🔥 | Latest

Children, Guns, and School: emily Follow @emilymichellee2 i mean, no uterus no opinion, so how about no gun no opinion PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNS PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNS PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNS PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNs PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNS PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNS PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNS PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNS PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNS PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNS PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNS PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNS PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNS PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNS PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNS PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNS PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNS PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNS PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNS PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNS PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNS PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNS PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNS PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNS PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNS PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNS PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNS PEOPLE WHO pON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNS PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNS PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNS emily @swiftly em Follow my uterus can't kill 20 young school children in a matter of minutes, emily emily @emilymichellee2 i mean, no uterus no opinion, so how about no gun no opinion 7:37 AM 19 May 2019 51,117 Retweets 175,230 Likes when-in-doubt-sing: science-jumps: theambassadorposts: having a uterus isn’t exactly a choice either Also people without uteruses have already been making laws about them for centuries This is the stupidest analogy I’ve ever seen
Children, Guns, and School: emily
 Follow
 @emilymichellee2
 i mean, no uterus no opinion, so how about
 no gun no opinion

 PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNS
 PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNS
 PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNS
 PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNs
 PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNS
 PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNS
 PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNS
 PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNS
 PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNS
 PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNS
 PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNS
 PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNS
 PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNS
 PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNS
 PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNS
 PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNS
 PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNS
 PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNS
 PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNS
 PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNS
 PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNS
 PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNS
 PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNS
 PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNS
 PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNS
 PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNS
 PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNS
 PEOPLE WHO pON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNS
 PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNS
 PEOPLE WHO DON'T OWN GUNS SHOULDN'T MAKE LAWS ABOUT GUNS

 emily
 @swiftly em
 Follow
 my uterus can't kill 20 young school
 children in a matter of minutes, emily
 emily @emilymichellee2
 i mean, no uterus no opinion, so how about no gun no
 opinion
 7:37 AM 19 May 2019
 51,117 Retweets 175,230 Likes
when-in-doubt-sing:

science-jumps:

theambassadorposts:
having a uterus isn’t exactly a choice either

Also people without uteruses have already been making laws about them for centuries


This is the stupidest analogy I’ve ever seen

when-in-doubt-sing: science-jumps: theambassadorposts: having a uterus isn’t exactly a choice either Also people without uteruses have al...

Drinking, Fire, and Gg: radfemfrommars "It's not safe at night." GG It's only not safe because there are men around. There's no safer place then being with 18 women in the woods drinking wine, making a fire and shooting guns. That's the safest l've ever felt. The only problem was the woman who wanted to bring her boyfriend nerdylilpeebee If there are 18 of you and you have guns.... why would one girl bringing her boyfriend make you less safe???? You have GUNS. The guy would be insane to try anything. Are you that deathly afraid of men that they terrify you even when they completely are outnumbered and outgunned?????? radfemfrommars One woman bringing her boyfriend would make us less safe. First, we didn't want him around because he didn't belong there. That wasn't the point of us all getting together. She wanted to bring her boyfriend, and 12 of us gave a hard "no", so he didn't get to come along. That's the end of it. I'm not leaving some man to roam around in the woods at night with us all spreading out every now and then. Say he tried something, and one of us beat him or shot him you think they'd believe us? Some whitebread yuppie beaten or shot by a bunch of "feminazis" in the woods doing witchy shit? I already see the news about how he had "so can much to give the world" and "he was a good kid, there's no way he would do that!" (despite him being 23 they're always kids in the eyes of the media) being afraid of men: I don't fear So as far as me an individual man, I fear the patriarchal system that would protect him, even in death #men are the problem #this is why lesbian separatism is a thing
Drinking, Fire, and Gg: radfemfrommars
 "It's not safe at night."
 GG
 It's only not safe because there are men
 around. There's no safer place then being with
 18 women in the woods drinking wine, making
 a
 fire and shooting guns. That's the safest l've
 ever felt. The only problem was the woman who
 wanted to bring her boyfriend
 nerdylilpeebee
 If there are 18 of you and you have guns.... why
 would one
 girl bringing her boyfriend make you
 less safe???? You have GUNS. The guy would be
 insane to try anything.
 Are you that deathly afraid of men that they
 terrify you even when they
 completely
 are
 outnumbered and outgunned??????
 radfemfrommars
 One woman bringing her boyfriend would make
 us less safe. First,
 we didn't want him around
 because he didn't belong there. That wasn't the
 point of us all getting together. She wanted to
 bring her boyfriend, and 12 of us gave a hard
 "no", so he didn't get to come
 along. That's the
 end of it. I'm not leaving
 some man to roam
 around in the woods at night with us all
 spreading out every now and then. Say he tried
 something, and one of us beat him or shot him
 you think they'd believe us? Some whitebread
 yuppie beaten or shot by a bunch of
 "feminazis" in the woods doing witchy shit? I
 already
 see the news about how he had "so
 can
 much to give the world" and "he was a
 good
 kid, there's no way he would do that!" (despite
 him being 23 they're always kids in the eyes of
 the media)
 being afraid of men: I don't fear
 So as far as me
 an individual man, I fear the patriarchal system
 that would protect him,
 even in death
 #men are the problem #this is why lesbian
 separatism is a
 thing

