manipulates the stock market on a daily basis, and has more conflicts of interest than can even be counted 8. He said Clinton was in the pockets of Goldman Sachs, and would do whatever they said. You bought it. Then he put half a dozen Goldman Sachs executives in positions of power in his administration 9. He said he'd surround himself with all the best and smartest people. You bought it. Then he put Betsy DeVos, opponent of public education, in charge of education, Jeff Sessions, opponent of the Voting Rights Act, in charge of voting rights, Ben Carson, opponent of the Fair Housing Act, in charge of fair housing, Scott Pruitt, climate change denier, in charge of the Environmental Protection Agency, and Russian quisling Rex Tillerson as Secretary of State 10. He said he'd faithfully execute the law. You bought it. Then he said his predecessor, Barack Obama, spied on him, without any evidence of Obama ever doing so, in order to divert attention from the FBI's investigation into collusion between his campaign and Russian operatives to win the election 11. He said he knew more about strategy and terrorism than the generals did. You bought it. Then he promptly gave the green light to a disastrous raid in Yemen- even though all his generals said it would be a terrible idea This raid resulted in the deaths of a Navy SEAL, an 8-year old American girl, and numerous civilians. The actual target of the raid escaped, and no useful intel was gained 12. He called Barack Obama "the vacationer-in-Chief and accused him of playing more rounds of golf than Tiger Woods. He promised to never be the kind of president who took cushy vacations on the taxpayer's dime, not when there was so much important work to be done. You bought it. He has by now spent more taxpayer money on vacations than Obama did in the first 3 years of his presidency. Not to mention all the money taxpayers are spending protecting his family, including his two sons who travel all over the world on Trump business 13. He called CNN, the Washington Post and the New York Times "fake news" and said they were his enemy. You bought it. Now he gets his information from Fox News, Breitbart, Gateway Pundit, and InfoWars More to come BUT HER EMAILS
Ben Carson, cnn.com, and Empire: Robert Reich
 9 hrs G
 Update for Trump voters
 1. He said he wouldn't bomb Syria. You bought it. Then he bombed Syria
 2. He said he'd build a wall along the border with Mexico. You bought it. Now
 his secretary of homeland security says it's unlikely that we will build a
 wall."
 3. He said he'd clean the Washington swamp. You bought it. Then he
 brought into his administration more billionaires, CEOs, and Wall Street
 moguls than in any administration in history, to make laws that will enrich
 their businesses
 4. He said he'd repeal Obamacare and replace it with something
 "wonderful." You bought it. Then he didn't.
 5. He said he'd use his business experience to whip the White House into
 shape. You bought it. Then he created the most chaotic, dysfunctional
 back-stabbing White House in modern history, in which no one is in charge
 6. He said he'd release his tax returns, eventually. You bought it. He hasn't,
 and says he never will
 7. He said he'd divest himself from his financial empire, to avoid any
 conflicts of interest. You bought it. He remains heavily involved in his
 businesses, makes money off of foreign dignitaries staying at his
 Washington hotel, gets China to give the Trump brand trademark and
 copyright rights, manipulates the stock market on a daily basis, and has
 more conflicts of interest than can even be counted
 8. He said Clinton was in the pockets of Goldman Sachs, and would do
 whatever they said. You bought it. Then he put half a dozen Goldman
 Sachs executives in positions of power in his administration
 9. He said he'd surround himself with all the best and smartest people. You
 bought it. Then he put Betsy DeVos, opponent of public education, in
 charge of education, Jeff Sessions, opponent of the Voting Rights Act, in
 charge of voting rights, Ben Carson, opponent of the Fair Housing Act, in
 charge of fair housing, Scott Pruitt, climate change denier, in charge of the
 Environmental Protection Agency, and Russian quisling Rex Tillerson as
 Secretary of State
 10. He said he'd faithfully execute the law. You bought it. Then he said his
 predecessor, Barack Obama, spied on him, without any evidence of Obama
 ever doing so, in order to divert attention from the FBI's investigation into
 collusion between his campaign and Russian operatives to win the election
 11. He said he knew more about strategy and terrorism than the generals
 did. You bought it. Then he promptly gave the green light to a disastrous
 raid in Yemen- even though all his generals said it would be a terrible idea
 This raid resulted in the deaths of a Navy SEAL, an 8-year old American
 girl, and numerous civilians. The actual target of the raid escaped, and no
 useful intel was gained
 12. He called Barack Obama "the vacationer-in-Chief and accused him of
 playing more rounds of golf than Tiger Woods. He promised to never be the
 kind of president who took cushy vacations on the taxpayer's dime, not
 when there was so much important work to be done. You bought it. He has
 by now spent more taxpayer money on vacations than Obama did in the
 first 3 years of his presidency. Not to mention all the money taxpayers are
 spending protecting his family, including his two sons who travel all over the
 world on Trump business
 13. He called CNN, the Washington Post and the New York Times "fake
 news" and said they were his enemy. You bought it. Now he gets his
 information from Fox News, Breitbart, Gateway Pundit, and InfoWars
 More to come

