🔥 | Latest

America, Books, and Love: Doctors in 1911 thought bicycles would turn women aU It wasn't just the freedom afforded by bicycles although that was also a thing. Doctors hotly debated whether the vibration between women's legs would give them insatiable sex drives and lead to lesbianism GRAGKED GoM Susan K. Foley, 2004, Women in France Since 1789: The Meanings of Difference. Moralists in the 7Gh cenGuru panicked over novels 0o000000000 They reasoned that women, being somehow unable to distinguish between reality and fiction, would act out the immoral situations they read about in novels. GRAGKED.GOM Cavallo, Chartier, and Cochrane, 2003. A History of Reading in the West. People thoughb the Postb Office would ruin Women 0 0 CENTLEMENl FOR LADIES XCLUSİVELY SUNDER S IN SUMS EXCEEDING SI Becausé the Post Office enabled women to send and receive letters unsupervised, the moralists of the 1870s were sure women would engage in "clandestine correspondence with unprincipled men." GRAGKED coM httpMaphamsquarterly org/roundtable/post-secrets When women started using bhe telephone bo have conversations, men freaked out. In 1909, telephones started appearing in homes, and women started using them socially. This panicked their husbands so much that they started making fun of women for it and calling them out on their "futility and frivolity" in newspapers, journals, and books. The average length of those calls was 7½ minutes. CRACKED cON Claude S. Fischer, 1994. America Calling: A Social History of the Telephone to 1940 jenroses: kipplekipple: virginiaisforhaters: Wow it’s almost like most of human history has been about controlling women… or something… I love the bike one. “The women may experience sexual pleasure, whereupon they will discard men entirely and immediately.” this casts an entirely new light on “A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle” and I’m sideyeing my brain for thinking it. 
America, Books, and Love: Doctors in 1911 thought
 bicycles would turn
 women aU
 It wasn't just the
 freedom afforded
 by bicycles
 although that
 was also a thing.
 Doctors hotly debated whether the vibration
 between women's legs would give them
 insatiable sex drives and lead to lesbianism
 GRAGKED GoM
 Susan K. Foley, 2004, Women in France Since 1789: The Meanings of Difference.

 Moralists in the
 7Gh cenGuru
 panicked over
 novels
 0o000000000
 They reasoned that women, being
 somehow unable to distinguish
 between reality and fiction, would act
 out the immoral situations they read
 about in novels.
 GRAGKED.GOM
 Cavallo, Chartier, and Cochrane, 2003. A History of Reading in the West.

 People thoughb
 the Postb Office
 would ruin Women
 0
 0
 CENTLEMENl
 FOR LADIES
 XCLUSİVELY
 SUNDER S
 IN SUMS
 EXCEEDING SI
 Becausé the Post Office enabled women to
 send and receive letters unsupervised, the
 moralists of the 1870s were sure women
 would engage in "clandestine
 correspondence with unprincipled men."
 GRAGKED coM
 httpMaphamsquarterly org/roundtable/post-secrets

 When women
 started using bhe
 telephone bo have
 conversations,
 men freaked out.
 In 1909, telephones started appearing in homes, and
 women started using them socially. This panicked their
 husbands so much that they started making fun of
 women for it and calling them out on their "futility and
 frivolity" in newspapers, journals, and books.
 The average length of those calls was 7½ minutes.
 CRACKED cON
 Claude S. Fischer, 1994. America Calling: A Social History of the Telephone to 1940
jenroses:
kipplekipple:

virginiaisforhaters:
Wow it’s almost like most of human history has been about controlling women… or something…

I love the bike one. “The women may experience sexual pleasure, whereupon they will discard men entirely and immediately.”

this casts an entirely new light on “A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle” and I’m sideyeing my brain for thinking it. 

jenroses: kipplekipple: virginiaisforhaters: Wow it’s almost like most of human history has been about controlling women… or something… I ...

