🔥 | Latest

Fbi, Memes, and Obama: Why is Peter Strzok so smug? He's in the SES. I would guess that 95% of Americans have never heard of the Senior Executive Service, but the SES has more REAL power than Congress. The SES was created in 1979 to form kind of an aristocracy among the federal bureaucracy All are political appointees. They resemble "civilian generals" but unlike generals they don't rotate out to new duty stations. Congress can haul FBI SESer Peter Strzok in and berate him, but they can't do a damn thing to him. Contempt of Congress? An SESer could not care any less. The approximately 10,000 SESers protect one another above all else. It's not about Democrats vs. Republicans, it's now more about the SES vs. the rest of the govemment Folks need to get up to speed on the REAL power structure in Washington There is a civil war going on, and 95% of it is happening below the surface. Trump and the Congress have barely made a dent in the power of the SES Imagine the old USSR, with KGB-aligned senior apparatchiks answerable directly to the Politburo and nobody else in charge of every federal agency and department. That is the SES, In our case today, the unexpected occurred and Trump was elected as POTUS, but the SES is still loyal to the Obama and The Washington D. C. Deep State is a group of 8,156 appointed managers in 75 federal agencies that control the executive bureaucracy and tell new political appointees what they can and cannot do. Yes, that’s right, the Deep State is an official government program, well-organized, comprehensive, and “in charge.” OUT OF THE 8,156 MEMBERS WHO MAKE UP THIS DEEP STATE OF ENSCONCED BUREAUCRATS, OVER 7,000 WERE APPOINTED BY OBAMA. These the are the “Obama Holdouts” that still control the executive branch of government a full year after Trump has come to office. Obama expanded the existing Flag_of_the_United_States_Senior_Executive_Service.svgprogram of Deep State managers and appointed over 7,000 of the 8,156 bosses who are called the Senior Executive Service. Some call it the “Shadow Government”, and it is true that this federal cabal works in the shadows. Have you ever heard of such a group? Some call it Obama’s Army. Let’s review what we know about the power of “political appointees” who hold important leadership and policymaking positions. There are four basic types of appointments: Presidential Appointments with Senate Confirmation: There are 1,212 senior leaders, including the Cabinet secretaries and their deputies, the heads of most independent agencies and ambassadors, who must be confirmed by the Senate. Presidential Appointments without Senate Confirmation: There are 353 positions which make up much of the White House staff, although they are also scattered throughout many of the smaller federal agencies. Non-career Senior Executive Service: Members of the Senior Executive Service (SES) work in key positions just below the top presidential appointees, bridging the gap between the political leaders and the civil service throughout the federal government. Schedule C Appointments: There are 1,403 Schedule C appointees who serve in a confidential or policy role. They range from schedulers and confidential assistants to policy experts. . The Senior Executive Service (SES) in 2016 had 8,156 members who were appointees. Obama appointed over 7,000 of them to these key positions. Most of these appointees do not arise from inside the respective agencies through
Fbi, Memes, and Obama: Why is Peter Strzok so smug? He's in the SES.
 I would guess that 95% of Americans have never heard of the Senior Executive
 Service, but the SES has more REAL power than Congress. The SES was
 created in 1979 to form kind of an aristocracy among the federal bureaucracy
 All are political appointees. They resemble "civilian generals" but unlike
 generals they don't rotate out to new duty stations.
 Congress can haul FBI SESer Peter Strzok in and berate him, but they can't do
 a damn thing to him. Contempt of Congress? An SESer could not care any
 less. The approximately 10,000 SESers protect one another above all else. It's
 not about Democrats vs. Republicans, it's now more about the SES vs. the rest
 of the govemment
 Folks need to get up to speed on the REAL power structure in Washington
 There is a civil war going on, and 95% of it is happening below the surface.
 Trump and the Congress have barely made a dent in the power of the SES
 Imagine the old USSR, with KGB-aligned senior apparatchiks answerable
 directly to the Politburo and nobody else in charge of every federal agency and
 department. That is the SES, In our case today, the unexpected occurred and
 Trump was elected as POTUS, but the SES is still loyal to the Obama and
The Washington D. C. Deep State is a group of 8,156 appointed managers in 75 federal agencies that control the executive bureaucracy and tell new political appointees what they can and cannot do. Yes, that’s right, the Deep State is an official government program, well-organized, comprehensive, and “in charge.” OUT OF THE 8,156 MEMBERS WHO MAKE UP THIS DEEP STATE OF ENSCONCED BUREAUCRATS, OVER 7,000 WERE APPOINTED BY OBAMA. These the are the “Obama Holdouts” that still control the executive branch of government a full year after Trump has come to office. Obama expanded the existing Flag_of_the_United_States_Senior_Executive_Service.svgprogram of Deep State managers and appointed over 7,000 of the 8,156 bosses who are called the Senior Executive Service. Some call it the “Shadow Government”, and it is true that this federal cabal works in the shadows. Have you ever heard of such a group? Some call it Obama’s Army. Let’s review what we know about the power of “political appointees” who hold important leadership and policymaking positions. There are four basic types of appointments: Presidential Appointments with Senate Confirmation: There are 1,212 senior leaders, including the Cabinet secretaries and their deputies, the heads of most independent agencies and ambassadors, who must be confirmed by the Senate. Presidential Appointments without Senate Confirmation: There are 353 positions which make up much of the White House staff, although they are also scattered throughout many of the smaller federal agencies. Non-career Senior Executive Service: Members of the Senior Executive Service (SES) work in key positions just below the top presidential appointees, bridging the gap between the political leaders and the civil service throughout the federal government. Schedule C Appointments: There are 1,403 Schedule C appointees who serve in a confidential or policy role. They range from schedulers and confidential assistants to policy experts. . The Senior Executive Service (SES) in 2016 had 8,156 members who were appointees. Obama appointed over 7,000 of them to these key positions. Most of these appointees do not arise from inside the respective agencies through

