🔥 | Latest

9/11, America, and Dad: December 20, 2018 Dear Mr. President: I have been privileged to serve as our country's 26th Secretary of Defense which has allowed me to serve alongside our men and women of the Department in defense of our citizens and our ideals I am proud of the progress that has been made over the past two years on some of the key goals articulated in our National Defense Strategy: putting the Department on a more sound budgetary footing, improving readiness and lethality in our forces, and reforming the Department's business practices for greater performance. Our troops continue to provide the capabilities needed to prevail in conflict and sustain strong U.S. global influence One core belief I have always held is that our strength as a nation is inextricably linked to the strength of our unique and comprehensive system of alliances and partnerships. While the US remains the indispensable nation in the free world, we cannot protect our interests or serve that role effectively without maintaining strong alliances and showing respect to thos allies. Like you, I have said from the beginning that the armed forces of the United States should not be the policeman of the world. Instead, we must use all tools of American power to provide for the common defense, including providing effective leadership to our alliances NATO's 29 democracies demonstrated that strength in their commitment to fighting alongsid us following the 9-11 attack on America. The Defeat-ISIS coalition of 74 nations is further proof. Similarly, I believe we must be resolute and unambiguous in our approach to those countries whose strategic interests are increasingly in tension with ours. It is clear that China and Russia, for example, want to shape a world consistent with their authoritarian model gaining veto authority over other nations' economic, diplomatic, and security decisions -to promote their own interests at the expense of their neighbors, America and our allies. That is why we must use all the tools of American power to provide for the common defense My views on treating allies with respect and also being clear-eyed about both malign actors and strategic competitors are strongly held and informed by over four decades o immersion in these issues. We must do everything possible to advance an international order that is most conducive to our security, prosperity and values, and we are strengthened in this effort by the solidarity of our alliances Because you have the right to have a Secretary of Defense whose views are better aligned with yours on these and other subjects, I believe it is right for me to step down from my position. The end date for my tenure is February 28, 2019, a date that should allow sufficient time for a successor to be nominated and confirmed as well as to make sure the Department's interests are properly articulated and protected at upcoming events to include Congressional Dad’s resignation letter.
9/11, America, and Dad: December 20, 2018
 Dear Mr. President:
 I have been privileged to serve as our country's 26th Secretary of Defense which has
 allowed me to serve alongside our men and women of the Department in defense of our citizens
 and our ideals
 I am proud of the progress that has been made over the past two years on some of the
 key goals articulated in our National Defense Strategy: putting the Department on a more sound
 budgetary footing, improving readiness and lethality in our forces, and reforming the
 Department's business practices for greater performance. Our troops continue to provide the
 capabilities needed to prevail in conflict and sustain strong U.S. global influence
 One core belief I have always held is that our strength as a nation is inextricably linked
 to the strength of our unique and comprehensive system of alliances and partnerships. While
 the US remains the indispensable nation in the free world, we cannot protect our interests or
 serve that role effectively without maintaining strong alliances and showing respect to thos
 allies. Like you, I have said from the beginning that the armed forces of the United States
 should not be the policeman of the world. Instead, we must use all tools of American power to
 provide for the common defense, including providing effective leadership to our alliances
 NATO's 29 democracies demonstrated that strength in their commitment to fighting alongsid
 us following the 9-11 attack on America. The Defeat-ISIS coalition of 74 nations is further
 proof.
 Similarly, I believe we must be resolute and unambiguous in our approach to those
 countries whose strategic interests are increasingly in tension with ours. It is clear that China
 and Russia, for example, want to shape a world consistent with their authoritarian model
 gaining veto authority over other nations' economic, diplomatic, and security decisions -to
 promote their own interests at the expense of their neighbors, America and our allies. That is
 why we must use all the tools of American power to provide for the common defense
 My views on treating allies with respect and also being clear-eyed about both malign
 actors and strategic competitors are strongly held and informed by over four decades o
 immersion in these issues. We must do everything possible to advance an international order
 that is most conducive to our security, prosperity and values, and we are strengthened in this
 effort by the solidarity of our alliances
 Because you have the right to have a Secretary of Defense whose views are better
 aligned with yours on these and other subjects, I believe it is right for me to step down from my
 position. The end date for my tenure is February 28, 2019, a date that should allow sufficient
 time for a successor to be nominated and confirmed as well as to make sure the Department's
 interests are properly articulated and protected at upcoming events to include Congressional
Dad’s resignation letter.

