🔥 | Latest

Ass, Children, and Crime: Thread Zachary Fox and 3 others liked A$MR Rocky @ChristianMingel Trained psychologists: "Hitting your kids can cause them to be violent adults" Twitter genius: "l was hit and I never turned out violent. That's why l can't wait to hit my own kids when l get them" 1/4/18, 2:44 PM 19.2K Retweets 55.4K Likes holyfuckabear: thebaconsandwichofregret: asexual-not-asexual-detective: Am I the only one who thinks that hitting a kid and abuse are different things? Like, if I ever had a kid, I wouldn’t spank their ass raw or something like that. But a bop on the mouth or the ear pull or a smack upside the head? Yea. Those are behavior modifiers. Except they’re not. The studies done by the trained psychologists in this joke show that little kids don’t associate being hit with the thing they’ve done wrong. Very small children only understand consequences that are directly caused by the thing they did. Steal a biscuit, biscuit tastes good. Then for no reason mummy hit me. Very different to stole a biscuit, now no biscuit after dinner because I stole a biscuit. And they also show that when a child is old enough to understand why they are being hit that non-physical punishment is equally as effective and less mentally harmful in the long run. Do you know who benefits the most from hitting as a punishment? The parent. It gives a satisfaction rush. Parents do it because it makes them feel good. Basically kids have two stages: too young to understand why they are being hit so physical punishment is useless for anything other than teaching a child that bigger stronger people can hit you whenever they like (Which sounds like the same lesson you would learn from abuse) And the second stage is old enough to be reasoned with so many punishment options are available and you chose physical violence because it makes *you* feel better, which is an abusive action. The only time a person should ever use violence against another human being, of any age, is to stop that person from being violent themselves. Hitting a stranger is a crime. Hitting someone small who relies on you for food, love, and shelter should be as well. Don’t hit your fucking kid.
Ass, Children, and Crime: Thread
 Zachary Fox and 3 others liked
 A$MR Rocky
 @ChristianMingel
 Trained psychologists: "Hitting your kids
 can cause them to be violent adults"
 Twitter genius: "l was hit and I never
 turned out violent. That's why l can't
 wait to hit my own kids when l get them"
 1/4/18, 2:44 PM
 19.2K Retweets 55.4K Likes
holyfuckabear:
thebaconsandwichofregret:

asexual-not-asexual-detective:

Am I the only one who thinks that hitting a kid and abuse are different things? Like, if I ever had a kid, I wouldn’t spank their ass raw or something like that. But a bop on the mouth or the ear pull or a smack upside the head? Yea. Those are behavior modifiers. 

Except they’re not. 
The studies done by the trained psychologists in this joke show that little kids don’t associate being hit with the thing they’ve done wrong. Very small children only understand consequences that are directly caused by the thing they did. Steal a biscuit, biscuit tastes good. Then for no reason mummy hit me. Very different to stole a biscuit, now no biscuit after dinner because I stole a biscuit.
And they also show that when a child is old enough to understand why they are being hit that non-physical punishment is equally as effective and less mentally harmful in the long run. 
Do you know who benefits the most from hitting as a punishment? The parent. It gives a satisfaction rush. Parents do it because it makes them feel good. 
Basically kids have two stages: too young to understand why they are being hit so physical punishment is useless for anything other than teaching a child that bigger stronger people can hit you whenever they like (Which sounds like the same lesson you would learn from abuse)
And the second stage is old enough to be reasoned with so many punishment options are available and you chose physical violence because it makes *you* feel better, which is an abusive action. 
The only time a person should ever use violence against another human being, of any age, is to stop that person from being violent themselves. 


Hitting a stranger is a crime. Hitting someone small who relies on you for food, love, and shelter should be as well. Don’t hit your fucking kid.

holyfuckabear: thebaconsandwichofregret: asexual-not-asexual-detective: Am I the only one who thinks that hitting a kid and abuse are diff...