The Washington D. C. Deep State is a group of 8,156 appointed managers in 75 federal agencies that control the executive bureaucracy and tel...

America, Dank, and Fail: Fig. 1: Capitalism explained by Capitalists Fig, 2: Socialism explained by Socialists Demand Supply Equilibrium Value (relative to inflation, btw) Tax Compensation (Businesses and Rich don't pay taxes they tag them to the prices) +Labor Costs This system will evenutally eliminate the poor and rich Higher Value EquilibriumValue and create one big "working Pensions class," free to reap the whole Value fruits of their labor and those least fortunate members of society will be assisted Price (Higher than equilibrium, as result of costs) Is the price too high for a particular consumer? (Y/N) Equilibrium Value Cost- Fail Equilibrium Value > Cost Win Social Bureacracy Potential sales lost: Potential Capital lost Potential Job Growth lost MiddlePrograms Class $Sale $ Regulation Sales Profit Profits Profit - Shares - Executive Income The employed get money to spend in the market, in turn not only funding other workers via trade, but the businesses who employ more workers; the result is a self-sufficient economy without recourse to government (taxes and labor costs would reduce in the absence of intervention, lowering prices and improving the number of sales.) Capital - Marketing - Research and Development nsion laxes Job Growth All in all, the businessman and shareholders get rich, con- sumers get what they want, workers get their cut, and the poor find jobs Woot Fig. 3: Socialism explained by Capitalists Fig. 4: Capitalism explained by Socialists 19 2 This sytem wil evernutalty ellminato tho poor and rich1. The aim of socialism is to bring the lower and croato one big "workin classes into the middle class and dissolve the class, free to reap the whole PoorPensions u e ubos and oeupper classes; what is not realized here is the east fortunate members of existance of a centralized bureaucracy would only sockety w5 isedset up a new upper class of "bureaucratic elites Socia MiddleProgram Bureacracy privileging themselves with the primary hold on capital and resources as they monopolize distribu- tion; this solution to "class warfare" defeats itself 2. While some individuals are truly disadvantaged and in need of help, automatically labeling the poor as "in need" is a sure way to keep them so. Not only is the welfare system flawed in acting as a "free lunch" to the unwilling, but also a trap, waiting to backfire as soon as individuals standard of living raises to a point where they no longer qualify for aid, but will not maintain a good standard of living for some time until they are independant RichLabor Taxes 4 . The services provided by bureaucracy are poor and make for a tax more expensive than any bill or pricetag on the narket; they are poor for the same reason a diabetic has more incentive to excercise than a perfectly fit individual here's always the threat of health, metaphorically job security. Also, they are more expensive due to added-on ureaucratic costs (paperwork, wages, etc.) and the cost for the actual services themselves, even more so for high- end service. 4. By putting the tax burden on the rich and business, one is sure to hamper industry; every cent of a rofit taxed is a cent lost to being able to provide more jobs, better goods and services, and a better working facility This is to assume that the bureaucracy won't own and manage the workplaces, in which the threat of failure and rofit loss would not factor in decision-making for the company's (worker's) best interests. 5. The fallacy in criticizing he rich as greedy, manipulative, and authoritative is that socialism's alternative, bureaucracy, is in essence no differ nt the problem now is the cronies are working together instead of competing. 6. Like taxation, regulation is a hin- rance to industry; instead of directly cutting into capital, it is a loss of potential gains. While they are good meaning egulations hinder the efficiency and production capabilities of the workplace, only hurting the worker in the end. 7 Soviet Russia, China and North Korea are/were socialist economies; next up, America <p>đź…±hit on yourself via /r/dank_meme <a href="http://ift.tt/2eGiP9n">http://ift.tt/2eGiP9n</a></p>