 BUT HER EMAILS
Being Alone, Matlock, and Tumblr: NOAM CHOMSKY: It's a pretty remarkable fact that-first of all, it is a joke. Half the world is cracking up in laughter. The United States doesn't just interfere in elections. It overthrows governments it doesn't like, institutes military dictatorships. Simply in the case of Russia alone-it's the least of it-the U.S. government, under Clinton, intervened quite blatantly and openly, then tried to conceal it, to get their man Yeltsin in, in all sorts of ways. So, this, as I say, it's considered-it's turning the United States, again, into a laughingstock in the world. So why are the Democrats focusing on this? In fact, why are they focusing so much attention on the one element of Trump's programs which is fairly reasonable, the one ray of light in this gloom: trying to reduce tensions with Russia? That's-the tensions on the Russian border are extremely serious. They could escalate to a major terminal war. Efforts to try to reduce them should be welcomed. Just a couple of days ago, the former U.S. ambassador to Russia, Jack Matlock, came out and said he just can't believe that so much attention is being paid to apparent efforts by the incoming administration to establish connections with Russia. He said, "Sure, that's just what they ought to be doing." So, meanwhile, this one topic is the primary locus of concern and critique, while, meanwhile, the policies are proceeding step by step, which are extremely destructive and harmful. So, you know, yeah, maybe the Russians tried to interfere in the election. That's not a major issue. Maybe the people in the Trump campaign were talking to the Russians. Well, OK, not a major point, certainly less than is being done constantly. And it is a kind of a paradox, I think, that the one issue that seems to inflame the Democratic opposition is the one thing that has some justification and reasonable aspects to it. c-bassmeow: Noam Chomsky’s piercing comments on the Democrat’s “Russia stole our election!” obsession. From an interview with DemocracyNow.
Being Alone, Matlock, and Tumblr: NOAM CHOMSKY: It's a pretty remarkable fact that-first of all, it is a joke. Half the
 world is cracking up in laughter. The United States doesn't just interfere in elections.
 It overthrows governments it doesn't like, institutes military dictatorships. Simply in
 the case of Russia alone-it's the least of it-the U.S. government, under Clinton,
 intervened quite blatantly and openly, then tried to conceal it, to get their man Yeltsin
 in, in all sorts of ways. So, this, as I say, it's considered-it's turning the United States,
 again, into a laughingstock in the world.
 So why are the Democrats focusing on this? In fact, why are they focusing so much
 attention on the one element of Trump's programs which is fairly reasonable, the
 one ray of light in this gloom: trying to reduce tensions with Russia? That's-the
 tensions on the Russian border are extremely serious. They could escalate to a
 major terminal war. Efforts to try to reduce them should be welcomed. Just a couple
 of days ago, the former U.S. ambassador to Russia, Jack Matlock, came out and
 said he just can't believe that so much attention is being paid to apparent efforts by
 the incoming administration to establish connections with Russia. He said, "Sure,
 that's just what they ought to be doing."
 So, meanwhile, this one topic is the primary locus of concern and critique, while,
 meanwhile, the policies are proceeding step by step, which are extremely destructive
 and harmful. So, you know, yeah, maybe the Russians tried to interfere in the
 election. That's not a major issue. Maybe the people in the Trump campaign were
 talking to the Russians. Well, OK, not a major point, certainly less than is being done
 constantly. And it is a kind of a paradox, I think, that the one issue that seems to
 inflame the Democratic opposition is the one thing that has some justification and
 reasonable aspects to it.
c-bassmeow:

Noam Chomsky’s piercing comments on the Democrat’s  “Russia stole our election!” obsession. From an interview with DemocracyNow.

c-bassmeow: Noam Chomsky’s piercing comments on the Democrat’s “Russia stole our election!” obsession. From an interview with DemocracyNow...