Dad’s resignation letter.

America, Tumblr, and Blog: tittily: sweet-bitsy: griefseed: he does nt even know Know what the economic state of america
America, Tumblr, and Blog: tittily:

sweet-bitsy:

griefseed:

he does nt even know

Know what

the economic state of america

tittily: sweet-bitsy: griefseed: he does nt even know Know what the economic state of america

Family, Friends, and Fucking: do older generations not get fatalistic humor?? like the other day my friend's parents were hanging around and we were joking and ¡ W:as like "well no matter what i can always fling myself off the nearest cliff and they didn't laugh then later the mom pulled me aside and was like "maybe you should get some help, sweetie" like stfu?? help? in this I honestly don't think they get it as a coping mechanism, they think it's a cry for help rather i'd even say it's past just coping and is also now a category of Stuff Kids Got Used To When No One Was Looking; not everyone using that humor is even covering up something bigger, we just stopped thinking along the line, and most parents don't seem My boss opened a door and missed me by inches, he said whoops, almost killed you there!" My result of "Oh, if only. Led to an as the goddamn Addams Family and the Family that lives next door and runs away screaming at the end of the episode I will say that it's interesting because this kind of hurnor is very, very prevalent Which is honestly a place you would expect fatalistic humor to be common and used as a coping method. You're one "oops away from death on the flight deck, one inch to the left and you don't have a head anymone because the jet that just landed now owns it as a wing-tip decoration. So you joke about it because lowkey you're fucking terrified it'll happen, but you're also desensitized to the danger itself because you face it every single day for 12 hours at a time. Anyway so we all know the mindset you adopt in the military because of the danger so to realise that an identical sense of humor has been adopted by normal people should about the amount of stress modem young It was also common in previous generations that had to deal with say, war and economic One of my favorite movies is Singing In The Rain which came in out 1952, right on the tailcoat of two world wars and a looming cold one, and for all it's a cheery happy musical, it's got this really bleak witty humor too, things like call me a cab! "okay, you're a cab! or the scene where Don says he'll be homeless by the next day and Cosmo cheerfully tells him not to be ridiculous.. the bank bailiffs And then quite probably one of my favorite opening lines, where two young girls are watching Lina on screen and one says "She's so refined. I think I'll kill myself Which really resonates with a lot of the things we say now when talking about people we find personally attractive, meaning not only is fatalism not a new trend, but those two girls at the starting sequence of Singing In The Rain are totally there for Lina, not Don So it's almost as if you can use fatalist humor as a sort of social atmosphere barometer. If fatalist humors starts to become Maybe sometimes it will be obvious, like during war times or in potentially dangerous it's less obvious, like the younger generation's views of their future. Either way, from all the comments above, it seems to have somehow emerged as a reliable measure of how things this explains a lot
Family, Friends, and Fucking: do older generations not get fatalistic
 humor?? like the other day my friend's parents
 were hanging around and we were joking and
 ¡ W:as like "well no matter what i can always
 fling myself off the nearest cliff and they
 didn't laugh then later the mom pulled me
 aside and was like "maybe you should get
 some help, sweetie" like stfu?? help? in this
 I honestly don't think they get it as a coping
 mechanism, they think it's a cry for help rather
 i'd even say it's past just coping and is also
 now a category of Stuff Kids Got Used To
 When No One Was Looking; not everyone
 using that humor is even covering up
 something bigger, we just stopped thinking
 along the line, and most parents don't seem
 My boss opened a door and missed me by
 inches, he said whoops, almost killed you
 there!" My result of "Oh, if only. Led to an
 as the goddamn Addams Family and the
 Family that lives next door and runs away
 screaming at the end of the episode
 I will say that it's interesting because
 this kind of hurnor is very, very prevalent
 Which is honestly a place you would expect
 fatalistic humor to be common and used as
 a coping method. You're one "oops away
 from death on the flight deck, one inch to
 the left and you don't have a head anymone
 because the jet that just landed now owns it
 as a wing-tip decoration. So you joke about
 it because lowkey you're fucking terrified it'll
 happen, but you're also desensitized to the
 danger itself because you face it every single
 day for 12 hours at a time.
 Anyway so we all know the mindset you
 adopt in the military because of the danger
 so to realise that an identical sense of humor
 has been adopted by normal people should
 about the amount of stress modem young
 It was also common in previous generations
 that had to deal with say, war and economic
 One of my favorite movies is Singing In The
 Rain which came in out 1952, right on the
 tailcoat of two world wars and a looming cold
 one, and for all it's a cheery happy musical, it's
 got this really bleak witty humor too, things
 like call me a cab! "okay, you're a cab! or
 the scene where Don says he'll be homeless
 by the next day and Cosmo cheerfully tells
 him not to be ridiculous.. the bank bailiffs
 And then quite probably one of my favorite
 opening lines, where two young girls are
 watching Lina on screen and one says "She's
 so refined. I think I'll kill myself
 Which really resonates with a lot of the things
 we say now when talking about people we
 find personally attractive, meaning not only is
 fatalism not a new trend, but those two girls
 at the starting sequence of Singing In The
 Rain are totally there for Lina, not Don
 So it's almost as if you can use fatalist
 humor as a sort of social atmosphere
 barometer. If fatalist humors starts to become
 Maybe sometimes it will be obvious, like
 during war times or in potentially dangerous
 it's less obvious, like the younger generation's
 views of their future. Either way, from all the
 comments above, it seems to have somehow
 emerged as a reliable measure of how things
 this explains a lot