America, Dank, and Fail: Fig. 1: Capitalism
 explained by Capitalists
 Fig, 2: Socialism
 explained by Socialists
 Demand Supply
 Equilibrium Value (relative to inflation, btw)
 Tax Compensation (Businesses and Rich don't pay taxes
 they tag them to the prices)
 +Labor Costs
 This system will evenutally
 eliminate the poor and rich
 Higher
 Value EquilibriumValue
 and create one big "working
 Pensions
 class," free to reap the whole
 Value
 fruits of their labor and those
 least fortunate members of
 society will be assisted
 Price (Higher than equilibrium, as result of costs)
 Is the price too high for a particular consumer? (Y/N)
 Equilibrium Value Cost- Fail
 Equilibrium Value > Cost Win
 Social
 Bureacracy
 Potential sales lost:
 Potential Capital lost
 Potential Job Growth lost
 MiddlePrograms
 Class
 $Sale $
 Regulation
 Sales Profit
 Profits
 Profit
 - Shares
 - Executive Income
 The employed get money to spend in the market, in turn not
 only funding other workers via trade, but the businesses who
 employ more workers; the result is a self-sufficient economy
 without recourse to government (taxes and labor costs would
 reduce in the absence of intervention, lowering prices and
 improving the number of sales.)
 Capital
 - Marketing
 - Research and Development
 nsion
 laxes
 Job Growth
 All in all, the businessman and shareholders get rich, con-
 sumers get what they want, workers get their cut, and the
 poor find jobs
 Woot
 Fig. 3: Socialism
 explained by Capitalists
 Fig. 4: Capitalism
 explained by Socialists
 19
 2
 This sytem wil evernutalty
 ellminato tho poor and rich1. The aim of socialism is to bring the lower
 and croato one big "workin classes into the middle class and dissolve the
 class, free to reap the whole
 PoorPensions u e ubos and oeupper classes; what is not realized here is the
 east fortunate members of
 existance of a centralized bureaucracy would only
 sockety w5 isedset up a new upper class of "bureaucratic elites
 Socia
 MiddleProgram
 Bureacracy privileging themselves with the primary hold on
 capital and resources as they monopolize distribu-
 tion; this solution to "class warfare" defeats itself
 2. While some individuals are truly disadvantaged
 and in need of help, automatically labeling the poor
 as "in need" is a sure way to keep them so. Not
 only is the welfare system flawed in acting as a
 "free lunch" to the unwilling, but also a trap, waiting
 to backfire as soon as individuals standard of living
 raises to a point where they no longer qualify for
 aid, but will not maintain a good standard of living
 for some time until they are independant
 RichLabor
 Taxes
 4
 . The services provided by bureaucracy are poor and make for a tax more expensive than any bill or pricetag on the
 narket; they are poor for the same reason a diabetic has more incentive to excercise than a perfectly fit individual
 here's always the threat of health, metaphorically job security. Also, they are more expensive due to added-on
 ureaucratic costs (paperwork, wages, etc.) and the cost for the actual services themselves, even more so for high-
 end service. 4. By putting the tax burden on the rich and business, one is sure to hamper industry; every cent of a
 rofit taxed is a cent lost to being able to provide more jobs, better goods and services, and a better working facility
 This is to assume that the bureaucracy won't own and manage the workplaces, in which the threat of failure and
 rofit loss would not factor in decision-making for the company's (worker's) best interests. 5. The fallacy in criticizing
 he rich as greedy, manipulative, and authoritative is that socialism's alternative, bureaucracy, is in essence no differ
 nt the problem now is the cronies are working together instead of competing. 6. Like taxation, regulation is a hin-
 rance to industry; instead of directly cutting into capital, it is a loss of potential gains. While they are good meaning
 egulations hinder the efficiency and production capabilities of the workplace, only hurting the worker in the end. 7
 Soviet Russia, China and North Korea are/were socialist economies; next up, America
<p>đź…±hit on yourself via /r/dank_meme <a href="http://ift.tt/2eGiP9n">http://ift.tt/2eGiP9n</a></p>