Apparently, Bad, and Click: Strongly Slightly Not sure/in Slightly Strongly Disagree Disagree between Agree Agree 1. I feel discouraged about the way things are going. goodluckdetective: theseriouscynic: vanillayote: clinicallydepressedpug: jinxasaurus: draggle: slashmarks: rosalinarosee: angst420: tantefledermaus: fromonesurvivortoanother: telegantmess: angryflyingstar: angst420: job applications just keep getting weirder….. pro jobseeking tip: never answer these surveys honestly also a tip: if they have a question like “Everybody steals from work sometimes” answer “disagree.” I found this out when i was working as a hiring manager and the company i worked for started instituting these tests for managerial hires or promotions. My boss and I were promoting someone and she failed the test because she answered that question as “slightly agree” which in the results tells them that she is someone likely to steal because she believes everyone does it. When we asked her about her answer, it turns out she picked what she did because she’s cynical and does assume that people steal but didnt agree with them doing so. she almost sued the company for not promoting her based on that but chose to leave instead. We lost a good employee because corporate decided these tests were a good way to screen for “good” employees.tldr these things are poorly designed, ambiguously worded, and structured in ways that are designed to eliminate people because the intention of the questions is never made clear. these tests are evil. this sounds like an ableist disaster for people who aren’t neurotypical and who struggle with reading signals   When I went to get diagnosed with ADHD, the neuropsychologist couldn’t figure out what was going on, because on paper I’m apparently floridly psychotic.  No, the questions are imprecise, and I am hyper-literal and extremely honest.   “Do you often see things that other people do not see?”  Yes.       The question I was answering:  “Are you especially observant?”      The question the test was actually asking:  “Are you having visual hallucinations?”  “Does your environment ever have special messages for you?”  Yes.        The question I was answering:  “Does the sudden sight of a rainbow during a    bout of doubt and self-loathing make you feel as though the world is trying to cheer you up?”       The question the test was actually asking:  “Do you believe that your toaster is trying to convince you that the neighbors are spying on you?” Five years later, I bombed a psych eval for a park ranger job for the same sort of thing.  Tread carefully, darlings.   ^^^^ that is actually such a huge issue with diagnosis!!!! and I’ve thought I didn’t experience symptoms for ages that I actually clearly had all along because of things being phrased super weirdly and confusingly :( And this is why McDonald’s never called me after I applied Yeah, this is why this kind of thing in job apps needs to be illegal. A lot of discrimination is well hidden. Oh! That explains why even having friends and my then-husband proofread these every time didn’t even work. They may not be as weird as me, but they’re not neurotypical. We all read the questions tantefledermaus mentioned as observational skills! Fuck. This explains why I’ve failed all of these fucking things. My sister said to answer these as if you were a really passive person who relied on management/authority to tell you exactly what to do/think. Protip: my Dad is a hiring manager at Home Depot and he told me the system they use (with the stupidass pointless 500 question quiz) is designed so it filters out people with neutral answers. Several months ago I applied for numerous jobs, each of which required their own dumbass tests. To save time (and my sanity) i would click the “sometimes” or middle option for nearly every question unless it was serious. Nobody every called me back. Hell only 1 of the 8 places i applied to even messaged me back saying “thank you but we have gone with someone else”. Your applications wont even get seen unless you “pass” the quiz. So when all yall do fill out these dumb things be sure to pick strong yes or no answers. Never “maybe” or “slighty agree/disagree” Thank you for that, cause I do that a lot. Like I legit feel neutral on some of those questions. Tumblr with the life hacks It’s really bad for someone who isn’t neurotypical because often, these questions do contain language meant to filter us out. For me, I tend to notice the ones meant to filter out people with ADD, like myself. For example “do you have trouble focusing on one task” or “do you like to move around.” My normal answers to these would be “yes, but I have it under control” and “of course, no one can sit still for hours”. But corporations read them as “do not hire” It’s a bunch of BS. So I answer them like a yes man from office space. Works pretty well.
Apparently, Bad, and Click: Strongly Slightly Not sure/in Slightly Strongly
 Disagree Disagree between Agree
 Agree
 1. I feel discouraged about the way things are going.
goodluckdetective:
theseriouscynic:

vanillayote:

clinicallydepressedpug:

jinxasaurus:

draggle:

slashmarks:

rosalinarosee:

angst420:

tantefledermaus:

fromonesurvivortoanother:

telegantmess:

angryflyingstar:

angst420:

job applications just keep getting weirder…..