Being Alone, Matlock, and Tumblr: NOAM CHOMSKY: It's a pretty remarkable fact that-first of all, it is a joke. Half the world is cracking up in laughter. The United States doesn't just interfere in elections. It overthrows governments it doesn't like, institutes military dictatorships. Simply in the case of Russia alone-it's the least of it-the U.S. government, under Clinton, intervened quite blatantly and openly, then tried to conceal it, to get their man Yeltsin in, in all sorts of ways. So, this, as I say, it's considered-it's turning the United States, again, into a laughingstock in the world. So why are the Democrats focusing on this? In fact, why are they focusing so much attention on the one element of Trump's programs which is fairly reasonable, the one ray of light in this gloom: trying to reduce tensions with Russia? That's-the tensions on the Russian border are extremely serious. They could escalate to a major terminal war. Efforts to try to reduce them should be welcomed. Just a couple of days ago, the former U.S. ambassador to Russia, Jack Matlock, came out and said he just can't believe that so much attention is being paid to apparent efforts by the incoming administration to establish connections with Russia. He said, "Sure, that's just what they ought to be doing." So, meanwhile, this one topic is the primary locus of concern and critique, while, meanwhile, the policies are proceeding step by step, which are extremely destructive and harmful. So, you know, yeah, maybe the Russians tried to interfere in the election. That's not a major issue. Maybe the people in the Trump campaign were talking to the Russians. Well, OK, not a major point, certainly less than is being done constantly. And it is a kind of a paradox, I think, that the one issue that seems to inflame the Democratic opposition is the one thing that has some justification and reasonable aspects to it. c-bassmeow: Noam Chomsky’s piercing comments on the Democrat’s “Russia stole our election!” obsession. From an interview with DemocracyNow.
Being Alone, Matlock, and Tumblr: NOAM CHOMSKY: It's a pretty remarkable fact that-first of all, it is a joke. Half the
 world is cracking up in laughter. The United States doesn't just interfere in elections.
 It overthrows governments it doesn't like, institutes military dictatorships. Simply in
 the case of Russia alone-it's the least of it-the U.S. government, under Clinton,
 intervened quite blatantly and openly, then tried to conceal it, to get their man Yeltsin
 in, in all sorts of ways. So, this, as I say, it's considered-it's turning the United States,
 again, into a laughingstock in the world.
 So why are the Democrats focusing on this? In fact, why are they focusing so much
 attention on the one element of Trump's programs which is fairly reasonable, the
 one ray of light in this gloom: trying to reduce tensions with Russia? That's-the
 tensions on the Russian border are extremely serious. They could escalate to a
 major terminal war. Efforts to try to reduce them should be welcomed. Just a couple
 of days ago, the former U.S. ambassador to Russia, Jack Matlock, came out and
 said he just can't believe that so much attention is being paid to apparent efforts by
 the incoming administration to establish connections with Russia. He said, "Sure,
 that's just what they ought to be doing."
 So, meanwhile, this one topic is the primary locus of concern and critique, while,
 meanwhile, the policies are proceeding step by step, which are extremely destructive
 and harmful. So, you know, yeah, maybe the Russians tried to interfere in the
 election. That's not a major issue. Maybe the people in the Trump campaign were
 talking to the Russians. Well, OK, not a major point, certainly less than is being done
 constantly. And it is a kind of a paradox, I think, that the one issue that seems to
 inflame the Democratic opposition is the one thing that has some justification and
 reasonable aspects to it.
c-bassmeow:

Noam Chomsky’s piercing comments on the Democrat’s  “Russia stole our election!” obsession. From an interview with DemocracyNow.

c-bassmeow: Noam Chomsky’s piercing comments on the Democrat’s “Russia stole our election!” obsession. From an interview with DemocracyNow...