Anaconda, Google, and Lgbt: Infanta Muerte @GeekRemix 9m *Pretends to be shocked part 3: Return of the homophobia* @Team YouTube@YouTube gay HD Oct 8, 2017 11:42 AM 0 views o Edit 0:38 Not suitable for most advertisers Request review Team YouTube @TeamYouTube Follow Replying to @GeekRemix Hi. If you think our system got it wrong, please appeal so an expert can review Here's more on the appeals process Update on monetization appeal and the appeals process Posted 9/5/17 3:19 PM, 84 messages productforums.google.com 2:02 PM-8 Oct 2017 Infanta Muerte @GeekRemix 2m Replying to @Team YouTube Excuse me but that was the most dismissive thing I have ever seen in my life. Fix the homophobic algorithm and don't but the work on me. 4 Infanta Muerte GeekRemix 1m 'Replying to @TeamYouTube Fix the blatant homophobia for LGBT+ terms for videos that are completely blank and private. This is 100% on you and only you. Infanta Muerte @GeekRemix 4m How am I supposed to appeal the fact that you auto flag LGBT+ terms and then throttle the views? it shouldn't happen in the first place. Team YouTube Φ @TeamYouTube Replying to @GeekRemix Hi. If you think our system got it wrong, please appeal so an expert can review. Here's more on the appeals process: goo.g/jvTDg4 Infanta Muerte @GeekRemix Additionally the FACT that more and more LGBT+ terms are being flagged as not suitable is 100% YOUR fault. YOU fix it. #LGBT #Youtube Team YouTube. @TeamYouTube Replying to @GeekRemix Hi. If you think our system got it wrong, please appeal so an expert can review. Here's more on the appeals process: goo.gl/jvTDg4 2:09 PM-8 Oct 2017 gay HD Oct 8, 2017 11:42 AM 0 views Edit 0:38 Not suitable for most advertisers transgender HD Sep 20, 2017 2:38 PM 0 views Not suitable for all advertisers Request review Edit 0:38 cisgender HD Sep 20, 2017 2:44 PM 0 views Editv 0:38 Straight couple H Sep 18, 2017 7:39 AM 0 views Edit 0:46 lesbian couple HD Sep 18, 2017 7:44 AM 0 views Not suitable for all advertisers Request review Edit v 0:46 bass-borot: geekremixalot: geekremix: links https://twitter.com/GeekRemix/status/917134851085619200 https://twitter.com/GeekRemix/status/917132350294822912 https://twitter.com/GeekRemix/status/917135357392687104 retweet these. don’t let them shut you up. fight. bring this to the attention of everyone.  REMINDER THAT MORE AND MORE LGBT+ TERMS ARE BEING ADDED TO THE AUTO FLAG LIST EVERY DAY! WHEN A VIDEO IS FLAGGED IT LOSES MONEY, BUT IT IS ALSO THEN THROTTLED FOR VIEWS SO PEOPLE DON’T SEE IT. YOUTUBE IS LITERALLY ERASING GAY CONTENT. If a video cannot meet the 1,000 views per week threshold required for manual review, then you have no chance of overturning YouTube’s autoflag system.  YouTube telling creators to “please appeal if you think we got it wrong” does NOTHING to help smaller creators and older content that get less than 1,000 views a week.
Anaconda, Google, and Lgbt: Infanta Muerte @GeekRemix 9m
 *Pretends to be shocked part 3: Return of the homophobia*
 @Team YouTube@YouTube
 gay HD
 Oct 8, 2017 11:42 AM
 0 views o
 Edit
 0:38
 Not suitable for most advertisers
 Request review
 Team YouTube
 @TeamYouTube
 Follow
 Replying to @GeekRemix
 Hi. If you think our system got it wrong,
 please appeal so an expert can review
 Here's more on the appeals process
 Update on monetization appeal and the appeals process
 Posted 9/5/17 3:19 PM, 84 messages
 productforums.google.com
 2:02 PM-8 Oct 2017

 Infanta Muerte @GeekRemix 2m
 Replying to @Team YouTube
 Excuse me but that was the most dismissive thing I have ever seen in my life. Fix
 the homophobic algorithm and don't but the work on me.
 4
 Infanta Muerte GeekRemix 1m
 'Replying to @TeamYouTube
 Fix the blatant homophobia for LGBT+ terms for videos that are completely blank
 and private. This is 100% on you and only you.

 Infanta Muerte @GeekRemix 4m
 How am I supposed to appeal the fact that you auto flag LGBT+ terms and then
 throttle the views? it shouldn't happen in the first place.
 Team YouTube Φ @TeamYouTube
 Replying to @GeekRemix
 Hi. If you think our system got it wrong, please appeal so an expert can
 review. Here's more on the appeals process: goo.g/jvTDg4

 Infanta Muerte
 @GeekRemix
 Additionally the FACT that more and more
 LGBT+ terms are being flagged as not
 suitable is 100% YOUR fault. YOU fix it.
 #LGBT #Youtube
 Team YouTube. @TeamYouTube
 Replying to @GeekRemix
 Hi. If you think our system got it wrong, please appeal so an expert can review.
 Here's more on the appeals process: goo.gl/jvTDg4
 2:09 PM-8 Oct 2017

 gay HD
 Oct 8, 2017 11:42 AM
 0 views
 Edit
 0:38
 Not suitable for most advertisers
 transgender HD
 Sep 20, 2017 2:38 PM
 0 views
 Not suitable for all advertisers
 Request review
 Edit
 0:38
 cisgender HD
 Sep 20, 2017 2:44 PM
 0 views
 Editv
 0:38
 Straight couple H
 Sep 18, 2017 7:39 AM
 0 views
 Edit
 0:46
 lesbian couple HD
 Sep 18, 2017 7:44 AM
 0 views
 Not suitable for all advertisers
 Request review
 Edit v
 0:46
bass-borot:

geekremixalot:
geekremix:

links
https://twitter.com/GeekRemix/status/917134851085619200
https://twitter.com/GeekRemix/status/917132350294822912
https://twitter.com/GeekRemix/status/917135357392687104
retweet these. don’t let them shut you up. fight. bring this to the attention of everyone. 
REMINDER THAT MORE AND MORE LGBT+ TERMS ARE BEING ADDED TO THE AUTO FLAG LIST EVERY DAY! WHEN A VIDEO IS FLAGGED IT LOSES MONEY, BUT IT IS ALSO THEN THROTTLED FOR VIEWS SO PEOPLE DON’T SEE IT.
YOUTUBE IS LITERALLY ERASING GAY CONTENT.

If a video cannot meet the 1,000 views per week threshold required for manual review, then you have no chance of overturning YouTube’s autoflag system. 
YouTube telling creators to “please appeal if you think we got it wrong” does NOTHING to help smaller creators and older content that get less than 1,000 views a week.

bass-borot: geekremixalot: geekremix: links https://twitter.com/GeekRemix/status/917134851085619200 https://twitter.com/GeekRemix/status/9...