pro jobseeking tip: never answer these surveys honestly

also a tip: if they have a question like “Everybody steals from work sometimes” answer “disagree.” I found this out when i was working as a hiring manager and the company i worked for started instituting these tests for managerial hires or promotions. My boss and I were promoting someone and she failed the test because she answered that question as “slightly agree” which in the results tells them that she is someone likely to steal because she believes everyone does it. When we asked her about her answer, it turns out she picked what she did because she’s cynical and does assume that people steal but didnt agree with them doing so. she almost sued the company for not promoting her based on that but chose to leave instead. We lost a good employee because corporate decided these tests were a good way to screen for “good” employees.tldr these things are poorly designed, ambiguously worded, and structured in ways that are designed to eliminate people because the intention of the questions is never made clear. these tests are evil.

this sounds like an ableist disaster for people who aren’t neurotypical and who struggle with reading signals 

 When I went to get diagnosed with ADHD, the neuropsychologist couldn’t figure out what was going on, because on paper I’m apparently floridly psychotic.  No, the questions are imprecise, and I am hyper-literal and extremely honest.  
“Do you often see things that other people do not see?”  Yes. 
     The question I was answering:  “Are you especially observant?”
     The question the test was actually asking:  “Are you having visual hallucinations?” 
“Does your environment ever have special messages for you?”  Yes.  
     The question I was answering:  “Does the sudden sight of a rainbow during a    bout of doubt and self-loathing make you feel as though the world is trying to cheer you up?”
      The question the test was actually asking:  “Do you believe that your toaster is trying to convince you that the neighbors are spying on you?”
Five years later, I bombed a psych eval for a park ranger job for the same sort of thing.  Tread carefully, darlings.  

^^^^ that is actually such a huge issue with diagnosis!!!! and I’ve thought I didn’t experience symptoms for ages that I actually clearly had all along because of things being phrased super weirdly and confusingly :(

And this is why McDonald’s never called me after I applied

Yeah, this is why this kind of thing in job apps needs to be illegal. A lot of discrimination is well hidden.

Oh!  That explains why even having friends and my then-husband proofread these every time didn’t even work.  They may not be as weird as me, but they’re not neurotypical.  We all read the questions tantefledermaus mentioned as observational skills!

Fuck. This explains why I’ve failed all of these fucking things.

My sister said to answer these as if you were a really passive person who relied on management/authority to tell you exactly what to do/think. 

Protip: my Dad is a hiring manager at Home Depot and he told me the system they use (with the stupidass pointless 500 question quiz) is designed so it filters out people with neutral answers. Several months ago I applied for numerous jobs, each of which required their own dumbass tests. To save time (and my sanity) i would click the “sometimes” or middle option for nearly every question unless it was serious. Nobody every called me back. Hell only 1 of the 8 places i applied to even messaged me back saying “thank you but we have gone with someone else”. Your applications wont even get seen unless you “pass” the quiz. 
So when all yall do fill out these dumb things be sure to pick strong yes or no answers. Never “maybe” or “slighty agree/disagree”

Thank you for that, cause I do that a lot. Like I legit feel neutral on some of those questions. Tumblr with the life hacks

It’s really bad for someone who isn’t neurotypical because often, these questions do contain language meant to filter us out.
For me, I tend to notice the ones meant to filter out people with ADD, like myself. For example “do you have trouble focusing on one task” or “do you like to move around.” My normal answers to these would be “yes, but I have it under control” and “of course, no one can sit still for hours”. But corporations read them as “do not hire”
It’s a bunch of BS. So I answer them like a yes man from office space. Works pretty well.

goodluckdetective: theseriouscynic: vanillayote: clinicallydepressedpug: jinxasaurus: draggle: slashmarks: rosalinarosee: angst420: ...