this explains a lot

Children, Crime, and Definitely: IN SOME PRISONS INMATE ON INMATE WOME Y GET 5 PADS PER PERIOD SEXUAL ABUSE IS 3X MEANING THEY HAVE HIGHER THAN MEN'S TO REUSE PADS. PRISON OVER THE LAST 10 YEARS WOMEN INPRISONS HAS I 90 PERCENT ARE INCREASED 138 PERCENT SINGLE MOTHERS DUE TO THE WORSENING ECONOMIC CONDITIONS OF WOMEN AND THE INCREASED RATE OF DRUG ARRESTS. AND OFTEN LOSE CONTACT WITH THEIR CHILDREN FOREVER. THE MAJORITY OF WOMEN COMMIT ECONOMIC CRIMES 80 PERCENT EANES IN IN YOUTH ,J ETENTIONIS THAN $2000 A AT THE TIME OF ARREST SEXUALLY ABUSED hello-i-ask-questions: libertarirynn: black-girl-against-feminism: such-justice-wow: platypus-protection-syndicate: canoeboy: not-saltrat88: judo-ichidai: Abolishing prisons is a feminist issue. How ‘bout quit doing crimes that would land you in these predicaments….just sayin Millions of us everyday go to work, get paid, don’t commit crimes that would lead to our arrest. I want a source on the $2k/year income statement. Because $40/week…surely not a US centered presentation…which begs the question where in the world do each of these claims come from? I tried to reverse image search and got 2 pages of pintrest pages so yeah… Great, thanks for these in no way bias statistics tumblr user “all-cops-are-bastards-1312” I need some evidence for these claims. I think “prisons need reform” and “you shouldn’t commit crimes” aren’t mutually exclusive statements. I’m not one who believes just being in prison means you forfeit all human rights, especially when you’re imprisoned for non-violent crimes.But yeah some sources on this would be nice. It would also be nice if these “facts” weren’t overplayed on OITNB characters, instantly making it more difficult to take them seriously. And it would be even nicer if feminists would stop co-opting issues like prison reform and labeling them as “feminist issues” when nearly all men’s prisons have the same and sometimes greater problems. Also somehow rape in men’s prisons is caused by men and yet women being raped in prison still doesn’t have anything to do with women.While i definitely agree our prison systems need SERIOUS reform, “abolishing” prison is absolutely out of the question.[Not to mention, women get more lenient sentances for the exact same crime. Stop acting like women get the short end of the stick in the legal system. They don’t.] Yeah that’s an excellent point. Also it looks like Tumblr May have nuked half my response again
Children, Crime, and Definitely: IN SOME PRISONS INMATE ON INMATE
 WOME
 Y GET
 5 PADS PER PERIOD
 SEXUAL ABUSE IS 3X
 MEANING THEY HAVE HIGHER THAN MEN'S
 TO REUSE PADS.
 PRISON
 OVER THE LAST 10 YEARS
 WOMEN INPRISONS HAS I 90 PERCENT ARE
 INCREASED 138 PERCENT
 SINGLE MOTHERS
 DUE TO THE WORSENING ECONOMIC
 CONDITIONS OF WOMEN AND THE
 INCREASED RATE OF DRUG ARRESTS.
 AND OFTEN LOSE CONTACT WITH
 THEIR CHILDREN FOREVER.
 THE MAJORITY OF WOMEN
 COMMIT ECONOMIC CRIMES
 80 PERCENT EANES
 IN IN YOUTH
 ,J
 ETENTIONIS
 THAN $2000 A
 AT THE TIME OF ARREST SEXUALLY ABUSED
hello-i-ask-questions:

libertarirynn:

black-girl-against-feminism:

such-justice-wow:
platypus-protection-syndicate:


canoeboy:


not-saltrat88:


judo-ichidai:
Abolishing prisons is a feminist issue.

How ‘bout quit doing crimes that would land you in these predicaments….just sayin


Millions of us everyday go to work, get paid, don’t commit crimes that would lead to our arrest. 


I want a source on the $2k/year income statement. Because $40/week…surely not a US centered presentation…which begs the question where in the world do each of these claims come from?


I tried to reverse image search and got 2 pages of pintrest pages so yeah… Great, thanks for these in no way bias statistics tumblr user “all-cops-are-bastards-1312”

I need some evidence for these claims.

I think “prisons need reform” and “you shouldn’t commit crimes” aren’t mutually exclusive statements. I’m not one who believes just being in prison means you forfeit all human rights, especially when you’re imprisoned for non-violent crimes.But yeah some sources on this would be nice. It would also be nice if these “facts” weren’t overplayed on OITNB characters, instantly making it more difficult to take them seriously. And it would be even nicer if feminists would stop co-opting issues like prison reform and labeling them as “feminist issues” when nearly all men’s prisons have the same and sometimes greater problems.

Also somehow rape in men’s prisons is caused by men and yet women being raped in prison still doesn’t have anything to do with women.While i definitely agree our prison systems need SERIOUS reform, “abolishing” prison is absolutely out of the question.[Not to mention, women get more lenient sentances for the exact same crime. Stop acting like women get the short end of the stick in the legal system. They don’t.]

Yeah that’s an excellent point. Also it looks like Tumblr May have nuked half my response again

hello-i-ask-questions: libertarirynn: black-girl-against-feminism: such-justice-wow: platypus-protection-syndicate: canoeboy: not-sal...