Being Alone, Matlock, and Yeah: NOAM CHOMSKY: It's a pretty remarkable fact that-first of all, it is a joke. Half the world is cracking up in laughter. The United States doesn't just interfere in elections. It overthrows governments it doesn't like, institutes military dictatorships. Simply in the case of Russia alone-it's the least of it-the U.S. government, under Clinton, intervened quite blatantly and openly, then tried to conceal it, to get their man Yeltsin in, in all sorts of ways. So, this, as I say, it's considered-it's turning the United States, again, into a laughingstock in the world. So why are the Democrats focusing on this? In fact, why are they focusing so much attention on the one element of Trump's programs which is fairly reasonable, the one ray of light in this gloom: trying to reduce tensions with Russia? That's-the tensions on the Russian border are extremely serious. They could escalate to a major terminal war. Efforts to try to reduce them should be welcomed. Just a couple of days ago, the former U.S. ambassador to Russia, Jack Matlock, came out and said he just can't believe that so much attention is being paid to apparent efforts by the incoming administration to establish connections with Russia. He said, "Sure, that's just what they ought to be doing." So, meanwhile, this one topic is the primary locus of concern and critique, while, meanwhile, the policies are proceeding step by step, which are extremely destructive and harmful. So, you know, yeah, maybe the Russians tried to interfere in the election. That's not a major issue. Maybe the people in the Trump campaign were talking to the Russians. Well, OK, not a major point, certainly less than is being done constantly. And it is a kind of a paradox, I think, that the one issue that seems to inflame the Democratic opposition is the one thing that has some justification and reasonable aspects to it. Noam Chomskys piercing comments on the Democrats Russia stole our election! obsession. From an interview with DemocracyNow.
Being Alone, Matlock, and Yeah: NOAM CHOMSKY: It's a pretty remarkable fact that-first of all, it is a joke. Half the
 world is cracking up in laughter. The United States doesn't just interfere in elections.
 It overthrows governments it doesn't like, institutes military dictatorships. Simply in
 the case of Russia alone-it's the least of it-the U.S. government, under Clinton,
 intervened quite blatantly and openly, then tried to conceal it, to get their man Yeltsin
 in, in all sorts of ways. So, this, as I say, it's considered-it's turning the United States,
 again, into a laughingstock in the world.
 So why are the Democrats focusing on this? In fact, why are they focusing so much
 attention on the one element of Trump's programs which is fairly reasonable, the
 one ray of light in this gloom: trying to reduce tensions with Russia? That's-the
 tensions on the Russian border are extremely serious. They could escalate to a
 major terminal war. Efforts to try to reduce them should be welcomed. Just a couple
 of days ago, the former U.S. ambassador to Russia, Jack Matlock, came out and
 said he just can't believe that so much attention is being paid to apparent efforts by
 the incoming administration to establish connections with Russia. He said, "Sure,
 that's just what they ought to be doing."
 So, meanwhile, this one topic is the primary locus of concern and critique, while,
 meanwhile, the policies are proceeding step by step, which are extremely destructive
 and harmful. So, you know, yeah, maybe the Russians tried to interfere in the
 election. That's not a major issue. Maybe the people in the Trump campaign were
 talking to the Russians. Well, OK, not a major point, certainly less than is being done
 constantly. And it is a kind of a paradox, I think, that the one issue that seems to
 inflame the Democratic opposition is the one thing that has some justification and
 reasonable aspects to it.
Noam Chomskys piercing comments on the Democrats  Russia stole our election! obsession. From an interview with DemocracyNow.

Noam Chomskys piercing comments on the Democrats Russia stole our election! obsession. From an interview with DemocracyNow.

Alive, Donald Trump, and Fucking: nunyabizni: mitchfynde: libfas: libfas: NYU stages gender-swapped Trump-Clinton debate to prove gender bias. End up realizing they might have been biased against Trump after all. So NYU staged a re-enactment of the debates, with Clinton acted by a man and vice versa. The idea was that it would ‘confirm the suspicion that Trump’s aggression would not be tolerated from a woman’, and that ‘Clinton’s competence would seem even more convincing coming from a man’. It turned out a little different, here are some reactions from the crowd: We heard a lot of “now I understand how this happened”—meaning how Trump won the election.  The simplicity of Trump’s message became easier for people to hear when it was coming from a woman—that was a theme. One person said, “I’m just so struck by how precise Trump’s technique is.”  Someone said that Jonathan Gordon [the male Hillary Clinton] was “really punchable” because of all the smiling.  There was someone who described Brenda King [the female Donald Trump] as his Jewish aunt who would take care of him. Someone else described her as the middle school principal who you don’t like, but you know is doing good things for you.  Source FUCKING LOL I just noticed the Guardian uploaded the video but they unlisted it, meaning only people with the link can see it (pls thank me pls) and it doesn’t show up in searches or suggestions. They basically hid it. Hmm. Why oh why would they do that?…. International Women’s Day? Here’s FEMALE TRUMP! KEEP IT ALIVE PEOPLE!!!!!!!!
Alive, Donald Trump, and Fucking: nunyabizni:

mitchfynde:
libfas:

libfas:

NYU stages gender-swapped Trump-Clinton debate to prove gender bias.
End up realizing they might have been biased against Trump after all.
So NYU staged a re-enactment of the debates, with Clinton acted by a man and vice versa.
The idea was that it would ‘confirm the suspicion that Trump’s aggression would not be tolerated from a woman’, and that ‘Clinton’s competence would seem even more convincing coming from a man’.
It turned out a little different, here are some reactions from the crowd:
We heard a lot of “now I understand how this happened”—meaning how Trump won the election. 
The simplicity of Trump’s message became easier for people to hear when it was coming from a woman—that was a theme. One person said, “I’m just so struck by how precise Trump’s technique is.” 
Someone said that Jonathan Gordon [the male Hillary Clinton] was “really punchable” because of all the smiling. 
There was someone who described Brenda King [the female Donald Trump] as his Jewish aunt who would take care of him.
Someone else described her as the middle school principal who you don’t like, but you know is doing good things for you. 
Source

FUCKING LOL
I just noticed the Guardian uploaded the video but they unlisted it, meaning only people with the link can see it (pls thank me pls) and it doesn’t show up in searches or suggestions.
They basically hid it. Hmm. Why oh why would they do that?….