<p>đź…±hit on yourself via /r/dank_meme <a href="http://ift.tt/2eGiP9n">http://ift.tt/2eGiP9n</a></p>

Bad, Gif, and Money: THETRUTHABOUT THE DEPT. OF EDUCATION <p><a href="http://redbloodedamerica.tumblr.com/post/157569374266/libertybill-the-back-story-the-truth-behind-the" class="tumblr_blog">redbloodedamerica</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a href="https://libertybill.tumblr.com/post/157531636327/the-back-story-the-truth-behind-the-dept-of" class="tumblr_blog">libertybill</a>:</p><blockquote> <h2> <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QN3D5sO3QDM">The Back Story: The Truth Behind the Dept. of Education</a> </h2> <p> This is actually a great video. <br/></p> </blockquote> <blockquote><p><i>You might be surprised to learn that the Department of Education does not build any schools or hire any teachers.  They don’t write any textbooks, grade any tests, or provide any training for teachers.</i></p><p><i>All they do is set one-size-fits-all standards and then bribe schools to comply with their programs with that money.  The money is not given based on how well the schools educate their students; but rather how well the schools comply with national education mandates from the federal government.</i></p><p><i>In all actuality, the states have their own departments of education that are more than capable of pursuing higher standards.</i></p><p><i>The Department of Education is just an unnecessary level of bureaucracy that sucks taxpayer money out of the states, pays itself, and then gives what’s left back to the states as long as they comply with their mandates.</i></p></blockquote><figure class="tmblr-full" data-orig-height="194" data-orig-width="350"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/087f802a03befd28962b1e94dccf94cf/tumblr_inline_olqhuthnBj1r1jtxd_500.gif" data-orig-height="194" data-orig-width="350"/></figure></blockquote> <p>Which is why everyone freaking out about Betsy Devos are missing the bigger picture. It really doesn&rsquo;t matter how good or bad she is at education. The entire department is a joke.</p>
Bad, Gif, and Money: THETRUTHABOUT
 THE DEPT. OF EDUCATION
<p><a href="http://redbloodedamerica.tumblr.com/post/157569374266/libertybill-the-back-story-the-truth-behind-the" class="tumblr_blog">redbloodedamerica</a>:</p>

<blockquote><p><a href="https://libertybill.tumblr.com/post/157531636327/the-back-story-the-truth-behind-the-dept-of" class="tumblr_blog">libertybill</a>:</p><blockquote>
<h2>
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QN3D5sO3QDM">The Back Story: The Truth Behind the Dept. of Education</a>
</h2>
<p> This is actually a great video. <br/></p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote><p><i>You might be surprised to learn that the Department of Education does not build any schools or hire any teachers.  They don’t write any textbooks, grade any tests, or provide any training for teachers.</i></p><p><i>All they do is set one-size-fits-all standards and then bribe schools to comply with their programs with that money.  The money is not given based on how well the schools educate their students; but rather how well the schools comply with national education mandates from the federal government.</i></p><p><i>In all actuality, the states have their own departments of education that are more than capable of pursuing higher standards.</i></p><p><i>The Department of Education is just an unnecessary level of bureaucracy that sucks taxpayer money out of the states, pays itself, and then gives what’s left back to the states as long as they comply with their mandates.</i></p></blockquote><figure class="tmblr-full" data-orig-height="194" data-orig-width="350"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/087f802a03befd28962b1e94dccf94cf/tumblr_inline_olqhuthnBj1r1jtxd_500.gif" data-orig-height="194" data-orig-width="350"/></figure></blockquote>