America, Books, and Post Office: Doctors in 1911 thought bicycles would turn women aU It wasn't just the freedom afforded by bicycles although that was also a thing. Doctors hotly debated whether the vibration between women's legs would give them insatiable sex drives and lead to lesbianism GRAGKED GoM Susan K. Foley, 2004, Women in France Since 1789: The Meanings of Difference. Moralists in the 7Gh cenGuru panicked over novels 0o000000000 They reasoned that women, being somehow unable to distinguish between reality and fiction, would act out the immoral situations they read about in novels. GRAGKED.GOM Cavallo, Chartier, and Cochrane, 2003. A History of Reading in the West. People thoughb the Postb Office would ruin Women 0 0 CENTLEMENl FOR LADIES XCLUSİVELY SUNDER S IN SUMS EXCEEDING SI Becausé the Post Office enabled women to send and receive letters unsupervised, the moralists of the 1870s were sure women would engage in "clandestine correspondence with unprincipled men." GRAGKED coM httpMaphamsquarterly org/roundtable/post-secrets When women started using bhe telephone bo have conversations, men freaked out. In 1909, telephones started appearing in homes, and women started using them socially. This panicked their husbands so much that they started making fun of women for it and calling them out on their "futility and frivolity" in newspapers, journals, and books. The average length of those calls was 7½ minutes. CRACKED cON Claude S. Fischer, 1994. America Calling: A Social History of the Telephone to 1940 virginiaisforhaters:Wow it’s almost like most of human history has been about controlling women… or something…
America, Books, and Post Office: Doctors in 1911 thought
 bicycles would turn
 women aU
 It wasn't just the
 freedom afforded
 by bicycles
 although that
 was also a thing.
 Doctors hotly debated whether the vibration
 between women's legs would give them
 insatiable sex drives and lead to lesbianism
 GRAGKED GoM
 Susan K. Foley, 2004, Women in France Since 1789: The Meanings of Difference.

 Moralists in the
 7Gh cenGuru
 panicked over
 novels
 0o000000000
 They reasoned that women, being
 somehow unable to distinguish
 between reality and fiction, would act
 out the immoral situations they read
 about in novels.
 GRAGKED.GOM
 Cavallo, Chartier, and Cochrane, 2003. A History of Reading in the West.

 People thoughb
 the Postb Office
 would ruin Women
 0
 0
 CENTLEMENl
 FOR LADIES
 XCLUSİVELY
 SUNDER S
 IN SUMS
 EXCEEDING SI
 Becausé the Post Office enabled women to
 send and receive letters unsupervised, the
 moralists of the 1870s were sure women
 would engage in "clandestine
 correspondence with unprincipled men."
 GRAGKED coM
 httpMaphamsquarterly org/roundtable/post-secrets

 When women
 started using bhe
 telephone bo have
 conversations,
 men freaked out.
 In 1909, telephones started appearing in homes, and
 women started using them socially. This panicked their
 husbands so much that they started making fun of
 women for it and calling them out on their "futility and
 frivolity" in newspapers, journals, and books.
 The average length of those calls was 7½ minutes.
 CRACKED cON
 Claude S. Fischer, 1994. America Calling: A Social History of the Telephone to 1940
virginiaisforhaters:Wow it’s almost like most of human history has been about controlling women… or something…

virginiaisforhaters:Wow it’s almost like most of human history has been about controlling women… or something…