Children, Feminism, and Period: IN SOME PRISONS INMATE ON INMATE WOME Y GET 5 PADS PER PERIOD SEXUAL ABUSE IS 3X MEANING THEY HAVE HIGHER THAN MEN'S TO REUSE PADS. PRISON OVER THE LAST 10 YEARS WOMEN INPRISONS HAS I 90 PERCENT ARE INCREASED 138 PERCENT SINGLE MOTHERS DUE TO THE WORSENING ECONOMIC CONDITIONS OF WOMEN AND THE INCREASED RATE OF DRUG ARRESTS. AND OFTEN LOSE CONTACT WITH THEIR CHILDREN FOREVER. THE MAJORITY OF WOMEN COMMIT ECONOMIC CRIMES 80 PERCENT EANES IN IN YOUTH ,J ETENTIONIS THAN $2000 A AT THE TIME OF ARREST SEXUALLY ABUSED black-girl-against-feminism: such-justice-wow: platypus-protection-syndicate: canoeboy: not-saltrat88: judo-ichidai: Abolishing prisons is a feminist issue. How ‘bout quit doing crimes that would land you in these predicaments….just sayin Millions of us everyday go to work, get paid, don’t commit crimes that would lead to our arrest. I want a source on the $2k/year income statement. Because $40/week…surely not a US centered presentation…which begs the question where in the world do each of these claims come from? I tried to reverse image search and got 2 pages of pintrest pages so yeah… Great, thanks for these in no way bias statistics tumblr user “all-cops-are-bastards-1312” I need some evidence for these claims. I think “prisons need reform” and “you shouldn’t commit crimes” aren’t mutually exclusive statements. I’m not one who believes just being in prison means you forfeit all human rights, especially when you’re imprisoned for non-violent crimes.But yeah some sources on this would be nice. It would also be nice if these “facts” weren’t overplayed on OITNB characters, instantly making it more difficult to take them seriously. And it would be even nicer if feminists would stop co-opting issues like prison reform and labeling them as “feminist issues” when nearly all men’s prisons have the same and sometimes greater problems.
Children, Feminism, and Period: IN SOME PRISONS INMATE ON INMATE
 WOME
 Y GET
 5 PADS PER PERIOD
 SEXUAL ABUSE IS 3X
 MEANING THEY HAVE HIGHER THAN MEN'S
 TO REUSE PADS.
 PRISON
 OVER THE LAST 10 YEARS
 WOMEN INPRISONS HAS I 90 PERCENT ARE
 INCREASED 138 PERCENT
 SINGLE MOTHERS
 DUE TO THE WORSENING ECONOMIC
 CONDITIONS OF WOMEN AND THE
 INCREASED RATE OF DRUG ARRESTS.
 AND OFTEN LOSE CONTACT WITH
 THEIR CHILDREN FOREVER.
 THE MAJORITY OF WOMEN
 COMMIT ECONOMIC CRIMES
 80 PERCENT EANES
 IN IN YOUTH
 ,J
 ETENTIONIS
 THAN $2000 A
 AT THE TIME OF ARREST SEXUALLY ABUSED
black-girl-against-feminism:

such-justice-wow:
platypus-protection-syndicate:


canoeboy:


not-saltrat88:


judo-ichidai:
Abolishing prisons is a feminist issue.

How ‘bout quit doing crimes that would land you in these predicaments….just sayin


Millions of us everyday go to work, get paid, don’t commit crimes that would lead to our arrest. 


I want a source on the $2k/year income statement. Because $40/week…surely not a US centered presentation…which begs the question where in the world do each of these claims come from?


I tried to reverse image search and got 2 pages of pintrest pages so yeah… Great, thanks for these in no way bias statistics tumblr user “all-cops-are-bastards-1312”

I need some evidence for these claims.

I think “prisons need reform” and “you shouldn’t commit crimes” aren’t mutually exclusive statements. I’m not one who believes just being in prison means you forfeit all human rights, especially when you’re imprisoned for non-violent crimes.But yeah some sources on this would be nice. It would also be nice if these “facts” weren’t overplayed on OITNB characters, instantly making it more difficult to take them seriously. And it would be even nicer if feminists would stop co-opting issues like prison reform and labeling them as “feminist issues” when nearly all men’s prisons have the same and sometimes greater problems.

black-girl-against-feminism: such-justice-wow: platypus-protection-syndicate: canoeboy: not-saltrat88: judo-ichidai: Abolishing priso...