Fail, Fire, and Life: Teacher: You have to make an innocent computer game! Me: Hose/lose from zach gage loselose is a game about choice and consequence, and b what it means to sucoeed or fail You play the role of a space captain on a seemingly endless quest to dectroy aftacking aliens. You receive one point for each alien you kil You have one life, and if an allen touches you, you ill esplode. Tyou manage to kil al of the stera without dying, you wil win th game Authough loselose is a video-game, everything that happens whl while you play is rea Each aien is procedurally generated out of a Sie on your computer. When you kill an alen, the fie it was created from is destroyed On the other hand, if you are kiled, the applcation itat wil be di stroyed 00:54 Lose/Lose is a video-game with real life consequences. Each alien in the game is created based on a random file on the players computer. If the player kills the alien, the file it is based on is deleted. If the players ship is destroyed, the application itself is deleted Although touching aliens will cause the player to lose the game, and killing aliens awards points, the aliens will never actually fire at the player. This calls into question the player's mission, which is never explicitly stated, only hinted at through classic game mechanics. Is the player supposed to be an aggressor? Or merely an observer, traversing through a dangerous land? Why do we assume that because we are given a weapon an awarded for using it, that doing so is right? By way of exploring what it means to kill in a video-game, Lose/Lose broaches bigger questions. As technology grows, our understanding of it diminishes, yet, at the same time, it becomes increasingly important in our lives. At what point does our virtual data become as important to us as physical possessions? If we have reached that point already, what real objects do we value less than our data? What implications does trusting something so important to something we maderoviad menetichave? AH YES. MY FAVOURITE FRIENDLY COMPUTER GAME
Fail, Fire, and Life: Teacher: You have to make an innocent
 computer game!
 Me:
 Hose/lose
 from zach gage
 loselose is a game about choice and consequence, and b
 what it means to sucoeed or fail
 You play the role of a space captain on a seemingly endless quest to
 dectroy aftacking aliens. You receive one point for each alien you kil
 You have one life, and if an allen touches you, you ill esplode.
 Tyou manage to kil al of the stera without dying, you wil win th
 game
 Authough loselose is a video-game, everything that happens whl
 while you
 play is rea
 Each aien is procedurally generated out of a Sie on your computer.
 When you kill an alen, the fie it was created from is destroyed
 On the other hand, if you are kiled, the applcation itat wil be di
 stroyed
 00:54
 Lose/Lose is a video-game with real life consequences. Each alien in the
 game is created based on a random file on the players computer. If the player kills
 the alien, the file it is based on is deleted. If the players ship is destroyed, the
 application itself is deleted
 Although touching aliens will cause the player to lose the game, and killing aliens
 awards points, the aliens will never actually fire at the player. This calls into
 question the player's mission, which is never explicitly stated, only hinted at
 through classic game mechanics. Is the player supposed to be an aggressor? Or
 merely an observer, traversing through a dangerous land?
 Why do we assume that because we are given a weapon an awarded for using it,
 that doing so is right?
 By way of exploring what it means to kill in a video-game, Lose/Lose broaches
 bigger questions. As technology grows, our understanding of it diminishes, yet, at
 the same time, it becomes increasingly important in our lives. At what point does
 our virtual data become as important to us as physical possessions? If we have
 reached that point already, what real objects do we value less than our data?
 What implications does trusting something so important to something we
 maderoviad menetichave?
AH YES. MY FAVOURITE FRIENDLY COMPUTER GAME

AH YES. MY FAVOURITE FRIENDLY COMPUTER GAME

Ass, Love, and Target: LOVE EATING ASS Do UP telekeys: who needs e3 when the perfect e3 press conference has already been done?
Ass, Love, and Target: LOVE
 EATING
 ASS
 Do UP
telekeys:
who needs e3 when the perfect e3 press conference has already been done?

telekeys: who needs e3 when the perfect e3 press conference has already been done?