<p>Which is why everyone freaking out about Betsy Devos are missing the bigger picture. It really doesn&rsquo;t matter how good or bad she is at education. The entire department is a joke.</p>

<p><a href="http://redbloodedamerica.tumblr.com/post/157569374266/libertybill-the-back-story-the-truth-behind-the" class="tumblr_blog">redbl...

Church, Dmv, and Driving: "LICENSING WHEN THE GOVERNMENTTAKES AWAY YOUR RIGHT TO DO SOMETHING AND THEN SELLS IT BACK TO YOU... @ameridanauthenti <p><a href="http://tatty28.tumblr.com/post/144021056603/proudblackconservative" class="tumblr_blog">tatty28</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a href="https://proudblackconservative.tumblr.com/post/144020753779/vagabonds-and-troubadours" class="tumblr_blog">proudblackconservative</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a href="http://vagabonds-and-troubadours.tumblr.com/post/144019768348/proudblackconservative-libertybill" class="tumblr_blog">vagabonds-and-troubadours</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="https://proudblackconservative.tumblr.com/post/144016728004/libertybill-church-of-egalitarianism" class="tumblr_blog">proudblackconservative</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="http://libertybill.tumblr.com/post/144005093107/church-of-egalitarianism-the-laissez-pharaoh" class="tumblr_blog">libertybill</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://church-of-egalitarianism.tumblr.com/post/144000747120">church-of-egalitarianism</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://the-laissez-pharaoh.tumblr.com/post/143996981728">the-laissez-pharaoh</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://libertybill.tumblr.com/post/143978654287">libertybill</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://crinzx.tumblr.com/post/143978569014">crinzx</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://thebluthisoutthere.tumblr.com/post/143978251833">thebluthisoutthere</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://lady--liberty.tumblr.com/post/143977279882">lady–liberty</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://crinzx.tumblr.com/post/143976938699">crinzx</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>Fishing <br/>Driving <br/>Flying <br/>Hunting <br/>Liquor sales <br/>Opening a business </p> <p>Feel free to add your own.</p> </blockquote> <p>Making money<br/>Leaving a country cause’ you’re property</p> </blockquote> <p>Getting married </p> </blockquote> <p>Keep them coming. </p> <p>What other freedoms do we pay for?</p> </blockquote> <p>Owning a pet in some places.<br/>Cutting hair for money.<br/>Growing your own food.</p> </blockquote> <p>Government: “Oh shit, dude! Looks like you…” *spins wheel*</p> <figure class="tmblr-full" data-orig-height="472" data-orig-width="540" data-orig-src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/ff6c8d4c6c2c7de41d38f3862bd63c5e/tumblr_inline_o6u6kaq9S71rw09tq_540.png"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/ff6c8d4c6c2c7de41d38f3862bd63c5e/tumblr_inline_o6u6kyg4Dc1rw09tq_540.png" data-orig-height="472" data-orig-width="540" data-orig-src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/ff6c8d4c6c2c7de41d38f3862bd63c5e/tumblr_inline_o6u6kaq9S71rw09tq_540.png"/></figure><p>“…yep, sorry buddy, but it looks like you collected rainwater on your own property without getting our express written permission and greasing our palms first. You’re going to jail, criminal scum!”<br/></p> </blockquote> <p>Oh yeah, I want non trained driver on the road that can run me over. 10/10!</p> </blockquote> <p>You think a drivers license makes you a good driver? Have you been on a road before, ever?</p> <p>I remember the last time my license expired. My car burst in to flames and flipped 10 times. <br/></p> </blockquote> <p>Lmao at the idea that a license has anything to do with your ability to drive. There is no way you’ve ever been on a road, buddy.</p> </blockquote> <p>Yeah, but if that’s how a few people drive with training, imagine how everyone would drive without training.</p> </blockquote> <p>Garbage. You really think a license from a government bestows upon people the magical ability to drive? You can learn how to do it or not. Obviously if you drive recklessly you get taken off the road, which is already the rule. The license has nothing to do with your ability to drive or lack thereof. The “training” people get from the government is nothing that can’t be learned on your own, and I learned to hell of a lot more about driving from actually doing it than driver’s ed. I don’t remember anything from that class.</p></blockquote> <p>I literally faked my entire driving log after I got my learners permit. The DMV lady looked at it for 2 seconds and gave me a driver’s liscence.</p></blockquote> <p>^^^ this. Bureaucracy is a soulless machine that doesn&rsquo;t give a shit about putting &ldquo;trained drivers&rdquo; on the road. That&rsquo;s nothing but a fantasy. The reality is any idiot can get a drivers license and it doesn&rsquo;t make us the least bit safer on the road.</p>
Church, Dmv, and Driving: "LICENSING
 WHEN THE GOVERNMENTTAKES AWAY YOUR RIGHT
 TO DO SOMETHING AND THEN SELLS IT BACK TO
 YOU... @ameridanauthenti
<p><a href="http://tatty28.tumblr.com/post/144021056603/proudblackconservative" class="tumblr_blog">tatty28</a>:</p>