Bitch, Cute, and Friends: You are NOT to have a single girls phone number e You are NOT to follow them on any social media (including Instagram Snapchat . and Twitter) E You are NOT to hang out with Keegan (including his house or anywhere in public) . You are NOT to go to Honda without me vvoom room You are NOT to hang out with your friends more than two times a week . You're NOT to look at a single girl e if girls come up to you at any place or anytime you are to WALK away e Mo is to NOT hang out us every time we hang out . You are NOT to ask for head Nau augn . You are NOT to get mad at me about a single thing ever again . You're NOT to bring up Tyler, Noah,Deven,or Josh ever again Nwe . You are NOT allowed to drink unless I am with you 21? . I am allowed to do a phone check when EVER I please x-xxxx e if we move in there are to . If we move in together your friends wil RARLEY be allowed over e If I catch you around giris 1 kill you e You are NOT to ditch me for your friends · Austin does NOT CONTROL WHEN I HANG OUT WITH YOU! navy、 . We are to go on a legit date once every two weeks at least Noyy . If I say jump you say "how high princess xoxo NEVER ever be girls at our house NoNO You are to make sure you tell me you love me once a day at least so i know your not messing around You are to NEVER take longer than 10 mins to text me back * bai-xue-lives: allthingshyper: wenamedthedogkylo: trenchmints: Filed under: yikes, get a new girlfriend, doubleyikes A classic example of what abusive behavior in women can look like. This isn’t cute or sweet or just for anyone’s own good, this is controlling. Young gents (and wlw and nb folks interested in ladies), if your girlfriend or prospective girlfriend presents you a list like this (especially in writing), you crumple that shit up, drop it at her feet, remind her that you are not property, and walk away. This shit isn’t funny or cute when a man does it to a woman; do not tolerate it just because it’s coming from a woman. Holy fucking shit this bitch is out of her mind obsessive already What do you wanna bet that she hates Keegan, Tyler, Noah, Deven, Josh, and Austin because they saw through her bullshit and tried to warn their bro
Bitch, Cute, and Friends: You are NOT to have a single girls phone number
 e
 You are NOT to follow them on any social media (including Instagram Snapchat
 .
 and Twitter) E
 You are NOT to hang out with Keegan (including his house or anywhere in public)
 . You are NOT to go to Honda without me vvoom room
 You are NOT to hang out with your friends more than two times a week
 . You're NOT to look at a single girl
 e if girls come up to you at any place or anytime you are to WALK away
 e Mo is to NOT hang out us every time we hang out
 . You are NOT to ask for head Nau augn
 . You are NOT to get mad at me about a single thing ever again
 . You're NOT to bring up Tyler, Noah,Deven,or Josh ever again Nwe
 . You are NOT allowed to drink unless I am with you 21?
 . I am allowed to do a phone check when EVER I please x-xxxx
 e if we move in there are to
 . If we move in together your friends wil RARLEY be allowed over
 e If I catch you around giris 1 kill you
 e You are NOT to ditch me for your friends
 · Austin does NOT CONTROL WHEN I HANG OUT WITH YOU! navy、
 . We are to go on a legit date once every two weeks at least Noyy
 . If I say jump you say "how high princess xoxo
 NEVER ever be girls at our house NoNO
 You are to make sure you tell me you love me once a day at least so i know your
 not messing around
 You are to NEVER take longer than 10 mins to text me back
 *
bai-xue-lives:

allthingshyper:
wenamedthedogkylo:

trenchmints:

Filed under: yikes, get a new girlfriend, doubleyikes

A classic example of what abusive behavior in women can look like. This isn’t cute or sweet or just for anyone’s own good, this is controlling.
Young gents (and wlw and nb folks interested in ladies), if your girlfriend or prospective girlfriend presents you a list like this (especially in writing), you crumple that shit up, drop it at her feet, remind her that you are not property, and walk away.
This shit isn’t funny or cute when a man does it to a woman; do not tolerate it just because it’s coming from a woman.


Holy fucking shit this bitch is out of her mind obsessive already

What do you wanna bet that she hates Keegan, Tyler, Noah, Deven, Josh, and Austin because they saw through her bullshit and tried to warn their bro

bai-xue-lives: allthingshyper: wenamedthedogkylo: trenchmints: Filed under: yikes, get a new girlfriend, doubleyikes A classic example o...

Ass, Bad, and Chill: Citizen of Arcterra @PhilodoxPils Svar till @_hoemo Nazis: Let's commit genocide. Antifa: Let's not. BLM: Please stop shooting us. Centrist: I cannot tell these apart officially-kim-jung-un: siryouarebeingmocked: kamiyu910: the-darkest-of-souls: nazis: lets commit genocide Antifa: lets dismantle our current government and instigate a horrendous for of government that commits mass murder and genocide for other reasons while using facist methods to try and silence other people  BLM: lies, lies, lies, bullshit riots, and cop shooting centrist: everyone needs to chill the fuck out  Nazis: “The Jews are too privileged, they have too much power, they’re oppressing the German people!” SJWs (AntiFa, BLM, etc): “The whites are too privileged, they have too much power, they’re oppressing the non-white people!” “Hitler’s first written utterance on political questions dating from this period emphasized that what he called “the anti-Semitism of reason” must lead “to the systematic combating and elimination of Jewish privileges. Its ultimate goal must implacably be the total removal of the Jews.“” “…the vile, anti-Semitic propaganda of the 1930’s, when splashed across Der Spiegel was blaming Jews - and so called disproportionate Jewish wealth - for Germany’s losing WWI and the country’s subsequent economic downturn. Canards about Jews controlling world finances - first promulgated by the Tsarist forgery, “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion” - was anti-Semitic back then and it is anti-Semitic today…” Why are these considered only bad if “white” is turned to something else? It’s the same rhetoric that the nazis spread. Why should we consider anyone who uses this any better than the nazis, when they said the same stuff?  Someone defending Antifa or BLM deliberately ignores what they actually flippin’ do. Take a shot. remember that time a guy did an experiment where he did an entire speech at an antifa rally using only hitler quotes and everyone cheered I’m screaming Antifa is literally a terrorist group “let’s just not commit genocide” my ass
Ass, Bad, and Chill: Citizen of Arcterra
 @PhilodoxPils
 Svar till @_hoemo
 Nazis: Let's commit genocide.
 Antifa: Let's not.
 BLM: Please stop shooting us.
 Centrist: I cannot tell these apart
officially-kim-jung-un:

siryouarebeingmocked:

kamiyu910:

the-darkest-of-souls:

nazis: lets commit genocide
Antifa: lets dismantle our current government and instigate a horrendous for of government that commits mass murder and genocide for other reasons while using facist methods to try and silence other people 
BLM: lies, lies, lies, bullshit riots, and cop shooting
centrist: everyone needs to chill the fuck out 

Nazis: “The Jews are too privileged, they have too much power, they’re oppressing the German people!”
SJWs (AntiFa, BLM, etc): “The whites are too privileged, they have too much power, they’re oppressing the non-white people!”


“Hitler’s first written utterance on political questions dating from this period emphasized that what he called “the anti-Semitism of reason” must lead “to the systematic combating and elimination of Jewish privileges. Its ultimate goal must implacably be the total removal of the Jews.“”
“…the vile, anti-Semitic propaganda of the 1930’s, when splashed across Der Spiegel was blaming Jews - and so called disproportionate Jewish wealth - for Germany’s losing WWI and the country’s subsequent economic downturn. Canards about Jews controlling world finances - first promulgated by the Tsarist forgery, “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion” - was anti-Semitic back then and it is anti-Semitic today…”
Why are these considered only bad if “white” is turned to something else? It’s the same rhetoric that the nazis spread. Why should we consider anyone who uses this any better than the nazis, when they said the same stuff? 

Someone defending Antifa or BLM deliberately ignores what they actually flippin’ do.
Take a shot.

remember that time a guy did an experiment where he did an entire speech at an antifa rally using only hitler quotes and everyone cheered

I’m screaming Antifa is literally a terrorist group “let’s just not commit genocide” my ass

officially-kim-jung-un: siryouarebeingmocked: kamiyu910: the-darkest-of-souls: nazis: lets commit genocide Antifa: lets dismantle our cu...