Ass, Bad, and Chill: Citizen of Arcterra @PhilodoxPils Svar till @_hoemo Nazis: Let's commit genocide. Antifa: Let's not. BLM: Please stop shooting us. Centrist: I cannot tell these apart officially-kim-jung-un: siryouarebeingmocked: kamiyu910: the-darkest-of-souls: nazis: lets commit genocide Antifa: lets dismantle our current government and instigate a horrendous for of government that commits mass murder and genocide for other reasons while using facist methods to try and silence other people  BLM: lies, lies, lies, bullshit riots, and cop shooting centrist: everyone needs to chill the fuck out  Nazis: “The Jews are too privileged, they have too much power, they’re oppressing the German people!” SJWs (AntiFa, BLM, etc): “The whites are too privileged, they have too much power, they’re oppressing the non-white people!” “Hitler’s first written utterance on political questions dating from this period emphasized that what he called “the anti-Semitism of reason” must lead “to the systematic combating and elimination of Jewish privileges. Its ultimate goal must implacably be the total removal of the Jews.“” “…the vile, anti-Semitic propaganda of the 1930’s, when splashed across Der Spiegel was blaming Jews - and so called disproportionate Jewish wealth - for Germany’s losing WWI and the country’s subsequent economic downturn. Canards about Jews controlling world finances - first promulgated by the Tsarist forgery, “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion” - was anti-Semitic back then and it is anti-Semitic today…” Why are these considered only bad if “white” is turned to something else? It’s the same rhetoric that the nazis spread. Why should we consider anyone who uses this any better than the nazis, when they said the same stuff?  Someone defending Antifa or BLM deliberately ignores what they actually flippin’ do. Take a shot. remember that time a guy did an experiment where he did an entire speech at an antifa rally using only hitler quotes and everyone cheered I’m screaming Antifa is literally a terrorist group “let’s just not commit genocide” my ass
Ass, Bad, and Chill: Citizen of Arcterra
 @PhilodoxPils
 Svar till @_hoemo
 Nazis: Let's commit genocide.
 Antifa: Let's not.
 BLM: Please stop shooting us.
 Centrist: I cannot tell these apart
officially-kim-jung-un:

siryouarebeingmocked:

kamiyu910:

the-darkest-of-souls:

nazis: lets commit genocide
Antifa: lets dismantle our current government and instigate a horrendous for of government that commits mass murder and genocide for other reasons while using facist methods to try and silence other people 
BLM: lies, lies, lies, bullshit riots, and cop shooting
centrist: everyone needs to chill the fuck out 

Nazis: “The Jews are too privileged, they have too much power, they’re oppressing the German people!”
SJWs (AntiFa, BLM, etc): “The whites are too privileged, they have too much power, they’re oppressing the non-white people!”


“Hitler’s first written utterance on political questions dating from this period emphasized that what he called “the anti-Semitism of reason” must lead “to the systematic combating and elimination of Jewish privileges. Its ultimate goal must implacably be the total removal of the Jews.“”
“…the vile, anti-Semitic propaganda of the 1930’s, when splashed across Der Spiegel was blaming Jews - and so called disproportionate Jewish wealth - for Germany’s losing WWI and the country’s subsequent economic downturn. Canards about Jews controlling world finances - first promulgated by the Tsarist forgery, “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion” - was anti-Semitic back then and it is anti-Semitic today…”
Why are these considered only bad if “white” is turned to something else? It’s the same rhetoric that the nazis spread. Why should we consider anyone who uses this any better than the nazis, when they said the same stuff? 

Someone defending Antifa or BLM deliberately ignores what they actually flippin’ do.
Take a shot.

remember that time a guy did an experiment where he did an entire speech at an antifa rally using only hitler quotes and everyone cheered

I’m screaming Antifa is literally a terrorist group “let’s just not commit genocide” my ass

officially-kim-jung-un: siryouarebeingmocked: kamiyu910: the-darkest-of-souls: nazis: lets commit genocide Antifa: lets dismantle our cu...