International Women’s Day? Here’s FEMALE TRUMP!

KEEP IT ALIVE PEOPLE!!!!!!!!

nunyabizni: mitchfynde: libfas: libfas: NYU stages gender-swapped Trump-Clinton debate to prove gender bias. End up realizing they might ...

Donald Trump, Friday, and Hillary Clinton: Did Third-party Candidates Cost Hillary Clinton the Election? Though third-party candidates appear to have drawn a large vote share in key states, Hillary Clinton would have needed to win a huge percentage of this often-misunderstood group of voters in order to flip the election results. MICHIGAN PENNSYLVANIA WISCONSIN Trump margin of victory: 11837 Stein/Johnson vote: +68.236 191565 27,257 7.4 223,707 What if... Total votes under scenario, in millions of votes TUN Clinton 2.40 EST ES 60% of the third-party vote went to Clinton? し464 2.96 し465 Trump still wins EEM AR 65% of the third-party vote went to Clinton? Trump still wins し46 147 .70% of the third-party vote went to Clinton? Clinton wins E 2.42 2.97 し46 2.98 し47 all of Stein's and half of Johnson's vote went to Clinton? 2.40 Trump still wins 298 し46 し47 2-37 2.96 LA5 148 all of Stein's and 60% of 2.35 2.97 Johnson's vote went to Clinton? 242 Clinton wins Note: Donald Trump still wins tossup states Florida, North Carolina, Ohio, lowa and Arizona under all of these scenarios. Vote totals as of Friday 5 pm, with 99% of the vote counted. Numbers rounded. Source: Associated Press 2.98 THE WALL STREET JOURNAI zanabism: If you still think HRC lost because of Jill stein or because of the third party votes in general please check out Washington Street Journals analysis on some of the ‘close’ states HRC lost. In order for her to win she would’ve had to gain pretty much all of Jill stein’s votes and at least 50%-70% of Gary johnson’s votes. This idea that third party candidates cost her the election is just not rooted in reality at all. ☕️
Donald Trump, Friday, and Hillary Clinton: Did Third-party Candidates Cost Hillary Clinton the Election?
 Though third-party candidates appear to have drawn a large vote share in key states, Hillary Clinton
 would have needed to win a huge percentage of this often-misunderstood group of voters in order
 to flip the election results.
 MICHIGAN
 PENNSYLVANIA
 WISCONSIN
 Trump margin of victory: 11837
 Stein/Johnson vote:
 +68.236
 191565
 27,257
 7.4
 223,707
 What if...
 Total votes under scenario, in millions of votes
 TUN
 Clinton 2.40
 EST
 ES
 60% of the third-party vote
 went to Clinton?
 し464
 2.96
 し465
 Trump still wins
 EEM
 AR
 65% of the third-party vote
 went to Clinton?
 Trump still wins
 し46
 147
 .70% of the third-party vote
 went to Clinton?
 Clinton wins
 E
 2.42
 2.97
 し46
 2.98
 し47
 all of Stein's and half of
 Johnson's vote went to Clinton? 2.40
 Trump still wins
 298
 し46
 し47
 2-37
 2.96
 LA5
 148
 all of Stein's and 60% of
 2.35
 2.97
 Johnson's vote went to Clinton? 242
 Clinton wins
 Note: Donald Trump still wins tossup states Florida, North Carolina, Ohio, lowa and Arizona under all of these scenarios. Vote totals as of Friday
 5 pm, with 99% of the vote counted. Numbers rounded.
 Source: Associated Press
 2.98
 THE WALL STREET JOURNAI
zanabism:

If you still think HRC lost because of Jill stein or because of the third party votes in general please check out Washington Street Journals analysis on some of the ‘close’ states HRC lost. In order for her to win she would’ve had to gain pretty much all of Jill stein’s votes and at least 50%-70% of Gary johnson’s votes. This idea that third party candidates cost her the election is just not rooted in reality at all.

☕️

zanabism: If you still think HRC lost because of Jill stein or because of the third party votes in general please check out Washington Stre...