Advice, Cute, and Friends: RULES You are NOT to have a single girls phone number You are NOT to follow them on any social media (including Instagram Snapchat and Twitter) Epai You are NOr to hang out with Keegan (ncluding his house or anywhere in public) You are NOT to go to Honda without me vwoam wroom You are NOT to hang out with your friends more than two times a week You're NOT to look at a single girl If gitls come up to you at amy place or anytime you are toWALK away Mo is to NOT hang out us every time we hang out You are NOT to ask for head ou Saugmt You are NOT to get mad at me about a single thing ever again You're NOT to bring up TylerNoah,Deven,or Josh gver egain Ewwe * . . You are NOT allowed to drink unless I am with you 21 l am allowed to do a phone check when EVER' please sx)xxx-xx ● If we move in there are to verbe girls at our house ,uc ho、 e It we move in together your friends w RARLEY be allowed over If I catch you around giris kill you e You are NoT to ditch me for your friends · Austin does NOT CONTROL WHEN I HANG OUT WITH YOU! revo ! We are to go on a legit date once every two weeks at least Yosp IfI say jump you say "how high princess-xoxo . You are to make sure you tell me you love me oncea day at least so l know your not messing around You are to NEVER take longer than 10 mins to text me back trenchmints Filed under yikes, get a new girlfriend, doubleyikes wenamedthedogkylo A classic example of what abusive behavior in women can look like. This isn't cute or sweet or just for anyone's own good, this is controlling Young gents (and wiw and nb folks interested in ladies), if your girltfriend or prospective girlfriend presents you a list like this (especially in writing), you crumple that shit up, drop it at her feet, remind her that you are not property, and walk away. This shit isn't funny or cute when a man does it to a woman; do not tolerate it just because it's coming from a woman. leeferal I've commented on this post before but I'lI keep saying it Do not throw something like this out Keep it. Hide it somewhere safe that you'll find it again - like where you keep your tax receipts, for example. Keep it in a plastic bag and touch the actual paper as little as possible to preserve fingerprints. Maybe write the date they gave it to you on the bag itself Should the person who gave you this try anything to harm you after giving you something like this - this piece of paper is evidence of their harmful intentions. If it comes to the bringing any kind of authority into your situation without this piece of paper it could just turn into a huge 'he said/she said situation and that's not a situation you want yourself to be in. Especially if the other person is a good enough actor. #abuse #reblogging again for added commentary 169,225 notes Surprisingly solid advice for men
Advice, Cute, and Friends: RULES
 You are NOT to have a single girls phone number
 You are NOT to follow them on any social media (including Instagram Snapchat
 and Twitter) Epai
 You are NOr to hang out with Keegan (ncluding his house or anywhere in public)
 You are NOT to go to Honda without me vwoam wroom
 You are NOT to hang out with your friends more than two times a week
 You're NOT to look at a single girl
 If gitls come up to you at amy place or anytime you are toWALK away
 Mo is to NOT hang out us every time we hang out
 You are NOT to ask for head ou Saugmt
 You are NOT to get mad at me about a single thing ever again
 You're NOT to bring up TylerNoah,Deven,or Josh gver egain Ewwe
 *
 .
 . You are NOT allowed to drink unless I am with you 21
 l am allowed to do a phone check when EVER' please
 sx)xxx-xx
 ●
 If we move in there are to verbe girls at our house ,uc ho、
 e It we move in together your friends w RARLEY be allowed over
 If I catch you around giris kill you
 e You are NoT to ditch me for your friends
 · Austin does NOT CONTROL WHEN I HANG OUT WITH YOU! revo !
 We are to go on a legit date once every two weeks at least Yosp
 IfI say jump you say "how high
 princess-xoxo
 . You are
 to make sure you tell me you love me
 oncea day at least so l know your
 not messing around
 You are to NEVER take longer than 10 mins to text me back
 trenchmints
 Filed under yikes, get a new girlfriend, doubleyikes
 wenamedthedogkylo
 A classic example of what abusive behavior in women can look like. This isn't
 cute or sweet or just for anyone's own good, this is controlling
 Young gents (and wiw and nb folks interested in ladies), if your girltfriend or
 prospective girlfriend presents you a list like this (especially in writing), you
 crumple that shit up, drop it at her feet, remind her that you are not property, and
 walk away.
 This shit isn't funny or cute when a man does it to a woman; do not tolerate it
 just because it's coming from a woman.
 leeferal
 I've commented on this post before but I'lI keep saying it
 Do not throw something like this out
 Keep it. Hide it somewhere safe that you'll find it again - like where you keep
 your tax receipts, for example. Keep it in a plastic bag and touch the actual
 paper as little as possible to preserve fingerprints. Maybe write the date they
 gave it to you on the bag itself
 Should the person who gave you this try anything to harm you after giving you
 something like this - this piece of paper is evidence of their harmful
 intentions. If it comes to the bringing any kind of authority into your situation
 without this piece of paper it could just turn into a huge 'he said/she said
 situation and that's not a situation you want yourself to be in. Especially if the
 other person is a good enough actor.
 #abuse #reblogging again for added commentary
 169,225 notes
Surprisingly solid advice for men