<blockquote><p><a href="https://proudblackconservative.tumblr.com/post/144020753779/vagabonds-and-troubadours" class="tumblr_blog">proudblackconservative</a>:</p>

<blockquote><p><a href="http://vagabonds-and-troubadours.tumblr.com/post/144019768348/proudblackconservative-libertybill" class="tumblr_blog">vagabonds-and-troubadours</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="https://proudblackconservative.tumblr.com/post/144016728004/libertybill-church-of-egalitarianism" class="tumblr_blog">proudblackconservative</a>:</p>

<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://libertybill.tumblr.com/post/144005093107/church-of-egalitarianism-the-laissez-pharaoh" class="tumblr_blog">libertybill</a>:</p>

<blockquote>
<p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://church-of-egalitarianism.tumblr.com/post/144000747120">church-of-egalitarianism</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://the-laissez-pharaoh.tumblr.com/post/143996981728">the-laissez-pharaoh</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://libertybill.tumblr.com/post/143978654287">libertybill</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://crinzx.tumblr.com/post/143978569014">crinzx</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://thebluthisoutthere.tumblr.com/post/143978251833">thebluthisoutthere</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://lady--liberty.tumblr.com/post/143977279882">lady–liberty</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://crinzx.tumblr.com/post/143976938699">crinzx</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Fishing <br/>Driving <br/>Flying <br/>Hunting <br/>Liquor sales <br/>Opening a business </p>
<p>Feel free to add your own.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Making money<br/>Leaving a country cause’ you’re property</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Getting married </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Keep them coming. </p>
<p>What other freedoms do we pay for?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Owning a pet in some places.<br/>Cutting hair for money.<br/>Growing your own food.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Government: “Oh shit, dude! Looks like you…” *spins wheel*</p>
<figure class="tmblr-full" data-orig-height="472" data-orig-width="540" data-orig-src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/ff6c8d4c6c2c7de41d38f3862bd63c5e/tumblr_inline_o6u6kaq9S71rw09tq_540.png"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/ff6c8d4c6c2c7de41d38f3862bd63c5e/tumblr_inline_o6u6kyg4Dc1rw09tq_540.png" data-orig-height="472" data-orig-width="540" data-orig-src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/ff6c8d4c6c2c7de41d38f3862bd63c5e/tumblr_inline_o6u6kaq9S71rw09tq_540.png"/></figure><p>“…yep, sorry buddy, but it looks like you collected rainwater on your own property without getting our express written permission and greasing our palms first. You’re going to jail, criminal scum!”<br/></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Oh yeah, I want non trained driver on the road that can run me over. 10/10!</p>
</blockquote>

<p>You think a drivers license makes you a good driver? Have you been on a road before, ever?</p>
<p>I remember the last time my license expired. My car burst in to flames and flipped 10 times. <br/></p>
</blockquote>