Surprisingly solid advice for men

Cute, Friends, and Funny: RULES * You are NOT to have a single girls phone number You are NOT to follow them on any social media (including Instagram Snapchat and Twitter) Epai You are NOr to hang out with Keegan (ncluding his house or anywhere in public) You are NOT to go to Honda without me vwoam wroom You are NOT to hang out with your friends more than two times a week You're NOT to look at a single girl If gitls come up to you at amy place or anytime you are toWALK away Mo is to NOT hang out us every time we hang out You are NOT to ask for head ou Saugmt You are NOT to get mad at me about a single thing ever again You're NOT to bring up TylerNoah,Deven,or Josh gver egain Ewwe . . You are NOT allowed to drink unless I am with you 21 l am allowed to do a phone check when EVER' please sx)xxx-xx ● If we move in there are to verbe girls at our house ,uc ho、 e It we move in together your friends w RARLEY be allowed over If I catch you around giris kill you e You are NoT to ditch me for your friends · Austin does NOT CONTROL WHEN I HANG OUT WITH YOU! revo ! We are to go on a legit date once every two weeks at least Yosp IfI say jump you say "how high princess-xoxo . You are to make sure you tell me you love me oncea day at least so l know your not messing around You are to NEVER take longer than 10 mins to text me back trenchmints Filed under yikes, get a new girlfriend, doubleyikes wenamedthedogkylo A classic example of what abusive behavior in women can look like. This isn't cute or sweet or just for anyone's own good, this is controlling Young gents (and wiw and nb folks interested in ladies), if your girltfriend or prospective girlfriend presents you a list like this (especially in writing), you crumple that shit up, drop it at her feet, remind her that you are not property, and walk away. This shit isn't funny or cute when a man does it to a woman; do not tolerate it just because it's coming from a woman. leeferal I've commented on this post before but I'lI keep saying it Do not throw something like this out Keep it. Hide it somewhere safe that you'll find it again - like where you keep your tax receipts, for example. Keep it in a plastic bag and touch the actual paper as little as possible to preserve fingerprints. Maybe write the date they gave it to you on the bag itself Should the person who gave you this try anything to harm you after giving you something like this - this piece of paper is evidence of their harmful intentions. If it comes to the bringing any kind of authority into your situation without this piece of paper it could just turn into a huge 'he said/she said situation and that's not a situation you want yourself to be in. Especially if the other person is a good enough actor. #abuse #reblogging again for added commentary 169,225 notes Love is never an excuse to control someone [TW: abuse]
Cute, Friends, and Funny: RULES
 * You are NOT to have a single girls phone number
 You are NOT to follow them on any social media (including Instagram Snapchat
 and Twitter) Epai
 You are NOr to hang out with Keegan (ncluding his house or anywhere in public)
 You are NOT to go to Honda without me vwoam wroom
 You are NOT to hang out with your friends more than two times a week
 You're NOT to look at a single girl
 If gitls come up to you at amy place or anytime you are toWALK away
 Mo is to NOT hang out us every time we hang out
 You are NOT to ask for head ou Saugmt
 You are NOT to get mad at me about a single thing ever again
 You're NOT to bring up TylerNoah,Deven,or Josh gver egain Ewwe
 .
 . You are NOT allowed to drink unless I am with you 21
 l am allowed to do a phone check when EVER' please
 sx)xxx-xx
 ●
 If we move in there are to verbe girls at our house ,uc ho、
 e It we move in together your friends w RARLEY be allowed over
 If I catch you around giris kill you
 e You are NoT to ditch me for your friends
 · Austin does NOT CONTROL WHEN I HANG OUT WITH YOU! revo !
 We are to go on a legit date once every two weeks at least Yosp
 IfI say jump you say "how high
 princess-xoxo
 . You are
 to make sure you tell me you love me
 oncea day at least so l know your
 not messing around
 You are to NEVER take longer than 10 mins to text me back
 trenchmints
 Filed under yikes, get a new girlfriend, doubleyikes
 wenamedthedogkylo
 A classic example of what abusive behavior in women can look like. This isn't
 cute or sweet or just for anyone's own good, this is controlling
 Young gents (and wiw and nb folks interested in ladies), if your girltfriend or
 prospective girlfriend presents you a list like this (especially in writing), you
 crumple that shit up, drop it at her feet, remind her that you are not property, and
 walk away.
 This shit isn't funny or cute when a man does it to a woman; do not tolerate it
 just because it's coming from a woman.
 leeferal
 I've commented on this post before but I'lI keep saying it
 Do not throw something like this out
 Keep it. Hide it somewhere safe that you'll find it again - like where you keep
 your tax receipts, for example. Keep it in a plastic bag and touch the actual
 paper as little as possible to preserve fingerprints. Maybe write the date they
 gave it to you on the bag itself
 Should the person who gave you this try anything to harm you after giving you
 something like this - this piece of paper is evidence of their harmful
 intentions. If it comes to the bringing any kind of authority into your situation
 without this piece of paper it could just turn into a huge 'he said/she said
 situation and that's not a situation you want yourself to be in. Especially if the
 other person is a good enough actor.
 #abuse #reblogging again for added commentary
 169,225 notes
Love is never an excuse to control someone [TW: abuse]

Love is never an excuse to control someone [TW: abuse]