<p>Lmao at the idea that a license has anything to do with your ability to drive. There is no way you’ve ever been on a road, buddy.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Yeah, but if that’s how a few people drive with training, imagine how everyone would drive without training.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Garbage. You really think a license from a government bestows upon people the magical ability to drive? You can learn how to do it or not. Obviously if you drive recklessly you get taken off the road, which is already the rule. The license has nothing to do with your ability to drive or lack thereof. The “training” people get from the government is nothing that can’t be learned on your own, and I learned to hell of a lot more about driving from actually doing it than driver’s ed. I don’t remember anything from that class.</p></blockquote>

<p>I literally faked my entire driving log after I got my learners permit. The DMV lady looked at it for 2 seconds and gave me a driver’s liscence.</p></blockquote>

<p>^^^ this. Bureaucracy is a soulless machine that doesn&rsquo;t give a shit about putting &ldquo;trained drivers&rdquo; on the road. That&rsquo;s nothing but a fantasy. The reality is any idiot can get a drivers license and it  doesn&rsquo;t make us the least bit safer on the road.</p>

<p><a href="http://tatty28.tumblr.com/post/144021056603/proudblackconservative" class="tumblr_blog">tatty28</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a href...

Anaconda, Bad, and Bitch: Dear Senator Ted Cruz, This morning you tweeted the following Senator Ted Cruz < @SenTedCruz Follow "Net Neutrality" is Obamacare for the Internet; the Internet should not operate at the speed of government. 7:43 AM-10 Nov 2014 This led me to assume one of two things → Thing #1. When you accepted campaign funds from telecom lobbyists last year* they asked that you publicly smear Net Neutrality Thing #a. You don't actually know what Net Neutrality is. There is very little I can do about Thing #. and so I'll instead work on fixing Thing #. And I'm going to do that by being a super terrific At dude and explaining to you exactly how Net Neutrality works. <p><a href="http://redbloodedamerica.tumblr.com/post/102335971297/oatmeal-i-wrote-a-letter-to-ted-cruz-explaining" class="tumblr_blog">redbloodedamerica</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://oatmeal.tumblr.com/post/102314919551/i-wrote-a-letter-to-ted-cruz-explaining-how-net">oatmeal</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>I wrote a letter to Ted Cruz explaining <a href="http://theoatmeal.com/blog/net_neutrality">how Net Neutrality ACTUALLY works</a>.  Read the full thing <a href="http://theoatmeal.com/blog/net_neutrality">here</a>.</p> </blockquote> <p>Ted Cruz is 100% correct actually.  Not only does he understand how net neutrality works, he also understands how the federal government works as well, which proponents of net neutrality do not.  </p> <p>Letting the FCC regulate the internet is exactly like Obamacare.  Remember when Obama lied to you about the Affordable Care Act? “<em>If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor.</em>&ldquo; &rdquo;<em>If you like your plan, you can keep your plan.</em>&ldquo; &rdquo;<em>It’s going to lower your premiums $2,500 per family, per year.</em>&ldquo;  I think you get the point.  Now Obama is going around touting how we should go the old &rdquo;<a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2340818">public utility</a>&ldquo; route.  He also says he doesn’t want them to have control of ISPs per say, he just want the FCC to force them to be &quot;equal.&rdquo; Yeah, not much difference.  In doing so, you are taking the power away from the individual ISPs (which is bad enough) and handing it over to the biggest monopoly in the world, the federal government.  That would only be the beginning if the government ever did nationalize the internet.  The government couldn’t even build a simple website after spending $2 Billion on it, but you’re going to trust them with this?  Only a fool would still trust that much power over something so free and open right now to the world’s biggest bumbling bureaucracy.  The government can only exacerbate the situation.  That’s okay though, because bandwagoning over little understood causes via a hashtag campaign and based on loose information has become an internet pastime.</p> <p>And before you start making unjust statements about Senator Cruz not understanding what net neutrality is, you might want to actually read up on <a href="http://www.cnet.com/news/comcast-vs-netflix-is-this-really-about-net-neutrality/">the real issue between Netflix and Comcast</a> first.  Because it’s far more complicated than “Comcast was bullying Netflix.”  But you got to keep the spotlight on the evil corporations though.  They’re the bad guy in your sordid tale.</p> <p>Also, before you start making absurd accusations that Ted Cruz is somehow in the pocket of Comcast, you may want to be aware that their PAC donated…<a href="http://www.gamepolitics.com/2014/04/11/report-comcast-gave-campaign-contributions-every-member-senate-judiciary-committee#.VGEL_PTF9v0">$2,500</a> …just $2,500 to his campaign fund.  Wow.  Ted Cruz must totally be Comcast’s bitch for that high price.  He may even murder someone for them now.</p> <p>Stick to funny comics about cats.  Politics, even of the internet variety, is not your forte.</p></blockquote>
Anaconda, Bad, and Bitch: Dear Senator Ted Cruz,
 This morning you tweeted the following
 Senator Ted Cruz <
 @SenTedCruz
 Follow
 "Net Neutrality" is Obamacare for the Internet; the
 Internet should not operate at the speed of government.
 7:43 AM-10 Nov 2014
 This led me to assume one of two things
 → Thing #1.
 When you accepted campaign funds from telecom lobbyists last
 year* they asked that you publicly smear Net Neutrality
 Thing #a.
 You don't actually know what Net Neutrality is.
 There is very little I can do about Thing #. and so I'll instead
 work on fixing Thing #. And I'm going to do that by being a
 super terrific At dude and explaining to you exactly how
 Net Neutrality works.
<p><a href="http://redbloodedamerica.tumblr.com/post/102335971297/oatmeal-i-wrote-a-letter-to-ted-cruz-explaining" class="tumblr_blog">redbloodedamerica</a>:</p>

<blockquote><p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://oatmeal.tumblr.com/post/102314919551/i-wrote-a-letter-to-ted-cruz-explaining-how-net">oatmeal</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>I wrote a letter to Ted Cruz explaining <a href="http://theoatmeal.com/blog/net_neutrality">how Net Neutrality ACTUALLY works</a>.  Read the full thing <a href="http://theoatmeal.com/blog/net_neutrality">here</a>.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Ted Cruz is 100% correct actually.  Not only does he understand how net neutrality works, he also understands how the federal government works as well, which proponents of net neutrality do not.  </p>
<p>Letting the FCC regulate the internet is exactly like Obamacare.  Remember when Obama lied to you about the Affordable Care Act? “<em>If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor.</em>&ldquo; &rdquo;<em>If you like your plan, you can keep your plan.</em>&ldquo; &rdquo;<em>It’s going to lower your premiums $2,500 per family, per year.</em>&ldquo;  I think you get the point.  Now Obama is going around touting how we should go the old &rdquo;<a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2340818">public utility</a>&ldquo; route.  He also says he doesn’t want them to have control of ISPs per say, he just want the FCC to force them to be &quot;equal.&rdquo; Yeah, not much difference.  In doing so, you are taking the power away from the individual ISPs (which is bad enough) and handing it over to the biggest monopoly in the world, the federal government.  That would only be the beginning if the government ever did nationalize the internet.  The government couldn’t even build a simple website after spending $2 Billion on it, but you’re going to trust them with this?  Only a fool would still trust that much power over something so free and open right now to the world’s biggest bumbling bureaucracy.  The government can only exacerbate the situation.  That’s okay though, because bandwagoning over little understood causes via a hashtag campaign and based on loose information has become an internet pastime.</p>
<p>And before you start making unjust statements about Senator Cruz not understanding what net neutrality is, you might want to actually read up on <a href="http://www.cnet.com/news/comcast-vs-netflix-is-this-really-about-net-neutrality/">the real issue between Netflix and Comcast</a> first.  Because it’s far more complicated than “Comcast was bullying Netflix.”  But you got to keep the spotlight on the evil corporations though.  They’re the bad guy in your sordid tale.</p>
<p>Also, before you start making absurd accusations that Ted Cruz is somehow in the pocket of Comcast, you may want to be aware that their PAC donated…<a href="http://www.gamepolitics.com/2014/04/11/report-comcast-gave-campaign-contributions-every-member-senate-judiciary-committee#.VGEL_PTF9v0">$2,500</a> …just $2,500 to his campaign fund.  Wow.  Ted Cruz must totally be Comcast’s bitch for that high price.  He may even murder someone for them now.</p>
<p>Stick to funny comics about cats.  Politics, even of the internet variety, is not your forte.</p></blockquote>

<p><a href="http://redbloodedamerica.tumblr.com/post/102335971297/oatmeal-i-wrote-a-letter-to-ted-cruz-explaining" class="tumblr_blog">redbl...